JOURNALIST JAILED IN BRITAIN

By Jim Stone - JimStone.is

Tommy Robinson

The manner in which it was done is why I am mentioning it. Britain may have MANY MANY JOURNALISTS IN JAIL.

Guess what??!!
AS PART OF THIS JOURNALIST'S SENTENCING, I HAVE BEEN ORDERED NOT TO TELL ANYONE HE'S IN JAIL!!!!!

HA HA HA HA HA, BITE ME QUEEN!!!

PART OF THIS GUY'S SENTENCING INCLUDES NOT ALLOWING ANYONE FROM REPORTING HE'S BEEN JAILED.

SO Breitbart and others, who reported this yesterday were (somehow) forced to take their reports down, and go dark on this topic.
I don't know how that kind of control was exerted but Britain got it done.

The Gateway Pundit still had this posted (see below)

MY COMMENT: This is a clear indicator that the governments of Britain and Europe have no intentions of slowing down the import of third world people to formerly white Christian areas. And if anyone speaks out about it, they will go to jail.

FACT: This reporter was jailed ONLY because he spoke out against what is the new war policy of the presiding power against it's people no matter what the British government claims.

They will say they did not jail him for reporting, and that they don't jail reporters. This is accomplished via the creation of a secondary charge out of thin air, and jailing him for violating the terms of that charge, or a secondary offense out of thin air, and jailing him for that offense with the prior statement he won't be jailed for that offence for as long as he no longer reports what they don't want him to.

Example: Put in place a potential sentence for a tiny offence, such as J-walking, that amounts to years in jail, but never enforce it until someone you don't like violates it. Then tell him he faces years in jail for breaking the law, but for as long as you don't do X, we'll forgive this. You'll never be jailed for X, because jailing people for X will make us look bad, no, we'll instead jail you for Y because the world can tolerate it because there is no stigma attached for jailing people for that.

We will then penalize anyone who reports we jailed you, on the grounds their reporting will "interfere with a court case" so no one knows about even that.

Never mind the fact that having people know about what is going on being a problem for a court proceeding only proves the court is bs.

That's how the sleaziest tyrannies operate.

----

Orwell’s Nightmare:
Articles About Tommy Robinson’s Arrest Rapidly Scrubbed From the Internet


Articles about the arrest and subsequent imprisonment of independent journalist and activist Tommy Robinson are being rapidly scrubbed from the internet after the British government put restrictions in place banning any reporting on the matter.

Robinson, 35, was arrested on Friday for suspicion of ‘breaching the peace’ while livestreaming to report on the trial of a child grooming gang. He will now have to serve a prior 13 month suspended sentence for a similar offense.

https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1000072789175422976

Articles from the Daily Record, Birmingham Live, The Mirror, RT and even Breitbart News were all taken offline in the hours following his detention.

The leaked gag-order to the press states that it “appears to be necessary for avoiding a substantial risk of prejudice to the administration of justice in these proceedings.” The order prohibits “any report of these proceedings.”

Author and journalist Mike Cernovich and independent researcher and journalist Nick Monroe kept tabs on the disappearing articles.

Monroe has also been archiving the deleted stories.

According to UK independent reporter Caolan Robertson, Robinson was arrested outside the Leeds Crown Court on Friday morning as he was covering the trial of ten men for offenses including child rape, trafficking, and supply of Class A drugs to children.

Robinson was on video telling the arresting officers that “this is free speech. This is where we’re at.”

“You know when you do this, more people are going to watch this now than ever,” he adds.

Robinson is heavily focused on Islamic extremism and has had several run-ins with law enforcement over his live streaming. His suspended sentence stems from an arrest last year for contempt of court after trying to film Muslims who had been accused of pedophilia outside a court in Canterbury.

The trial he was attempting to cover was that of Tamin Rahani, 37, Shershah Muslimyar, 20, Rafiullah Hamidy, 24, and an unnamed teenager who are all charged with three counts of raping a teenager.

It is now safe to say that the UK has become a police state. The treatment of both Robinson and the media that wishes to cover his arrest highlight the great importance of the First Amendment here in the US.

-----

 UK Free speech is dead!!

A British woman arrested - THIS IS WHAT SHE WAS ARRESTED FOR>>>>>>>>
BREAKING - Lady that questioned police over praying at Speakers Corner Arrested!
 
THIS IS A DISGRACE,  Regulations are being flouted and police are told to allow rules to be being broken. 
 

Make this international please, share everywhere!

THIS IS WHAT SHE WAS ARRESTED FOR:
All the lady did some weeks ago, was to question the police on duty at Speakers Corner Hyde Park (a traditional free speech are for all and sundry to take a soap box and voice an opinion without hindrance) Sadly the Corner has been flooded by praying mats and prayer which is NOT allowed in the park - NO praying. The lady became a star on You Tube as she persisted in asking the police very politely why they were allowing the park rules to be flaunted. That was ALL she did - see below.

Open the door we want to talk to you. 'You're under arrest'.
Can you believe this?

This is utterly disgraceful,what a scandal
 
THIS IS WHAT SHE WAS ARRESTED FOR>>>>>>>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smyZAUEKMss

Commented by John,
Re, the 1977 Criminal Law Act:
It is not only an offence to 'use force to enter an occupied dwelling house', it is an ARRESTABLE offence to use the THREAT of force in an ATTEMPT to gain entry.  What a pity the lady opened the door.   She should have said that if they had anything to say to her, they should put it in writing.
 
Norman Scarth

My comments posted on this video.
YOU OBVIOUSLY DO NOT KNOW THE UK LAW.
FACT. Stated many times in stated cases. No one, even the Queen has authority to enter an occupied dwelling without the consent of the occupier. These police have committed criminal offences. They used threats of violence, i.e . breaking in to persuade the lady to open her door. This is against the Criminal law act 1977 section 6 which prohibits anyone using force , which can be against property, to enter occupied property without consent of the occupier. There is the proviso, without lawful excuse". This takes it into common law so any legal statute or order including a warrant issuing from an administrative court , cannot over ride this common law freedom as stated and confirmed by Lord Denning. "The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail—its roof may shake—the wind may blow through it—the storm may enter—the rain may enter—but the King of England cannot enter—all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement.’ So be it—unless he has justification by law.[7] The law here is Common law which is superior to statute law. Anyone who knows how I can contact this lady please contact me through a private message on facebook using the name of Colin Turley. I have stopped Gloucestershire and Thames Valley Police breaking into property with so called warrants. . You need to stand up to these corrupt bullying police. I as an ex constable know that the decent police have left the service. What is left behind are corrupt bullying puppets.
 
 
Read also:
 
 
Background: