UPDATE 21. January 2021: 11,000 Pages of Evidence Filed in Landmark 5G Case Against the FCC, Hearing Set for Jan. 25, 2021

RESIST wherever you still can!

5G Exposed: A Must-See Documentary on this Wireless ‘Experiment on Humanity’

This new documentary by Sacha Stone investigates the science (and lack thereof) behind the effect of wireless technology on the human population – especially children. Exposing the industry bias and aversion to the overwhelmingly strong evidence that 5g is not just harmful, but a genuine threat to Humanity and all biological life.

Watch this extremely important

5G Documentary Here: !

 

The documentary features weapons development experts, biologists, molecular & cellular scientists, blood microscopists and activists outlining the first-hand science behind 5G and electro magnetic radiation with alarming calls to action.

It will show you what you can do to protect your family. Every parent, educator and legislator needs to see it, and take some simple steps accordingly to protect the lives with which we are entrusted.

With what’s at stake — especially as 5G is now being rapidly deployed despite there being very strong evidence it is harmful — this is perhaps the most timely documentary.

 

WATCH ALSO:

The Truth About Cell Phone Radiation and 5G by Theodora Scarato

Veteran MD Drops Bombshell About 5G Technology Dangers At 5G Hearing

Dr. Sharon Goldberg, an internal medicine physician & professor gives her testimony regarding 5g technology dangers specifically involving electromagnetic radiation. She says: "Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period."

READ MORE:

Governments and Industries together in 5G Fraud
By Peter Tocci - 13. March 2019 This article begins to make the case that information carrying microwave radiation (ICMR) from wireless systems, 5G included, is one of the ...
 
The Plan To Control The World
... the serious dangers to public health (62). But this higher level of radiation is necessary to trace the entire population. That is why the government does not listen to the hundreds of experts. They have ...
 
BEWARE OF 5G
Department of Nuclear, Sub-nuclear and Radiation Physics, G. Marconi University, Rome, ...
 
Shielding EMF Improves Autoimmune Disease
... significant symptom changes in 90% of patients with autoimmune disease. No longer can it be ignored that manmade electromagnetic radiation poses innumerable risks to human health The Ubiquity of Electrosmog ...
 
Corona Virus And 5G
The explosive and censored 5G-Link interviews UPDATE 18. March 2020: Research on the Effects of Wireless Radiation Exposure on the Immune System UPDATE 01. March 2020: CORONAVIRUS ...
 
Swiss Halt Rollout of 5G
... the letter told the Financial Times. The agency is responsible for providing the cantons with safety criteria against which telecoms operators’ radiation emissions can be judged. Under Switzerland’s ...
 
Military Use of 5G Technology
... frequencies and radiation, and is now an expert on the topic, which has led media outlets and the local council to brand him as a "conspiracy theorist". Mark Steele goes further in his investigation ...
 
The EMF-Microbiome Interaction
... room: non-native electromagnetic radiation (wifi, cell phones, and other devices) Although research in this area is limited, the available data indicate that much like humans, bacteria are also affected ...
 
No Reason to Believe 5G Is Safe
... of cell phone radiation of "fear mongering" over the advent of wireless technology's 5G. Since much of our research is publicly-funded, we believe it is our ethical responsibility to inform the public about ...
 
5G TeleComs Are Losing
5G Cell Phone Radiation: How the Telecom Companies Are Losing the Battle to Impose 5G Against the Will of the People The telecommunications companies and the mainstream media would have you believe ...
 
The 5G Electromagnetic “Mad Zone”
... analysis of the impacts of 5G Electromagnetic Radiation By Claire Edwards - GR - 14. September 2019 The entities rolling out 5G are tormenting humanity and sucking their humanity from them by taking ...
 
Brussels Halts 5G Deployment Indefinitely
5G project not compatible with radiation safety standards, say authorities. By Lance D Johnson - 20. August 2019 (Natural News) In the next year, preliminary 5G networks are set to roll ...
 
MicroWaves - the Contergan of the 21st Century
... at home, is an ongoing concern. But the invisible electromagntic radiation from modern technology is the silent killer with an even larger proportion.  As stated by University Researchers, Government ...
 
===

UPDATE:

11,000 Pages of Evidence Filed in Landmark 5G Case Against the FCC, Hearing Set for Jan. 25

After the FCC last month found no evidence of harm caused by wireless technology, CHD and other groups sued — and included 11,000 pages of evidence refuting the FCC’s conclusion.

By Children's Health Defense Team - 21. January 2021

11,000 Pages of Evidence Filed in Landmark 5G Case

For decades, the public has been told there is no evidence that wireless technology is harmful. Claims of 5G harms have been dismissed as “conspiracy theory.”

A landmark case against the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) contests these statements and asserts that the harms are proven and that an epidemic of sickness exists.

Recently, the leading environmental and health advocacy organizations that filed the case submitted 11,000 pages of evidence in support of their claims. (Links to the evidence are provided below).

The case is being heard by the U.S. Courts of Appeals of the DC Circuit. Oral arguments are scheduled for Jan. 25 at 9:30 a.m. EST. The public can listen to it on YouTube.

In December 2019, the FCC closed an inquiry it initiated in 2013 in which the commission asked the public to submit comments to the inquiry’s docket as to whether or not the FCC should review its 1996 health guidelines for Radio Frequency (RF) radiation emitted by wireless devices and infrastructure.

About 2,000 comments — an exceptionally large number — were filed with the FCC. These comments were filed by scientists and science organizations, such as the BioInitiative and EMF Scientist, by doctors and medical organizations, by cities, such as Boston and Philadelphia, and by hundreds of individuals including parents of children who were injured by this technology. The comments referenced thousands of studies showing clear and profound evidence of harm.

Nevertheless, the FCC order, published on Dec. 4, 2019, concluded there is no evidence that wireless technology causes harm, and no need to review the guidelines. The FCC decision didn’t provide an analysis of the science, disregarded the evidence of sickness and didn’t defend its decision with evidence.

Consequently, two lawsuits were filed against the FCC. One by the Environmental Health Trust (EHT) and Consumers for Safe Cell Phones, and one by the Children’s Health Defense (CHD) and additional petitioners including Prof. David Carpenter who is the co-editor of the BioInitiative Report, the most comprehensive review of the science by 29 leading scientists and public health experts.

CHD’s case was also joined by physicians who see the sickness in their clinics and by parents of children who have become sick with radiation sickness. One petitioner is a mother whose son died from a glioblastoma, the same brain tumor that killed Beau Biden, President Joe Biden’s son.

The petitioners of both the EHT and CHD cases filed joint briefs. They argued that, considering the overwhelming evidence that was submitted to the FCC’s docket, and since the FCC’s order lacked evidence of reasoned decision-making, the FCC violated the Administrative Procedures Act and that the commission’s decision is capricious, arbitrary, abuse of discretion and not evidence-based.

The petitioners also argued that the FCC violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) because the Agency failed to consider the environmental impacts of its decision, and didn’t comply with the 1996 Telecommunications Act (TCA) because it failed to consider the impact of its decision on public health and safety.

The Opening Brief was filed by petitioners on July 29, 2020. The FCC filed its brief on Sept. 22, 2020; and the petitioners filed their Reply Brief on Oct. 21, 2020.

The court has ordered that in the oral arguments scheduled for Jan. 25, only one attorney will present the case for all the petitioners. It allocated 10 minutes for oral arguments for the petitioners as well as for the FCC.

EHT and CHD have agreed to have CHD’s attorney, Scott McCullough, former Assistant Texas Attorney General and a seasoned telecom and administrative law attorney, present the petitioners’ joint argument.

The three-judge panel in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that presides over the case includes the Honorable Karen Henderson, Patricia Millett and Robert Wilkins.

EHT is represented by attorney Edward B. Myers, who intervened in the successful case against the FCC with the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and several Native American tribes when the court upheld the relevance of NEPA in FCC proceedings.

The NRDC filed an amicus brief in the case. An amicus brief was also filed by the Building Biology Institute, and by an executive from the telecom industry, Joe Sandri. Sandri’s brief included a statement of Dr. Linda Birenbaum, director of the National Institute of Environmental and Health Services (NIEHS) from 2009-2019, stating that the evidence of carcinogenic effects of wireless technology has been established.

The evidence referenced in the case shows profound harmful effects and widespread sickness from wireless technology. The evidence (called the “Joint Appendix”) was recently filed and includes 11,000 pages of scientific and human evidence, yet, it is only the tip of the iceberg.

In this type of case only evidence that was submitted to the FCC’s docket can be used. There s much evidence that wasn’t submitted.

The Joint Appendix contains 440 documents. The table of contents alone is 54 pages. Because of the sheer volume of evidence, it had to be divided into 27 volumes. The court requires seven sets of the Joint Appendix, and therefore, 189 binders each containing approximately 500 pages were shipped to the court. The printing and shipping costs for the Joint Appendix amounted to more than $15,000.

