UPDATE 20. September 2021: Richard Ebright and 15 Top Scientists Eviscerate Fauci and Daszak in Lancet Medical Journal
UPDATE 19. September 2021: BREAKING: Fauci was ‘up to his neck’ funding coronavirus research in Wuhan - Investigative journalist confirms EcoNews research, compilations and publications.
UPDATE 10. September 2021: NIH DOCUMENTS PROVIDE NEW EVIDENCE U.S. FUNDED GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH IN WUHAN
VERY IMPORTANT: The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier
DOWNLOAD And SPREAD It Far And Wide - before it is deleted
UPDATE 09. September 2021: It's Not Hard to Figure Out Why You Didn't Hear About Fauci Being Exposed As a Liar Yet
UPDATE 08. September 2021: "SMOKING GUN: FAUCI ADMITTED TO CREATING 'DOOMSDAY VIRUS," GAIN-OF-FUNCTION IN 2012 + "Public Health" Propaganda - Dr. Fauci enters witness protection
UPDATE 07. September 2021: Fauci: “One of the Enemies of Public Health is Disinformation” (VIDEO)
UPDATE 25. August 2021: Judicial Watch: New Fauci Agency COVID Emails Detail Discussions about Wuhan Institute; Describe Gates Foundation Placement of Chinese Representatives on ‘Important International Counsels’
UPDATES 24. August 2021: Medical Monsters On The Loose
UPDATE 07. August 2021: FAUCI FUNDED TORTUROUS FLESH EATING PARASITE EXPERIMENTS ON BEAGLE PUPPIES
UPDATE: 23. July 2021: Senator Rand Paul Roasts Tony Fauci - on NIH funded gain-of-function R&D in Wuhan
UPDATE 15. July 2021: DR. JUDY MIKOVITS EXCLUSIVE! FAUCI, COVID, ‘VACCINE’ INJECTIONS, 5G AND DEFEATING TO BEAT THE GLOBALISTS!
UPDATE 12. July 2021: Nuremberg Code Exposes The Crimes Of Gates And Fauci
UPDATE 07. July 2021: More Fauci Lies: The Dirty Truth About the Only FDA Approved COVID Prescription
|Fauxi and CDC: OUT OF AFRIKA!|
UPDATE 06. July 2021: Fauci-Funded EcoHealth Refuses To Give Wuhan Documents To Congress + ANTHONY FAUCI WAS INSTALLED BY GERMAN BIG PHARMA AS USA's JOSEF MENGELE OVERSEEING USA GENOCIDE P1
UPDATE 01. July 2021: IT'S OFFICIAL! FAUCI THE FRAUD NAMED IN MASSIVE VAX SCAM LAWSUIT FILED BY AMERICAN FRONTLINE DOCTORS
UPDATE 29. June 2021: 'Suddenly You Can't Find Him': Jim Jordan Criticizes Fauci For Skipping GOP COVID-19 Origin Hearing
UPDATE 24. June 2021: Fauci is a Jesuit - How his Jesuit education helped prepare him for the pandemic (Video)
UPDATE 19. June 2021: Report: Dr. Fauci participated in 'secret meeting' with scientists about COVID-19 origins in Feb. 2020 - HOLD THEM RESPONSIBLE!
UPDATE 16. June 2021: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. warns that Fauci, Gates are committing mass genocide against humanity
UPDATE 12. June 2021: ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR. SOUNDS THE ALARM OVER GENOCIDAL CRIMES OF ANTHONY FAUCI AND BILL GATES
UPDATE 09. June 2021: Dr Anthony Fauci has been ‘found out on a million fronts’ + Is this not PROOF enough that COVID was studied in China & Fauci LIED under oath? + Rand Paul: "More Children Have Died From Suicide Than From COVID"
UPDARE 06. June 2021: LOCK'em UP NOW! Dr Anthony Fauci Threatened Indian Scientists To Withdraw Study Linking COVID-19 To AIDS Virus (Does Faux Chi hold more compromising evidence against top officials in his dossiers than Eppstein? Or why is Dr. DeathnDoom not yet locked up???)
UPDATE 05. June 2021: ‘Scientists were threatened: Anthony Fauci and his gang will destroy careers and reputation’: Indian experts make explosive claims after emails become public + Trump wanted to publicly grill Fauci on Wuhan lab funding — and bill China for pandemic
UPDATE 03. June 2021: Dr. Fauci and the strange odyssey of America’s Doctor Death + THE FRAUD CHI EMAILS OF DR FAUXI dump location
UPDATE 02. June 2020: HUGE! NEW EMAIL Shows Dr. Fauci Was Told in Jan. 2020 the Coronavirus “Looked Engineered” #FauciEmails + The Dokkktor Fraud Chi scandal is a decoy, a distraction ... much worse to come! + Email Shows Dr. Fauci KNEW in March 2020 that 99% of Italian Covid Fatalities Had Other Illnesses — Ignored This During His Hundreds of Interviews #FauciEmails + In February 2020 Email, Fauci Wrote Face Masks “Not Effective in Keeping Out Virus”
UPDATE 31. May 2021: Sen. Tom Cotton slams Fauci for covering his track on his links to Chinese virology laboratory + FAUCI-GATE: EMAIL DUMP EXPOSES FAUCI AS A MASS MURDERER
UPDATE 28. May 2021: Revealed: Dr. Fauci Previously Argued For Risky Viral Experiments – Even if The Work Could Lead to a Deadly Pandemic + Stop Trusting The Experts!
UPDATE 19. May 2021: House Intel Republicans: “Under the Leadership of Dr. Anthony Fauci” US Likely Engaged in Dangerous Research in China, Covid-19 Escaped Wuhan Lab
PROLOGUE: There is a story making the rounds now, saying that Doccctor Faux Chi would retire within the coming three months. We say NO WAY! He must be indicted, removed from office and put on trial for crimes against humanity and actually for war crimes, not just for lying to the U.S. congress. The evidence that he is the king-pin in the illegal, outlawed and unlawful U.S. R&D of gain-of-function in very dangerous pathogenic gene-sequences is there.
ICYMI: ANTHONY FAUCI DELIBERATELY RELEASED COVID-19 FROM WUHAN LAB + Leaked Mail, Plotkin and Fauci Perjury, Evidence Vaccine Racket Unwinding + Tucker Carlson: Anthony Fauci let the coronavirus pandemic happen, why isn't there a criminal investigation?
Dr. Fauci is Finally Unmasked
By Peter Barry Chowka - 17. May 2021
Dr. Anthony Fauci has been the leader of the federal government’s politically based responses to Covid-19 since day one of the pandemic. The director since 1984 of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, he now serves as President Biden’s leading advisor on the issue. Last year, Fauci repeatedly undercut President Trump when he was working for the 45th president. And now he’s all in for Joe Biden.
In recent years, people on the left who lie and break the law – from the streets to the suites – have rarely been held accountable. One of them, in the opinion of many, is Dr. Anthony Fauci. Fauci is more responsible than anyone else for promoting lockdowns, mask mandates, and experimental vaccines rather than inexpensive, effective treatments for Covid-19.
While most conservatives have lost faith in “Dr. Doom,” it has seemed like he would never be held to account for what he has done or that he would ever be compelled to relinquish his lifelong, incredibly influential, and highly remunerative bureaucratic perch.
But – keep your fingers crossed – that may be about to change. The serious unraveling of Fauci’s undeserved reputation as “an American hero” and “the most trusted voice on Covid-19” has finally begun.
In the past several weeks, a number of things happened to alter the status quo Fauci-is-god spin. For months now, outlying reporting, from reputable sources – including whistleblowers like virologist Dr. Li-Meng Yan who escaped from Red China – has maintained that the origin of Covid-19 was the Wuhan Institute of Virology. According to these sources, the virus was either a bioweapon or a horrific experiment that got loose by accident from the Wuhan lab. After being dismissed as a conspiracy theory, these possibilities to explain the coronavirus have now gained significant ground and gone mainstream.
On May 2, Nicholas Wade, a 30 year veteran of the New York Times as a science writer and editor, published a lengthy article, “Origin of Covid – Following the clues,” that examined and pretty much confirmed the hypothesis of the virus’s creation in the Wuhan lab. Tucker Carlson at Fox News, who has the number one show on all of cable news, building on the work of his colleague Steve Hilton who first reported on this subject last January, highlighted Wade’s article on the origins of Covid-19 on Monday, May 10. Carlson added an emphasis on Fauci’s role, noting Fauci’s pushing masks and lockdowns. He wondered if this behavior was “a cover for something else. Could it be that Tony Fauci is trying to divert attention from himself and his own role in the COVID-19 pandemic?”
Screenshot Tucker Carlson Tonight, Fox News Channel May 10, 2021
That high profile line of inquiry let the cat out of the bag.
The following day, Fauci was grilled by Republican Senators when he appeared at a U.S. Senate hearing.
Gain of function research in China and a possible U.S. role
Even before Fox News’s reporting one week ago, momentum for taking a serious look into Covid-19’s origins was starting to build. In an opinion piece in the Washington Post on May 6, “Congress is finally investigating the lab accident covid-19 origin theory,” for example, Josh Rogin took note of the developments and confirmed that “It is clear that the NIH and other U.S. agencies don’t want to have their activities investigated” – most likely because of what might be revealed.
|Anthony Fauci - Smart implementer of the eugenicist agenda of mass murder|
The Wuhan lab conducted experiments involving “gain of function” research on viruses like the coronavirus basically to enhance them so they would be more deadly to humans. Gain of function is a controversial form of study that involves boosting the infectivity and lethality of a pathogen. It is the weaponization of the coronavirus. This is the kind of research that you would expect would come out of a place like Germany during World War Two.
And Fauci, it appears, was allegedly a major supporter of this line of “research.” Documents, including published scientific studies, and the accounts of those involved attest to the fact that – in Carlson’s words – “those experiments [in China] were funded by American tax dollars. . . approved and directed by Tony Fauci in Washington.”
Previously, these reports were to be found in the alternative media or on less prominent programs like Steve Hilton’s The Next Revolution (Sunday nights on Fox News) or Stephen K. Bannon’s War Room: Pandemic. Now, on May 10, they were trumpeted on the number one program on all of American cable news. And not only on Carlson’s conservative opinion program: later that week, Fox News’s daily signature news department program Special Report began airing a series of probing segments (including here and here) on the origins of Covid-19.
The allegations aimed at Fauci, based on a variety of records, are that his NIH Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases provided millions of dollars of U.S. government funding to a third party that used the money to help fund the deadly research at the Wuhan China lab. This action allegedly circumvented a prohibition of funding further gain of function research that was ordered by the Obama administration in 2014. Ultimately, it was this research – engineered as a bioweapon or resulting in an accidental release of the enhanced virus – that likely led to the worldwide Covid-19 pandemic.
Carlson said on May 10, “More than any other single American, Tony Fauci is responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic.”
When an article about his Monday broadcast was published at Fox News dot com, it was titled “Anthony Fauci let the coronavirus pandemic happen. Why isn't there a criminal investigation?”
Carlson further asserted – in a summary of his program’s reporting:
For five years – from 2014 to 2019 – the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which Fauci runs, and has for decades, pumped money to a group called the EcoHealth Alliance. The gain of function research had been banned by the U.S. during that period, at the behest of the Obama Administration! The allegation now is that Tony Fauci. . .invoked that special exception in order to keep funding the Wuhan lab, and the deadly experiments that were going on there. The experiments that clearly went so wrong.
Fauci grilled on Capitol Hill
On Tuesday, May 11, Fauci was one of the witnesses at a hearing of the SenateHealth, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee on the government’s Covid-19 response. Several of the committee’s Republican members, notably Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), grilled Fauci on the subject of gain of function research and the NIH’s possible role in funding it in China. It was video clips of Paul’s challenges to Fauci, and Fauci’s replies, that went viral and further established the subject as an important one.
Fox News’s reporting and the questioning of Fauci at the May 11 hearing could not be ignored by the MSM. As the Washington Post reported (and tried to spin) the story on May 12 in an article titled “Rand Paul and the GOP effort to blame Fauci for the coronavirus”:
For much of the past year, Republicans have decried lead government coronavirus expert Anthony S. Fauci’s prescriptions for mitigating the pandemic — including masks, social distancing and keeping society shut down.
But increasingly in the past week, the effort has taken on a new flavor — with suggestions that Fauci might be personally to blame for the advent of the virus itself.
There remain major questions about just how the virus emerged, including the idea that it somehow escaped a lab in the city of Wuhan, China, where the virus originated. The theory, which was once highly speculative and which was downplayed by top medical experts such as Fauci, is suddenly being treated more seriously, though there is no conclusive evidence either way.
But while some Republicans have criticized the initial dismissal of that theory as evidence of a lack of curiosity from the media and health officials about the origins of the virus — or even some kind of pro-China or anti-Trump bias — the theories about Fauci’s complicity take things to another level. [emphasis added.]
Dr. Anthony Fauci takes questions from Sen. Paul during Senate committee hearing May 11, 2021
Source: Video at Senate Committee Website
At the May 11 hearing, Sen. Paul questioned Dr. Fauci during his allotted seven minutes:
Senator Rand Paul grilled Antony Fauci and established that Fauchi lied to congress
Sen. Rand Paul: Dr. Fauci, do you still support funding of the NIH funding of the lab in Wuhan?
Dr. Anthony Fauci: Senator Paul, with all due respect, you are entirely and completely incorrect that the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. . . [note: it is likely that Fauci misspoke in this reply.]
Paul: Do you support sending money to the Wuhan Virology Institute?
Fauci: We do not send money now to the Wuhan Virology Institute.
Paul: Do you support sending money? We did under your tutelage. We were sending it through EcoHealth. It was a sub-agency and a sub-grant. Do you support that the money from NIH that was going to the Wuhan Institute?
Fauci: Let me explain to you why that was done. The SARS-CoV-1 originated in bats in China. It would have been irresponsible of us if we did not investigate the bat viruses and the serology to see who might have been infected in China.
Paul: Or perhaps it would be irresponsible to send it to the Chinese government that we may not be able to trust with this knowledge and with this incredibly dangerous viruses….
Fauci: I do not have any accounting of what the Chinese may have done, and I’m fully in favor of any further investigation of what went on in China. However, I will repeat again, the NIH and NIAID categorically has not funded gain-of-function research to be conducted in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. [emphasis added.]
The full hearing transcript can be read here. Sen. Paul’s questioning of Fauci on gain of function begins 59 minutes and 43 seconds into the transcript.
On May 12, Sen. Paul called Fauci a liar for his testimony the day before.
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., claimed on Wednesday that Dr. Anthony Fauci lied to Congress when he denied that the National Institute of Health was funding research at the controversial Wuhan lab.
“I would say what Dr. Fauci said yesterday was verifiably false,” alleged Paul during an appearance on America’s Newsroom.
The plot thickens: China’s plan to employ the coronavirus as a weapon was revealed in a 2015 publication
A little over a week ago, the largest mainstream newspaper in Australia and the country’s only national paper, The Australian, published an eye-opening article that has gained virtually no notice here. The paper’s investigative reporter Sharri Markson reported that according to documents that she had obtained, leading Chinese Communist Party scientists floated the idea of a virus-based bio-weapon to take down the West – in 2015!
The Australian article, published on May 7, was headlined “‘Virus warfare’ in China military documents.”
Chinese military scientists discussed the weaponisation of SARS coronaviruses five years before the COVID-19 pandemic, outlining their ideas in a document that predicted a third world war would be fought with biological weapons.
The Australian article is behind a paywall but an editorial about it, “Covid as biological war? China paper needs answers,” can be read here. In its article about the story, “‘New Era’ May Be Upon Us,” the Daily Telegraph, another leading Australian newspaper, reported:
Forget the prospect of war with China. We may already be at war – but simply failed to recognise the weaponry.
Sharri Markson on SkyNews May 9, 2021
Australian television picked up the story. On May 9, SkyNews Australia reported“Chinese document discussing weaponising coronaviruses provides ‘chilling’ information.” In the article about the television report:
Sky News host Sharri Markson has assessed “chilling” details from a document produced by Chinese military scientists, in which they discussed weaponising SARS coronaviruses five years before the COVID-19 pandemic hit.
Ms Markson said the book was written by People’s Liberation Army scientists and senior Chinese public health officials in 2015.
The documents describe SARS coronaviruses as heralding a “new era of genetic weapons” and said they can be “artificially manipulated into an emerging human – disease virus, then weaponised and unleashed in a way never seen before.”
The Chinese-language paper is called “The Unnatural Origin of SARS and New Species of Man-Made Viruses as Genetic Bioweapons.”
“The document also talks about the psychological terror that bioweapons can cause. It’s chilling,” Ms Markson said. . .
“The significance of this paper is that it offers a rare insight into how senior scientists at one of the PLA’s [People’s Liberation Army] most prominent military universities, where high levels of defence research were conducted, were thinking about biological research.”
This development was reported in India, at dnaindia dot com.
The executive director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), Peter Jennings, said the document is as close to a “smoking gun as we’ve got. I think this is significant because it clearly shows that Chinese scientists were thinking about military application for different strains of the coronavirus and thinking about how it could be deployed.”
The Epoch Times, which excels in covering otherwise underreported news from Asia, reported the story on May 9.
The newly discovered Chinese military paper is titled “The Unnatural Origin of SARS and New Species of Man-Made Viruses as Genetic Bioweapons.” Eighteen authors at the highest levels of China’s military and academic hierarchy wrote the 263-page paper. It was obtained by DoS in May 2020 and independently authenticated by digital forensics specialist Robert Potter. Additional details of the paper will be published in Sharri Markson’s September book on the origins of COVID-19, “What Really Happened in Wuhan” (HarperCollins).
As time goes on, inevitably the truth will out – in this case, thanks to Fox News, Nicholas Wade, Stephen K. Bannon, Sharri Markson, the Australian media, and many other uncorrupted truth-seeking sources. As Brian Kilmeade noted on Fox News Primetime on May 13, Covid-19 is “The biggest liability case in the history of man.”
The battle for the real truth about Covid-19 has just begun – but fourteen months into the pandemic, there are finally some encouraging signs.
Addenda: In response to the recent reporting from Australia, the usual left wing and mainstream media outlets, including The Guardian, dissed the story. Predictably, as well, official sources in China responded. As The Australian noted, “Beijing denies producing bio-weapons after The Australian’s revelation over weaponising SARS coronavirus.”
Peter Barry Chowka is a veteran journalist who writes about politics, media, popular culture, and health care for American Thinker and other publications. He also appears in the media, including recently as a contributor to OANN, BBC World News, The Glazov Gang, and Fox News. Peter's website is https://peter.media His YouTube channel is here. For updates on his work, follow Peter on Twitter at @pchowka.
Anthony Fauchi, Ralph Baric and Peter Daszak must get indicted NOW!
Gain of Function
First published 16. May 2021
Some background on Gain Of Function research as it relates to the timeline of pandemic response simulations from 2010 to present. All footage courtesy of the MSM, except for the editing of popcorn man.
Study; "A SARS-like Cluster of Circulating Bat Coronaviruses Shows Potential for Human Emergence": https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985
Study; "The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade": https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/2...
PANDEMIC SIMULATIONS and RESPONSE SCENARIOS: Crimson Contagion 2020: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimson...
Event 201 2019: https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.o...
Disease X 2018: https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/201...
Spars 2017: https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.o...
LockStep 2010: https://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf...
Conspiracy Theory With Jesse Ventura, Season1, Episode 5,"Secret Societies", 2009: https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x71...
EcoHealth Funding: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/...
Fauci 2017, "surpirise outbreak" statement, full presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNXGA...
FAUXI AND GATES MUST BE INDICTED AND BROUGHT TO TRIAL
Like all old foxes or farts for that matter in governmental administration, also Anthony Fauxi has a huge cabinet with dossiers about the powerful and mighty holding information that those concerned don't want to come into the open. Is that the reason why neither Trump nor Biden could remove him so far? A new steel-broom is needed!
The world‘s leading medical journal The Lancet has now published an article explicitly condemning the letter organized by Dr. Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak of the EcoHealth Alliance, Jeremy Farrar of the Wellcome Trust, and others.
On February 1, 2020, when confronted with first evidence the Covid pandemic may have originated in the Wuhan Lab he funded via Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance, Fauci organized a conference call, apparently to discuss how to suppress this dangerous information, since the trail led straight to them.
On Feb. 19, 2020, Daszak, Farrar and others published a letter in The Lancet, saying that “We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.”
This letter was then used to suppress and censor the Chinese lab leak theory in Mainstream Media and on social media for over a year. There was, and remains, no evidence for the “scientists’” claims.
Now, a new article in The Lancet by Jacques van Helden of Aix-Marseille University in France, Richard Ebright of Rutgers U. and 14 other authors has skewered the Fauci apologists’ unscientific Fake News “which claimed overwhelming support for the hypothesis that the novel coronavirus causing the COVID-19 pandemic originated in wildlife.”
“The authors associated any alternative view with conspiracy theories by stating: “We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin”. The statement has imparted a silencing effect on the wider scientific debate, including among science journalists,” Ebright and colleagues charge.
