UPDATE 03. September 2021: IRISH PATRIOTS HANG AN IMPORTANT MESSAGE OVER THE BRIDGE AT RTE NEWS STUDIOS

UPDATE 02. September 2021: DR. ZELENKO CONFIRMS COVID-19 & THE JABS ARE A SINISTER & NEFARIOUS GENOCIDE AGAINST THE HUMAN RACE

UPDATE 01. September 2021: Former Pfizer VP: ‘The gloves are off,’ UK govt to inject all 12-15-year-olds without parental consent + DON'T MENTION THE "V" - DR. MCCLOSKEY & LAWYER SABRINA O’SULLIVAN

UPDATE 29. AUGUST 2021: IN MEMORY OF ROY + BREAKING NEWS: TWO SENIOR FDA VACCINE LEADERS STEP DOWN

UPDATE 27. August 2021: New Israeli Study Finds Fully Vaccinated People are at “Greater Risk of Hospitalization” and 13 TIMES MORE LIKELY to Catch Covid-19 Than Those Who Have Recovered and Have Natural Immunity

UPDATE 26. August 2021: Large Israeli study: Natural immunity provides 13 times more protection against Delta than Pfizer's vaccine does + 1.6m Moderna doses withdrawn in Japan over contamination

UPDATE 25. August 2021: Pentagon orders all active-duty troops to submit to COVID-19 shot immediately + FDA ‘playing bait and switch’ with Americans, tricking them into believing shots currently being offered have been granted full approval when they have not

UPDATE 24. August 2021: Two Things Mainstream Media Didn’t Tell You About FDA’s Approval of Pfizer Vaccine

UPDATE 23. August 2021: FDA Approves First COVID-19 Vaccine - PfizerBioNTech Comirnaty

UPDATE 21. August 2021: DR. SHAWN BROOKS, PHD, OXFORD “NOTHING CAN STOP WHAT IS COMING”

UPDATE 19. August 2021: American Frontline Doctors Report: ‘The vaccines are neither safe nor effective’ - “In the 82 countries which offer vaccination programs, not only was the average COVID fatality rate greater than in unvaccinated countries, but the number of deaths increased as the number or percentage of residents vaccinated increased.”

Repeated Booster Jabs May be Lethal Researcher Warns

By FWM - 19, August 2021

A researcher has warned that the Covid vaccine spike protein could destroy natural immunity. Immune failure may be due to a buildup of vaccine-induced spike proteins inside the body, said Walter Chesnut of WMCResearch.org.

Chesnut warned that the “robust immune response” triggered by the jabs “may come at a lethal cost,” even at a later stage. In reviewing a peer-reviewed scientific study, he noted that the vaccine recipient’s telomeres become inactivated.

The vaccine “turns off transcription of/depletes AUF1 and WRN deleting telomeres,” Chesnut tweeted. “It is a catastrophe. This is what you are now seeing just the beginning of.”

Telomerase is an enzyme in human DNA that regulates aging. The telomeres that encapsulate DNA, shorten over time as humans age. The study in question was published in the Journal of Bacteriology & Parasitology, showing that the vaccine spike proteins have “deleterious effects on telomerase, impairing its synthesis,” Chesnut underscored.

“With this activity inhibited, it takes time for the inevitable immune cell exhaustion to appear. This may be the signature Trojan Horse ‘gift’ of the spike. Whatever short-lived immune response is fool’s gold replacing the ability of the immune system to replenish itself.”

Spike proteins “may be chronically present” in the injected and “continually suppressing telomerase”.

According to Chesnut, “we are basically seeing the effects of chemotherapy with the spike protein. But in a very unique way. Quickly replicating cells are being exhausted. We can now explain the all too common reports of hair loss, for example.”

Vaccine-induced destruction of telomeres, which is associated with Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s, ferroptosis, hypothalamus and autophagy, is happening, Chesnut also tweeted. He said it was possible to delete telomeres with “cells lacking WRN”. It is “a form of cell death you may not know of: Synthetic Lethality,” Chesnut added.

Without telomerase, “key cells in the body are unable to replenish themselves and ‘run out’ well before they should in the course of a normal lifespan,” explained researcher Elizabeth Blackburn.

French Professor Christian Perronne says the vaccinated are a problem. Photo: The Conversation

In the same vein, World Health Organization European Advisory Group of Experts in Immunization former Vice President Professor Christian Perronne believes that all vaccinated people pose a greater risk than the unvaccinated. Alluding to the deteriorating situation in Israel and the UK, the infectious disease expert stated: “Vaccinated people should be put in quarantine, and should be isolated from society.”

Perronne specializes in tropical pathologies and emerging infectious diseases. He was chairman of the specialized committee on Communicable diseases of the French High Council of Public Health.

He went on to say: “Unvaccinated people are not dangerous; vaccinated people are dangerous for others. It’s proven in Israel now – I’m in contact with many physicians in Israel – they’re having big problems, severe cases in the hospitals are among vaccinated people, and in the UK also, you have the larger vaccination program and also there are problems.”

The current working group on the Covid-19 pandemic in France is reported to be “utterly panicked” about this development.

President Donald Trump, an early promoter of jabs, has meanwhile shifted his position on vaccine booster shots. Trump criticized the new phase of vaccine marketing as a money-making scheme by Pfizer during an interview with Fox Business’ Maria Bartiromo. The former US president pointed out that the promises made by the company were empty.

“You wouldn’t think you would need a booster. You know when these first came out they were good for life. Then they were good for a year or two. And I could see the writing on the wall, I could see the dollar signs in their eyes, of that guy that runs Pfizer. You know the guy that announced the day after the election that he had the vaccine.”

Pfizer has repeatedly called the shots “safe and effective” but the pharmaceutical giant will reportedly not be mandating them for its own employees. Images leaked from a “confidential” Pfizer booklet written by Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer Payal Betcher revealed that Pfizer will not be following the recommendations of US President Biden to mandate injections for all employees.

* Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet fora. etc.

Featured image is from Unsplash

===

===

- earlier info see:  & THE VACCINE CONUNDRUM II​​​​​ & THE VACCINE CONUNDRUM III​​​​​ & THE VACCINE CONUNDRUM IV &  &  & THE VACCINE CONUNDRUM VII & THE VACCINE CONUNDRUM VIII &  &  &  + MUST READ AND DISTRIBUTE: 

===

===

===

UPDATES:

IRISH PATRIOTS HANG AN IMPORTANT MESSAGE OVER THE BRIDGE AT RTE NEWS STUDIOS

First published on BITCHUTE September 3rd, 2021.