The Joint Appendix includes references to thousands of peer-reviewed scientific studies showing DNA damage, reproductive harm, neurological effects such as ADHD, and radiation sickness, which seems to be the most widespread manifestation of wireless harms.

The evidence shows effects on the brain, including impaired blood flow and damage to the blood-brain barrier, cognitive and memory problems and effects on sleep, melatonin production and mitochondrial damage. Causal mechanism of harm was also established. Oxidative Stress, a mechanism of harm that can lead to cancer, non-cancer conditions and DNA damage, was found in 203 out of 225 studies.

Unlike industry statements, both the majority of the studies and the weight of the evidence leave no doubt that the harms are proven.

The Joint Appendix also includes reports of leading expert scientists such as the BioInitiative Report; opinions of medical associations such as the California Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics; appeals of leading expert scientists; U.S. government agencies’ reports (U.S. Access Board, NIBS, the Department of Interior, U.S. Navy, the Military, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; government studies including the recent National Toxicology Program (NTP), a $30 million study that found clear evidence of cancer and DNA damage; as well as acknowledgement of harm by U.S. government agencies and scientists contradicting the FCC position.

In December 2020, the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NAS) issued a report determining that the most likely cause of the symptoms suffered by the U.S. diplomats in Cuba and China is Radio-Frequency (wireless) weapons. The NAS was appointed by the Department of State. The report references much of the same evidence filed in the case against the FCC.

The NAS invited Prof. Beatrice Golomb, M.D., Ph.D., to present to the committee. Golomb’s 2018 paper was the first to show that pulsed RF is the most likely explanation for the diplomats’ symptoms. She pointed out the diplomats likely suffer from the same condition experienced by growing segments of the population from wireless technology known as radiation sickness/ microwave sickness/ electrosensitivity. Golomb’s paper was referenced in the case.

Hundreds of testimonials of people who have become sick like the diplomats and statements of doctors were filed to the FCC’s docket. The petitioners argued that the FCC guidelines that deny sickness are being used to deny accommodation for the injured, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Nevertheless, the FCC denied the evidence, the sickness and did not address the accommodation issue. For those who have been injured this case has profound consequences.

“Environmental Health Trust has worked for over a decade to protect the public from radiofrequency radiation, testified to Congress and published critical research on why children are more vulnerable,” said Devra Davis Ph.D., MPH, president and founder of Environmental Health Trust. “The FCC has ignored our extensive submissions to the FCC over the years which clearly document harm. As the legacies of lead, asbestos, and tobacco teach us, this issue deserves the immediate attention of our federal government in order to protect our children’s healthy future.”

“This is a landmark case and it is of the utmost importance to the Children’s Health Defense which works relentlessly to eliminate the epidemic of sickness in children,” said the organization’s chairman, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. “The American public has been poorly served by the FCC. The FCC’s guidelines are decades-old and are based on scientific assumptions that were proven false. Its failure and disregard of public health is evident in the growing and widespread conditions involving brain damage, learning disabilities, and a host of complex neurological syndromes.”

Kennedy added: “The overwhelming experimental and human evidence which the FCC has ignored leaves no doubt that wireless technology is a major contributory factor to this epidemic. The FCC has shown that its chief interest is protecting the telecom industry and maximizing its profits, and its position as put forward in its brief is simply indefensible.”

The oral arguments are the final stage of this case. After the hearing, all that will be left is to wait for the court’s decision, said Dafna Tachover, director of CHD’s Stop 5G and Wireless Harms Project, who has initiated and led the case for CHD. “We have invested significant resources in this case and all of us worked very hard for the past 13 months. We believe that we have a strong case. Now it is up to the court. As William Wilberforce, who fought slavery said, ‘You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again that you didn’t know.’”

Link to Joint Appendix 27 volumes:

Volume 1; Volume 2; Volume 3; Volume 4

Volume 5; Volume 6; Volume 7; Volume 8

Volume 9; Volume 10; Volume 11; Volume 12

Volume 13; Volume 14; Volume 15 ; Volume 16

Volume 17; Volume 18; Volume 19; Volume 20

Volume 21; Volume 22; Volume 23; Volume 24

Volume 25; Volume 26; Volume 27

How to access the oral arguments online

The oral arguments are Jan. 25 9:30 a.m. EST, however according to the schedule, 2 other cases are scheduled for the same time and they will be heard ahead of our case. Hence, most likely, our oral arguments will not start before 10:20 a.m. EST.