Contrary to the Fake Scientists’ claim, “there is no direct support for the natural origin of SARS-CoV-2, and a laboratory-related accident is plausible. There is so far no scientifically validated evidence that directly supports a natural origin.”
“Neither the host pathway from bats to humans, nor the geographical route from Yunnan (where the viruses most closely related to SARS-CoV-2 have been sampled) to Wuhan (where the pandemic emerged) have been identified. More than 80 000 samples collected from Chinese wildlife sites and animal farms all proved negative”, the researchers write.
In addition, the international research community “has no access to the sites, samples, or raw data” related to the Wuhan Lab and the Covid outbreak, the article attests. Even WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has now declared “that all hypotheses remained on the table, including that of a laboratory leak.”
A lab leak origin of the pandemic is “plausible”, the authors find: “Some unusual features of the SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence suggest that they may have resulted from genetic engineering.”
Ebright and collegaues also skewered Fauci’s stooges for placing “unity” and their political agenda over critical evaluation and science:
“As scientists, we need to evaluate all hypotheses on a rational basis, and to weigh their likelihood based on facts and evidence, devoid of speculation concerning possible political impacts. Contrary to the first letter published in The Lancet … we do not think that scientists should promote “unity” (“We support the call from the Director-General of WHO to promote scientific evidence and unity over misinformation and conjecture”).
As shown above, research-related hypotheses are not misinformation and conjecture. More importantly, science embraces alternative hypotheses, contradictory arguments, verification, refutability, and controversy. Departing from this principle risks establishing dogmas, abandoning the essence of science, and, even worse, paving the way for conspiracy theories. Instead, the scientific community should bring this debate to a place where it belongs: the columns of scientific journals.”
It is hard to imagine how Fauci, Daszak, Farrar and their co-conspirators can remain in their positions after this brutal scientific takedown.
Fauci was ‘up to his neck’ funding coronavirus research in Wuhan
Investigative journalist Sharri Markson confirms what ECOTERRA Intl. researched, compiled and had published since February 2020 - often exclusively - on EcoNews (just do a search here on the site). Every official and more specifically every prosecutor or judge in any country, who still shields the culprits, must be charged from now on as co-conspirator. The truth had been brought to light but justice was persistently delayed and therby denied. Hundredthousands of people lost their lives, the health of millions has been affected and billions were deprieved of their right to life, health and happiness. Now the time to stop and prosecute the criminals responsible has come.
Sep 19, 2021
Dr Anthony Fauci was “up to his neck” funding coronavirus research in Wuhan, which “just shows how incredibly stupid” he is, says Sky News host Sharri Markson.
Ms Markson has been investigating Anthony Fauci’s involvement in funding the Wuhan Institute of Virology and discovered his agency “had funded 60 projects at the Wuhan laboratory”.
“Then he wrote a paper where he said gain of function research was worth the risk of a pandemic, and that he had even funded coronavirus research in conjunction with the Chinese military,” Ms Markson said.
Mr Fauci, who has been the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases since 1984, apparently stayed silent during Oval Office meetings at the start of the pandemic about the “risky research that was underway at the Wuhan Institute of Virology”.
“He never mentioned that his agency was funding this, and he actually knew a whole lot about it.” Sharri Markson explores this in a documentary premiering on Monday night, ‘What Really Happened in Wuhan’, including exclusive interviews with former US President Donald Trump and Mike Pompeo.
Dr. Fauci never shared any of his intimate knowledge concerning the Corona Crimes with President Trump in the early months of the pandemic.
Watch at 8pm Monday 20. September 2021 on Sky News Australia.
NIH DOCUMENTS PROVIDE NEW EVIDENCE U.S. FUNDED GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH IN WUHAN
U.S.-funded experiment in China posed biosafety risks but did not cause Covid-19 pandemic, scientists say.
A researcher works in a lab of Wuhan Institute of Virology in central China’s Hubei province on Feb. 23, 2017. Photo: FeatureChina via AP
DOCUMENTS OBTAINED BY The Intercept contain new evidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the nearby Wuhan University Center for Animal Experiment, along with their collaborator, the U.S.-based nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance, have engaged in what the U.S. government defines as “gain-of-function research of concern,” intentionally making viruses more pathogenic or transmissible in order to study them, despite stipulations from a U.S. funding agency that the money not be used for that purpose.
Grant money for the controversial experiment came from the National Institutes of Health’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which is headed by Anthony Fauci. The award to EcoHealth Alliance, a research organization which studies the spread of viruses from animals to humans, included subawards to Wuhan Institute of Virology and East China Normal University. The principal investigator on the grant is EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak, who has been a key voice in the search for Covid-19’s origins.
Scientists unanimously told The Intercept that the experiment, which involved infecting genetically engineered mice with “chimeric” hybrid viruses, could not have directly sparked the pandemic. None of the viruses listed in the write-ups of the experiment are related to the virus that causes Covid-19, SARS-CoV-2, closely enough to have evolved into it. Still, several scientists said the new information, which the NIH released after it was sued by The Intercept, points to biosafety concerns, highlighting a general lack of oversight for research on pathogens and raising questions about what other information has not been publicly disclosed.
“As a virologist, I personally think creating chimeras of SARS-related bat coronaviruses that are thought to pose high risk to humans entails unacceptable risks,” said Jesse Bloom, who studies the evolution of viruses at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. Severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, is a disease caused, like Covid-19, by an airborne coronavirus.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci listens during a briefing on the coronavirus pandemic at the White House on March 26, 2020, in Washington, D.C. Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images
The experiment also raises questions about assertions from Fauci and NIH Director Francis Collins that NIH-funded projects at the Wuhan Institute of Virology did not involve gain-of-function research. In May, Fauci testified before Congress: “The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” The documents do not establish whether Fauci was directly aware of the work.
Scientists working under a 2014 NIH grant to the EcoHealth Alliance to study bat coronaviruses combined the genetic material from a “parent” coronavirus known as WIV1 with other viruses. They twice submitted summaries of their work that showed that, when in the lungs of genetically engineered mice, three altered bat coronaviruses at times reproduced far more quickly than the original virus on which they were based. The altered viruses were also somewhat more pathogenic, with one causing the mice to lose significant weight. The researchers reported, “These results demonstrate varying pathogenicity of SARSr-CoVs with different spike proteins in humanized mice.”
But the terms of the grant clearly stipulated that the funding could not be used for gain-of-function experiments. The grant conditions also required the researchers to immediately report potentially dangerous results and stop their experiments pending further NIH review. According to both the EcoHealth Alliance and NIH, the results were reported to the agency, but NIH determined that rules designed to restrict gain-of-function research did not apply.
The Intercept consulted 11 scientists who are virologists or work in adjacent fields and hold a range of views on both the ethics of gain-of-function research and the Covid-19 origins search. Seven said that the work appears to meet NIH’s criteria for gain-of-function research.
One said that the experiment “absolutely does not meet the bar” for gain-of-function research. “You can’t predict that these viruses would be more pathogenic, or even pathogenic at all in people,” said Angela Rasmussen, a virologist with the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization at the University of Saskatchewan. “They also did not study transmissibility at all in these experiments,” meaning that the scientists did not look at whether the viruses could spread across a population.
Three experts said that, while they did not have enough knowledge of U.S. policies to comment on whether the research met NIH criteria, the experiment involving humanized mice was unnecessarily risky.
One virologist, Vincent Racaniello, a professor of microbiology and immunology at Columbia University, said while he considered the mouse experiment described in the document to clearly fall into the gain-of-function category, he didn’t see it as problematic. “You can do some kinds of gain-of-function research that then has unforeseen consequences and may be a problem, but that’s not the case here,” said Racaniello.
Robert Kessler, communications manager for EcoHealth Alliance, denied that the work on the humanized mice met the definition of gain-of-function research. Kessler insisted that bat viruses are not potential pandemic pathogens because, he said, “a bat virus is not known to be able to infect humans.” The proposal justified the work on WIV1 by explaining that it is “not a select agent” — referring to a list of closely monitored toxins and biological agents that have the potential to pose a severe threat to public health — and “has not been shown to cause human infections, and has not been shown to be transmissible between humans.”
But the group’s bat coronavirus research was focused on the very threat that bat viruses pose to people. Kessler did acknowledge that, while the original bat coronavirus in the experiment did not spread among humans, the research was designed to gauge how bat coronaviruses could evolve to infect humans.
All but two of the scientists consulted agreed that, whatever title it is given, the newly public experiment raised serious concerns about the safety and oversight of federally funded research. “In my point of view, the debate about the definition of ‘gain-of-function’ has been too much focused on technical aspects,” said Jacques van Helden, a professor of bioinformatics at Aix-Marseille Université. “The real question is whether or not research has the potential to create or facilitate the selection of viruses that might infect humans.” The experiments described in the proposal clearly do have that potential, he said.
NIH spokesperson Elizabeth Deatrick said that the agency had considered the research — and decided not to restrict it under its own rules. “In 2016, NIAID determined that the work was not subject to the Gain-of-Function (GoF) research funding pause and the subsequent HHS P3CO Framework,” Deatrick wrote, referring to criteria put in place in 2017 to guide the agency’s funding decisions about research that involves, or is reasonably anticipated to involve, potential pandemic pathogens.
Republican members of Congress have alleged, without sufficient evidence, that gain-of-function research in Wuhan sparked the coronavirus pandemic. As part of an inquiry into the origins of the pandemic, they have twice grilled Fauci in Congress on his role as NIAID director.
In a heated exchange in July, Republican Sen. Rand Paul accused Fauci of lying when he claimed that NIH did not fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Experts now say that the documents support the contention that NIH funded gain-of-function work, though not in the specific instance where Paul alleged it. “There’s no question,” said Racaniello, of Columbia University, who pointed to the decreased weight of the mice infected with the chimeric viruses that was described in the research summaries sent to NIH. “From the weight loss, it’s gain of function. Tony Fauci is wrong saying it’s not.”
But the documents do not prove Paul’s claim that Fauci was lying, as they do not make clear whether Fauci read them. Nor do they in any way support Paul’s allegation that Fauci was “responsible for 4 million people around the world dying of a pandemic” — or that anyone intentionally caused Covid-19. What is clear is that program officers at NIAID, the agency that Fauci oversees, did know about the research.
A paragraph describing the research, as well as two figures illustrating its results, were included in both a 2018 progress report on the bat coronavirus grant and an application for its 2019 renewal. And NIH confirmed that it reviewed them.
“NIH has never approved any research that would make a coronavirus more dangerous to humans,” the agency said in a statement, echoing remarks by Collins, the NIH director, posted to its website in May. “The research we supported in China, where coronaviruses are prevalent, sought to understand the behavior of coronaviruses circulating in bats that have the potential to cause widespread disease.” Similar research funded by NIH had aided in the development of vaccines against the coronavirus, the statement continued.
The White House did not respond to questions about the research.
The main building of the National Institutes of Health located in Bethesda, Md., seen on Aug. 17, 2009. Photo: J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Shifting Definitions, Growing Viral Load
The humanized mouse experiment fits with the overall goal of the $3.1 million grant, which was titled “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence” and aimed at preventing a pandemic by predicting the circumstances under which a bat coronavirus could evolve to infect humans. The researchers took an ambitious three-pronged approach: screening people with high exposure to wildlife, mathematical modeling, and lab experiments on viruses. Peter Daszak, the EcoHealth Alliance president, has worked closely with scientists in China for years, and roughly $750,000 of the grant was allocated for the Wuhan Institute of Virology. An additional nearly $300,000 went to East China Normal University, where researchers did field sampling.
In a 2005 paper, Daszak’s team showed that the first SARS virus originated in bats. Middle East respiratory syndrome, or MERS, is caused by a coronavirus that emerged in 2012 and also believed to come from bats, which are now a prime target for virologists trying to understand and combat emerging diseases. Daszak has long maintained that his research is critical to preventing outbreaks.
But the research on the bat viruses in Wuhan showed that infecting live animals with altered viruses can have unpredictable consequences. A report to NIH on the project’s progress in the year ending in May 2018 described scientists creating new coronaviruses by changing parts of WIV1 and exposing genetically engineered mice to the new chimeric viruses. Research published in 2017 in the journal PLOS Pathogen showed that, in cells in a laboratory, similar chimeric viruses reproduced less effectively than the original. NIH cited that research as one of the reasons the moratorium on gain-of-function research of concern didn’t apply to this experiment. “It was a loss of function, not a gain of function,” the email from NIH explained. (NIH also pointed out that the changes to the chimeric viruses “would not be anticipated to increase virulence or transmissibility in humans.”)
Inside the lungs of the humanized mice, however, the novel viruses appear to have reproduced far more quickly than the original virus that was used to create them, according to a bar graph shown in the documents. The viral load in the lung tissue of the mice was, at certain points, up to 10,000 times higher in the mice infected with the altered viruses than in those infected with WIV1. According to Deatrick, the NIH spokesperson, the difference in the rates of viral reproduction — which were particularly pronounced two and four days after the mice were infected with the virus — didn’t amount to gain of function because, by the end of the experiment, the amount of virus produced by the parent and chimeric strains evened out. “Viral titers were equivalent by the end of the experimental time-course,” Deatrick wrote. The email also said, “NIH supports this type of research to better understand the characteristics of animal viruses that have the potential to spill over to humans and cause widespread disease.”
Scientists The Intercept consulted expressed differing views on whether the increase in viral load could be translated to an increase in transmissibility, which relies on the virus’s ability to replicate. To some, the jump in viral load indicated that the modified RNA virus could replicate far more rapidly than the original in the lungs of the mice, likely leading to increased pathogenicity and spread. Rasmussen, of the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization, pointed out that viral load is not identical to reproduction rate, noting: “This shows the chimeric viruses replicated a little faster, but that tells us exactly nothing about transmissibility. Furthermore, WIV1 caught up by the end of the experiment. We see differences in the rate of viral replication all the time, but it is often not directly correlated with pathogenicity.”
Another figure in the documents suggests that at least one of the altered viruses not only enhanced viral reproduction, but also caused the humanized mice to lose more weight than those exposed to the original virus — a measure of the severity of illness.
A graph from a report on NIH-funded research in Wuhan shows viral load in lung tissues of humanized mice. Screenshot: FOIA Document
NIH requires the increase in viral reproduction to be immediately reported, according to a note in the Notice of Award the agency issued in July 2016. “No funds are provided and no funds can be used to support gain-of-function research covered under the October 17, 2014 White House Announcement,” the note said. If any new MERS-like or SARS-like chimeras show “enhanced virus growth greater than 1 log over the parental backbone strain,” the note continued, the researchers were instructed to stop all experiments with the viruses and send the data to NIAID grant specialists, as well as to the Wuhan Institute of Virology biosafety committee. The enhanced growth of the chimeric coronaviruses in the humanized mice was, at one point, up to 4 log greater — or 10,000 times — the rate of the original virus. But there are no indications the research was stopped.
In fact, the bat coronavirus grant was renewed for a five-year period in 2019, although the Trump administration suspended funding in April 2020 amid the Covid-19 pandemic and spiraling concerns about its origins. (Funding was later reinstated but under strict conditions that Daszak said were impossible for his group to meet.)
Kessler, EcoHealth Alliance’s communications manager, also pointed to the fact that the grant was renewed in 2019 — after EcoHealth Alliance had twice submitted documents detailing the experiment — as evidence that the organization did nothing wrong. “If there had been any violations, they would not have done so,” he said.
Long History of Controversy
The practice of making chimeric viruses in order to study how they might become more contagious was under scrutiny long before the pandemic. Proponents of such gain-of-function research argued that it can help virologists better understand and defend against natural outbreaks. But critics said that they were unreasonably dangerous.
In October 2014, the federal government put a moratorium on funding gain-of-function research on potential pandemic pathogens that could be “reasonably anticipated” to lead to spread in humans, as outlined in a 2017 guidance from the Department of Health and Human Services. In December 2017, the moratorium was lifted and replaced with new guidelines for oversight of research using potential pandemic pathogens. The grantees reported that the humanized mouse experiment was done between June 2017 and May 2018. Gain-of-function research was thrust into the spotlight again in 2020, amid speculation that the Wuhan Institute of Virology had conducted such research and that it was somehow linked to the pandemic.
While the new information about the research on humanized mice does not provide the “smoking gun” for proponents of what has become known as the “lab leak theory,” it lends the hypothesis credence, according to Stuart Newman, a professor of cell biology who directs the developmental biology laboratory at New York Medical College. “Making chimeric coronaviruses, mixing and matching RBDs [a part of the virus that allows it to attach to receptors] and spike proteins is exactly the scenario imagined by many lab-leak scenario proponents,” said Newman. “The fact that this was an established research paradigm in the Wuhan lab … definitely makes the laboratory origin more plausible.”
The documents about the research were released by NIH after The Intercept submitted a Freedom of Information Act request in September 2020, later suing to have it fulfilled. The request sought copies of these and other grant proposals that Daszak submitted to the agency, as well as the agency’s communications about the proposals. NIH originally denied The Intercept’s request on the grounds that releasing Daszak’s proposals would undermine an ongoing investigation. Counsel for the agency later admitted that NIH had not reviewed many of the records before making that assertion.
“The contents of the grants raise serious questions about the review processes and oversight relating to risky pathogen research,” said Alina Chan, a Boston-based scientist and co-author of the upcoming book “Viral: The Search for the Origin of Covid-19.” The new information in the documents warrants further inquiry into whether researchers may have omitted information about other concerning experiments, she said. “The question is: What else did they do in more recent years that we’re not aware of?”
Documents referenced in this article:
CONTACT THE AUTHOR:
Kilmeade: It appears Anthony Fauci lied under oath
8 Sept 2021
This pdf document is prepared for humanity by Dr. David E. Martin.
DOWNLOAD And SPREAD It Far And Wide - before it is deleted
It's Not Hard to Figure Out Why You Didn't Hear About Fauci Being Exposed As a Liar Yet
By Matt Vespa - 09. September 2021
Source: AP Photo/Alex Brandon
Instead of reporting on Fauci lies about funding research that ultimately unleashed a pandemic on the world and killed hundreds of thousands of Americans, ABC’s World News Tonight, the CBS Evening News, and NBC Nightly News were peddling lies and stoking hatred of Texas’s new election integrity law.
And while CBS and NBC were aware enough to exclude any mention of Fauci from their reports, ABC chose to hoist Fauci up as he bashed college students for going to football games and enjoying their lives over the Labor Day weekend.
“Dr. Anthony Fauci tonight on the crowds this Labor Day weekend, saying, ‘I don't think it's smart.’ And what he's now saying about booster shots, that third shot,” touted anchor David Muir during his opening tease.
And this isn’t the only time this has happened obviously. Fauci’s emails revealed many things, including how store-bought masks don’t do much if anything concerning curbing the spread of the virus. Fauci is adrift like Joe Biden, albeit he can string sentences together. Yet, this man’s credibility died eons ago and if the media did their jobs—he wouldn’t be on television spewing science fiction. Alas, the media protect their own—always.
"SMOKING GUN: FAUCI ADMITTED TO CREATING 'DOOMSDAY VIRUS," GAIN-OF-FUNCTION IN 2012
GAB TV 08. September 2021
"Public Health" Propaganda
- Dr. Fauci enters witness protection
By Techno Fog - 08. September 2021
Let me tell you about an under-the-table immunity deal:
Dr. Fauci lied to Congress about US funding of gain of function research at Wuhan to protect US institutions. And to show their appreciation, the institutions will protect Dr. Fauci by declining to prosecute his lies.
The Intercept Reporting.
Revelations from The Intercept’s FOIA requests, which the US government took a year to release to the public (and only after litigation was pursued), show federal funds were used “to fund bat coronavirus research at the Chinese laboratory.” The Intercept continues:
According to Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, the documents contain critical information about the research done in Wuhan, including about the creation of novel viruses. “The viruses they constructed were tested for their ability to infect mice that were engineered to display human type receptors on their cell,” Ebright wrote to The Intercept after reviewing the documents.
The documents show the goal of the project, led by EcoHealth Alliance, was to “understand what factors increase the risk of the next CoV [coronavirus] emerging in people.” This included modifications to the coronaviruses collected by EcoHealth Alliance. As stated in the project summary:
Enter Dr. Fauci
If EcoHealth Alliance sounds familiar, it is because its president, Peter Daszak, led the effort to mislead the public about the origins of COVID-19 and the likelihood it leaked from the lab. It was Daszak who organized and signed an influential “scientific” statement in The Lancet disregarding the lab leak theory – while concealing his role in the research “and creating the impression of scientific unanimity.”
It was also Daszak who worked in conjunction with the US Government – in particular, Dr. Fauci – to push the false narrative that COVID couldn’t have been leaked from a lab. In April 2020, Dr. Fauci was congratulated by Daszak for helping “dispel the myths being spun around the virus’ origins.”
Remarkably, this came after Dr. Fauci was warned that COVID-19 had “unusual features” that “look engineered.” It also came after Dr. Fauci had been informed gain of function research had been approved by NIH.
After the article from The Intercept published, Dr. Fauci has been (again) under fire for lying to Senator Rand Paul about the US government’s funding of gain of function research at Wuhan.