===

DR. ZELENKO CONFIRMS COVID-19 & THE JABS ARE A SINISTER & NEFARIOUS GENOCIDE AGAINST THE HUMAN RACE

First published on BITCHUTE September 2nd, 2021.

===

Former Pfizer VP: ‘The gloves are off,’ UK govt to inject all 12-15-year-olds without parental consent

01. September 2021

‘KNOWING WHAT I KNOW FROM 40 years TRAINING & PRACTICE IN TOXICOLOGY, BIOCHEMISTRY & PHARMACOLOGY, to participate in this extraordinary abuse of innocent children in our care can be classified in no other way than MURDER.’

Featured Image

Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former Pfizer vice president and chief scientist for allergy and respiratory, issued a warning to parents in the U.K. with school children between ages 12 and 15 years that the government is planning to inject experimental gene-based COVID-19 “vaccines” into them with or without parental consent, beginning next week. 

Originally posted on a shared Telegram channel with Robin Monotti, Yeadon explained that children are not at any “measurable risk from SARS-CoV-2,” that there is “no benefit whatsoever” from these injections, that they are quite dangerous to young people, and are even proving to be ineffective against the virus. 

Consequently, these shots only present serious risks, and no benefit, and “WILL ONLY RESULT IN PAIN, SUFFERING, LASTING INJURIES AND DEATH.” 

With candor, he stated, “This extraordinary abuse of innocent children in our care can be classified in no other way than MURDER,” and he advised parents with kids in this age range to keep them home from school this fall “no matter what.” 

Finally, he emphasized, COVID “has never been about a virus or public health. It’s wholly about control, totalitarian and irreversible control at that, and they’re nearly there.” 

The full text of the message is below: 

ALERT ALERT ALERT

ALL PARENTS IN U.K. WITH CHILDREN AGED 12-15 years

I’ve just been informed via someone senior in the vaccination authorities that they will begin VACCINATING ALL SCHOOL CHILDREN AGED 12 – 15 years old STARTING SEPTEMBER 6th 2021.

WITH OR WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT.

Children are at no measurable risk from SARS-CoV-2 & no previously healthy child has died in U.K. after infection. Not one.

The vaccines are NOT SAFE. The USA reporting system VAERS is showing around 13,000 deaths in days to a few weeks after administration. A high % occur in the first 3 days. Around 70% of serious adverse events are thrombo-embolic in nature (blood clotting- or bleeding-related).

We know why this is: all of the gene-based vaccines cause our bodies to manufacture the virus spike protein & that spike protein triggers blood coagulation.

The next most common type of adverse events are neurological.

Death rates per million vaccinations are running everywhere at around 60X more than any previous vaccine.

Worse, thromboembolic events such as pulmonary embolisms, appear at over 400X the typical low rate after vaccination.

These events are serious, occur at a hideously elevated level & are at least as common in young people as in elderly people. The tendency is that younger people are having MORE SEVERE adverse events than older people.

There is literally no benefit whatsoever from this intervention. As stated, the children are unquestionably NOT AT RISK & vaccinating them WILL ONLY RESULT IN PAIN, SUFFERING, LASTING INJURIES AND DEATH.

Children rarely even become symptomatic & are very poor transmitters of the virus. This isn’t theory. It’s been studied & it pretty much doesn’t happen that children bring the virus into the home. In a large study, on not one occasion was a child the ‘index case’ – the first infected person in a household.

So if you’re told “it’s to protect vulnerable family members”, THAT IS A LIE.

The information emerging over time from U.K. & Israel is now showing clearly that the vaccines DO NOT EVEN WORK WELL. If there’s any benefit, it wanes.

Finally, the vaccines ARE NOT EVEN NECESSARY. There are good, safe & effective treatments.

IF YOU PERMIT THIS TO GO AHEAD, I GUARANTEE THIS: THERE WILL BE AVOIDABLE DEATHS OF PERFECTLY HEALTHY CHILDREN, and severe illnesses in ten times as many.

And for no possible benefit.

KNOWING WHAT I KNOW FROM 40 years TRAINING & PRACTISE IN TOXICOLOGY, BIOCHEMISTRY & PHARMACOLOGY, to participate in this extraordinary abuse of innocent children in our care can be classified in no other way than MURDER.

It’s up to you. If I had a secondary school age child in U.K., I would not be returning them to school next month, no matter what.

The state is going to vaccinate everyone. The gloves are off. This has never been about a virus or public health. It’s wholly about control, totalitarian & irreversible control at that, and they’re nearly there.

PLEASE SHARE THIS INFORMATION WIDELY.

With somber best wishes,

Mike

************

Source

https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/former-pfizer-vp-the-gloves-are-off-uk-govt-to-inject-all-12-15-year-olds-without-parental-consent/

===

DON'T MENTION THE "V"

- DR. MCCLOSKEY & LAWYER SABRINA O’SULLIVAN

First published on BITCHUTE September 1st, 2021.

 

TheIrishInquiry

Dr. McCloskey recorded a video recently outlining her experience while working in an out-of-hours GP centre, where she met many sick, distressed, worried people, most of whom were double jabbed. Her video received 120K views in 36 hours on The Irish Inquiry Facebook page alone, before it was removed.

The Health and Social Care Board has said it has ordered an ‘urgent investigation’ in Dr. McCloskey, after receiving numerous complaints ‘from both GP colleagues and members of the public around her behaviour, comments and conflict of interest.

Dr. McCloskey will be with us tonight for an update.

Human Rights Lawyer, Sabrina O Sullivan has been very vocal on Twitter for some time and has now begun to set up stalls in Dublin City Centre to speak with people and relay her concerns about the ongoing restrictive measures. Tonight, she will discuss the V rollout and whether the numbers are accurate, the Teenheard campaign - informing parents and teenagers on how to deal with a return to school, and the pushback from student nurses.

===

BREAKING NEWS: 

TWO SENIOR FDA VACCINE LEADERS STEP DOWN

---- BECAUSE THEY REFUSED TO APPROVE THE BOOSTER SHOTS! --

---- The retirements of Dr. Marion Gruber, director of the Office of Vaccines Research and Review, FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, and Dr. Philip Krause, the deputy director of the office. ----

PEOPLE THIS IS HUGE AS THESE --- TWO SENIOR LEADERS in the US Food and Drug Administration’s - HEAD OF THE VACCINES REVIEW OFFICE ARE STEPPING DOWN!! --- THEY WOULDN’T APPROVE COVID–19 DEATH-JABS FOR YOUNGER CHILDREN & BOOSTERS SHOTS!! -- PASS THIS ON AND MAKE SURE THE WORLD KNOWS.

