DID YOU KNOW A THIRD BUILDING FELL ON 9/11?

Nothing but lies in the official version concerning Building 7 "collapsed" on 09th September.

Not just any building … a 576-foot-tall, 47-story, steel-framed high-rise, known as World Trade Center Building 7. This building ...

Unlike the Twin Towers, Building 7 was not hit by a plane. In fact, it was 370 feet away from the closest of the Twin Towers, and yet at 5:20 p.m. that afternoon it spontaneously collapsed into its own footprint in near perfect symmetry and, for over 100 feet, it fell at free-fall acceleration—that is, at the speed of gravity.

After being forced by public pressure to investigate this anomaly, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) concluded that WTC 7's collapse was simply “due to normal office fires.” Can you watch the video above and convince yourself that office fires of any kind caused this? If so, some of the most basic laws of physics and history itself would vehemently disagree with you.

According to Newton's Laws of Motion, free fall acceleration is possible only when there is nothing providing upward resistance. To truly appreciate this basic law of physics, hold any object out in front of you and let it drop. The fact that Building 7 literally dropped in this manner is not only extraordinary, it is unprecedented. In the history of high-rise construction, not a single steel-framed building has ever collapsed due to fire, much less in near perfect symmetry or at the rate of gravity. For this to have happened to Building 7, ALL SUPPORT COLUMNS HAD TO BE REMOVED SIMULTANEOUSLY. The only event that can explain this, without violating Newton's Laws of Motion, is CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. For NIST, an agency with very deep and broad scientific and technical expertise, to claim this collapse was caused by normal office fires is a preposterous and blatant lie.

In direct contradiction to NIST’s claim, multiple recordings and eyewitness testimonies exist in which “authorities” stated they were going to bring Building 7 down because it was unstable. There are also numerous recordings of loud explosions just prior to its collapse. The deliberate demolition of Building 7 was also later corroborated during a 2004 PBS interview in which World Trade Center leaseholder Larry Silverstein said, "[the fire department] made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse." The glaring problem with his statement, however, is that controlled demolition of even small buildings requires weeks of careful planning and physical preparation by trained experts. For the fire department, or even professional demolition experts, to claim they were going to bring down Building 7 with only one afternoon of planning and preparation (and while it was still on fire!) is also a preposterous and blatant lie.

The inescapable conclusion is that Building 7 was indeed brought down by controlled demolition, but that demolition was planned and prepared weeks, if not months, in advance. The only remaining question is: Who could have done this?  Perhaps you believe terrorists from the Middle East were somehow involved, but consider for a moment the identities of some of the tenants who were housed in Building 7 at the time. They included the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Office of Emergency Management, the U.S. Secret Service, and most interestingly, the Department of Defense and the CIA. In fact, Building 7 housed the largest CIA field office in the country, making it one of the most highly secured buildings in all of New York City. Installing enough precisely placed explosives to bring that building down symmetrically and as fast as gravity, without being noticed, would have been impossible—except with the complicity of those who held ultimate authority over access to the building’s most sensitive areas. Without question, that authority would have belonged exclusively to Larry Silverstein and the Department of Defense and especially the CIA.

If you are among those who find it impossible to believe that members of the U. S. government could have played a role in 9/11, there are two likely reasons you feel that way. First, you are a decent human being who can’t imagine anyone committing that kind of evil for any reason. And second, you are a patriotic American and cannot easily come to terms with something that shatters your fundamental belief in our system of democracy. Unfortunately, history has shown that people who commit evil acts have often held some of the world’s highest positions of power, and the U.S. government is no exception. In 1962, the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff unanimously proposed to President Kennedy that state-sponsored acts of terrorism be perpetrated on American soil, against American citizens. The head of every branch of the U.S. armed forces gave their written support to sink U.S. ships, shoot down hijacked American planes, and gun down and bomb civilians on the streets of Washington, D.C., and Miami. Thankfully, President Kennedy rejected their plan. The public learned about the proposed "Operation Northwoods" 35 years later, when the top secret document was declassified by the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Review Board. The complete declassified document, which offers an almost precise analogue to the events of 9/11, can be read online at George Washington University’s National Security Archive: Operation Northwoods.

Disturbed that the U.S. government's 9/11 investigation was corrupted by egregious omissions, fabrications, and contradictions, and most especially by NIST’s absurd dismissal of Newton’s Laws of Motion, in 2006 a group of professional architects, engineers, and scientists began analyzing physical evidence collected from the World Trade Center debris. Their analyses quickly revealed that the collapse of Building 7 was the result of controlled demolition involving nano-thermite, a sophisticated military incendiary developed and manufactured exclusively for the U.S. government by federal research facilities, DoD & DHS contractors, prestigious universities, and most interestingly, NIST itself. This growing organization of career professionals, known as Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth.org), now includes over 3,000 highly educated and experienced subject matter experts and over 22,000 citizens, all of whom are calling for a new and verifiably independent investigation into the events of 9/11. Most recently, New York area fire commissioners made history by publicly joining this call for a new investigation, and a four-year computer modeling study by researchers in the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the University of Alaska Fairbanks concluded that fire did not bring down World Trade Center Building 7.

Not surprisingly, the mainstream news media has routinely mocked these professionals as "conspiracy theorists" and dismissed their scientific findings without review. No, you won’t find anyone on FOX or CNN discussing Building 7 or any of the other disturbing anomalies, contradictions, or omissions that were left out of the government's official 9/11 Commission Report. Why? Because the people presenting the news on mainstream media are either unaware, willfully ignorant, grossly incompetent, or knowingly complicit in helping the government to conceal the truth. As a result, to this day a large percentage of Americans still have never even heard of Building 7, much less what happened to it.

With the exception of the brave and conscientious members of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, you also won’t find many technical professionals raising this topic. Many of them, like their fellow Americans, have never even heard of Building 7. Those who do know of Building 7 must have certainly recognized the lie immediately.  But having caved under career pressure, they now offer their silent consent to the government’s official narrative.

The incredible boldness of this crime, and the unconscionable betrayal and murder of citizens by members of their own government, makes the truth of 9/11 very difficult indeed. But once you come to terms with what really happened, the endless "War on Terror" and the domestic spying and ongoing erosion of our civil liberties all begin to make sense. The picture it paints is much darker than the one we were sold, and the implications are breathtaking.

The consequences of speaking the truth about 9/11 are fast becoming insignificant compared to the consequences of remaining silent. Like the very attacks themselves, silence is also treason against truth and justice—and even life itself.

As Martin Luther King, Jr. profoundly noted:

      “There comes a time when silence is betrayal.”

      “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.”

      “In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.”

Truth and justice are the cornerstones of valid governments and civil societies, but they are meaningless without a voice. For justice to prevail, good people must stand up and speak the truth. People like you. Yes, you have a career and a reputation to consider, but you also have a choice to make. You can allow yourself to be defined by your career ambitions and the opinions of others or you can choose to define yourself on the basis of your principles and have the courage to take a stand in their defense.

Will you allow ignorance, apathy, and cowardice to feed the growing tyranny that threatens our democracy and freedom?

Or will you help shine the light of truth on this terrible darkness and demand the justice that all 9/11 victims and their families deserve?

It is one minute to midnight.
Do you have the strength to face the truth?
Do you have the courage to share it?

If so, the following short videos will help you learn and share this critically important truth with others.





If you still have doubts, questions, or you are just ready to become more fully informed about what really happened on 9/11, please visit 9-11TruthAndJustice.org.

Source: https://9-11wastreason.org/