Of course, Dr. Fauci wasn’t the only public official lying to the public. Dr. Francis Collins, the director of the NIH, was asked point-blank by radio host Hugh Hewitt about this funding. Here is what Dr. Collins said:
Hugh Hewitt: But can you rule out, Dr. Collins, the United States having funded any sort of gain of function research in Wuhan?
Dr. Francis Collins: We absolutely did not fund gain of function research in Wuhan.
Understanding what this is.
Properly understood, the two most powerful public health officials in the United States – Dr. Collins and Dr. Fauci – are running an intelligence operation against the American people. Assisting in the operation is the Biden Department of Justice, who apparently refuses to prosecute Dr. Fauci for his false statements to Senator Paul. Also providing help are those within the government who have been obstructing public and media FOIA requests into the funding of gain of function research.
We observe, however, that their deceit, while effective, are also self-defeating, undermining their position that COVID-19 was of natural origins. You see, to an astute observer, the lies by Dr. Collins and Dr. Fauci are circumstantial evidence of guilt.
The depth of that guilt is yet to be fully understood.
After lying to the public for more than a year about masks, therapeutics and vaccines, Dr. Fauci on Tuesday said “One of the enemies of public health is disinformation.”
Fauci flip-flopped and lied for over a year to the American public about the seriousness of the China Virus and his background funding the Chinese virology lab and the origins of the virus.
Dr. Fauci also lied to the American public about the success of the safe drug hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in treating the virus.
Hundreds of thousands of Americans died when HCQ was available but banned by Fauci and the CDC from COVID patients.
Now there is an all out war on Ivermectin.
Ivermectin has been used for decades to treat infections in humans, but the liars in the media have now labeled the drug a “horse dewormer.”
Cristina Laila began writing for The Gateway Pundit in 2016 and she is currently the Associate Editor.
Judicial Watch: New Fauci Agency COVID Emails Detail Discussions about Wuhan Institute; Describe Gates Foundation Placement of Chinese Representatives on ‘Important International Counsels’
By JUDICIAL WATCH - 25. August 2021
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it received 129 pages of records from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) which include “urgent for Dr. Fauci ” email chain which cites ties between the Wuhan lab and the taxpayer-funded EcoHealth Alliance. The government emails also report that the foundation of U.S. billionaire Bill Gates worked closely with the Chinese government to pave the way for Chinese-produced medications to be sold outside China and help “raise China’s voice of governance by placing representatives from China on important international counsels as high level commitment from China.”
The new production of records also includes a January 6, 2020, “Wuhan Pneumonia Update” report which details how Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, was tied to the Wuhan lab and was “funded for work to understand how coronaviruses evolve and jump to human populations.”
The documents were obtained by Judicial Watch through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit for records of communications, contracts and agreements with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (No. 1:21-cv-00696)). The lawsuit specifically seeks records about NIH grants that benefitted the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The agency is only processing 300 pages of records per month, which means it will take until the end of November for the records to be fully reviewed and released under FOIA.
You can ask [NIAID Human Coronavirus, Rhinovirus Research Program Officer] Erik Stemmy for the grant awarded to the Ecohealth in NYC who collaborates with Dr. Shi, Zhengli in Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), who has been doing coronavirus research in cave bats in China. Erik would know what exactly NIH funding supports.
I visited her and others at the Wuhan Ins Viro in 2018 and visited its BSL4 1ab. [Redacted]
Also in 1983 NIH and CAS [Chinese Academy of Sciences] (WIV is one of the research institutes under CAS) signed a MOU and it included sharing research materials. I know [sic] this a long time ago.
This email chain is part of a previously released January 23, 2020, exchange with the subject line “Urgent for Dr. Fauci: China’s lab for studying SARS and Ebola is in Wuhan.” It begins with Melinda Haskins, chief of legislative affairs for NIAID, writing to senior NIAID officials, and includes a link to a Daily Mail article, titled “China built a lab to study SARS and Ebola in Wuhan – and US biosafety experts warned in 2017 that a virus could ‘escape’ the facility that’s become key in fighting the outbreak.” She writes: “Dr. Fauci will be brief [sic] multiple Senators tomorrow on our novel coronavirus response … Would you please confirm the exact nature of our support to the Wuhan Institute of Virology/Biosafety Lab. You’ll want to read the Daily Mail article above.”
A January 6, 2020, email exchange on “coronavirus countermeasures,” initiated by NIAID Chief Medical Officer Hilary Marston, includes a “Wuhan Pneumonia Update” report prepared by NIH/DMID.
The report was updated on January 8, 2020, and lists in its background information on “Wuhan Pneumonia:”
- In December 2019 the Wuhan Municipal Health Committee identified an outbreak of viral pneumonia cases of unknown cause.
- On December 31st the WHO China Country Office was notified of 44 patients with pneumonia of unknown etiology, 11 of which were severely ill.
- As of January 5th, 2020 there are 59 patients with a diagnosis of unknown viral pneumonia is Wuhan, 7 of which are severely ill. At least one patient is on ECMO … The earliest case was reported December 12th, and the latest onset was December 29th. All patients are isolated and receiving treatment in Wuhan medical institutions. 163 close contacts have been identified for ongoing medical observation.
- Case-patients in the outbreak are reported to have fever, difficulty breathing, and bilateral lung infiltrates on chest radiography (CDC, https://bit.ly/36GxY3y).
- Hong Kong has added Wuhan Pneumonia to the list of notifiable diseases. As of January 7th, 2020 the Hong Kong Center for Health Protection has reports of 30 cases under enhanced surveillance with recent travel history to Wuhan….
- Epidemiological investigation showed that some patients operated businesses in the Wuhan South China Seafood City. As of January 1st, 2020 the market has been closed for environmental sanitation and disinfection.
- There is currently no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission, however one family cluster has been identified. No nosocomial transmission has been seen …
- Fragments of coronavirus RNA with an 86% homology to SARS has been found in one patient…
- News reports on 1/8/2020 the virus is a novel coronavirus, sequenced in one patient and identified in others.
The report also details a NIH coronavirus grant “portfolio” that funded 13 basic science research grants, two treatment research grants and five vaccination research grants related to coronavirus:
Peter Daszak (R01A|110964-06) is funded for work to understand how coronaviruses evolve and jump to human populations, with an emphasis on bat CoVs and high-risk populations at the human-animal interface. Main foreign sites are in China (including co-investigators at the Wuhan Institute of Virology).
The report notes that one of the grants, made to Fang Li, “is funded to investigate the receptor recognition and cell entry in coronaviruses using structural approaches using spike proteins in complex with receptors. This award found the first evidence of a MERS-related CoV that uses the human receptor and provides evidence of a natural recombination event between bat CoVs.” Another grant involves “a team of investigators using mouse models of SARS and MERS to investigate CoV pathogenesis and develop vaccines and therapeutics.”
A section of the report on “Vaccines” details:
“The VRC [Vaccine Research Center] and collaborators have stabilized the MERS-CoV spike protein in its prefusion conformation. The stabilized spike protein is potently immunogenic and elicits protective antibodies to the receptor binding domain, n-terminal domain and other surfaces of the spike protein. The stabilized coronavirus spike protein, and mRNA expressing the spike protein through collaboration with Moderna Therapeutics, is currently being evaluated in the humanized DPP4 mouse model at UNC.
Another grant description indicates that NIH was funding research at Jefferson University using the rabies virus as a vector to deliver a potential vaccine. In an accompanying spreadsheet detailing the grants, one grant is listed as having gone to Dr. Ralph Baric of UNC-Chapel Hill to study “Mechanisms of MERV-CoV Entry, Cross Species Transmission and Pathogenesis.” That grant had been funded from 2015-2020.
In a January 7, 2020, email exchange with the subject line “Wuhan Pneumonia” Stemmy asks Chen if she has any information about the “viral pneumonia outbreak in Wuhan.” Chen replies: “Yes, I have been following the news. Here is what I know so far [redacted]. Chen also revealed that her tour in Beijing had ended three weeks earlier.
Stemmy asks, “Do you know if there is a replacement for you in embassy in Beijing? If so I’d love to connect with them.” Chen replies, “No replacement for now <smiley face emoji>.”
In a January 22, 2020, email exchange titled “Collecting info on N CoV [novel coronavirus]”, NIAID “Senior Volunteer”, Dr. Karl Western, informs Chen and other NIAID officials:
Two recent examples involving CAS Institute of Virology and BSL-4 facility include:
- University of Minnesota and CAS Institute of Virology review of the origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses in Nature Reviews: Microbiology. Minnesota had a CEIRS award for one funding cycle.
- Columbia University School of Public Health, Eco-Health Alliance and CAS Institute of Virology published a few days ago on the results of surveillance of human animal interactions and bat coronavirus spillover potential in rural southern China. Columbia is a current CETR holder.
In a heavily redacted response email, Chen writes: “Thanks Dr. Western. Eco-health has NIAID grant which has collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, CAS, studying the coronaviruses in wild animals, focusing on bats, in China. One of the key Chinese collaborators is Dr. Zhengli Shi, who works on coronaviruses.”
On February 6, 2020, Han Koo, an executive assistant to the Director of NIH who works in the Office of Grants Administration (OGA), emails Chen and Matthew Brown, then-Director of the NIH China Office: “We need POCs [points of contact] of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) and The Chinese Academy of Science (CAS) ASAP.”
Later in the chain Chen writes: “In 2018, NSF [the U.S. National Science Foundation] and NSFC [the National Science Foundation of China] had a joint initiative on Ecology and Evolution of infectious diseases. A workshop was held prior to the initiative (NIH is one of the participants to this initiative. Many participants of the workshop are from CAS institute including WIV [Wuhan Institute of Virology] scientists. NIAID grant to EcoHealth is studying coronaviruses in animals including bats. The grant has different countries as collaborators in addition to China.” A colleague then responds: “Thanks! Do you recall who the US and Chinese PIs [principal investigators] are on that coronavirus vector/reservoir grant are?” Chen replies: “See the attachment I prepared previously. This grant is on bat [redacted].”
In an October 20, 2017, email exchange following Chen’s submission of a situation report, NIAID official James Meegan tells Chen: “Jim LeDuc at U Texas Medical Branch, Director of the Galveston BSL4, works closely with them [Wuhan Institute of Virology]. In 1986 Jim and I spent the year on and off in Wuhan setting up a virology lab and studying Hantavirus infections and treating patients with ribavirin. We trained many, and some later came to the States. I think that helped it on its way to becoming a center for virology.”
Further in the exchange, Chen writes, “The [Wuhan] lab will be operational soon. The visit has been arranged through one of our grantees. I know Jim LeDuc has been worked with WIV and had done some training. [Redacted.] Also, I was told only certain viruses can be worked in this lab. [Redacted]” Handley then tells Chen: “Please make a very careful and full report on what you learn during this visit. It will be a very important interaction and one that many are interested in. Please share your report with us before it goes into any other reporting. We will be glad to engage directly or via grantees in whatever will help ensure safe operations.”
On March 4, 2020, Greg Folkers, Fauci’s chief of staff, emails an academic paper titled “On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-COV-2”, published in National Science Review on March 3, 2020, to David Morens and other unidentified officials within NIAID, and asks in his cover note: “David, this may come up in ASF’s [Anthony S. Fauci’s] 10:00 hearing [likely referring to House Appropriations Committee hearings held on March 4, 2020, on NIH budget requests.] What do you make of this paper and the attendant press coverage?” Folkers highlights within the report two passages. One reads: “Our results suggest that the development of the new variations in functional sites in the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike seen in SARS-COV-2 and viruses from pangolin SARS-CoVs are likely caused by mutations and natural selection besides recombination.” The second highlighted passage reads: “Although the L type (~70%) is more prevalent than the S type (~30%), the S type was found to be the ancestral version. Whereas the L type was more prevalent in the early stages of the outbreak in Wuhan, the frequency of the L type decreased after early January 2020.” Morens replied, but his response is entirely redacted.
Five years prior to the outbreak, in an October 30, 2014, report titled “Wuhan,” Chen informs Ken Earhart that she had met with a Chinese official from Wuhan. Chen reports that his office “is similar to what I am doing here seeking, facilitating, and promoting international scientific collaborations for scientists in Wuhan.” She continues that this official was asked by an organization put together in part by the Wuhan Institute of Virology “to help the members in the organization increase scientific exchanges between the members and international ID [infectious disease] experts.”
In a September 5, 2017, situation report, Chen informs her colleagues that she had “attended a ‘Belt and Road’ High Level Meeting for Health Cooperation: towards a Health Silk Road.” She also reported:
Last week USAID, CDC, ESTH [Environment, Science, Technology, and Health] and I met with Gates Foundation, initially planned to talk about global Malaria eradication efforts to see if there is any area we can work together. But we ended talking in general Chinese policies and the foundation’s current strategies in China — capacity building to help China raise its national standards and leverage China’s resource to help others. One of the examples for raising the national standards is to help China FDA for its reform. Gates foundation has managed to work out a mechanism with China FDA to provide fund[ing] to China FDA for placing experienced Chinese-Americans who had worked at US FDA for many years to work in China FDA as senior consultants….
On the approach for leveraging China’s resource to help others, Gates Foundation is working with Chinese government on donations to its neighboring countries and African countries such as anti-malaria medicines, bed nest, diagnostics etc. More specifically, it helps Chinese companies to gain pre-qualification on medications so that Chinese company manufactured drugs can be sold outside China, helps the Chinese to establish bilateral collaboration with specific countries in Africa, teaches the Chinese how to do resource mobilization, and helps raise China’s voice of governance by placing representatives from China on important international counsels as high level commitment from China.
Chen goes on to describe numerous other ways the Gates Foundation was helping the Chinese government by, for example, helping “Chinese companies gain pre-qualification on medications so that Chinese company manufactured drugs can be sold outside China.” Chen continues: “Just met with a group from the Global Virome Project (GVP) which is funded partially by USAID. The head of the project, Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance, is an NIAID funded PI. His collaborator at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China has done excellent work on corona viruses in Chinese bat populations.”
A heavily redacted October 26, 2017, email released to Judicial Watch in a previous production includes a newly released response from Handley. The email chain begins with Chen sending a trip report to her colleagues regarding her visit to the BSL4 Lab in Wuhan. She notes: “My contact who helped arrange the visit is Dr. Zhengli Shi, who is a Chinese collaborator on a NIAID grant to EcoHealth for SARS like corona virus project.” She continues: “The P4 lab is located in a new developing zone about one hour car ride from the current institute location in central Wuhan city. The location will be the new campus for the entire institute in the near future (a lot of construction is going on right now). Since we are not allowed to take photos so only the photo from the outside is attached.”
Newly released in this production of HHS documents is Handley’s reply in the email chain: “This is a sensitive subject and will be of interest to others.”
Later in the exchange, Handley tells Chen, “Please send us by e-mail your full report on the visit and then we can decide what to do with the information.” After Chen emails Handley the report, he writes: “There is enough good information in your report that it needs to be shared in some form or another.”
On July 18, 2016, Chen sends an “activity update” to top NIAID officials, summarizing her activities for the prior three weeks. In a discussion of the Chinese needing assistance with conducting clinical trials of new medicines, Chen notes: “GSK’s [Glaxo Smith Kline’s] Zhi Hong (the head of the GSK anti-infective program and led the GSK center for infectious diseases and public health in Beijing) met with Dr. Fauci on Monday, the 11th, asking for NIAID support for this clinical trial network in China. I know Dennis [presumably Dennis Dixon, Chief of NIAID Bacteriology and Mycology] and Carl [possibly Carl Dieffenbach, Director of NIAID AIDS Research] attended the meeting with Fauci. I don’t know the outcome of the meeting.” Further along, Chen writes: “I met with EcoHealth Alliance, a NY based non-profit organization on health. They have a R01 grant from DMID [Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases] on identifying SARS-like coronaviruses in China. They partner with Dr. Shi Zhengli at Wuhan Institute of Virology. I visited Dr. Shi over a year ago. She took bat samples in caves in certain regions of China, isolated and identified viruses and found some viruses are similar to SARS by sequencing. Now [redacted]. We are talking about close animal-human close contact in densely populated city.” Chen also mentions an upcoming meeting of “Chinese NIH Alumni” and talks about NIH Director Francis Collins discussing with the head of Peking University Medical School “about the establishment of a Chinese NIH Alumni as there are so many Chinese researchers trained and worked at NIH in the past.”
On October 12, 2016, Chen sends a “High” importance email to senior NIAID officials Handley, Bernabe and Dixon regarding an upcoming conference in China. Chen notes: “Another topic under session 1, Zoonotic Disease Characterization and Prevention, has some relevance to us. NIAID funded George Gao at CAS [Chinese Academy of Sciences] for avian flu (I think it was on avian flu genetics in birds) and we have grant from RDB funding coronavirus survey in bats. The Chinese collaborator is Wuhan Institute of Virology, a CAS institute too. The request for zoonotic diseases is from a Chinese agency I don’t know, AQSIQ. [Redacted.]” Dixon replies: “Thanks Ping. I see the topic of ‘prevention and control’ by your name. While we have occasional projects in that realm, they are at the border of our mission area relative to CDC who list their name that way sometimes in reverse order.”
In a January 20, 2017, situation report, Chen discusses the Global Virome Project “to identify viruses present in wildlife with potential crossing over to humans … Following the identification of the viruses is the development of vaccines to protect human population. China has huge capacity for vaccine development (I think it has 7 national owned vaccine manufacturing facility and over 30 private vaccine making companies.) [Redacted] One of the partners in this project is EcoHealth Alliance. Peter Daszak from EcoHealth Alliance is one of the leaders of GVP and he has NIAID grant from RDB looking at the coronaviruses in bat populations in China in collaboration with Wuhan Institute of Virology. He came to visit me once in the Embassy. This grant has direct connection with the purpose of GVP.”
In a July 7, 2017, situation report, Chen informs her colleagues: “RDB [NIAID’s Respiratory Disease Branch] has a grant to EcoHealth which has a Chinese collaborator at WIV working on finding similar SARS viruses in bat populations and then look for human exposures to the viruses carried by the bats in the villagers near the caves. USAID funds the same organization and they do more virus seeking projects in China.”
On May 27, 2018, Chen emails colleague Nancy Boyd, forwarding her an announcement sent to Chen by people at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which Chen describes as “China’s only publicly known P4 lab.” Chen adds: “I copied Gayle [Bernabe] at OGR and she can forward to programs officers with the P4 pathogen portfolio.”
“These emails provide extraordinary and troubling information about Fauci’s agency partnership with China and its monitoring, concerns and funding for the Wuhan Institute,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The Gates Foundation should also explain the government report about its assistance to and advocacy for China.”
In July, Judicial Watch obtained records from NIAID officials in connection with the Wuhan Institute of Virology revealing significant collaborations and funding that began in 2014. The records revealed that NIAID gave nine China-related grants to EcoHealth Alliance to research coronavirus emergence in bats and was the NIH’s top issuer of grants to the Wuhan lab itself.
In June, Judicial Watch announced that it filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits against the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and the State Department for information on the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Also in June, Judicial Watch obtained records from HHS revealing that from 2014 to 2019, $826,277 was given to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for bat coronavirus research by the NIAID.
In March, Judicial Watch publicly released emails and other records of Fauci and Dr. H. Clifford Lane from HHS showing that NIH officials tailored confidentiality forms to China’s terms and that the WHO conducted an unreleased, “strictly confidential” COVID-19 epidemiological analysis in January 2020. Additionally, the emails reveal an independent journalist in China pointing out the inconsistent COVID numbers in China to NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ Deputy Director for Clinical Research and Special Projects Lane.
In October 2020, Judicial Watch uncovered emails showing a WHO entity pushing for a press release, approved by Fauci, “especially” supporting China’s COVID-19 response.
BACKUP PDF OF EMAILS - 3,234 pages
A review of these emails that cover 3,234 pages reveal an effort by Fauchi and his people to intentionally and knowingly hide information about Gain-of-Function research.
Don’t we have enough ways to cause death or kill people? So what kind of people are busy adding new ways of killing others? And will they someday pay the ultimate price? In his new book, Robert Kennedy fingers Dr. Anthony Fauci as perhaps the most successful mass murderer in history, the “principal architect of “agency capture” — “the subversion of democracy by a drug industry that manipulates regulators like sock puppets.” Not only has Fauci pushed the wrong potentially disastrous pandemic solution, he has also blocked the right ones.
It is bad enough that the vaccines are causing over 50,000 deaths according to vaccine reporting systems in America, the European Union, England, and Scotland, which all have official vaccine reporting systems. Many think those numbers are underreported and are 5 to 10 times higher. Do you know that there are people who do not care, even a little, how many people are being killed (murdered) by vaccines? Fauci is one of them.
The June 2021 edition of the International Journal of Infectious Diseases is entitled, “The first case of postmortem study in a patient vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2.” The most concerning part of their study was that tests found SARS-CoV-2 in nearly every organ tested, including the man’s brain, lungs, trachea, kidney, and heart. In short, his whole body was overrun with high loads of vaccine-induced spike proteins or viral RNA. The man’s body was overrun with vaccine-induced spike proteins.
New Ways To Cause Death
The death count from the pandemic will continue to go up, and not the least of the reasons is the firing of doctors and nurses because they refuse to take an experimental lethal genetic changing injection. There is a significant chance of a significant shortage of nurses starting on October 1, former New York Times journalist Alex Berenson has reported, because they are quitting their jobs rather than take experimental coronavirus vaccines.