===

IN MEMORY OF ROY

First published on BITCHUTE August 29th, 2021.

Groups and people from all over Ireland come together after the death of 23 year old Roy Butler who died after taking the Janssen Vaccine, watch as they pay respect to those who died and take peaceful action against the Vaccine Centre.

===

===

New Israeli Study Finds Fully Vaccinated People are at “Greater Risk of Hospitalization” and 13 TIMES MORE LIKELY to Catch Covid-19 Than Those Who Have Recovered and Have Natural Immunity

By Julian Conradson - 27. August 2021

A new study out of Israel has seemingly confirmed that individuals who have natural immunity have better protection against the NEW DELTA VARIANT than people who are fully vaccinated.

The team of researchers, from Maccabi Healthcare and Tel Aviv University, published their study earlier this week to medRxiv.org.

‘This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, ‘ the team of researchers wrote

Not just a little bit better either. People who have taken both doses of the Pfizer jab are 13 TIMES more likely to have a breakthrough infection, and are even at a “greater risk for Covid-19 hospitalizations.”

TRENDING: WATCH: Ashli Babbitt's Husband Appears on Tucker Carlson to Respond to MSNBC Interview With Her Killer

The researchers conducted an extensive study on 800,000 individuals that were broken into 3 groups. People who had received either one or two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine were compared with unvaccinated individuals who have natural immunity, because they had already recovered from the virus.

SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees had a 13.06-fold (95% CI, 8.08 to 21.11) increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant compared to those previously infected, when the first event (infection or vaccination) occurred during January and February of 2021. The increased risk was significant (P<0.001) for symptomatic disease as well. 

When allowing the infection to occur at any time before vaccination (from March 2020 to February 2021), evidence of waning natural immunity was demonstrated, though SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees had a 5.96-fold (95% CI, 4.85 to 7.33) increased risk for breakthrough infection and a 7.13-fold (95% CI, 5.51 to 9.21) increased risk for symptomatic disease. SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees were also at a greater risk for COVID-19-related-hospitalizations compared to those that were previously infected.

MOST NOTABLY, the study also found – Three months after a 2nd dose, the risk of contracting Covid was 13.06 times higher among the vaccinated and they are 27 TIMES more likely to experience symptoms.

After adjusting for comorbidities, we found a 27.02-fold risk (95% CI, 12.7 to 57.5) for symptomatic breakthrough infection as opposed to symptomatic reinfection (P<0.001) (Table 2b). None of the covariates were significant, except for age ≥60 years. 

So, to get this straight – According to these highly credible researchers who conducted a massive study on hundreds of thousands of people, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine won’t just make people more likely to catch new variants – they will also be more affected by symptoms and more likely to end up hospitalized.

This latest data just adds to a mounting pile of evidence that demonstrates the experimental jab’s low efficacy when it comes to stopping the spread of the virus. Even before this most recent study, some researchers had already found that the vaccinated spread the virus as much, if not more, than the unvaxxed.

The FDA skipped out on necessary trials and rubber-stamped their experimental jab anyway.

According to available data, a third of the entire US population had contracted Covid BY THE END OF 2020.

Natural immunity is not new.. It has consistently proven to be superior to inoculation. If 1/3rd of Americans had already contracted the virus – before it had even been known for a full year – then why would “everyone” need to take their experimental vaccine?

Well…

The authoritarian health regime in the US, led by Furor Dr. Fauci, has been flip-flopping since their comrades in thee CCP unleashed the virus on the world.

They are wholly unconcerned with saving anyone and are fully invested in using lockdowns and freedom-crushing restrictions to tighten their grip on power. 

Mindless compliance hasn’t worked so now they must start forcing people in other ways.

 

Author:

Julian Conradson

===

===

Large Israeli study: Natural immunity provides 13 times more protection against Delta than Pfizer's vaccine does

By ALLAHPUNDIT - 26. August 2021

AP Photo/Jessica Hill

Big news from Maccabi Healthcare Services, which tracked many thousands of people for this (not yet peer-reviewed) study. If its findings are borne out, anyone who’s had COVID should be allowed to submit the results of a prior positive test in lieu of proof of vaccination wherever that’s required. After all, they’re much safer from the virus than the vaccinated are.

Israeli scientists compared three groups, those who’ve had both shots but never been infected, those who’ve been infected but haven’t had their shots, and those who’ve been infected and then had one shot. The third group was the most protected, but only slightly more than the natural immunity group was. That corresponds with other studies showing that infection plus vaccination equals the best possible immunity.

The surprise came when they compared the vaccinated group to the infected but unvaccinated group. Some scientists have speculated that vaccine immunity is actually superior to natural immunity in the belief that the shots produce a more diverse array of antibodies than infection does. That’s not what the Israelis found. Not only is natural immunity superior, it’s no contest. Especially in the age of Delta:

In model 1, we matched 16,215 persons in each group. Overall, demographic characteristics were similar between the groups, with some differences in their comorbidity profile (Table 1a).

During the follow-up period, 257 cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection were recorded, of which 238 occurred in the vaccinated group (breakthrough infections) and 19 in the previously infected group (reinfections). After adjusting for comorbidities, we found a statistically significant 13.06-fold (95% CI, 8.08 to 21.11) increased risk for breakthrough infection as opposed to reinfection (P<0.001). Apart from age ≥60 years, there was no statistical evidence that any of the assessed comorbidities significantly affected the risk of an infection during the follow-up period (Table 2a).

As for symptomatic SARS-COV-2 infections during the follow-up period, 199 cases were recorded, 191 of which were in the vaccinated group and 8 in the previously infected group. Symptoms for all analyses were recorded in the central database within 5 days of the positive RT-PCR test for 90% of the patients, and included chiefly fever, cough, breathing difficulties, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, myalgia, weakness, headache and sore throat. After adjusting for comorbidities, we found a 27.02-fold risk (95% CI, 12.7 to 57.5) for symptomatic breakthrough infection as opposed to symptomatic reinfection (P<0.001) (Table 2b). None of the covariates were significant, except for age ≥60 years.

No contest. It’s above my pay grade to try to explain why the advantage is so stark but I assume it has to do with one’s immune system getting a better “look” at SARS-CoV-2 from infection than from vaccination. The vaccine instructs your body to produce the virus’s spike protein; that single component is what your immune system learns to recognize and attack. Someone who’s infected by the virus itself learns to recognize the whole organism, by contrast. If the spike protein on Delta looks sufficiently different from the spike protein on earlier variants, it stands to reason that a vaccinated person’s antibodies may have more difficulty responding to it. Whereas the antibodies in a person with natural immunity may recognize the virus itself and move rapidly to clear it even if the spike seems unfamiliar.