You can listen to the hearing here.

Source

Related

5G What they don’t want you to know

5G What they don’t want you to know Part 2

READ ALSO:

5G Phone Users May Be Exposed to Radiation Levels That Exceed Recommended Safety Limits

A recent study found that a 5G phone held 3 inches or closer to the body can expose the user to radio frequency limits that exceed those recommended by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.

Report on ‘Havana Syndrome’ Prompts Call for More Research Into Health Impact of 5G

Last month’s report on the illnesses of 50 American diplomats in Cuba and China stopped short of blaming microwave weapons. But some experts say the technology is the only plausible cause, and that the investigation could hold lessons about the safety of 5G.

Weighing in on Wireless: New Report on ‘Havana Syndrome’ + Palm Coast Keeps 5G Tower at Bay + More

Here’s the latest news, policy, events and campaigns related to Children’s Health Defense’s 5G and Wireless Harms program.

Landmark Study Highlights Health Threats of 5G on People + Planet

The New Hampshire Commission to Study the Environmental and Health Effects of Evolving 5G Technology heard from 13 experts in epidemiology, occupational health, toxicology, physics and engineering, plus one wireless industry expert. All except the industry rep agreed RF radiation coming from wireless devices affects humans, animals, insects and plants.

70+ Mayors, Elected Officials in France Call for Moratorium on 5G

Officials say the health risks of 5G haven’t been properly evaluated. They also cite concerns about the increase in electromagnetic pollution and the dehumanization of society.

5G Fund for Rural America Hands Over U.S. Farms to Big Tech, Critics Say

FCC’s new fund includes money for precision agriculture that opponents say is more about commodification and control of information than better farming.

Response Brief Filed in Landmark Case Against FCC on 5G and Wireless Health Impacts

The following is a transcript of this video. Also see related article.     DAFNA TACHOVER: Hi everyone, and thank you for joining us. My name is Dafna Tachover and I’m the Children’s Health Defense director of its 5G, and Wireless Home Program. We are holding this press conference to discuss the filing of our […]

Response Brief Filed in Landmark Case Against FCC on 5G and Wireless Health Impacts

PRESS CONFERENCE: Wednesday, October 21 at 3:00 p.m. EDT. REGISTER NOW WASHINGTON, DC, October 20, 2020—Children’s Health Defense (CHD), the children’s health advocacy group headed by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., filed its response to the Federal Communications Commission’s brief on Monday in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. CHD’s case against […]

Employees at France’s Biggest Phone Company Undermine Country’s 5G Push

Employees at Orange, France’s biggest phone company and the tenth largest mobile network operator in the world, are calling for management to stop the rollout of 5G just days before the industry plans to commit billions to their deployment in the country.

Apple’s Big Surprise — No New Products Include 5G Compatibility

This year, the big surprise during Apple’s annual mid-September launch event wasn’t what new products they were offering, but what the new products didn’t offer — none of the new Apple devices include 5G compatibility.

Washington Post Is Right That 5G Is a Lie, But Wrong About the Reason

Neville Ray, president of technology at T-Mobile, admits that so far, 5G is “meaningless.”“We celebrated some 5G launches — T-Mobile didn’t, others did — but they’ve proven to be pretty meaningless,” Ray said. “If we’re honest with ourselves, 5G really hasn’t had any real impact in the U.S. materially to date.” His claim that T-Mobile didn’t celebrate 5G launches, however, is contrary to his company’s massive advertising campaign showing 5G radiation coming from cell towers, painted in splendid pink.

5G “Small Cell” Proliferation Takes a Hit in Cambridge MA

In an important win for those who are concerned about 5G and small cell wireless proliferation, on August 26, 2020 the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissed a lawsuit by “neutral host” provider ExteNet Systems, Inc. against the City of Cambridge, MA.

President Trump’s Administration Revitalizes Proposal to Nationalize 5G

President Trump’s campaign is reviving its proposal to nationalize 5G, despite the fact that the deployment of 800,000 5G “small cell” antennas near homes and interconnecting 50 billion more radiation-emitting devices, as this current plan dictates, is going to result in a health crisis.

CHD’s Dafna Tachover Clears Up the Confusion Surrounding 5G

Watch Children’s Health Defense attorney and Director of 5G and Wireless Harms Project, Dafna Tachover, in this webinar hosted by 5G Free California. Tachover is a thought leader and an expert on the issue of wireless technology and its effects.