October 1 is the proposed deadline for mandatory vaccinations for staff in many hospitals, Berenson said, and the situation is so severe that he warned, “if you need to get sick, do it before the mandates hit October 1.”
A cardiologist who treated a child suffering from myocarditis – an inflammation of the heart muscle – after getting vaccinated against the coronavirus (COVID-19) told the child’s mother that “no case of myocarditis is mild.”
Special Offer: My 100 lesson course on cancer at eighty percent off the regular price of 500 dollars. So your cost will be only 99 dollars. The course is part of a doctoral program at Da Vinci University and, when taken for credit, costs 1,000 Euros for both parts. I want! »
The 150 nurses and other hospital workers at Houston Methodist Hospital who were fired for refusing to receive one of the experimental COVID vaccines were apparently regarded by administrators as disposable.
But two months later, the hospital is one of several in the area experiencing a severe shortage of medical personnel as media report local hospitals have reached a “breaking point” because of a flood of COVID-19 cases, noted the Foundation for Economic Education.
How many people have died since the pandemic began because they were afraid to go to the hospital or because cancer tests were not available? How many people have been killed because of masks that diminish oxygen and increase CO2? How many have died because of being locked down (sun and vitamin D deprivation) or socially distanced? We do know without a doubt that suicides have increased dramatically because of these public policies. Is it murder?
Fearmongering from journalists, scientists,
and politicians did more harm than the virus.
We know mental and emotional health has suffered, but to the people who do not count the mounting vaccine deaths as a concern, nothing matters but promoting vaccines even if informed consent and the Nuremberg Code are ignored.
How many eventually will die because of blood shortages? The vaccinated can no longer donate blood! How many will die from alterations to their blood after being vaccinated? It is not just the trillions of spike proteins but the stacking of red blood cells, which cuts down on oxygen delivery.
How many died because governments, the press, and social media have been denying early treatment of COVID with substances like Ivermectin? We should never forget that Dr. Fauci led the crusade to suppress functional remedies like Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, which could have avoided 80% of the deaths and hospitalizations from COVID and ended the pandemic overnight.
And they are still at it. On August 21, we read that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is urging people to stop taking veterinary drugs to treat or prevent Covid-19 after receiving multiple reports of patients who have been hospitalized after “self-medicating with ivermectin intended for horses,” according to the federal agency.
“You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it,” the FDA tweeted from its official account on Saturday, alongside a consumer update detailing why the drug can be unsafe for humans. When they give full approval this week, the FDA will prove for all time that they are the most devastating terrorist organization in the world, along with the CDC.
They are getting desperate to sell unwanted COVID vaccines. Millions anxiously wonder about the latent effects of those jabs as almost 40,000 are reported dead, and millions of adverse reactions to the vaccines are officially registered. The FDA is expected to fully approve the COVID Pfizer shot this week without public discussion, without transparency.
The agency does not mind maiming and killing Americans. The FDA is fully aware that vaccination does not protect but causes health injuries and deaths and spreads the virus.
“Billions of people injected with we know not what. The immorality of such a mass inoculation of an untested and unapproved experimental vaccine is a charge that the corrupt public health authorities intend to escape by granting the still untested vaccines full approval not only before the required tests are conducted but in the face of the vaccine’s failure. The illegitimate, corrupt President of the United States is serving as a hired voice both for pharmaceutical profits and a secret agenda,” writes Paul Craig Roberts.
Roberts, in another essay, writes, “The entire big money vaccination campaign is based on the lie that there are no cures. The asserted absence of cures is the only reason for the emergency use of an untested and unapproved experimental vaccine. The use of HCQ and Ivermectin has been prevented by protocols established by NIH, CDC, and WHO.”
Kennedy writes, “How can we possibly count the suffering and the deaths from a man who has “failed dismally over his 50-year career with the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) to address the cause, to prevent or cure the exploding epidemics of allergies and chronic disease that Congress charged him with curtailing. The chronic disease pandemic is his enduring legacy. Those ailments now debilitate 54% of American children compared to 6% when he joined NIAD.”
“Dr. Fauci and his band of pharma and Silicon Valley profiteers — working with corrupted politicians, captured federal agencies, and the bought and brain-dead mainstream media — have used the COVID pandemic to mint billions from vaccines and other profitable medicines. His disastrous mismanagement ran up one of the biggest COVID death counts among all nations.”
Dr. Vanden Bossche, who has a Ph.D. degree in Virology from the University of Hohenheim, Germany, says, “Every person out there who is ‘partially’ or ‘fully’ vaccinated is a walking disease incubation system that puts everyone else at risk of contracting a deadly, vaccine-caused ‘variant’ that could kill them. The ‘vaccinated’ are walking murderers spreading disease to others. Getting injected for the Fauci Flu is not only foolish; it is also a form of murder in that unvaccinated people are now at risk of contracting the deadly diseases being manufactured inside the bodies of the vaccinated. If Trump had never introduced the vaccine in the first place, the pandemic would have fizzled out long ago. Since his vaccines continue to be pushed … however, the ‘Delta’ variant is spreading like wildfire, soon to be followed by other ‘variants’ as we enter the fall season.”
Dr. Luc Montagnier, a French virologist and recipient of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Medicine, refers to the mass vaccine program as an “unacceptable mistake” and are a “scientific error as well as a medical error.” He asserts that “The history books will show that…it is the vaccination that is creating the variants.” In other words: “There are antibodies, created by the vaccine,” forcing the virus to “find another solution” or die. “This is where the variants are created. It is the variants that “are a production and result from the vaccination.”
None of the World’s Worst People are in Prison
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts contends, “They are withholding cures from people so they can continue the vaccine profits. This is grounds for arrest and indictment of every one of them: Fauci, the Head of the FDA, the Head of the CDC, and everybody involved. This is legitimate evidence for arresting them, indicting them, and putting them on trial. They killed people for vaccine profits by withholding cures. The deaths from Covid, but they would not let them use HCQ, Ivermectin, and now they are blocking a cure from Eli Lilly. This, I think, is the only case we need to make. We have proof they withheld treatment. We know that. It’s not speculative and not a theory. It is an absolute known fact. They withheld treatment, and they are continuing to withhold treatment so they can sell a vaccine.”
At least a hundred million people in America love and trust a human beast. And at least a hundred million see Fauci for what he is. He is slick, and like many other doctors, can gain trust when it is not deserved.
We’ve all heard about the atrocities committed by doctors during the Nazi regime. These terrible deeds tend to be largely personified by Josef “Angel of Death” Mengele and a handful of other, lesser-known Third Reich physicians, such as Erwin Ding-Schuler. In addition, however, there is a whole host of virtually unknown Nazi doctors who committed unspeakable crimes against humanity throughout World War II and the events leading up to it.
Fauci will be remembered in time as the worst human being ever to walk our planet, along with Bill Gates, competing with the worst monsters of history. They can say anything they want, but their actions speak louder than their words. History will not be kind to them, and neither should we. The Gates Foundation is a significant investor in Pfizer.
Dr. Mark Sircus AC., OMD, DM (P) - Professor of Natural Oncology, Da Vinci Institute of Holistic Medicine, Doctor of Oriental and Pastoral Medicine, Founder of Natural Allopathic Medicine
Learn Dr Sircus protocol including dosages, methods, side effects and contra-indications. This bundle includes the special edition of Transdermal Magnesium Therapy, Iodine and Sodium Bicarbonate eBooks.GET YOURS
FAUCI FUNDED TORTUROUS FLESH EATING PARASITE EXPERIMENTS ON BEAGLE PUPPIES
First published on BITCHUTE August 7th, 2021.
We need to do with the same thing with Fauci. What a piece of shit this bastard Fauci is. I hate this criminal asshole. He does not care about us any more than he does dogs. Think about it.
Lab-WE CAN ONLY TEST FOR COVID NOT FOR VARIANTS-how do they know there is a Delta Variant "surge"?: https://www.bitchute.com/video/uHKpSK4sFiHT/
Rand Paul Roasts Tony Fauci
- on NIH funded gain-of-function R&D in Wuhan
THE COVID BLAME GAME | THE HIGHWIRE
First published on BITCHUTE July 23rd, 2021.
Rand Paul Roasts Tony Fauci; Biden’s Epic Blame Game Begins; Del Dives into the Data; Dr. McCullough on the Vaccine, Delta Variant, and much more; An all-new HighWire Hero!
Guest: Dr. Peter McCullough, MD, MPH
DR. JUDY MIKOVITS EXCLUSIVE! FAUCI, COVID, ‘VACCINE’ INJECTIONS, 5G AND DEFEATING TO BEAT THE GLOBALISTS!
First published on BITCHUTE July 15th, 2021.
BOMBSHELL 1-on-1 between Stew Peters and Dr. Judy Mikovits, one of the world’s most qualified experts discussing COVID-19, Tony Fauci, ‘Vaccines’, Shedding, Adverse Events and HOW TO BEAT THE GLOBALISTS!
Nuremberg Code Exposes The Crimes Of Gates And Fauci
Jul 12, 2021 Sunday Night Live
Nuremberg Code Exposes The Crimes Of Gates And Fauci
More Fauci Lies: The Dirty Truth About the Only FDA Approved COVID Prescription
It's challenging to find a statement or recommendation by Anthony Fauci that isn't a bald-faced lie, but this is a big one.
By Dr. Joseph Mercola - 07. July 2021
Editor’s Commentary: If anyone needed proof that a huge chunk of the American public is brainwashed, idiotic, or a combination of the two, one needs only look at the fact that Anthony Fauci is still listened to by so many people. This is a man who do not deserve the title of “Doctor” and should almost certainly be charged with multiple crimes, yet he continues to be perched atop the healthcare world dictating to the Biden regime what needs to be done about Covid-19.
One of his solutions has been well-documented by us and others. He’s the king of the vaccine-pushers. But there’s another solution he has been pushing since before the so-called “vaccines” were rolled out, and his connections to that solution are dubious. He’s been pushing Remdesivir and helping to suppress Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine. The latter two have been demonstrated to save lives. Fauci’s favorite solution/investment, Remdesivir, is questionable at best.
And yet it’s the one that’s pushed by the FDA. This is a scandal that nobody’s talking about other than a handful of doctors and journalists, including our good Dr. Joseph Mercola…
- Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, favors using remdesivir, despite a lack of science-based evidence of it being effective against COVID-19
- The antiviral prodrug is a nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor and a close cousin to the HIV drug tenofovir used to fight the retrovirus that triggers AIDS
- Although trials with remdesivir do not back the general claims from Fauci that the drug is “highly significant” and the “new standard of care,” general approval by the FDA was given in October 2020, which boosted first quarter sales for its maker
- Conversely, ivermectin, a long-used antiparasitic drug with a known profile of safety, is effective against the virus but information is being suppressed as fear strategies are used to funnel the public into vaccination programs
In the early months of 2019, the pharmaceutical industry was under fire from legislators and the media about the exorbitant prices being charged in the U.S. for drugs. According to one poll reported by Ars Technica,1 58% of people in the U.S. held a negative view of the industry.
The price hike on one life-saving medication — EpiPen — rose from $50 in 2007 for a single autoinjector to $600 in 2018 for a pack of two.2 One reason the price rose so dramatically was that the maker, Mylan, began selling the injectors in two packs only — leaving the door open to charge whatever they felt like for that double-dose package.3
The move subsequently led to a class action lawsuit alleging “the two-pack sale of EpiPens is a pretense for charging unconscionable prices” and that Mylan is “misstating the science of EpiPen dosage in order to purportedly justify its price gouging,’ in violation of various state deceptive and unfair trade practice and consumer protection laws,” according to MarketWatch.
Profits for the drug company rose to $1.1 billion each year for the drug since it is next to impossible for people with severe allergic reactions to go without an EpiPen. But just when it looked like governmental agencies and legislators were considering looking at pricing policies, the pharmaceutical industry used the 2020 pandemic to reverse their public image when they were called upon to develop a vaccine for a viral infection at “Warp Speed.”4
Now, despite the fact the industry holds no responsibility for adverse events associated with the vaccine,5 including death, 2020 gave Big Pharma the needed impetus to overcome their lowest reputation score since public opinion of the industry began being measured in 2001.6
During 2020, Big Pharma as a whole worked hard to portray itself as a benevolent industry that poured billions of dollars into the creation of drugs and vaccines with the intent of protecting public health. As part of that group, biotech giant Gilead Sciences is no different.
The company manufactures remdesivir,7 which is the antiviral drug favored by Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and the chief medical adviser to the president. However, while the chief medical officer of the U.S. promotes remdesivir, scientific evidence demonstrates the drug has a dark side, and it is not effective.
Fauci’s Favored Drug Has a Dark Secret
The FDA fully approved remdesivir October 22, 2020, for use in adults and children in the treatment of COVID-19.8 This came after the emergency use authorization was issued May 1, 2020, for remdesivir in patients who had “suspected or laboratory-confirmed COVID-19.”
Remdesivir is an antiviral drug that is a nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor. It was tested in primates as a treatment for Ebola and found to have some effectiveness against the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in 2002 and the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) outbreak in 2012.9
Before this, Gilead had produced a remarkably similar drug called tenofovir for HIV.10 Remdesivir is nearly a copy of Gilead’s HIV drug and is also a reverse transcriptase inhibitor. According to a paper published in Molecules, “Reverse transcriptase is an enzyme in the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and many retroviruses that convert the RNA template to DNA.”11
The enzyme helps to synthesize a strand of DNA that complements the RNA template. Several nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are anti-HIV agents.12 This may support the hypothesis that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is a chimera.
The term chimera comes from mythology and describes an organism or individual in which the body has cells from genetically distinct organisms. In Greek mythology,13 a chimera was a fire-breathing monster that had the face of a lion, the tail of a snake and the wings of a dragon. In a review of the use of remdesivir for COVID-19, one research team wrote:14
“Other clinically approved nucleoside/nucleotide analogues, such as the hepatitis C drug sofosbuvir and HIV drugs alovudine and zidovudine, have also been shown to be active against the SARS RdRp [RNA dependent RNA polymerase] in in vitro biochemical assays and might have the potential to be repurposed against COVID-19.”
The Mountain View Voice15 reports Fauci believes the remdesivir trials were reminiscent of research that had been conducted nearly 34 years ago when he and his colleagues were analyzing the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
The relationship between SARS-CoV-2 and human retroviruses is complex. To date, there are three retroviruses that scientists have identified that infect humans. Retroviruses are RNA genetic material that changes the host DNA. In 2019, the three known retroviruses that may cause human illness were HIV and types 1 and 2 human T-cell lymphotropic viruses.16
In “The Many Ways in Which COVID Vaccines May Harm Your Health,” you can watch my interview with Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., and Judy Mikovits, Ph.D., where we discuss one of the more dangerous parts of SARS-CoV-2 — the spike protein envelope, common in retroviruses, that causes many of the disease challenges doctors are fighting from COVID-19.
Despite Negative Trial Results FDA Approved Remdesivir
Pharmaceutical company Gilead Sciences was given at least $70.5 million in taxpayer money to develop remdesivir, and that number may be higher.17 The recommended treatment dose for remdesivir spans five to 10 days, all of which must be administered in the hospital.18
Gilead Sciences charges the government $2,340 and private insurance $3,120,19 which is well above the drug maker’s estimated cost for production, which is between $10 and $600 for a 10-day course.20
But the price tag does not reflect the effectiveness of the drug. There were several negative trial results, and yet the FDA approved the drug anyway. A few trials were stopped early when participants experienced significant side effects. Some scientists believed the data suggested the drug could shorten recovery time.21
However, the drug has not produced adequate results or proved to reduce the potential for death in those with severe disease. Worse yet, the treatment comes with an added price tag of potential kidney damage.22
While Fauci called the results of studies that had not been peer-reviewed from a pharmaceutical-sponsored clinical trial “highly significant” and referred to remdesivir as the “new standard of care,”23 the World Health Organization had a different recommendation. Based on evidence from the SOLIDARITY trial, the WHO conditionally recommended against using remdesivir in hospitalized patients.24
Fauci’s support of an antiviral drug that hasn’t lived up to the hype helped support the company’s falling revenues. During the first quarter of 2021, remdesivir grossed $1.5 billion in sales, helping boost Gilead’s total bottom line of $6.4 billion in revenue during that same quarter — a 16% increase over the first quarter of 2020. But when revenue for remdesivir was excluded, revenue actually plummeted 11%, at a disappointing $4.9 billion.25
Remdesivir Not Backed by Results
The data from science trials for remdesivir have been disappointing. One study published in The New England Journal of Medicine26 concluded that the drug worked better than a placebo and so was stopped early for benefit. However, as Peter Gotzsche from The Institute for Scientific Freedom wrote, this benefit was not a reduction in mortality from COVID-19, but rather shortened hospital days.27
The placebo-controlled study demonstrated the drug could reduce hospital stays from 15 days to 11 days. Yet, other physicians were finding the drug was keeping people in the hospital longer. Although Dr. George Ralls with Orlando Health reported they saw positive benefits with the drug, he also attributed it to longer hospital stays in order to complete the course of treatment.28
As I reported in “The New COVID-19 Medication Isn’t Backed by Results,” in the middle of the study (April 20, 2020), the researchers changed the primary outcome measures so patients only had to meet three of an original eight categories,29 and none of the three included measurement of mortality.
In the last update to Clinical Trials30 before publication, the researchers had one primary outcome measurement — time to recovery. The idea for the drug was to keep people from dying, but the researchers stopped measuring that important outcome.
In another study published in The Lancet,31 researchers evaluated remdesivir in patients with severe COVID-19. The primary endpoint measurement was how long it took for clinical improvement. The drug was stopped early because 12% of the patients experienced adverse events and researchers found there were no statistically significant clinical benefits.
Just before the release of the studies in The New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet, Bloomberg32 reported the WHO accidentally posted results of a third study. The summary was removed, but details showed “the drug wasn’t associated with patients getting better more quickly; and 13.9% of patients getting the drug died, versus 12.8% getting standard care.”
Ivermectin Is Effective but Intentionally Suppressed
While researchers using remdesivir struggle to identify and prove the drug is effective against COVID-19, data clearly show ivermectin can prevent it and when used early can keep people from progressing to the hyper inflammatory phase of the disease.
In fact, ivermectin can even be used late in the disease to help critically ill patients recover. The drug has a long history of use as an antiparasitic33 and has a known safety profile as compared to remdesivir, which has a short history of use.
In the early months of COVID-19, a group of physicians formed the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC).34 The collaboration of the five founding physicians in the group resulted in a protocol that can be used in the hospital and another that can be used as an outpatient. Each of the five founding members has treated critical illness for decades.
The two protocols are available for download on the FLCCC alliance website in multiple languages.35,36 Ivermectin was added to the outpatient and inpatient protocols. Although many of the drugs used in the protocols are now accepted standards of care in many places, the same is not true of ivermectin.
It is important to remember that as others clamor for randomized controlled trials to demonstrate that ivermectin is effective, these become more or less unethical when you can see from clinical evidence that something is working, and you know you’re condemning the control group to poor outcomes or death.
In fact, this is the same argument vaccine makers are using now to justify the elimination of control groups by giving everyone the vaccine.
While the WHO recommended that remdesivir not be used in hospitalized patients based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of pooled data from four randomized trials, the evidence37 they used to recommend that ivermectin not be used in patients with COVID-19 except in clinical trials is based on what they admit is a “high degree of uncertainty.”38
You can read more about the benefits of using ivermectin and how this information is being purposefully suppressed in “COVID, Ivermectin and the Crime of the Century.” In the article is a video from DarkHorse podcast host Bret Weinstein, Ph.D., in which he interviews Dr. Pierre Kory about the importance of early treatment of COVID-19 and the shameful censoring of information about ivermectin.
It’s no small irony, then, that YouTube deleted this interview, which is why I embedded a Bitchute version. How this interview could possibly be labeled as misinformation is a mystery, considering the entire conversation is about published research and they are both credentialed medical science experts.
Steps to Help Reduce the Severity of the Disease
As I’ve discussed, fear is contagious and is being used to control your behavior. One strategy initially used to funnel the public into vaccination programs revolved around using PCR testing to demonstrate a rising number of cases. However, as I’ve written several times, PCR testing does not accurately diagnose an active infection.
During lockdown, many people put on pandemic pounds that contribute to increasing your risk of getting sick. Instead of depending on drugs and vaccines, I recommend you proactively work to support your immune system using strategies that evidence demonstrates reduces your risk of severe disease.
It has become evident that optimizing your vitamin D level may be the least expensive, easiest and most beneficial strategy to minimize your risk. Making simple lifestyle changes to normalize your blood sugar levels can also help reduce your risk of heart disease, Type 2 diabetes and viral infections such as COVID-19 and flu.
Comorbid conditions that are related to severe disease with COVID-19 include cardiovascular disease and Type 2 diabetes. In “Nearly Half of American Adults Have Cardiovascular Disease,” I summarize strategies that improve the microcirculation in your heart as well as mitochondrial function and insulin resistance, which are related to strong heart health.