There’s a wrinkle to the Israeli findings. People who were infected with the virus and recovered more recently had a bigger advantage over the vaccinated than people who were infected last year did. The numbers above describe the comparative immunity of those who were either vaccinated or infected in January and February of this year. If you expand the group to include people who were infected between March and December 2020 as well, the relative advantage of natural immunity dipped to being six-fold better against infection and seven-fold better against symptomatic illness than the vaccines were. That’s still far superior, but it’s evidence that natural immunity wanes just like vaccine immunity does. Except more slowly, and from a way higher baseline.

Which means there’s good news and bad news. The good news is that if you insist on not getting vaccinated and end up being infected by Delta, you’ll have extremely strong immunity if you recover.

The bad news lies in the phrase “if you recover.” And even if you do, it may be a hard road. Another study from Israel found that, while it’s true that in rare cases vaccination can cause heart inflammation, COVID itself causes the same condition at a higher rate. In Israel, getting the jab led to an extra 2.7 cases of inflammation per 100,000 people versus 11 extra cases per 100,000 among COVID patients. There are also studies abroad floating around indicating that adults infected by Delta are more likely to have a severe illness than they were with previous variants, which may leave patients more susceptible to “long COVID.” In fact, despite more than half the population being vaccinated, the United States has more people in the hospital for COVID right now than it did a year ago at this time. And the great, great majority of them are unvaccinated.

Taking your chances with the virus is a high-stakes bet.

Anyway, Ross Clark writes today at the Spectator that these new findings may call for a rethink of national COVID strategies. Do they?

It suggests that the efficacy of the Pfizer vaccine — so impressive in trials — is not strong enough to bring about the kind of herd immunity we might have gained by letting the virus pass through the population. The same is probably true of other vaccines — as Kate wrote on Coffee House yesterday, recent studies have suggested that the efficacy of AstraZeneca declines over time, too, although not at quite the rate of the Pfizer one.

It also suggests that we might be wasting our time trying to foist jabs on the young when they may have gained better, stronger immunity to Covid through natural infection. But one of the most interesting issues is the new light it sheds on the debate over vaccinating children; perhaps it is better to simply allow them to be infected on the grounds they’re highly unlikely to come to serious harm but are more likely to gain lasting immunity from the disease that way.

“Letting the virus pass through the population” would come with a much higher body count than mass vaccination would. How many casualties does he have in mind?

The point about children is interesting but I don’t see why he’s treating vaccine immunity and natural immunity as an either/or. After all, there’s a missing fourth group from the Israeli study that scientists didn’t examine, people who got both shots and then got infected. What sort of immunity do they have relative to everyone else? The same as those with natural immunity or the same as the infection + one dose group? Or better than that? There are plenty of young-ish unvaccinated Americans landing in ERs due to Delta; vaccination would have almost certainly averted that outcome for them. If Delta is so hyper-contagious that we’re all destined to get it eventually, it seems to me the strategy should be to build a baseline of immunity via vaccination to prevent the infection from becoming severe and then count on natural immunity post-infection to create durable protection against getting the virus again. It’s not either/or.

I’ll leave you with this clip of nurses in Mississippi quitting because they can’t cope with the patient load from unvaccinated patients. Something else to consider before we switch to the ol’ herd immunity herp derp strategy.

 

===

1.6m Moderna doses withdrawn in Japan over contamination

Company confirms reports of particulate matter in vials, but finds 'no safety issues'

By YUMIKO URASAKI and YUKO NOMURA - 26. Augist 2021

The Moderna vaccine against COVID-19 was cleared in May for emergency use in Japan.   © Reuters

TOKYO/ NEW YORK -- About 1.6 million doses of Moderna's coronavirus vaccine have been taken out of use in Japan because of contamination reported in some vials, the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare said early Thursday.

Several vaccination centers have reported that vaccine vials contained foreign matter, according to an announcement from the ministry, which added it will seek to minimize the impact of the withdrawal on the country's inoculation program.

The ministry said later in the day that the substance that had been mixed in may have been metal. "It's a substance that reacts to magnets," a ministry official said. "It could be metal."

Takeda Pharmaceutical handles distribution of the U.S.-developed Moderna vaccine in Japan.

Nasdaq-listed Moderna confirmed receiving "several complaints of particulate matter" in vaccine vials distributed in Japan but said it had found "no safety or efficacy issues" related to these reports.

"The company is investigating the reports and remains committed to working transparently and expeditiously with its partner, Takeda, and regulators to address any potential concerns," a Moderna spokesperson told Nikkei, saying the drugmaker believed a "manufacturing issue" at a plant in Spain was the cause.

The vaccine lot in question and two adjacent lots have been put on hold "out of an abundance of caution," the spokesperson said.

The Japanese ministry has not halted the use of Moderna vaccines in other batches, deeming them safe.

Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga told reporters on Thursday afternoon that he had instructed the ministry to look into the case with safety as the top priority, adding he had received reports that the withdrawal "won't have a significant impact on the country's vaccination campaign."

The Moderna vaccine was granted emergency-use authorization in Japan in May.

READ NEXT

===

BEWARE

All four COVID-19 inoculations are currently approved under "ëmergency" in Europe only conditionally - i.e. subject to approval - and are (according to the EMA assessment report on conditional approval, - see screenshots) in a phase of development until 

- December 2022 (Spikevax from Moderna), 
- December 2023 (Janssen from Johnson & Johnson and Comirnaty from Biontech/Pfizer) 
- March 2024 (AstraZeneca's Vaxzevira) 

awaiting still the final a s s e s s m e n t  o f  t h e  STUDY PHASE.

===

 

FDA ‘playing bait and switch’ with Americans, tricking them into believing shots currently being offered have been granted full approval when they have not

25. August 2021

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s announcement Monday that it had granted “full approval” to the Covid shots being offered by Pfizer is riddled with deceptions meant to trick the American public into thinking they have no choice but to take the jab while at the same time protecting a major pharmaceutical company from legal liability.

What was actually given full approval was a separate Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine product which goes by the name Comirnaty.

But Comirnaty is not even currently available in the U.S.

This is part of a cynical plot to protect Pfizer from broad legal liability and also to snooker U.S. employers into mandating the vaccine for their employees.

Watch Dr. Robert Malone, inventer of the mRNA technology on which the Covid vaccines are based, explain the chicanery the FDA is using to fool the American people.