Children’s Health Defense Principal Brief in Landmark Case Against FCC on 5G and Wireless Harms: Submitted!

What we put in our bodies and our children’s developing bodies is the most important and most personal choice we make as human beings. But when it comes to damaging levels of radiation, that right to choose has been stolen from us. The Children’s Health Defense (CHD) mission to protect children from toxic exposure reached […]

Hawaii’s Big Island Called Upon Telecom to Cease and Desist 5G Deployment

A resolution to cease the buildout of 5G wireless infrastructure until it can be proven safe, through independent research and testing, passed the Hawaii County Council on July 22, 2020, almost unanimously. The vote was 8-1.

Easton CT is Saying NO THANKS to 5G, and We Can Too!

Take Action and request that your city pass a “cease and desist” resolution calling on wireless companies to stop their build out of 4G/5G small cell wireless antennas until such facilities are proven safe through independent research!

5G Friend or Foe: CHD’s Dafna Tachover at the First Debate with Telecom

This debate between “5G harms” experts and industry representatives was an invaluable opportunity to present to those working in the industry the science-based evidence that the harm caused by 5G is indeed real and cannot be dismissed as mere conspiracy theory.  Our hope is that the issues and evidence raised in the debate will cause them to re-think their products and technology.

CHD’s 5G and Wireless Harms Project: Monthly Summary, May 2020

This May 2020 update chronicles CHD’s legal and educational efforts to stop 5G and wireless harms.

CHD in the First Direct Debate with Telecom on 5G – Don’t Miss!

On June 23rd, 2020, 1:00 p.m. Eastern 10:00 am Pacific, Children’s Health Defense will take part in the first ever direct debate with the telecom industry, titled: “5G – Friend or Foe?”

CHD Gives Notice to FCC Against 5G Cell Towers on Homes—Ex-Parte Letter Receives Over 15,000 Signatures!

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) submitted a legal notice to the FCC against the OTARD rule expansion, signed by over 15,000 people. At 735 pages, it is likely one of the largest submissions to the FCC in number of signatories. Of those who signed, 6,231 declared that they and/or their children have been injured by wireless radiation.

CHD’s 5G & Wireless Harms Project: Monthly Summary, April 2020

The April 2020 update chronicles CHD’s legal and educational efforts to stop 5G and wireless harms.

Easton, CT, Calls upon Telecom to Cease and Desist 5G Deployment

Easton Becomes First Town in CT to Ban 5G when on May 7, 2020, the Easton Board of Selectmen unanimously approved a 5G cease and desist resolution “until such technologies have been proven safe to human health and the environment through independent research and testing.”

Ask the Lawyers—5G Webinar Transcript

The advocacy organization 5G Free California recently conducted a webinar called “Ask the Lawyers” to enable advocates from around the country to ask questions on legal matters regarding 5G deployment. Dafna Tachover, Director of CHD’s Stop 5G and Wireless Harms Project, participated in the webinar, explaining our lawsuit against the FCC. The transcript below serves as a helpful action tool for advocates to better understand what is legally possible in their own communities and on a national level.

David V. Goliath: An 11 y/o is on a Mission to Educate About 5G Harms and Protect his Mom

When  11-year-old David’s mother was officially diagnosed with microwave sickness, he and the family did everything they could to eliminate the causes, but it wasn’t enough and her symptoms are increasing again. David has taken up the cause of wireless harms, competing in his county’s 4-H competition and speaking to politicians. 

RFK, Jr. Joins EM Radiation Research Trust in Calling Upon UK Prime Minister to Halt 5G Deployment

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Dafna Tachover, Director of 5G and Wireless Harms Project of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), signed onto the UK EM Radiation Research Trust  (RRT) letter calling on UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson and political leaders to protect the public from the proven harms of wireless radiation and 5G.

Sign to Join CHD’s Submission to Stop FCC Rule Allowing 5G & Satellites Antennas on Homes

The FCC is about to expand its ‘Over The Air Reception Devices’ (OTARD) rule (WT 19-71), to allow wireless companies to install 5G and other cell towers and transmitting devices (not only receiving devices as the name suggests) on homes.

CHD Statement on 5G and Coronavirus

Thousands of peer reviewed scientific studies link wireless technology, including 5G, to a grim inventory of deadly and dangerous injuries, but Children’s Health Defense (CHD) does not find sound scientific evidence to support the hypothesis that 5G is the cause of the COVID-19 pandemic.