It is difficult to control Type 2 diabetes when you rely strictly on medication and do not change the underlying lifestyle factors that have caused the problem. If properly addressed, Type 2 diabetes can be entirely reversible in most people. In “Diabetes Can Increase the Complications of COVID-19,” I discuss some of those dietary and lifestyle choices and offer suggestions for change.
- 1 Ars Technica, September 14, 2019
- 2 Ars Technica, August 17, 2018
- 3 MarketWatch September 7, 2016
- 4 U.S. Department of Defense, Operation Warp Speed
- 5 CNBC, December 17, 2020
- 6 European Pharmaceutical Review, November 3, 2020
- 7 Gilead Sciences, Veklury
- 8 FDA, October 22, 2020
- 9 Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2021;538:145
- 10 ACS Central Science, 2020;6(5)
- 11, 12 Molecules, 2020;25(10)
- 13 Britannica, Chimera
- 14 ACS Central Science, 2020;6(5) Other Nucleoside Candidates
- 15 Mountain View Voice, April 29, 2020
- 16 Minessota Department of Health, Retroviruses that May Cause Human Illness
- 17 Public Citizen, May 7, 2020
- 18 FDA, Highlights of Prescribing Information
- 19 CNBC, June 29, 2020
- 20 Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, November 10, 2020
- 21 New England Journal of Medicine, 2020;383
- 22 International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2020; doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.093
- 23 Alliance of Human Research Protection, May 6, 2020
- 24 World Health Organization, Therapeutics and COVID-19: Living Guidelines
- 25 Fierce Pharma, April 30, 2021
- 26 New England Journal of Medicine, 2020; DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2007764
- 27, 29 Scientific Freedom, June 1, 2020
- 28 WFTV 9, June 23, 2020
- 30 Clinical Trials, December 9, 2020
- 31 The Lancet, 2020;395(10236):P1569
- 32 Bloomberg, April 23, 2020
- 33 The Journal of Antibiotics, 2017;70
- 34 Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance
- 35 FLCCC Alliance I-MASK+ Protocol
- 36 FLCCC MATH+ Hospital Protocol
- 37 The BMJ, 2020;370 doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2980
- 38 World Health Organization, Therapeutic and COVID-19 Living Guidelines, 7.1 Ivermectin/ Justification
This article was brought to you by Dr. Mercola, a New York Times bestselling author. For more helpful articles, please visit Mercola.com today and receive your FREE Take Control of Your Health E-book!
The first $666,442 installment of EcoHealth's $3.7 million NIH grant was paid in June 2014, with similar annual payments through May 2019 under the "Understanding The Risk Of Bat Coronavirus Emergence" project, as we noted in April.
As we noted in April, the WIV "had openly participated in gain-of-function research in partnership with U.S. universities and institutions" for years under the leadership of Dr. Shi 'Batwoman' Zhengli, according to the Washington Post's Josh Rogin.
Now, Daszak is refusing to comply with a months-old document request from House Republicans related to his work at the Wuhan lab, according to Just The News.
As government investigators and journalists dig to uncover the full scope of Daszak's links to the WIV, Daszak is continuing to spurn a congressional request for that information.
In April, Republicans on the House Committee on Energy and Commerce sent Daszak a letter directing him to submit, among many other documents, "all letters, emails, and other communications between [EcoHealth] and [the WIV] related to terms of agreements, bat coronaviruses, genome or genetic sequencing, SARS-CoV-2, and/or laboratory safety practices" pursuant to key NIH research funding through EcoHealth to the Wuhan lab as a grant sub-recipient.
Yet Daszak himself has not cooperated with the request. An aide with the Energy and Commerce Committee confirmed to Just the News this week that the committee has "received no response still from EcoHealth Alliance and Peter Daszak to the April 16th letter from Leaders Rodgers, Guthrie, and Griffith." -JTN
"We have asked Daszak to provide information we know he has that sheds light on the origins of this pandemic," said GOP Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, who has also publicly noted Daszak's refusal to play ball.
"Dr. Daszak, you received American funds you used to conduct research on bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology," Rodgers continued during a House subcommittee meeting last week. "You owe it to the American people to be transparent."
Meanwhile, Congressional Democrats aren't actually interested in getting to the bottom of things - as they themselves hold subpoena power in both chambers. The ultimate authority, as JTN notes, rests with that party - specifically Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Frank Pallone - who notably boosted funding to Fauci's NIH in 2015 to the tune of $2 billion per year through 2020.
Why a subpoena hasn't been issued in more than two months is unclear, but we could venture a guess...
ANTHONY FAUCI WAS INSTALLED BY GERMAN BIG PHARMA AS USAS JOSEF MENGELE OVERSEEING USA GENOCIDE P1
First published on BITCHUTE July 2nd, 2021.
Dr. Anthony Fauci “The Highest Paid Employee In The Entire U.S. Federal Government?
This extraordinary fact of US government life could only have happened by way of the sheer power and overwhelming influence exerted by German Big Pharma.
Which means that it was Big Pharma who installed “Fauci the Fearmonger” as the Godfather of America’s infamous Medical Mafia.
How else could Fauci have kept his high position at the National Institutes of Health unless The Powers That Be behind the reigning medical tyranny propped him up for 37 years as the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases?
What in the world is a highly unscrupulous 80-year-old corruptocrat doing holding the most powerful position in public health anyway?
IT'S OFFICIAL! FAUCI THE FRAUD NAMED IN MASSIVE VAX SCAM LAWSUIT FILED BY AMERICAN FRONTLINE DOCTORS
First published on BITCHUTE July 1st, 2021.
'Suddenly You Can't Find Him': Jim Jordan Criticizes Fauci For Skipping GOP COVID-19 Origin Hearing
Jun 29, 2021
At today's GOP House Oversight and Reform Subcommittee on Select Coronavirus Crisis hearing, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) took aim at NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci for not appearing before the Republican-led hearing.
Fauci is a Jesuit
- How his Jesuit education helped prepare him for the pandemic (Video)
24. June 2021
The United States is facing the most deadly enemy it will ever have to face. This enemy is not only the usual military enemy, but it has the organization and the capability for massive espionage and clandestine operations within the United States. It uses a facade that is virtually perfect to hide its operations.
In fact, right now, this enemy is working secretly to undermine the principles that made this country the greatest nation in the world. This enemy has infiltrated the highest levels and departments of the U. S. government, and poses an extreme danger to America.
The array of books written that detail the sinister plots of the Congress of Vienna and the Jesuits against the American Republic are numerous.
That this conspiracy has raged since 1815 is a fact of history. We will show that this conspiracy is in full force today and that it is the reason America is having so many problems at the present time and is so close to losing her freedoms.
Most people know very little about the Pope’s Jesuits. The reason for this is that they are a very secretive society. In order to understand what the Order of the Jesuits is, please read below.
"My history of the Jesuits is not eloquently written, but it is supported by unquestionable authorities, [and] is very particular and very horrible. Their [the Jesuit Order's] restoration [in 1814] by pope Pius VII] is indeed a step toward darkness, cruelty, despotism, [and] death. ... I do not like the appearance of the Jesuits. If ever there was a body of men who merited eternal damnation on earth and in hell, it is this Society of [Ignatius de] Loyola [the Jesuits]." John Adams
Fauci- How his Jesuit education helped prepare him for the pandemic!
Jun 24, 2020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtHKbe1j0TQ
Dr. Anthony Fauci said the way his Jesuit education stressed intellectual rigor and the importance of service to others helped prepare him for his work in public health during an interview on the AMDG Podcast with host Mike Jordan Laskey.
The "Black Nobility" are/were the oligarchic families of Venice and Genoa, Italy, who in the 12th century held the privileged trading rights (monopolies).
The first of three crusades, from 1063 to 1123, established the power of the Venetian Black Nobility and solidified the power of the wealthy ruling class.
The Black Nobility aristocracy achieved complete control over Venice in 1171, when the appointment of the Doge was transferred to what was known as the Great Council, which consisted of members of the commercial aristocracy (among them the infamous de'Medici family).
Venice has remained in their hands ever since, but the power and influence of the Venetian Black Nobility extends far beyond its borders, and today it is felt in every corner of the globe. (Don't forget, our modern banking system originated in Italy.)
In 1204 the oligarchic family parceled out feudal enclaves to their members, and from this epoch dates the great building-up of power and pressure until the government became a closed corporation (don't we know this from somewhere?) of the leading Black Nobility families.
More of this can be found in the works of Dr. John Coleman, Black Nobility Unmasked World-wide, 1985; Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300, 1992.
The Jesuit Order is an almost 500-year old covert operations, geo-political, male-only organization, structured as a secret military operation: demanding secret oaths and complete obedience to each direct superior, which is ultimately the Superior General (often nicknamed as the Black Pope, since he dresses in black and 'stands in the shadow' of the white Pope).
The "Society of Jesus" - as they are officially known - was originally used by the Vatican to counter the various Reformation movements in Europe, to which the Vatican lost much of its religious and political power.
Absolute-temporal-ruling power has always been the Vatican institution's primary objective.
The Jesuit Order is since 1814 in complete control of the - obscenely wealthy - Vatican institution (and its Catholic clergy hierarchy) and presently also controls various other organizations together with the Military Order of Malta, such as:
- the United Nations
- European Commission
- Council on Foreign Relations
- various central banks
- big corporations
- secret services
- numerous societies and cults, such as Freemasonry ("The Brotherhood") and Opus Dei.
In general it can be said that the Jesuits are mainly involved in:
- Religious perversions and propaganda
- Political and judicial meddling
Hegelian dialectic deception politics, by creating / infiltrating / controlling multiple sides to further their own agenda ("thesis + antithesis -> synthesis").
# Left v. Right political dogma: Democrats v. Republicans, Liberals v. Conservatives, Labour v. Tories, etc. This is the political duopoly trap, where the voting outcome can only swing in two main directions. Any emerging of true political opposition is deflected and extinguished by temporary controlled opposition spin-off's from the main parties and media blackouts and/or smear campaigns.
# The present focus of many media corporations on "Muslim terror threats", especially after the mass trauma psyop of 9-11, is part of their strategy of tension, to divide groups by fear and polarize people's frustration and anger towards this synthesized enemy or its controlled opposition, instead of the real fascistic threat from the secretive power structures.
# The artificial global food price crisis versus the centralization of food management structures (examples: Codex Alimentarius UN agenda, Genetically modified food controversies - such as the resistance to correct labeling and nutrient reductions compared to natural whole foods.)
# Non-Aligned Movement promoted as a 'force against' the United Nations.
there is plenty more ...
Here is another https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/372405296
Report: Dr. Fauci participated in 'secret meeting' with scientists about COVID-19 origins in Feb. 2020
By CHRIS ENLOE - 19. June 2021
Anthony Fauci - Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images
Dr. Anthony Fauci, chief medical adviser to President Joe Biden, admitted this week that a meeting took place with prominent scientists last February to discuss the origins of COVID-19 outbreak in China.
Just days after that meeting, one scientist who previously voiced concerns that COVID-19's genome was unnatural, completely reversed their opinion, and any suggestion that COVID-19 did not naturally emerge was dismissed as a conspiracy theory.
News of the meeting is particularly noteworthy because the theory that COVID-19 escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology has gained significant traction in recent weeks. The theory was previously dismissed as a conspiracy theory despite a lack of evidence disproving the possibility.
What are the details?
According to USA Today, that meeting, which took place on Feb. 1, 2020, "played a pivotal role in shaping the early views of several key scientists whose published papers and public statements contributed to the shutting down of legitimate discussion about whether a laboratory in Wuhan, China, might have ignited the COVID-19 pandemic."
The call was convened after Kristian Andersen, an expert in infectious disease genomics at the prestigious Scripps Research Translational Institute in California, told Fauci he was concerned COVID-19 may have been artificially engineered.
"The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered," Andersen wrote in an email prior to the teleconference, adding that he and other scientists "all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory."
Andersen's email was one of more than 3,000 Fauci's work-related emails obtained by BuzzFeed News in early June.
Among those on the call included Fauci, Andersen, Wellcome Trust director Jeremy Farrar, National Institutes of Health Director Dr. Francis Collins, "plus several other international experts on emerging infectious diseases and virology," USA Today reported.
"I remember it very well," Fauci recounted in an interview with USA Today. "We decided on the call the situation really needed to be looked into carefully."
"It was a very productive back-and-forth conversation where some on the call felt it could possibly be an engineered virus," Fauci added of the meeting.
Following the meeting, the group decided that World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesu should be looped into their conversation. What came from contact with the controversial WHO is not clear.
What happened after the meeting?
Just three days later, Andersen told scientists "the data conclusively show" that COVID-19 was not engineered, denouncing suggestions that COVID-19 did not emerge naturally.
"Reading through the letter I think it's great, but I do wonder if we need to be more firm on the question of engineering," Andersen said. "The main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered with intent and that is demonstrably not the case. Engineering can mean many things and could be done for either basic research or nefarious reasons, but the data conclusively show that neither was done…"
"If one of the main purposes of this document is to counter those fringe theories, I think it's very important that we do so strongly and in plain language ('consistent with' [natural evolution] is a favorite of mine when talking to scientists, but not when talking to the public – especially conspiracy theorists)," he added.
Several weeks later, Andersen and other scientists released a report on the origins of COVID-19, explaining their work, "clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus."
That report, according to USA Today, was "hugely influential and is among the key reasons that any kind of lab-related hypothesis — involving either a natural or man-made virus — was dismissed by so many for so long."
That report spread the wrong conclusions and those responsible must be further investigated.
Despite not only having the knowledge but even published that HCQ is good against any SARS-CoV, he advised against it in 2020/21 and thereby caused the death of many, many patients from whom it was withheld based on Fauchi's instructios. He must be prosecuted for this.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. warns that Fauci, Gates are committing mass genocide against humanity
By Ethan Huff - 16. June 2021
(Natural News) What was accomplished in 2020 other than the abolition of Americans’ constitutional rights? Not much, according to Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who recently took some time to talk to Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, about the wreckage that has been left behind due to the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) plandemic.
Rather than help “save lives” as they claimed to do, eugenicists Bill Gates and Tony Fauci actually launched a global genocide that is still in motion. It started with lockdowns and business closures and has since progressed to mass “vaccination,” the full impact of which still remains to be seen.
“The entire gamut of constitutional rights has been trampled on this past year in a way that we couldn’t have imagined even two years ago,” Kennedy explained, noting that Fauci bears much of the responsibility for all this.
“Tony Fauci has a $7.6 billion annual budget, and that money, $6.1 billion, comes from United States taxpayers and $1.6 billion comes from the military, and that’s why he got into all of these bioweapons.”
Immediately after 9/11, the military started pouring money into the production of new bioweapons, even though this is illegal, Kennedy further warned. And Fauci has been there all along to see nearly every project through to completion.
Fauci pretended to fund research for “vaccines” while actively pushing new bioweapons
By categorizing his endeavors as “dual use,” Fauci was able to provide cover for his bioweapons endeavors by claiming they were for “research” involving new “vaccines.” It happened decades ago and it is still happening today, with the Chinese Virus being the current iteration.
Along with Gates, who also has a penchant for genocide, Fauci has been sending untold millions of taxpayer dollars to China and elsewhere to be used for bioweapons research. This is also coming to light, in large part thanks to the #FauciEmails movement.
“There’s no knowledge that’s ever come out of 20 years of him messing with this stuff that has ever helped public health,” Kennedy says. “And we now know that, of course, this virus almost certainly came from experiments that [Fauci] was conducting in China, and he caused this global pandemic.”
The reason Fauci has so much power is that his agency was supposed to be studying allergies and infectious diseases to get to the root cause of why they occur. Instead, he abused his post to conduct bioweapons research like some kind of homicidal maniac.
When Fauci first started working in his current position nearly 50 years ago, the national allergy rate was only six percent. Today, it is over 54 percent, showing that Fauci has done absolutely nothing to help fix the problem and only made it worse than ever before.
Since Fauci came into office, there has been an explosion of chronic disease, autoimmune disease, autism and other illnesses that never used to exist before he was installed into his position. How has he gotten away with this?
“When he came into office, [autism] affected one in 10,000 Americans. Today, it is one out of every 22 boys born in this country,” Kennedy says. “His job is to tell us why this is happening.”
“He doesn’t do that research, even though that’s the research Congress told him to do,” Kennedy added, revealing that the worst chronic illnesses we see today actually went epidemic not long after Fauci was installed.
“What he does is he took all of that money and turned his agency into an incubator for the pharmaceutical industry.”
More of the latest news about the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) can be found at Pandemic.news.
Sources for this article include:
ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR. SOUNDS THE ALARM OVER GENOCIDAL CRIMES OF ANTHONY FAUCI AND BILL GATES
First published on BITCHUTE June 12th, 2021.
ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR. SOUNDS THE ALARM OVER GENOCIDAL CRIMES OF ANTHONY FAUCI AND BILL GATES [2021-06-11] - MIKE ADAMS (VIDEO)
Backup on BRIGTEON
- RFK, Jr., on the Genocidal Crimes of Gates and Fauci
14. June 2021
Dr Anthony Fauci has been ‘found out on a million fronts’
•9 Jun 2021
America’s most senior infectious disease expert Dr Anthony Fauci has now been “found out on a million fronts,” according to Sky News host Alan Jones.
“He (Fauci) was told early, way back in February 2020, that there was fairly good evidence that this virus had been engineered,” Mr Jones said. “Funds made available by the agency which Fauci heads … to the tune of $600,000 went to this Wuhan Institute of Virology.
“This is the mob, remember, involved in gain-of-function research.”
Mr Jones questioned why Fauci would continue to argue coronavirus was transmitted from an animal to humans “in spite of advice to the contrary”. “It is only now that the emails have been leaked that he has had to admit that he is not convinced that the virus developed naturally,” he said. “The truth in all this from day one has not been shared with us. “There can be no greater contempt for the people than to deny the truth.”
Is this not PROOF enough that COVID was studied in China & Fauci LIED under oath?
•Jun 9, 2021
Everybody is talking about Dr. Fauci — from his released emails to his recent media deflection tour — but most are missing the REAL story. So, Glenn breaks it down with what COULD be the needed evidence, showing that not only was the COVID virus being studied in Wuhan, China for SEVEN YEARS (N.B.: actually more and Glenn should read this: China worked on SARS-CoV-2 since at least 2007 ) but that Fauci might have lied under oath, too. This SHOULD be the front-page story on the New York Times — and everywhere else. The CDC, NIH, and Biden administration SHOULD be setting the record straight. But they’re not, and until then, their credibility is gone.
Anthony Fauci is also to be held responsible for the LOCKDOWN HYSTERIA
Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett RIPPED Dr. Fauci and said he may be legally culpable for everything if he acted outside the scope of his employment by funding the Wuhan lab.
“Did Fauci circumvent the rules – and by the way, if he did do that, he is acting outside the course and scope of his employment which makes him legally culpable for everything from wrongful death lawsuits to negligent lawsuits – he has no immunity if he’s acting through misfeasance outside the scope of his employment,” Jarrett said during an appearance on Rose Unplugged 1320 AM WJAS.
Gregg Jarrett also said there needs to be a criminal investigation into whether Fauci lied to Congress.
“If [Fauci] lied to Congress he should be charged and criminally prosecuted,” Jarrett said.
Check out Rose Unplugged on WJAS 1320 AM – The Talk of Pittsburgh 1320 AM
Cristina Laila began writing for The Gateway Pundit in 2016 and she is currently the Associate Editor.
Last year group of Indian scientists discovered that coronavirus was engineered with AIDS like insertions. After GreatGameIndia published the results of the study, it attracted heavy criticism to an extent that the authors were forced to retract their paper. Now, Fauci Emails reveal that it was Dr Anthony Fauci himself who threatened the Indian scientists and forced them to withdraw their study linking COVID-19 to AIDS virus.
Last year, a group of Indian scientists discovered that coronavirus was engineered with AIDS like insertions. The study concluded that it was unlikely for a virus to have acquired such unique insertions naturally in a short duration of time.
Readers of GreatGameIndia would remember how after we published the results of the study, it attracted heavy criticism from social media experts to an extent that even the authors were forced to retract their paper.
Later, none other than the French Nobel Laureate Luc Montagnier himself confirmed the conclusions of the study.
It was in this context that the Batwoman of China, Shi Zhengli said, “I advice those who believe… academic analysis of Indian scholars, to shut their stinking mouths”.
Concerns about the manmade origin of the virus and the implications of the findings of the study were raised with Dr Anthony Fauci as well, but he chose to remain silent and ignore it.
Researcher Adam Gaertner explained to Dr Fauci how the virus was created in an email titled, “Coronavirus bioweapon production method”.
Now the Fauci Emails show that when he was asked about this research paper by the Indian scientists, he had dismissed it saying it is “really outlandish”. Several other emails have also shown that Dr Fauci was warned that COVID-19 may have been ‘engineered’, but he had dismissed all of them.
A leading infectious disease expert, Kristian Andersen, emailed Dr Fauci referring to the Indian study saying that some of the features of the virus looked engineered. But he did not announce it in public. This reveals that Dr Fauci was already aware of the man-made nature of the virus but he did not inform the public about the same.
Further, Professor Madhav Nalpat, the Director of the Department of Geopolitics & International Relations at Manipal University claimed on Indian television that Dr Fauci threatened to tarnish reputations and destroy careers of scientists.