The FDA on Monday approved a biologics license application for the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine. The Biden White House, with cover from its corporate media shills, immediately reported that vaccine mandates are now legal for military, healthcare workers, college students and employees of just about any business.

But as Children’s Health Defense reports, “there are several bizarre aspects to the FDA approval that will prove confusing to those not familiar with the pervasiveness of the FDA’s regulatory capture, or the depths of the agency’s cynicism.”

The FDA acknowledges that while Pfizer has insufficient supplies of the newly licensed Comirnaty vaccine actually available, there is “a significant amount” of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine — which has been produced under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and will continue to be offered under the same EUA status, CHD reports.

The FDA in its convoluted letter of approval for the Pfizer vaccine under the EUA should remain unlicensed but can be used “interchangeably” (page 2, footnote 8) with the newly licensed Comirnaty product [which is currently unavailable].

According to the FDA, the newly licensed Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine and the existing vaccine, while “legally distinct,” are not any different in terms of their “safety or effectiveness.”

Here is the pertinent quote from footnote 8 that proves we are talking about two separate shots and not just a “rebranding” of the same shot as the mainstream media is reporting:

“The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness.”

The “certain differences” are not specified, but it is perfectly clear that the two jabs are legally distinct.

The below analysis by Children’s Health Defense explains the trickery in which the FDA has engaged — all for the legal benefit of the Big Pharma giant Pfizer and the detriment of American citizens.

There is a huge real-world difference between products under an EUA compared with those that FDA has fully licensed. EUA products are experimental under U.S law.

Both the Nuremberg Code and Federal Regulations provide that no one can force a human being to participate in this experiment. Under 21 U.S. Code Sec.360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), “authorization for medical products for use in emergencies,” it is unlawful to deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental subject. Instead, potential recipients have an absolute right to refuse EUA vaccines.

U.S. laws, however, permit employers and schools to require students and workers to take licensed vaccines.

EUA-licensed vaccines have an extraordinary liability shield under the 2005 Public Readiness and Preparedness Act. Vaccine manufacturers, distributors, providers and government planners are immune from liability. The only way an injured party can sue is if he or she can prove willful misconduct, and if the U.S. government has also brought an enforcement action against the party for willful misconduct. No such lawsuit has ever succeeded.

The government has created an extremely stingy compensation program, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, to redress injuries from all EUA products.

The program’s parsimonious administrators have compensated under 4% of petitioners to date — and not a single COVID vaccine injury — despite the fact that physicians, families and injured vaccine recipients have reported more than 600,000 COVID vaccine injuries.

At least for the moment, the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine has no liability shield. Vials of the branded product, which say “Comirnaty” on the label, are subject to the same product liability laws as other U.S. products.

When the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices places a vaccine on the mandatory schedule, a childhood vaccine benefits from an generous retinue of liability protections.

But licensed adult vaccines, including the new Comirnaty, do not enjoy any liability shield. Just as with Ford’s exploding Pinto, or Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup, people injured by the Comirnaty vaccine could potentially sue for damages.

And because adults injured by the vaccine will be able to show that the manufacturer knew of the problems with the product, jury awards could be astronomical.

Pfizer is therefore unlikely to allow any American to take a Comirnaty vaccine until it can somehow arrange immunity for this product.

Given this background, the FDA’s acknowledgement in its approval letter that there are insufficient stocks of the licensed Comirnaty, but an abundant supply of the EUA Pfizer BioNTech jab, exposes the “approval” as a cynical scheme to encourage businesses and schools to impose illegal jab mandates.

The FDA’s clear motivation is to enable Pfizer to quickly unload inventories of a vaccine that science and the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System have exposed as unreasonably dangerous, and that the Delta variant has rendered obsolete.

Americans, told that the Pfizer COVID vaccine is now licensed, will understandably assume that COVID vaccine mandates are lawful. But only EUA-authorized vaccines, for which no one has any real liability, will be available during the next few weeks when many school mandate deadlines occur.

The FDA appears to be purposefully tricking American citizens into giving up their right to refuse an experimental product.

While thmedia has trumpeted that the FDA has approved COVID vaccines, the FDA has not approved the Pfizer BioNTech vaccines, nor any COVID vaccines for the 12- to 15-year age group, nor any booster doses for anyone.

And FDA has not licensed any Moderna vaccine, nor any vaccine from Johnson & Johnson — so the vast majority of vaccines available in the U.S., if not all, remain unlicensed EUA products.

Here’s what you need to know when somebody orders you to get the vaccine:; Ask to see the vial. If it says “Comirnaty,” it’s a licensed product. If it says “Pfizer-BioNTech,” it’s an experimental product, and under 21 U.S. Code 360bbb, you have the right to refuse.

If it comes from Moderna or Johnson & Johnson (marketed as Janssen), you have the right to refuse.

The FDA is playing bait and switch with the American public — but we don’t have to play along. If it doesn’t say Comirnaty, you have not been offered an approved vaccine.

SourceChildren’s Health Defense

Author:

 

leo hohmann

Independent author, researcher, writer Leo Hohmann, PO Box 291, Newnan, GA 30264, or via credit card below.

===

Pentagon orders all active-duty troops to submit to COVID-19 shot immediately

By Doug Mainwaring - 25. August 2021

WASHINGTON, D.C.  — The Pentagon ordered all U.S. service members to submit to the COVID-19 vaccination as quickly as possible. 

Marines who decline the vaccine risk losing their pensions and other benefits, as well as forced separation or court martial, although court proceedings for thousands or tens of thousands of individual service members would likely overload the military’s disciplinary system.

Featured Image

 Shutterstock

In a memorandum released today, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin directed the secretaries of all military departments to “immediately begin full vaccination of all members of the Armed Forces,” and “impose ambitious timelines for implementation.” 

“With the support of the President, I have determined that mandatory vaccination against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is necessary to protect the Force and defend the American people,” he asserted. 

Notice of the order came just two days after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) fully approved the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. The mandate failed to mention the unknown effects of the shots on recipients and thousands of adverse reactions to a vaccine that continues to be experimental until clinical trials end in 2023.    

The Pentagon had previously said that it expected to mandate the vaccine no later than September 15. An official deadline for full vaccination has not been announced.  

Vaccine resistance in the military remains strong 

Austin averred in his memorandum that “Our vaccination of the Force will save lives,” yet many troops remain uncertain about the safety of a vaccine that has been approved for just a little over 48 hours.   

With more than 800,000 troops who have yet to take the COVID-19 jab, “Vaccine resistance in the military remains strong,” blared a recent Washington Post headline. 