“What is even more disgusting is the cover-up. Any scientist who spoke up was strictly warned that his career would be destroyed should he speak against Dr Fauci,” said Prof Nalapat.
This fact was also revealed by Josh Rogin, a columnist of the Washington Post who claims that scientists don’t speak up about issues connected to Dr. Anthony Fauci’s research. Rogin also claims Fauci is the ‘Godfather’ of gain-of-function research that was taking place at the Wuhan laboratory which was then named as the site of the coronavirus outbreak.
Josh Rogin appeared on Megyn Kelly’s podcast, where he said – ‘I often talk to scientists who say the same thing, who say, “Listen, we really want to speak out about this, but we can’t do it.”
‘Why can’t we do it? Well, we get all of our funding from NIH, or NIAID, which is run by Dr. Fauci.” So we can’t say anything like ‘Oh, gain-of-function research might be dangerous, or it might have come from a lab, because we’re going to lose our careers, we’re going to lose our funding, we’re not going to be able to do the work.”
Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, one of the researchers of the study had earlier said that they stand by their conclusion that the SARS-CoV-2 is not natural. “We said this in Jan 2020, we are saying it again”, he had tweeted.
He said clearly referring to Dr Fauci, that the paper was outlandish for those who wanted to prove the ‘natural origin’ theory for the virus. He said that their study had correctly identified sections of the genome that are giving this virus its speciality.
When asked why they had withdrawn the paper, he said that was withdrawn due to the pressure from the people with vested interests.
Pandey also said that this paper was just a section of the different studies that they had conducted and they wanted to include the entire findings in the updated version. But the revised manuscripts were hard-blocked by the publishers.
He said that in the revised manuscript, they have provided information on why the virus infection remains asymptomatic and why it infects human beings so easily. But it never was allowed to come out, he said.
Commenting on how a scientific paper is being blocked to favour a particular agenda, he said, “Science is the new medieval church, those who are popes of it censor at their will”.
Meanwhile, Dr Fauci himself funded gain-of-function experiments at Wuhan lab through Peter Daszak, the President of EcoHealth Alliance by the US Government.
The interesting part is that Peter Daszak is the same guy who orchestrated the publication of a ‘scientific’ paper in Lancet claiming that the virus made the cross-species jump naturally.
How can the same guy who funded the experiments to make the cross-species jump of the virus, claim that it evolved naturally?
If you think that’s outrageous, well just wait for it.
Peter Daszak is also the same guy the WHO sent to China to investigate the claims whether the virus evolved naturally or was coronavirus engineered.
Fauci and all people like him are mere puppets or as the puppet masters call them, ‘useful idiots’ for the puppet masters who began their march against humanity, led by GOG/Satan, beginning in November 1917 when they entered into both Russia, creating the Bolsheviks, and into Palestine wherein in both countries they exterminated tens of millions of Christians. Who are the puppet masters many call the ‘elites’ which also entails the minions or ‘useful idiots’ as the real puppet masters call them. Who are the real puppet masters?
I have done a lot of historical research of their own documentations and bible study to find out who the people are who have been controlling this world in wickedness; creating this free slave world in which we all now live in a debt based, fiat economic system and you can read about them here; if you care to and if you do, read to the end to learn all of the truth. It is slow going in the beginning because the ground work had to be laid so you will understand how it all ties together; be patient it will be worth your time. tinyurl.com/matrixofgog
OPERATION LOCKSTEP FROM THE ROCKEFELLER PLAYBOOK:
“1st Phase: Common/cold/Flu. Mild symptoms at most. Media endorsement of mass paranoia and fear. Flawed testing system utilized, which picks up any genetic material in the body and triggers a positive result. Inflation of Covid case numbers, through changing of death certificates, double-counting, and classifying all deaths including other diseases and natural causes as Covid19. Lockdown will condition us to life under Draconian laws, prevent protests and identify public resistance.
2nd Phase: The 1st Phase will lead to compromised and frail immune system through lack of food, social distancing, wearing of masks, and lack of contact with sunlight and healthy bacteria. Exposure to 5G radiation will further attack the immune system. Thus, when people re-emerge into society, more people will fall ill. This will be blamed on Covid19. This will all occur before the vaccination is ready to justify it. A longer and more potent lockdown will follow until everyone takes the vaccine.
3rd Phase: If majority of people resist the vaccine, a weaponized SARS/HIV/MERS virus will be released. A lot of people will die from this. It will be survival of the fittest. It will also be the ultimate push for everyone to be vaccinated, in order to return to normality. Those who have taken the vaccine will be at war with those who have not. It will be anarchy from all sides.”
“Covid-19means the ‘certificate of identification of vaccination with artificial intelligence’ and ’19’ was the year in which it was created.”
I would venture to say that about 90% of Christians today, whom have been given by God a ‘strong delusion’ also ‘believe the lie’. I have attempted to awaken them, but they turn the scriptures upside down to fit their narrative. Sad.
‘Scientists were threatened: Anthony Fauci and his gang will destroy careers and reputation’: Indian experts make explosive claims after emails become public
Ambassador Deepak Vohra was another panellist in the debate who subscribed to the view that the coronavirus was created in a laboratory in Wuhan. He said that the virus was manufactured in a laboratory in Wuhan at the behest of Dr Fauci and Peter Daszak acted as a conduit to bankroll such experiments.
By OpIndia - 05. June 2021
Dr Anthony Fauci, the face of the American COVID-19 response, recently found himself in hot water after thousands of his emails obtained under the Freedom of Information Act pointed out his possible role in suppressing the truth and providing misleading information about the coronavirus.
The cache of emails revealed that several people, including researchers, people in US administration and intelligence, wanted to probe the role of the Chinese lab, but they were overruled by Dr Anthony Fauci and others, who had vested interests in the issue as they themselves were instrumental in US govt funding the study on the virus in the Wuhan lab. It has invariably given a boost to the lab-leak theory that many have been alleging after the outbreak first emerged in the central Chinese city of Wuhan.
Dr Anthony Fauci deliberately concealed the synthetic nature of coronavirus: Dr PSV Rao
In a debate on NewsX, Dr PSV Rao accused Dr Anthony Fauci of lying to the world about the true nature of the coronavirus. He pointed out the discrepancy between the assertions made by Dr Fauci in his leaked emails from February 2020 and the public remarks made by him then. In February 2020, Dr Fauci talked about the genome sequencing of the coronavirus, pointing out that the virus was not evolutionary. However, his email conversations from that time revealed that this was not the case.
“On January 31, 2020, Delhi researchers were referring to research I had mentioned in my Sunday Guardian article, which found that the spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2 had four insertions which are not found in any other Coronavirus, and the insertions are similar to those found in HIV virus. AIDS virus is retro RNA, it has to change to DNA and then transform to RNA. We have no study so far in the world that says a retro RNA virus can transform into RNA virus,” Dr PSV Rao said while throwing his weight behind the suspicions that the virus was synthetically manufactured.
Dr Rao further said, “In the month of Jan there were two other publications, one by Wuhan Doctors about the cases and another study by Hong Kong doctors who had gone to Wuhan and studied the disease. Both the research published are saying the same thing. A leading infectious disease expert, Kristian Andersen, emailed Dr Fauci that some of the features of the virus looked engineered. But he did not announce it in public. This reveals that Dr Fauci was already aware of the man-made nature of the virus but he did not inform the public about the same.”
Dr Rao further alleged that it was Dr Fauci’s organisation that had funded the gain of function experiments that were going on at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
When asked why Dr Fauci did not publicly raise misgivings shared by some of the doctors about the engineered nature of the virus, Dr Rao said that perhaps Dr Fauci was not ready to take criminal liability on his head after announcing the genome sequencing of the virus in February 2020. Dr Rao further added that the pathogen experiments conducted in Wuhan Institute of Virology were possibly funded by Dr Fauci, through Peter Daszak, in order to hide his direct involvement.
FBI should have interviewed Dr Anthony Fauci to know about the origins of COVID-19: Prof Madhav Nalapat
Another panellist on the news show, Professor Madhav Nalapat said that he has it on good authority that Dr Anthony Fauci has been lying from the very beginning. Madhav said he has been informed by expert virologists about the bat virus and the coronavirus that was detected in December 2019. He says he’s been informed by virologists that the coronavirus is genetically engineered.
“I have been told Dr Fauci is lying from the beginning. I have been told about the bat virus and the coronavirus that was found in Wuhan. I don’t know whether he is lying all these decades about his educational qualifications or he knew about the man-made nature of the virus and still kept quiet,” Prof Nalapat said.
He further said that the virus was manufactured in a lab and that FBI should have investigated Dr Fauci to get to the bottom of this murky affair. “Dr Fauci and others were aware of its lab origins. He should not have been interviewed by news channels but under oath by the FBI,” Prof Nalapat said.
Prof Madhav alleged that those who dared to go against Dr Fauci were warned in no uncertain terms that their reputation will be tarnished and their careers will be destroyed if they spoke against Dr Fauci and the synthetic nature of the virus. “What is even more disgusting is the cover-up. Any scientist who spoke up was strictly warned that his career would be destroyed should he speak against Dr Fauci,” said Prof Nalapat.
“Friends in the United States and Japan extensively briefed me that this natural origin of coronavirus is absolute bunkum. I asked them to expose him. But they said, If we speak out, Dr Fauci and his gang will destroy us and destroy our reputation,” Prof Nalapat said about doctors who confided in him that the virus was genetically engineered and not natural as claimed by Dr Fauci in 2020.
Prof Nalapat also slammed Democrats for shielding Dr Anthony Fauci and his collusion with the Chinese PLA. “Democrats very well knew that 70 per cent of the research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology was done by PLA and was in close cooperation with them. They were looking at bio-weapons. The money sent by Dr Fauci through Daszak went to the PLA,” Nalapat said.
Dr Fauci outsourced the virus creation to China with generous donations: Deepak Vohra
Ambassador Deepak Vohra was another panellist in the debate who subscribed to the view that the coronavirus was created in a laboratory in Wuhan. He said that the virus was manufactured in a laboratory in Wuhan at the behest of Dr Fauci and Peter Daszak acted as a conduit to bankroll such experiments.
“In 2014, the United States placed a moratorium to stop the gain of function research. The US federal funding was banned for three viruses and attempts to weaponize them. Therefore, Dr Fauci outsourced the creation of coronavirus to Wuhan. He stopped the research back at the home and financed it to be carried out in China. And the Chinese were more than happy to accept American investment in developing a potential bio-weapon,” Vohra said.
Earlier, Indian researchers whose study had suggested an artificial origin of Covid-19 said that they were forced to withdraw the study due to pressure from vested interests.
Trump wanted to publicly grill Fauci on Wuhan lab funding — and bill China for pandemic
By Sharri Markson - 05. June 2021
President Trump wanted to haul Dr. Anthony Fauci in front of a presidential commission to give evidence about funding the Wuhan laboratory suspected of leaking COVID-19.
Advanced plans were underway for the special presidential panel, with an executive order even drawn up to hold China and its collaborators accountable and tally a reparations bill to fire off to Beijing.
Trump’s senior advisers talked him out of the idea as it was about to be announced, according to insider accounts detailed in a soon-to-be-released book on the origins of COVID-19, “What Really Happened in Wuhan.”
Former President Donald Trump wanted to have Dr. Anthony Fauci testily in front of a presidential commission. REUTERS
In another bombshell revelation from the book, United States officials suspected China had developed a vaccine for COVID-19 prior to the outbreak, with the claims included in a “sensitive but unclassified” internal report.
The book also reveals President Biden scrapped a push by the State Department’s Arms, Control, Verification and Compliance Unit to formally confront China in Geneva over its cover-up of COVID-19 and potential breaches of the biological weapon convention in the Wuhan lab.
Former President Trump wanted to bill China for the pandemic, a new book claims. REUTERS
And in a revelation set to embarrass the intelligence community, United States intelligence agencies sought advice on whether the virus was zoonotic — derived from bats — or could have a laboratory origin from the very scientists who had spent 15 years working closely with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, including EcoHealth Alliance’s Peter Daszak and University of North Carolina’s Ralph Baric.
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence later published a statement saying COVID-19 was not man-made and could not have been genetically manipulated.
That conclusion is now in doubt, and Biden last week ordered US intelligence agencies to probe COVID-19’s origins and report back in 90 days.
Fauci public grilling
Trump was “enthusiastic” about creating a presidential commission similar to those which probed the the 9/11 terror attacks and the assassination of John F. Kennedy.
A White House executive order was drafted in August 2020 stating: “By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows: The National Commission on the Origins and Costs of COVID-19 is hereby established.”
It was the brainchild of Trump’s trade adviser Peter Navarro, who said he had the support of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.
In meetings in the Oval Office, Trump kicked around names who would be best to lead the commission.
The draft executive order named Sen. Tom Cotton as the commissioner, while Pompeo’s senior policy adviser Mary Kissel and his China adviser Miles Yu were to act as co-chair and vice co-chair or executive director. Retired Air Force Brig. Gen. Robert Spalding would lead the sessions on the geo-politics, and a general from Fort Detrick, the US biological weapons defense program in Maryland, would run the virology portion of the inquiry to investigate whether the virus had been manipulated in a lab.
In a highly controversial move, Trump’s top adviser on the coronavirus, Fauci, would be hauled in to explain why he funded risky coronavirus research in China and the not-for-profit EcoHealth Alliance president Peter Daszak would be grilled on the missing virus database from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, among other topics.
Trump was “enthusiastic” about creating a presidential commission. UPI
The executive order states the commission would investigate “the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic; the economic, political, social, human, and other costs of the pandemic borne by the United States; and whether the People’s Republic of China or the Chinese Communist Party have used the pandemic to advance their own economic, geopolitical, military, or territorial agendas.”
The Commission would have also tallied a bill to send to Beijing “to recover any damages as well as all costs estimated.”
Such a commission, determined to hold the Communist Party to account and ask it to pay repatriations for the economic and human damage from the pandemic, would have been explosive, and significantly corrode already-strained China-US relations.
Yu had an office set up in the White House to run the commission and Navarro says, “We almost got to the finish line.”
But the presidential commission was killed off during a meeting in the Oval Office where Trump’s economic advisers argued fiercely against it.
Other officials were concerned the commission would be seen as a political maneuver so close to the November election and be derided by the media.
One senior White House official said, “It was actually an excellent idea, just floated way too late.”
“It would’ve looked very political, and (we) had tried very, very hard to make the China issue non-partisan.”
Another senior Trump official said, “An inquiry like that is exactly the right thing but it was going to be almost impossible for President Trump to appoint a commission that was going to be viewed as bipartisan.”
“People were too crazed on the left. I don’t think the left would have participated in it,” he said.
Navarro said it was a mistake to kill off the idea. “They are all China apologists,” he said.
[Director of the National Economic Council Larry] “Kudlow is just stupid, dumb. You can quote me on that.
“That was the biggest heartbreak in my four years at the White House. I worked really hard to get that commission established.
“We had a presidential commission for Pearl Harbor, for the BP oil spill and for the Kennedy assassination. We need one into the origins of the coronavirus as well.”
The push to Confront China
There were other attempts to hold China accountable for the pandemic that also were shut down.
Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Tom DiNanno led a push to demarche the Chinese ambassador in Geneva. Demarche is a formal diplomatic representation from one government to another.
DiNanno wanted to have a senior administration official, perhaps Secretary Pompeo or himself, stand up in a formal setting and confront Beijing over its cover-up of the virus, its gain-of-function research in the Wuhan labs, and potential breaches of the Biological Weapons Convention.
DiNanno wrote a memo on Dec. 5, 2020 to senior figures in the State Department attaching a “sensitive but unclassified” document which outlined the case for the demarche.
“The research the Chinese were doing on Gain of Function (GOF) was for potential military offensive purposes, they hid it and did not/have not shared what they knew and know,” he wrote.
“We believe this behavior violates the spirit, object, and purpose of the BWC.”
The idea met with heavy pushback internally.
When DiNanno called one of the State Department’s top weapons experts into his office to discuss the demarche, she told him she had not read his memo and said, “Your attitude is anti-science.”
DiNanno lost his temper at the official’s intransigence and admits to yelling at her in fury: “I’m the boss and when I ask you to do something, I expect you to do it.”
The official repeatedly said, “I’m sorry, I’m sorry.”
“She didn’t want China to have a biological weapon that got out of a lab. It’s too horrible a thing to contemplate,” DiNanno said in hindsight.
“But then maybe you should work for another department. If you’re in the biological weapons [agency] you have to deal with biological weapons.”
The Trump administration wanted to hold China accountable for the pandemic but those efforts were shut down. AP Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and Non-Proliferation Christopher Ford said he agreed with the plan to demarche China as long as the US had solid cause to do so. He was concerned that DiNanno’s claim that the virus may have been the product of human manipulation had not yet been evaluated by scientific experts, however, and Ford wanted to wait until DiNanno had convened a panel of third-party experts to assess it. In the meantime, he directed DiNanno to “draw up a list of tough questions for China for a possible demarche.”
“If we were going to surface this publicly with an adversary power, we needed to be on very solid factual and analytical ground,” Ford said in an interview for the book “What Really Happened In Wuhan.”
After several months of negotiations, the State Department eventually won interagency clearance on several questions to demarche China, but they did not include claims about COVID-19 being genetically manipulated. By then Biden was President and the move was ditched.
“Biden scrapped it, China would have been demarched with Pompeo still in charge,” DiNanno said.” You either confront a tyrant or appease him. History has taught us appeasement doesn’t work.”
Ford said the demarche questions were still in clearance when he resigned.
“As far as I know the final decision not to send the demarche occurred after the handover of power to the Biden administration,” he said.
Another top official said the “Biden Administration killed that too,” along with the State Department inquiry into the origins of the pandemic.
The White House did not respond to messages seeking comment.
China’s Early Vaccine
Senior US Government officials were highly concerned with how early China had developed a vaccine for COVID-19.
The officials investigated the possibility vaccine development began prior to the time Beijing admitted to the World Health Organization there was an outbreak on Dec. 31, 2019. They raised the explosive issue in an internal report without forming any conclusions.
“It may seem likely that the Wuhan Institute of Virology has been researching a vaccine before the outbreak,” the State Department analysis authored by Miles Yu stated.
Patent applications “may give credence to the following possibility: prior to the surprise outbreak in its close vicinity, WIV had possessed the novel coronavirus in its lab and had known of its lethality and pathogenicity for a while. It had been actively researching a vaccine before anyone else could succeed, thus giving China the sole patent right.”
In mid-January 2020, Fauci donated free Remdesivir samples to China for an experimental clinical trial to see if it was effective against COVID-19.
Remdesivir was an American invention, developed by Fort Detrick scientists and the American pharmaceutical company GILEAD, using taxpayer funds.
After Fauci donated the samples, the Wuhan Institute of Virology compiled a commercial patent for the same treatment on Jan. 19 — before it had even acknowledged human-to-human transmission – in a case of likely intellectual property theft.
“It raises the possibility that WIV has been researching a COVID-19 vaccine of its own all along, and would like to prevent GILEAD’s Remdesivir from entering the Chinese market,” the State Department analysis prepared for Pompeo states.
“Filing a patent requires lengthy documentation, clinical statistics and international national legal opinions. It normally would take months or even years to prepare and compile the application, rather than a few days.”
The investigation for the book discovered that Chinese military scientists also filed a patent application for a COVID-19 vaccine, different from the duplicative Remdesivir treatment, on Feb. 24, 2020.
The applicant is listed as the Institute of Military Medicine, Academy of Military Sciences of the PLA and the lead inventor is military scientist, Zhou Yusen.
Professor Nikolai Petrovsky from Flinders University in Australia, who has developed a COVID-19 vaccine, said the early timeframe left open the possibility the Chinese scientists were working on a vaccine before authorities admitted there was a coronavirus outbreak.
Intelligence Agency Embarrassment
United States intelligence and health agencies sought advice on whether the virus had passed from bats to humans, as China claimed, or could have a laboratory origin. But they enlisted scientists who had spent 15 years working closely with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
A meeting on Feb. 3, 2020, organized by the National Academies of Sciences, included officials from the FBI, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, along with the NIH and the Department of Health and Human Services.
Invited to brief the high-level officials were EcoHealth Alliance president Daszak, who has worked with “batwoman” Chinese virologist Shi Zhengli for more than 15 years.
EcoHealth has also funded projects at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, with cash from US government agencies.
Also invited to brief the intelligence and health agencies was University of North Carolina researcher Ralph Baric, who conducted a highly-controversial gain-of-function experiment with Zhengli in 2015.
On the invitation list were also strong proponents of the natural-origin theory, including Scripps Research Institute Professor Kristian Andersen.
A prominent discussion point at the meeting was how to fight “misinformation.”
The meeting objective was to assess what data is needed to understand the evolutionary origins of COVID-19 and respond to “resulting misinformation.”
Fauci gave a 10-minute presentation.
By April, the intelligence community had concluded there was no chance that COVID-19 had been manipulated in a lab.
“The Intelligence Community also concurs with the wide scientific consensus that the COVID-19 virus was not manmade or genetically modified,” the Office of the Director of National Intelligence said in the April 30, 2020 statement.
The statement was false; there was no consensus. More than 30 internationally renowned scientists signed letters to call for an inquiry into a potential lab leak.
Asked if it would correct the record, the ODNI simply pointed to last week’s statement announcing a 90-day investigation into the origins of COVID-19.
“What Really Happened In Wuhan,” by Sharri Markson, an award-winning journalist for The Australian, will be published by HarperCollins in September and is available for preorder from Amazon now: https://amzn.to/3ig0ZMp
THE FRAUD CHI EMAILS OF DR FAUXI
03. June 2021
Dr. Fauci and the strange odyssey of America’s Doctor Death
By Steven M. Lopez - 03. June 2021
Dr. Anthony Fauci testifies before the US Senate. C-SPAN screen capture.
WASHINGTON. Thanks to the mainstream media, Dr. Anthony Fauci is the official face of America’s Covid-19 response. As the director of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, not to mention the most vocal member of presidents Donald Trump and Joe Biden’s White House Coronavirus Task Force, he is the man the media reverently turn to.
But Dr. Fauci has been anything but consistent.
As coronavirus began to rage through China, Dr. Fauci told Newsmax that “this is not a major threat for the people of the United States, and this is not something that the citizens of the United States right now should be worried about.”
When the World Health Organization said those not presenting symptoms of Covid-19 “do not need to wear a medical mask,” Fauci was against masks. He later changed his mind, going so far as to advise wearing two masks.
He now says we might have to wear them (one or two?) until 2022.
He once said vaccinating 75 percent of the US population would create “herd immunity” to the disease.
But when a poll showed only “60 percent or more would take it [vaccines], I thought, I can nudge this up a bit, so I went to 80, 85 percent,” Fauci told the New York Times.
And testifying before the US Senate, Fauci denied the National Institutes of Health-funded gain-of-function research in alliance with the Wuhan Virology Institute of China. This field of research modifies animal viruses to become highly infectious to humans. The controversial practice seeks to devise treatments and vaccines to combat possible future animal-to-human transmission of infections.
“That categorically was not done,” Fauci told GOP Sen. Rand Paul of NIH funding of gain-of-function research in China.
But true to form, Fauci later admitted
“a modest collaboration with very respectable Chinese scientists who were world experts on coronavirus.”
And then, bombshell emails surfaced between Fauci and members of the virology community through Freedom of Information requests made by Buzzfeed and The Washington Post.
In one exchange, Fauci asks Dr. Kristian Anderson of the Scripps Research Institute to…
“… look really closely at all the [coronavirus genetic] sequences to see that some of the features look engineered.”
This was only natural since Anderson had informed Fauci that aspects of the coronavirus genome were “inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.”
But the most damning email was between Fauci and his deputy Hugh Auchincloss, in which Fauci wrote:
“Hugh, it is essential that we speak… you will have tasks today that must be done.”
He attached a research paper with his email.
Auchincloss fleshed out his “tasks” and the contents of the research paper in his email response:
“The paper you sent me says the experiments were performed before the gain of function pause but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH… will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad.”
This tends to suggest Fauci and his NIH colleagues feared blowback if it came to light their five-year, $600,000 gain-of-function research grant helped China facilitate the deaths, so far, of 3.7 million souls worldwide.
All the above calls into question the media’s portrayal of President Donald Trump as a “racist” and “conspiracy theorist” for hitting China hard on its release of lab-made coronavirus.
And that makes the media much more than duplicitous. It makes them complicit in mass murder.
An unintended consequence of the media’s Trump derangement syndrome.
The inconvenient revelations prompted booksellers Barns & Noble and Amazon to pull Fauci’s upcoming book “Expect the Unexpected: Ten Lessons on Truth, Service, and the Way Forward” from their sites for pre-sale.
Before pulling Fauci’s tome, the publisher National Geographic Books said the author offers “a universal message on how to lead in times of crisis and find resilience in the face of disappointments and obstacles.”
That “message” in leadership perfectly describes President Trump’s four years in the White House than the unscrupulous Fauci’s tenure as a so-called man of science and a corrupt media’s go-to demigod.
Steve Lopez - Originally from Los Angeles, Steven M. Lopez has been in the news business for more than thirty years. He made his way around the country: Arizona, the Bay Area, and now resides in South Florida. A cigar and bourbon aficionado, Steven is a political staff writer for Communities Digital News and an incredibly talented artist.
Follow Steve on:
The Dr. Fauci Emails
Jun 2, 2021
Truly jaw dropping.
The doctor who thanked Dr. Fauci for dismissing the Wuhan lab leak theory is the same guy who gave $600k to the lab, “investigated” it for the WHO and then acted as a Facebook fact checker censoring info on the Wuhan lab leak theory.
SUMMIT NEWS: https://summit.news/newsletter
The Dokkktor Fraud Chi scandal is a decoy, a distraction ... much worse to come!
BEWARE: Yes, no SARS-CoV-2 as 'virus' has been isolated and proven to exist, but what does exist are lab-created nano-biochemical agents that work as toxins and gene-altering pathogens in your body, which the Chinese term gene-weapons. Just like the COVID-19 vaccines are not vaccines in the classical sense but gene-altering operation systems.
For over a year now The Gateway Pundit has been reporting evidencethat the COVID-19 Virus originated in a Wuhan, China laboratory.
Our first report was back on April 9, 2020 when we confirmed Dr. Shi Zhengli ran the coronavirus program at the Wuhan lab AFTER her program was shut down in the US due to a prior leak that killed a researcher!
As early as 2018 US State Department officials warned about safety risks at the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab on scientists conducting risky tests with the bat coronavirus.
US officials made several trips to the Wuhan laboratory.
Despite the warnings, the US National Institute of Health (NIH) under Dr. Anthony Fauci awarded a $3.7 million grantto the Wuhan lab studying the bat virus. This was after State Department warned about the risky tests going on in the lab.
This is unbelievable!
The deadly China coronavirus that started in China sometime in late 2019 has now circled the globe. Evidence suggests that the coronavirus didn’t come naturally. We still don’t know whether the deadly virus was leaked intentionally or if it was an accident.
** And yet as recently as February 9, 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) has denied the coronavirus leaked from a lab in Wuhan!
But a video has surfaced from December 2019 of WHO official Peter Daszak admitting to coronavirus manipulation at the Wuhan Lab before the pandemic was announced.
The video interview was originally filmed on December 9, 2019. A copy was posted in May 2020.
As Dr. Lawrence Sellin reported at The Gateway Pundit back in July 2020 — Dr. Peter Daszak, President of the EcoHealth Alliance and a long-time collaborator with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, presumably was referring to the Ralph Baric- Zheng-Li Shi experiments, stated “you can manipulate them in the lab pretty easily” inserting a spike protein “into a backbone of another virus.”
And yet for over a year Dr. Anthony Fauci has vehemently denied the Wuhan coronavirus was man-made until last month when Dr. Fauci admitted it may have possibly been naturally occurring.
On Tuesday emails from April 2020 were released via FOIA.
In one email from April 18, 2020, Dr. Peter Daszak thanked Dr. Fauci for insisting the COVID-19 virus was naturally occurring — when both men knew this was a lie.
And now a second email surfaced from the Fauci email dump that shows Dr. Fauci was told inlate January 2020 that some of the features of the coronavirus “look engineered.”
Dr. Fauci knew the truth.
And he lied about it for over year — maybe because he was funding the projects — something else he lied about.
This is damning information for this serial liar and very dangerous man.
Jim Hoft is the founder and editor of The Gateway Pundit, one of the top conservative news outlets in America. Jim was awarded the Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media Award in 2013 and is the proud recipient of the Breitbart Award for Excellence in Online Journalism from the Americans for Prosperity Foundation in May 2016.
Apparently, the NIH/NIAID were aware that 99% of covid deaths in Italy had other illnesses.
The Gateway Pundit has been reporting this information for over a year now.
In August Joe Hoft at The Gateway Pundit reported that the CDC admitted on their website that only 6% of the 153,504 coronavirus deaths at the time actually died exclusively from coronavirus. The other 94% had 2-3 serious illnesses or conditions and the overwhelming majority were of advanced age.
President Trump retweeted this factual TGP report that was later flagged by the tech giants.
The tech giants labeled it fake news.
But thanks to the Fauci email release on Tuesday we now know that Dr. Fauci had this information back in March 2020.
Fauci ignored this information.
And Fauci lied to the American public and destroyed the US economy, tens of thousands of businesses and millions of lives.
But Dr. Fauci never bothered communicating this information in his infinite media appearances.
Via a March 2020 Fauci email.
When will this megalomaniac face justice?
Joe Hoft is the twin brother of TGP's founder, Jim Hoft. His posts have been retweeted by President Trump and have made the headlines at the Drudge Report. Joe worked as a corporate executive in Hong Kong and traveled the world for his work, which gives him a unique perspective of US and global current events. He has ten degrees or designations and is the author of three books. His new book: 'In God We Trust: Not in Lying Liberal Lunatics' is out now - please take a look and buy a copy. @joehoft
In February 2020 Email, Fauci Wrote Face Masks “Not Effective in Keeping Out Virus”
By Paul Joseph Watson - 02. June 2021
Said COVID was "small enough to pass through material." Image Credit: Chip Somodevilla via Getty Images
In an email from February 2020 released under the Freedom of Information Act, Dr. Anthony Fauci wrote that a typical store-bought face mask “is not really effective in keeping out virus, which is small enough to pass through material.”
Included in the trove of emails, which were obtained by The Washington Post and BuzzFeed News, is Fauci’s response to former health and human services secretary Sylvia Burwell when she asked him for advice about wearing face masks while traveling.
Fauci wrote: “Masks are really for infected people to prevent them from spreading infection to people who are not infected rather than protecting uninfected people from acquiring infection.
“The typical mask you buy in the drug store is not really effective in keeping out virus, which is small enough to pass through material. It might, however, provide some slight benefit in keep out gross droplets if someone coughs or sneezes on you.”
Fauci went on in the email to advise Burwell not to wear a face mask because she was visiting “a very low risk location.” Dr. Fauci was still advising against wearing face masks as late as March 2020, when he told the media, “there’s no reason to be walking around with a mask.”
He later reversed his position after the CDC began recommending that Americans wear face coverings.
Social media networks have long censored and deleted information pertaining to the efficacy of masks, or lack thereof, despite numerous credible studies concluding that they are largely useless at stopping the spread of COVID-19.
A study in Denmark involving 6,000 participants found that “there was no statistically significant difference between those who wore masks and those who did not when it came to being infected by Covid-19,” the Spectator reported.
“1.8 per cent of those wearing masks caught Covid, compared to 2.1 per cent of the control group. As a result, it seems that any effect masks have on preventing the spread of the disease in the community is small.”
Sen. Tom Cotton slams Fauci for covering his track on his links to Chinese virology laboratory
By Ramon Tomey - 31. May 2021
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) criticized top American infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci during a television appearance. The lawmaker accused Fauci of “playing word games” and “attempting to cover his tracks” regarding the origin of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).
According to Cotton, the Fauci could be involved in a “genuine scandal” with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
During a May 23 Fox News appearance, Cotton said that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) must “come clean and tell [Congress] exactly what happened. Cotton added that he thinks many of the scientific bureaucrats and experts “are trying to cover their tracks” on where COVID-19 really came from.
The lawmaker also commented on the “gain of function” research conducted at the Wuhan facility, which received NIH funding. The research aimed to examine sickness-causing pathogens such as bat coronaviruses. Chinese scientists at the WIV, led by the institute’s resident expert Shi Zhengli, frequently visited the caves in southern China’s Yunnan province to collect samples of coronaviruses from bats.
“This could be public health bureaucrats violating explicit direction from the Obama [administration] … to continue research that is highly, highly dangerous and particularly susceptible to escape from a laboratory – especially [one based] in China,” Cotton said.
“The money that the NIH gave went to an American organization, which turned around and gave hundreds of thousands of dollars to these Wuhan labs,” he explained, adding that these labs then proceeded to “investigate coronaviruses … and find ways to make them more contagious and more dangerous.”
Cotton also brought up the idea that the virus escaped from the WIV facility during his Fox News appearance. “Dr. Fauci has been to Congress, and he said this absolutely did not happen. But [he] is playing word games,” he said. The U.S. senator added that he and other colleagues approached Fauci’s boss, NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins, to “come clean” and explain why the gain of function research continued to be funded despite an explicit ban on it.
A spokesperson for the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) did not immediately respond to a request for comment sent by Fox News. Fauci is the incumbent NIAID director.
Cotton joins Sen. Rand Paul in criticizing Fauci’s links to the Wuhan laboratory
Cotton has been searching for evidence that COVID-19 leaked from a laboratory for more than a year now. He has also called for a deeper investigation of the pathogen’s origins since the pandemic struck. Despite these, Cotton received criticism for being a “conspiracy theorist.”
Fauci, on the other hand, received more media attention when he admitted that the Wuhan coronavirus leaking from a laboratory may be true. (Related: Tom Cotton blames China for coronavirus spread, says Beijing made “conscious decision” to allow it to escape the country.)
A May 24 report by The Hill said the NIAID director was “not convinced” the Wuhan coronavirus developed naturally. The infectious disease expert said during an event: “[On the matter of SARS-CoV-2 developing naturally,] I am not convinced about that. I think we should continue to investigate what went on in China until we continue to find out … what happened.”
But even before Cotton voiced out his sentiments toward Fauci, his colleague Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) engaged in a verbal showdown with the NIAID director. During a May 11 congressional hearing, Paul zoomed in on claims that SARS-CoV-2 did escape a laboratory in Wuhan. (Related: Dr. Rand Paul doubles down, takes on Dr. Fauci and the coronavirus gain-of-function coverup.)
“Three million people have died from this pandemic, and that should cause us to explore all possibilities. Instead, government authorities self-interested in continuing ‘gain of function’ research say there’s nothing to see here. To arrive at the truth, the U.S. government should admit that the Wuhan laboratory was experimenting to enhance the coronavirus’s ability to infect humans,” Paul said.
Fauci defended himself and told the U.S. senator for Kentucky that he was “entirely and completely incorrect.” He denied the lawmaker’s claim that the NIH funded gain of function research in the Chinese facility. “I do not have any accounting of what the Chinese may have done, and I’m fully in favor of any further investigation. However, I will repeat again: The NIH and NIAID categorically [have] not funded ‘gain of function’ research,” Fauci said.
Paul doubled down on his claims when he spoke to WKRC 12 on May 20. He told the CBS affiliate: “We should not be experimenting with making [the Wuhan coronavirus] more transmissible. [What] if something were to escape that is … deadly and cause a pandemic? When you see [Fauci’s] answers in the testimony, you see someone who is not genuine because he has actually been an outspoken advocate of gain of function [research.]”
FAUCI-GATE: EMAIL DUMP EXPOSES FAUCI AS A MASS MURDERER
The Pete Santilli Show - LIVE Channel Published June 2, 2021
✅ Pete Santilli LIVE! https://rumble.com/PeteLive
✅ The Pete Santilli Show Main Channel https://rumble.com/c/ThePeteSantilliShow
✅SBN News Clips https://rumble.com/c/SBNNewsClips
✅Pete Santilli Show Guest Interviews https://rumble.com/c/PeteSantilliInterviews
PROLOGUE: No objection to throw Faux Chi under the bus, but make sure the bus of truth doesn't stop then - it must drive on since there are more to be flattened and first of all the truth must be revealed about the whole issue..
Dr. Fauci previously argued that conducting risky experiments and manipulating contagious viruses was worth the work, even if a lab accident could lead to a deadly pandemic.
The Australian reported on the newly unearthed comments Fauci made in the American Society for Microbiology in October 2012.
“In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?” Fauci wrote, according to The Australian.
“Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?
“Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks.”
Dr. Fauci was grilled by Senator Rand Paul for supporting and funding gain-of-function experiments being conducted in the Wuhan lab
It is clear workers at the Wuhan lab successfully isolated the coronavirus and were actively experimenting with species-to-species transmission.
Fauci lied under oath and claimed the NIH never funded gain-of-function research in the Wuhan institute.
Dr. Fauci not only funded gain-of-function research, we now know that he supported these risky experiments even if the work could lead to deadly zoonotic pandemic.
Cristina Laila began writing for The Gateway Pundit in 2016 and she is currently the Associate Editor.
Every now and then, I’m lucky enough to meet someone who “follows the science.” I count on such folks to teach me some science that I do not yet know. Being scientifically literate, I like to start by asking them some basic questions:
How are key data terms defined? How are data collected and reported? What theories guided the design of the models that process the raw data? What studies validated the models? How sensitive are the models to variations in inputs? How well do the models perform using historical data? Do the models have a track record at prediction — and if so, how well have they done? What alternative hypotheses were considered? How were the hypotheses tested?
Anyone surprised by such questions can’t plausibly claim to understand the science, much less to follow it. Most likely, they’ve confused “the science” with a selected scientist, a claimed scientific consensus, or the scientific establishment. Or, worse, partisan politics masquerading as science.
The confusion stems from a common misconception — an improper line many people draw between scientists working for corporations and scientists working for universities or government agencies. While most people understand that corporate scientists tend to support positions that serve corporate interests, many have been fooled into believing that academic and government scientists serve objective scientific truth.
Employment incentives are important to all scientists. The only difference is that it’s easier for outsiders to guess what a corporation wants its scientists to say than it is to understand what drives career advancement in academia or government.
With the absence of a bottom line or market feedback, success in academic or government science often flows to those most adept at flattering their more senior colleagues. Because the greatest form of scientific flattery is building upon someone else’s work, promotions and prestigious appointments invariably go to scientists who confirm that their supervisors moved “the science” in the right direction, and push it a little bit further in that same direction. Those who suggest that their predecessors have moved science in the wrong direction tend to have short, unhappy careers.
In other words, corporate scientists are motivated to confirm the excellence of their employers’ new products. Academic and government scientists are motivated to confirm the excellence of their employers’ old research.
What’s more, scientists often let their own biases color their work. Over the past 15 months, for example, vast numbers of Americans have trusted Dr. Anthony Fauci to make hugely consequential decisions about their lives, families, communities, and livelihoods.
At first blush, that choice seems reasonable. Dr. Fauci has a long record of public service and prestigious appointments. Before trusting him to rewrite America’s economic and social structures, however, it might have been a good idea to notice that he favors “rebuilding the infrastructures of human existence, from cities to homes to workplaces” in ways that “prioritize changes in those human behaviors that constitute risks for the emergence of infectious diseases,” including “crowding at home, work, and in public places.”
For Americans who share Fauci’s vision and values, such advice was golden. For those of us who see humans as something other than carriers of pathogens, however, the changes he imposed may run counter to our own values and beliefs. How many of the Americans who’ve followed Fauci understand that what they’ve been following is not “the science,” but rather an idiosyncratic scientist who views the drastic impositions on our lives as having “nothing to do with liberty.”
He's but one example. There are many others. The United States has fallen into a cult of expertise. Far too many Americans place credentialed experts on a pedestal, confuse their personal and professional biases with objective science, and hide from the open inquiry that’s supposed to animate scientific investigation.
Worse, they trust these experts on critical questions unrelated to their narrow areas of expertise. Was it really a good idea to let an immunologist who advocates social restructuring and deurbanization, but not liberty, shutter our businesses, schools, and churches?
Such misplaced trust is hardly an anomaly. Today’s Green Party true believers would deprive billions of people of affordable energy because an alleged 97% of scientists whose prestige and funding would disappear if science determined that a climate crisis was not imminent agree that a climate crisis is imminent. Yet it’s wrong to express skepticism, examine their motivations, or question their credibility?
The cult of expertise is a clear and present danger. Self-serving scientists -- many trapped so deeply in the system they don’t even know they’re serving themselves -- have convinced gullible Americans that their opinions represent objective science.
There are no shortcuts. If you want to follow the science, you must first study, question, and understand the science. Otherwise, you’re at the mercy of some scientist’s personal incentives, biases, and values. Far from science, that’s such a clear act of faith that it animates the biblical warning, “Put not your trust in princes, nor in the son of man, in whom there is no help.”
Bruce Abramson, PhD, JD, is a principal at JBB&A Strategies and B2 Strategic, a director of the American Center for Education and Knowledge, and author of the forthcoming book "The New Civil War: Exposing Elites, Fighting Utopian Leftism, and Restoring America" (RealClear Publishing, 2021).
via RealClear Politics (emphasis TYLER DURDEN),
US House Representatives led by Devin Nunes released a report showing that the US likely engaged in dangerous research in China and that the China coronavirus (COVID-19) likely escaped from a Wuhan lab. This is consistent with what we have been reporting for a year.
The Washington Times reported on the House report:
House Intelligence Committee Republicans released a report on the coronavirus pandemic on Wednesday and pointed the finger directly at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, arguing there is “overwhelming circumstantial evidence” supporting the hypothesis COVID-19 originated in the lab.