Pentagon spokesperson John Kirby noted in a press conference today that there is a wide discrepancy among the branches of the military concerning their members’ vaccination status: 

  • Navy: 73% fully vaccinated; 
  • Air Force (including Space Force): 57% fully vaccinated;  
  • Marine Corps: 53% fully vaccinated; 
  • Army: 40% fully vaccinated.  

The Pentagon’s mandate is “a lawful order and we fully anticipate that our troops are going to follow lawful orders,” insisted Kirby.  

“It might be [a] lawful order, but when so many refuse to take a questionable treatment, how do you punish them effectively?” asked Aspals Legal, a web resource for military lawyers.   

A law that violates rights is unworkable,” noted Aspals Legal.  

Vaccine resistance in the US military remains strong, a dilemma for Pentagon as mandate looms – it might be lawful order, but when so many refuse to take a questionable treatment, how do you punish them effectively? A law that violates rights is unworkable https://t.co/K41go5yf3h

— aspals legal (@aspals) August 21, 2021

Draconian measures: Marines risk losing pensions and benefits 

Marines who decline the vaccine risk losing their pensions and other benefits, as well as forced separation or court martial, although court proceedings for thousands or tens of thousands of individual service members would likely overload the military’s disciplinary system.  

“What I would expect is [that commanders turn to] nonjudicial punishments, duty restrictions, measures that make life inconvenient until someone relents,” Kristofer Goldsmith —an Army veteran and CEO of Sparverius, an organization that deals with what it views as disinformation campaigns and domestic extremism— told The Washington Post

“Marines will lose their pensions, tuition assistance, and access to the G.I. bill, along with other military benefits, if they refuse the COVID-19 vaccination,” reported the Washington Free Beacon on Monday.  

The Beacon described the threats to Marines as “draconian measures” that aim to “make life as an unvaccinated troop as difficult as possible.” 

Why would a service member decline the COVID-19 vaccine?  

LifeSiteNews’ Celeste McGovern has offered 10 reasons why anyone, including service members, might resist the COVID-19 vaccine, despite now being approved by the FDA: 

  1. It’s still experimental – Pfizer’s clinical trials don’t end until May 2023
  2.  The COVID jab mandates violate fundamental human rights 
  3. There’s a history of medical disasters to consider 
  4. There has been no external review of the Pfizer jab 
  5. All we have is six months of incomplete data 
  6. There are no control groups in this global experiment 
  7. The immunity the jabs may have provided appears to be waning 
  8. Pfizer never publicized troubling results from animal trials 
  9. Wave of vaccine mandates issued in response to FDA announcement 
  10. Pfizer is a career criminal with a rising tide of victims 

“The whole FDA stamp of approval is merely a facilitator for forcing shots on unwilling Americans,” wrote McGovern. “The fallout was seen immediately with a wave of vaccine mandates from companies, universities and organizations who were waiting for the final FDA authorization that would assuage any nigglings of conscience or fears of legal reprisal.  

“This FDA stamp gives them the full green light to impose their will on others and to abuse medical freedom of conscience and the universal principle of informed consent,” she added. 

===

Two Things Mainstream Media Didn’t Tell You About FDA’s Approval of Pfizer Vaccine

By CHD - 24. August 2021

Buried in the fine print of Monday’s approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of the Pfizer Comirnaty COVID vaccine are two critical facts that affect whether the vaccine can be mandated, and whether Pfizer can be held liable for injuries.

Monday, the FDA approved a biologics license application for the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine.

Monday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a biologics license application for the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine.

The press reported that vaccine mandates are now legal for military, healthcare workers, college students and employees in many industries. New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio has now required the vaccine for all teachers and school staff. The Pentagon is proceeding with its mandate for all military service members.

But there are several bizarre aspects to the FDA approval that will prove confusing to those not familiar with the pervasiveness of the FDA’s regulatory capture, or the depths of the agency’s cynicism.

First, the FDA acknowledges that while Pfizer has “insufficient stocks” of the newly licensed Comirnaty vaccine available, there is “a significant amount” of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine — produced under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) — still available for use.

The FDA decrees that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine under the EUA should remain unlicensed but can be used “interchangeably” (page 2, footnote 8) with the newly licensed Comirnaty product.

Second, the FDA pointed out that the licensed Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine and the existing, EUA Pfizer vaccine are “legally distinct,” but proclaims that their differences do not “impact safety or effectiveness.”

There is a huge real-world difference between products approved under EUA compared with those the FDA has fully licensed.

EUA products are experimental under U.S. law. Both the Nuremberg Code and federal regulations provide that no one can force a human being to participate in this experiment. Under 21 U.S. Code Sec.360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), “authorization for medical products for use in emergencies,” it is unlawful to deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental subject. Instead, potential recipients have an absolute right to refuse EUA vaccines.

U.S. laws, however, permit employers and schools to require students and workers to take licensed vaccines.

EUA-approved COVID vaccines have an extraordinary liability shield under the 2005 Public Readiness and Preparedness Act. Vaccine manufacturers, distributors, providers and government planners are immune from liability. The only way an injured party can sue is if he or she can prove willful misconduct, and if the U.S. government has also brought an enforcement action against the party for willful misconduct. No such lawsuit has ever succeeded.

The government has created an extremely stingy compensation program, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, to redress injuries from all EUA products. The program’s parsimonious administrators have compensated under 4% of petitioners to date — and not a single COVID vaccine injury — despite the fact that physicians, families and injured vaccine recipients have reported more than 600,000 COVID vaccine injuries.

At least for the moment, the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine has no liability shield. Vials of the branded product, which say “Comirnaty” on the label, are subject to the same product liability laws as other U.S. products.

When the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices places a vaccine on the mandatory schedule, a childhood vaccine benefits from a generous retinue of liability protections.

But licensed adult vaccines, including the new Comirnaty, do not enjoy any liability shield. Just as with Ford’s exploding Pinto, or Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup, people injured by the Comirnaty vaccine could potentially sue for damages.

And because adults injured by the vaccine will be able to show that the manufacturer knew of the problems with the product, jury awards could be astronomical.

Pfizer is therefore unlikely to allow any American to take a Comirnaty vaccine until it can somehow arrange immunity for this product.

Given this background, the FDA’s acknowledgement in its approval letter that there are insufficient stocks of the licensed Comirnaty, but an abundant supply of the EUA Pfizer BioNTech jab, exposes the “approval” as a cynical scheme to encourage businesses and schools to impose illegal jab mandates.

The FDA’s clear motivation is to enable Pfizer to quickly unload inventories of a vaccine that science and the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System have exposed as unreasonably dangerous, and that the Delta variant has rendered obsolete.

Americans, told that the Pfizer COVID vaccine is now licensed, will understandably assume COVID vaccine mandates are lawful. But only EUA-authorized vaccines, for which no one has any real liability, will be available during the next few weeks when many school mandate deadlines occur.

The FDA appears to be purposefully tricking American citizens into giving up their right to refuse an experimental product.

While the media has trumpeted that the FDA has approved COVID vaccines, the FDA has not approved the Pfizer BioNTech vaccines, nor any COVID vaccines for the 12- to 15-year age group, nor any booster doses for anyone.

And the FDA has not licensed any Moderna vaccine, nor any vaccine from Johnson & Johnson — so the vast majority, if not all, of vaccines available in the U.S. remain unlicensed EUA products.

Here’s what you need to know when somebody orders you to get the vaccine: Ask to see the vial. If it says “Comirnaty,” it’s a licensed product.

If it says “Pfizer-BioNTech,” it’s an experimental product, and under 21 U.S. Code 360bbb, you have the right to refuse.

If it comes from Moderna or Johnson & Johnson (marketed as Janssen), you have the right to refuse.

The FDA is playing bait and switch with the American public — but we don’t have to play along. If it doesn’t say Comirnaty, you have not been offered an approved vaccine.

Authors:

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s avatar

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s reputation as a resolute defender of the environment stems from a litany of successful legal actions.

Meryl Nass, M.D.'s avatar

Meryl Nass, M.D.

Meryl Nass, MD, ABIM, is an internist with special interests in vaccine-induced illnesses, chronic fatigue syndrome, Gulf War illness, fibromyalgia and toxicology.

===

FDA approval means nothing to me. 

The FDA approved Quaaludes, which are now considered a Schedule 1 drug like heroin.

The FDA approved DES, a "synthetic form of estrogen, was marketed to the expecting mother who preferred to have a healthy baby. It claimed to prevent spontaneous abortion, miscarriage, and premature labor. Studies soon showed that mothers who took DES during the first five months of pregnancy were more likely to suffer from complications with their reproductive systems. The FDA finally banned it in 1971."

The FDA approved Vioxx, "an anti-inflammatory medication intended to treat arthritis, was the subject of one of the largest recalls in history. After it was approved in 1999, it was prescribed to over 20 million people and was one of the most widely prescribed drugs of 2003. The following year, it was recalled. One of the FDA’s own scientists, Dr. David Graham, estimated that Vioxx had been associated with more than 27,000 heart attacks or deaths linked to cardiac problems."

===

MUST READ: 

===

===

 

A few pointers on the clotshot that just got "approved"

The actual shot people know of as the "pfizer shot" never got approved. It stayed as "experimental". However, a second jab under a different name "Comirnaty" DID get "approved". Here's the kicker: Under emergency authorization the same old clotshot can be administered without approval until enough "Comirnaty" gets produced, apparently they have practically none, and they have millions of vials of the shot we all know and have come to love ready to go that can be completely used up before the "approved" version, (which is probably an identical weapon) HAS TO be used, with the previous one "discontinued".

And as everyone knows, they threw procedure out the window and even Comirnaty has until Halloween 2025 to complete it's safety studies, all the while it will be administered without them.

When I originally went over the approval document, it was a lengthy convoluted confusing snake speak script ALL THE WAY THROUGH. With an extended decipher done later, the above is precisely what it really says, in reality the "Pfizer shot" did NOT get approved but re-authorized for use until the tens of millions of shots already made are used, and then they'll switch to the "approved" Comirnaty version which has basically no clinical trials done on it, and are instead PENDING 2025.

THERE IS ONLY ONE WAY TO CURE SUCH  GOVERNMENTAL DECEPTION AND LIES:

JANET WOODCOCK WILL BE HELD RESONSIBLE

FDA Approves First COVID-19 Vaccine

Approval Signifies Key Achievement for Public Healt

Español

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty (koe-mir’-na-tee), for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older. The vaccine also continues to be available under emergency use authorization (EUA), including for individuals 12 through 15 years of age and for the administration of a third dose in certain immunocompromised individuals.

“The FDA’s approval of this vaccine is a milestone as we continue to battle the COVID-19 pandemic. While this and other vaccines have met the FDA’s rigorous, scientific standards for emergency use authorization, as the first FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccine, the public can be very confident that this vaccine meets the high standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality the FDA requires of an approved product,” said Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock, M.D. “While millions of people have already safely received COVID-19 vaccines, we recognize that for some, the FDA approval of a vaccine may now instill additional confidence to get vaccinated. Today’s milestone puts us one step closer to altering the course of this pandemic in the U.S.” 

Since Dec. 11, 2020, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine has been available under EUA in individuals 16 years of age and older, and the authorization was expanded to include those 12 through 15 years of age on May 10, 2021. EUAs can be used by the FDA during public health emergencies to provide access to medical products that may be effective in preventing, diagnosing, or treating a disease, provided that the FDA determines that the known and potential benefits of a product, when used to prevent, diagnose, or treat the disease, outweigh the known and potential risks of the product.

FDA-approved vaccines undergo the agency’s standard process for reviewing the quality, safety and effectiveness of medical products. For all vaccines, the FDA evaluates data and information included in the manufacturer’s submission of a biologics license application (BLA). A BLA is a comprehensive document that is submitted to the agency providing very specific requirements. For Comirnaty, the BLA builds on the extensive data and information previously submitted that supported the EUA, such as preclinical and clinical data and information, as well as details of the manufacturing process, vaccine testing results to ensure vaccine quality, and inspections of the sites where the vaccine is made. The agency conducts its own analyses of the information in the BLA to make sure the vaccine is safe and effective and meets the FDA’s standards for approval. 

Comirnaty contains messenger RNA (mRNA), a kind of genetic material. The mRNA is used by the body to make a mimic of one of the proteins in the virus that causes COVID-19. The result of a person receiving this vaccine is that their immune system will ultimately react defensively to the virus that causes COVID-19. The mRNA in Comirnaty is only present in the body for a short time and is not incorporated into - nor does it alter - an individual’s genetic material. Comirnaty has the same formulation as the EUA vaccine and is administered as a series of two doses, three weeks apart. 

“Our scientific and medical experts conducted an incredibly thorough and thoughtful evaluation of this vaccine. We evaluated scientific data and information included in hundreds of thousands of pages, conducted our own analyses of Comirnaty’s safety and effectiveness, and performed a detailed assessment of the manufacturing processes, including inspections of the manufacturing facilities,” said Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. “We have not lost sight that the COVID-19 public health crisis continues in the U.S. and that the public is counting on safe and effective vaccines. The public and medical community can be confident that although we approved this vaccine expeditiously, it was fully in keeping with our existing high standards for vaccines in the U.S."

FDA Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness Data for Approval for 16 Years of Age and Older

The first EUA, issued Dec. 11, for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for individuals 16 years of age and older was based on safety and effectiveness datafrom a randomized, controlled, blinded ongoing clinical trial of thousands of individuals. 

To support the FDA’s approval decision today, the FDA reviewed updated data from the clinical trial which supported the EUA and included a longer duration of follow-up in a larger clinical trial population. 

Specifically, in the FDA’s review for approval, the agency analyzed effectiveness data from approximately 20,000 vaccine and 20,000 placebo recipients ages 16 and older who did not have evidence of the COVID-19 virus infection within a week of receiving the second dose. The safety of Comirnaty was evaluated in approximately 22,000 people who received the vaccine and 22,000 people who received a placebo 16 years of age and older.

Based on results from the clinical trial, the vaccine was 91% effective in preventing COVID-19 disease. 

More than half of the clinical trial participants were followed for safety outcomes for at least four months after the second dose. Overall, approximately 12,000 recipients have been followed for at least 6 months.

The most commonly reported side effects by those clinical trial participants who received Comirnaty were pain, redness and swelling at the injection site, fatigue, headache, muscle or joint pain, chills, and fever. The vaccine is effective in preventing COVID-19 and potentially serious outcomes including hospitalization and death.

Additionally, the FDA conducted a rigorous evaluation of the post-authorization safety surveillance data pertaining to myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and has determined that the data demonstrate increased risks, particularly within the seven days following the second dose. The observed risk is higher among males under 40 years of age compared to females and older males. The observed risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age. Available data from short-term follow-up suggest that most individuals have had resolution of symptoms. However, some individuals required intensive care support. Information is not yet available about potential long-term health outcomes. The Comirnaty Prescribing Information includes a warning about these risks.

Ongoing Safety Monitoring

The FDA and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have monitoring systems in place to ensure that any safety concerns continue to be identified and evaluated in a timely manner. In addition, the FDA is requiring the company to conduct postmarketing studies to further assess the risks of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination with Comirnaty. These studies will include an evaluation of long-term outcomes among individuals who develop myocarditis following vaccination with Comirnaty. In addition, although not FDA requirements, the company has committed to additional post-marketing safety studies, including conducting a pregnancy registry study to evaluate pregnancy and infant outcomes after receipt of Comirnaty during pregnancy.

The FDA granted this application Priority Review. The approval was granted to BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH.

Related Information

###

The FDA, an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, protects the public health by assuring the safety, effectiveness, and security of human and veterinary drugs, vaccines and other biological products for human use, and medical devices. The agency also is responsible for the safety and security of our nation’s food supply, cosmetics, dietary supplements, products that give off electronic radiation, and for regulating tobacco products.

===

75% of the FDA’s funding comes from Big Pharma. How utterly insane.

Follow the Commissioners...

Scott Gottlieb - Former Commissioner of the FDA resigns and then goes to Pfizer to be on the board of directors. 

Stephen Hahn - Replaces Gottlieb as FDA Commissioner and eventually resigns. He is now the Chief Medical Officer for Moderna.

Janet Woodcock - Wrongly advises Rick Bright (a fully-controlled individual) that HCQ is a dangerous drug requiring EUA that should be ONLY limited to hospitalized patients. Remember, all of the relevant clinical data at the time showed HCQ to be extremely effective in early treatment and NOT in hospitalized patients. Several months later Janet Woodcock replaces Stephen Hahn as the Commissioner of the FDA. 

Is this all making sense yet?

===

===

DR. SHAWN BROOKS, PHD, OXFORD “NOTHING CAN STOP WHAT IS COMING”

First published on BITCHUTE August 21st, 2021. SW OHIO SCHOOL BOARD MEETING - AUG 18 2021 BACKUP

"The people who have taken it are going to die in the next 6 months to 3 to 5 years."

"Your school is going to close, because they (staff) will fall ill and they will die."

Dr. Sean Brooks: “Dr. Robert Malone, who created the messenger RNA [mRNA] vaxxx has said no one should ever take these jabs ever, under any circumstance whatsoever -- he created it! And he says, ‘Don't ever do it!’ "doctor’s chilling testimony of what happens when one takes the cvd vaxxx — "The people who have taken it are going to die in the next 6 months to 3 to 5 years."
“Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming”

Dr. Shawn Brooks, PhD, Oxford. Have 48 publications, including 23 books. Studied health medicine, anatomy, and physiology for approximately 21 years.

===

===

Report: ‘The vaccines are neither safe nor effective’

By Mordechai Sones - 19. August 2021

In a report on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness released yesterday, Dr. Geoff Mitchell MD, JD determined the shots “neither safe nor effective,” and concluded “the best data tells us that the COVID-19 vaccines are failing.”

According to that data, says Dr. Mitchell, “Countries with active vaccination programs have more COVID deaths than those who do not.” Moreover, “Countries with a higher percentage of their population vaccinated have more COVID deaths,” and “COVID deaths have increased with vaccination after vaccination programs were implemented.”

“The culmination of sixteen months of Africa study is that HCQ and IVM are both about 70% effective in reducing death,” he noted, “but Artemisinin and atovaquone-proguanil are (inadvertently) 95% effective in reducing COVID death.  Artemisinin is reportedly intentionally used in four countries to treat COVID.  The most well-known of artemisinin-treating country is Madagascar which has a 954 COVID deaths, a rate of 35 dpm.  This is 2% of the U.S. rate.”

Dr. Mitchell wrote: “Among the 104 countries which offer no demonstrable COVID vaccination programs, on 08/16/21, their COVID fatality rates averaged an unexpectedly lower 690 deaths per million.”

However, “Among the 82 countries which offer vaccination programs, on 08/16/21, their COVID fatality rates averaged 828 deaths per  million which is counterintuitively higher than the COVID fatality rate for unvaccinated countries.

“In the 82 countries which offer vaccination programs, not only was the average COVID fatality rate greater than in unvaccinated countries, but the number of deaths increased as the number or percentage of residents vaccinated increased.”

DOWNLOAD THE REPORT AS PDF

Author:

Mordechai Sones

Mordechai Sones 

STOP VACCINE
PASSPORTS

===

===

Vaccine passports aren’t our ‘route to freedom’, they are our ’PASSPORT TO SLAVERY!

===