** A copy of the report is here.
The report states:
Possible U.S. Funding of Gain of Function Research in China
Under the leadership of Dr. Anthony Fauci, 19 between Fiscal Years 2014 and 2019, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) awarded more than $3.7 million in grants to EcoHealth Alliance to examine the “risk of future coronavirus (CoV) emergence[s]…in China.”20 EcoHealth Alliance has also reportedly received funding from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).21 The President of EcoHealth Alliance, Dr. Peter Daszak, has been an outspoken opponent of the lab leak hypothesis since the outbreak of the pandemic.22 Dr. Daszak was the only American scientist to participate in the WHO’s 28-day investigation into the origins of COVID-19.23
Officials from both the Trump and Biden administrations have said the Chinese government worked for over a year to thwart an independent investigation into the origins of the virus. Both administrations cast doubt on the manner in which a joint study from China and the World Health Organization was conducted earlier this year. Though the WHO-China report said a jump from animals to humans was most likely, numerous Trump officials have pointed to an accidental escape from the Wuhan lab as a highly plausible, or the most likely, origin for the pandemic.
Led by Rep. Devin Nunes, the ranking member on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, the 21-page Republican report, In Focus: COVID-19 and the Wuhan Institute of Virology, laid out what the congressmen saw as the case for considering a leak from a Wuhan lab.
One year ago we reported that Dr. Fauci likely broke the law when he funded COVID related research in Wuhan:
It actually appears that Fauci and Obama gave the China lab millions for research into COVID:
We’ve reported extensively on this subject for a year. Recently we reported on one theory where China intentionally attempted to infect US military – athletes visiting Wuhan in October 2019:
Also, we now know China’s military was involved in the research at all time:
China is now targeting Lawrence Sellin PhD who has shared numerous pieces at The Gateway Pundit on this subject:
The Republican House report appears thorough and fare but realistically they have a ways to go to catch up to our reporting on this matter.
Joe Hoft is the twin brother of TGP's founder, Jim Hoft. His posts have been retweeted by President Trump and have made the headlines at the Drudge Report. Joe worked as a corporate executive in Hong Kong and traveled the world for his work, which gives him a unique perspective of US and global current events. He has ten degrees or designations and is the author of three books. His new book: 'In God We Trust: Not in Lying Liberal Lunatics' is out now - please take a look and buy a copy. @joehoft
'Tucker Carlson Tonight' host examines why the NIAID director helped fund research at the Wuhan lab
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
How do we assess the Biden administration’s response to COVID? Well, here’s one marker: it tells you pretty much everything that the White House that is supposedly so committed to science chose as its head COVID coordinator a man with no background at all in science or medicine. His name is Jeffrey Zients. Zients ran Joe Biden’s presidential transition team, that’s his qualification. He’s a former management consultant from Bain, who sat on the board of Facebook. Jeffrey Zients is a political operative. That’s who’s overseeing COVID response for Joe Biden. The good news is because Zients isn’t even close to being an actual scientist, he doesn’t talk like one. Occasionally he says things whose significance the rest of us can clearly understand. Read what Zients said on CNN yesterday, and it becomes very clear how the White House understands this pandemic.
JEFFREY ZIENTS: And the light at the end of the tunnel is brighter and brighter. Let's keep up our guard. Let's follow the CDC guidance. And the CDC guidance across time will allow vaccinated people more and more privileges to take off that mask.
There it is. "The CDC guidance across time will allow vaccinated people more and more privileges to take off that mask." A sentence like that raises so many questions, it’s hard to know where to start. How about here: If the vaccines work, why are any vaccinated people wearing masks anywhere, ever? Seriously. Jeffrey Zients should be required to explain that, slowly and with numbers, so the rest of us who didn’t serve on the board of Facebook can understand. No one’s asked him to explain that, of course, so he hasn’t. Nor has anyone asked Zients just how effective masks are at preventing the spread of COVID. Our public health authorities act as though masks are absolutely critical. But are they absolutely critical? Where are the serious studies that prove that? Do they exist? If they do exist, is there a reason they’re being hidden from us? And, finally, when did masklessness become a privilege? For thousands of years, until 12 months ago, masklessness was the global status quo. Virtually everyone on earth lived without masks. That wasn’t considered weird. Masks were weird. They were unhealthy and menacing. Yet Jeffrey Zients has just informed us that things have changed. Going forward, not wearing a mask, even after you’ve been vaccinated, is "a privilege" — a Scooby snack, a gold star, a pat on the head — that may or may not be granted to you exclusively by the Democratic Party, on the basis of no science, but purely because they’re in charge and you’re not. That’s called public health. It’s absolutely critical to the existence of our species that you comply with it reflexively, without asking questions or thinking about it. This will all continue, Zients explained, "across time."
What does that mean, exactly? How long will this terrifyingly irrational exercise continue? For the answer to that question, we go to a man even more partisan than Jeffrey Zients. The nation’s most highly credentialed political operative, Tony Fauci, let us know that, actually, this mask thing is never going to end.
CHUCK TODD, NBC: But is the mask going to be something we have with us in a seasonal aspect?
DR. ANTHONY FAUCI: You know, that's quite possible. I think people have gotten used to the fact that wearing masks, clearly, if you look at the data, diminishes respiratory diseases…So it is conceivable that as we go on a year or two or more from now, that during certain seasonal periods when you have respiratory-borne viruses like the flu, people might actually elect to wear masks to diminish the likelihood that you’ll be spreading these respiratory-borne diseases.
"A year or two or more from now." In other words, never — you’re never taking off the mask. Get ready for a lifetime of filthy wet cotton covering your mouth, reduced oxygen flow to your brain, and a world where every stranger looks the same because no one has a face. When Kamala Harris and her husband kissed the other day while wearing masks, they were giving you a preview of your daughter’s wedding. In a masked world, human beings never really touch each other. Is that public health? No, it’s not public health. It’s a kind of punishment. Tony Fauci is punishing the country — you, us, everyone. The question is: why is he doing that? Maybe he liked it, that’s possible. But you’ve got to think that at least part of Fauci’s authoritarian germ hysterical is a cover for something else. Could it be that Tony Fauci is trying to divert attention from himself and his own role in the COVID-19 pandemic?
What do we mean by that? We can’t recommend more strongly a new piece by Nicholas Wade, who for more than 50 years has been one of the preeminent science writers in the world. For 30 years, Nicholas Wade worked for the New York Times, he edited the science section there. But this piece did not run in the New York Times, he edited the science section there. But this piece did not run in the New York Times. It ran on Medium. And the piece explains where the virus almost certainly came from. In it, Wade makes it clear that, more than any other single American, Tony Fauci is responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic.
Wade lays out a nearly insurmountable amount of evidence that this virus originated at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Central China. We’ve raised this possibility from the early days of the pandemic. But this piece all but proves it. At the time the outbreak began last fall, the Wuhan lab was conducting experiments on how to make bat viruses infectious to human beings. Those experiments were funded by American tax dollars, the funding for those experiments was approved and directed by Tony Fauci in Washington. It’s hard to believe that, but it’s true, and the piece lays it out.
Many of the Wuhan experiments fell under the direction of a Chinese researcher Shi Zheng-li. Known as the "bat lady," she was China's leading expert on bat-born viruses. Her job was genetically engineering coronaviruses so that they infect human beings, and do so as easily as possible.
The work, Wade notes, involved, "doing gain-of-function experiments designed to make coronaviruses infect human cells."
Why was this research going on? You’ll have to ask the scientist who did it.
But the facts remain, these were some of the most dangerous experiments ever conducted by mankind. And yet we know that China wasn't taking the necessary safety precautions. And we should not be surprised by that. Several years ago, U.S. diplomatic cables warned about lax standards at the Wuhan Lab. The Wuhan facility was classified as a "bio-safety-level two laboratory." What does that mean? According to Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers, that's approximately the same level of safety that you would find in a dentist's office in America.
So that lab, conducting research on the coronavirus, and how to make it transmissible to human beings, resulted almost certainly infected a lab researcher and spread from there. The first coronavirus patients didn’t come from the so-called wet market as we heard. That was a lie. The first patients of the coronavirus were employees at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Once again, why would the Wuhan lab be conducting experiments like that in the first place? Well, we know that Tony Fauci had authorized payment for the research. For five years -- from 2014 to 2019 -- the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which Fauci runs, and has for decades, pumped money to a group called the EcoHealth Alliance.
The EcoHealth Alliance, run by a man called Dr. Peter Daszak, contracted with Dr. Shi to conduct gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab.
Just before the pandemic became public knowledge -- on December 9, 2019 -- Peter Daszak sat for an interview that was streamed online. In that interview, he bragged about how easy it is to manipulate coronaviruses in lab experiments.
PETER DASZAK: Coronavirus is a pretty good… You can manipulate them in the lab pretty easily. It’s spike protein, Spike protein drives a lot of what happens with the coronavirus, zoonotic risk. So you can get the sequence, build the protein. And we worked with Ralph Barrack at UNC to do this. Insert into a backbone of another virus and then do some work in the lab.
Just days after he said that, it became clear that this new version of coronavirus, this novel coronavirus, what we now call COVID-19, was running rampant through Wuhan then China then the world. Since the pandemic began, Peter Daszak, not surprisingly, has appeared on virtually every media platform available to him to deny, in the most strenuous and dismissive terms, that the Wuhan lab could be in any way linked to the outbreak, since he has very personal motives for claiming that. "The idea that this virus escaped from a lab is just pure baloney," he said last year. But that’s a lie. It’s not pure baloney.
A lot of smart people knew that right away. One of those people is Alina Chan, a molecular biologist at the Broad Institute at Harvard and MIT. She bravely wrote a paper about how the coronavirus's genome hadn't changed much over time, and that was odd because that genome had gone through trillions of replications. According to Chan, that fact implied that the virus was designed for human-to-human transmission from the outset.
The former director of the CDC also clearly understood this. He too argued the virus came from the Wuhan lab.
CDC DIR. REDFIELD: I am of the point of view that I still think the most likely ideology of this pathogen in Wuhan was from a laboratory, escaped. Other people don’t believe that. It’s fine. Science will eventually figure it out. It’s not unusual for respiratory pathogens that are being worked on in a laboratory to infect the laboratory worker.
Millions of people have died of COVID-19, so it’s not a matter of score-settling or blame-assignment to figure out where it came from. If you want to prevent the next global pandemic, you have to figure out how this one started. And so, the World Health Organization, said it would get to the bottom of it. The World Health Organization, of course, is beholden to China. And so, it tried to hide the basic facts of the origins of this pandemic. And to hide those facts, WHO appointed none other than Peter Daszak as the only America-based representative on the investigative team looking into where the virus came from. In what turned out to be a sham report, that team concluded it's "extremely unlikely" the virus came from the Wuhan lab. That’s not true.
The WHO’s investigation into the origins of the virus was fraudulent, and that matters to public health globally. But one thing you’ll notice is that Tony Fauci did not say that. Why? Because once again, he’s implicated in it, personally. The gain-of-function research that Peter Daszak was bragging about in the video we just showed you had, in fact, been banned explicitly by the U.S. government. There was a federal moratorium on the funding of exactly the kind of gain-of-function experiments that went on in the Wuhan lab, to disastrous effects. So why didn't the feds halt its funding to the lab in Wuhan? That is a central question, and Nicholas Wade looked into it.
Here's what he found: "Someone wrote a loophole into the moratorium. The moratorium specifically barred funding any gain-of-function research that increased the pathogenicity of the flu, MERS or SARS viruses. But then a footnote on p.2 of the moratorium document states that 'An exception from the research pause may be obtained if the head of the USG funding agency determines that the research is urgently necessary to protect the public health or national security.'"
And that’s exactly the loophole that was exploited. Who signed off on this? Tony Fauci — possibly along with Francis Collins, the director of the NIH -- invoked that special exception in order to keep funding the Wuhan lab, and the deadly experiments that were going on there. The experiments that clearly went so wrong.
According to Richard Ebright, "Unfortunately, the NIAID Director [Fauci] and the NIH Director exploited this loophole to issue exemptions to projects subject to the pause – preposterously asserting the exempted research was ‘urgently necessary to protect public health or national security — thereby nullifying the pause."
This wouldn’t have happened if Tony Fauci didn’t allow it to happen. That is clear.
It’s an amazing story. It is a shocking story. In a functional country, there would be a criminal investigation into Tony Fauci’s role in the COVID pandemic that has killed millions and halted our country, changing it forever. So why isn’t there a criminal investigation into Tony Fauci’s role in this pandemic?
This article is adapted from Tucker Carlson's opening commentary on the May 10, 2021, edition of "Tucker Carlson Tonight."
ANTHONY FAUCI DELIBERATELY RELEASED COVID-19 FROM WUHAN LAB
First published on BITCHUTE May 8th, 2021.
• Serial Killer Overlords: Darkest Secret Revealed https://www.bitchute.com/video/49qlIKYTyUOi/
• Schizophrenic New World Order Slaughter House https://www.bitchute.com/video/iRQzx8wS1vYu/
• Judaism's Trinity of Terror: ADL, SPLC & ACLU https://www.bitchute.com/video/9otiIAVZWjcE/
• White Devil Deception Documentary https://www.bitchute.com/video/GxL9uJOGrNI2/
• Europa: The Last Battle (Part 1) https://www.bitchute.com/video/Wze8635Y2q4q/
• ‘Q-Anon’ Bears Striking Resemblance to Jewish Bolshevik Psy-Op From 1920s Known As ‘Operation Trust’ https://www.camelotdaily.com/q-anon-bears-striking-resemblance-to-jewish-bolshevik-psy-op-from-1920s-known-as-operation-trust/
• Bolshevik Deep State Created Coronavirus Severing 94% of U.S. Imports, Threatening Gas, Agriculture, Power & Defense, To Usher In Liberty Crushing Force of Economic Collapse, Starvation, Agenda 21 and World War https://www.camelotdaily.com/bolshevik-controlled-deep-state-orchestrated-coronavirus-to-usher-in-liberty-crushing-force-of-starvation-and-agenda-21/
• Kamala Harris, Communist China Linked Utah Gov't and CIA, Groomed Antifa To Kill in D.C. https://www.bitchute.com/video/2KHJMj6tQC8h/
• Obama Paid Italian Weapons Contractor Leonardo $400M To Manipulate 2020 Election Via Satellite https://www.bitchute.com/video/gUH7RFMhpDa4/
• EU lawsuit Reveals Globalist's Coronahoax Vaccine Extermination Protocol https://www.bitchute.com/video/NqchtUtaDyVL/
• Scientist Linked To Wuhan's Coronavirus, Covid-19 Test, Bill Gates and Facebook 'Fact Checker' https://www.bitchute.com/video/CW8Y52nAXcD0/
• Anthony Fauci & Barack Obama Orchestrated Coronavirus Attack On U.S. https://www.bitchute.com/video/wfViREx8T2KK/
• Lock Bill Gates Up! https://www.bitchute.com/video/klFNqd0LXknv/
• Bill Gates' Medical Tyranny 2020 https://www.bitchute.com/video/TZzHMTjAnOHS/
• Bill Gates Vaccines & Transhumanism: Dark Secrets You Need To Know https://www.bitchute.com/video/Gy6r9muGUcm8/
• Microsoft is Umbrella Corporation? https://www.bitchute.com/video/5WnICkTGlIIm/
• White Americans Forced to Wear Tracking Anklets After Being Labelled Coronahoax Positive https://www.bitchute.com/video/FUDqcjaf3Fsl/
• Israel's Unit 8200 Stole America's 2020 Election For China's Geriatric Puppet Joe Biden https://www.bitchute.com/video/oTiLnLuXViaq/
• Nuclear Physicist VP of Dominion Software Told Antifa Via Phone, "I Made Sure Trump Wouldn't Win" https://www.bitchute.com/video/cIlKvU4soaSm/
• Russian Bolshevik Funded Terrorist Group Black Lives Matter Linked to Israel https://www.bitchute.com/video/UORVToCabuxV/
• Israel: Countdown To Destruction https://www.bitchute.com/video/undupOOvlQQ9/
• Black African Cult Convinces History-Challenged White Couple To Kiss Their Boots https://www.bitchute.com/video/T3oij0sH5rBF/
• NASCAR Endorses Bolshevik Orchestrated White Genocide https://www.bitchute.com/video/kQYZKgZXfBvf/
• Jewish Billionaire George Soros’ Masonic 33 Million Dollar Donation to Bolshevik Linked Black Lives Matter Terrorist Group Behind Abolition of Police https://www.camelotdaily.com/jewish-billionaire-george-soros-masonic-33-million-dollar-donation-bolshevik-linked-black-lives-matter-terrorist-group-behind-abolition-police/
• CDC Leadership's Central Goal In America? "Get Rid of White People" https://www.bitchute.com/video/Der0YKcgViHT/
• Jewish Media Glorifies Violent Black Criminal George Floyd Who Had Son Named ‘Mason’, Bolshevik Created Coronavirus, Deadly Levels of Jewish Created Opioids, Killed By Masonic Police Force Using ‘Knee-On-Neck’ Tactic Taught by Israeli Defense Forces. LETS KILL WHITE PEOPLE!? https://www.camelotdaily.com/george-floyd-bolshevik-created-coronavirus-deadly-levels-israeli-opioids-killed-masonic-police-force-using-knee-neck-tactic-taught-israeli-defense-forces/
• PEDOGATE 2020 | In-Depth Exploration (DISTURBING NEW INTEL) MUST WATCH! https://www.bitchute.com/video/nF0aleJHiTXw/
• Russian Bolshevik Controlled YouTube Restricts Content About 5G Dangers After Attacks On 5g Towers Across America Increase https://www.camelotdaily.com/youtube-restricts-content-5g-dangers-attacks-5g-towers-across-america-increase/
• United States 5g Map: https://www.speedtest.net/ookla-5g-map
• Nation of Islam & Scientology Members Steal $3.8M From California Tax Payers https://www.bitchute.com/video/azLiHsMZtUGE/
• Death Cult of Transgenderism's Self Destruction https://www.bitchute.com/video/MvRFFaYQczEc/
• Bolshevik Bernie Praises The World's Worst Dictators, "Food Lines Are a Good Thing" https://www.bitchute.com/video/g0hgSj0fMHm6/
• Russian Bolshevik Michael Bloomberg's Final Solution For America https://www.bitchute.com/video/MBIcjpNnSuus/
• Mike Obama 2020: It Clicks The Like Button https://www.bitchute.com/video/E3IVBmdu4Pmk/
• Trump Doesn’t Like Those Who “Use Their Faith To Do Wrong”. You Mean Like Jewish Supremacists? https://www.bitchute.com/video/ffqcuGhNJaFU/
Leaked Mail, Plotkin and Fauci Perjury, Evidence Vaccine Racket Unwinding
Vaccine Racket Unwinds as Officials’ E-mails Leak and Plotkin and Fauci Both Caught Perjuring Themselves
By Sherri Kane, J.T. Kong, and Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz - 02. March 2020
This is PART 4 of our series of articles exposing the ‘controlled opposition’ in the ‘vaccination debate.’ In our earlier reports we detailed how opposition and ‘vaccine hesitancy’ leaders and groups are controlled; why ‘vaccine hesitancy’ is diverted away from vaccine-induced cancers and auto-immune diseases; who controls the counterintelligence MKULTRA mind-control and its subordinate MKNAOMI bioweapons program; and the ‘death racket’s’ damage to civilization justified by depopulation proponents. These powerful forces in politics and health science include Bill Gates and major media owners.
We vetted the Murdochs’ role in PART 2 when we explained the The VAXXED v. UN-VAXXED controversy, and California Democratic Rep. Adam Shiff (D), whose Deep State agency caused VAXXED to be restricted from Google/YouTube, Facebook and Amazon for purportedly offending people.
In PART 3 we further revealed the cover-up of the Special Virus Cancer Program (SVCP) in the ‘Measles Virus Cancer Cure Fraud. We presented evidence of lies from both sides of the vaccination debate, concealing unconscionable acts and diabolical facts from the cancer virus vaccine industry. We especially noted Dr. Joseph Mercola‘s involvements as a leading voice urging vaccine hesitancy, but as controlled opposition financially-tied to Barbara Loe Fisher and her ‘astroturf’ double-agency. This purportedly ‘grassroots’ National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) was administered partly by Big Pharma lobbyists from its inception. They were largely responsible for the despicable National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 that indemnified vaccine makers from liability for vaccine injuries.
Here we complete our consideration of Dr. Mercola’s role in the MKULTRA subversion of society and the racketeering enterprise entrusted by the public with children’s health, safety and the future of civilization.
Vaccine Officials Stanley Plotkin and Anthony Fauci Commit Perjury
Scientific evidence tampering, concealing facts, neglecting and silencing opposition has been standard operating procedures for government and vaccine industry officials. But now two leaders have been caught committing perjury under oath. These officials include Dr. Stanley Plotkin and Dr. Anthony Fauci.
Dr. Plotkin is a leading consultant to vaccine makers. In the 1960s, while working at the Wistar Institute in Philadelphia, he played a pivotal role in developing a rubella vaccine. Plotkin also developed with Paul Offit a rotavirus vaccine.
During the 1970s, Plotkin lead the development of an experimental vaccine against the simian (monkey) cytomegalovirus–one of the most common vaccine contaminants. Although this “CMV” vaccine has yet to be commercialized, Plotkin clearly obtained his background intelligence on CMV from his colleagues at Wistar who worked in the SVCP.
Attached here is a copy of the Wistar Institute SVCP Contract # 71-2092. It proves that Plotkin has aided-and-abetted by willful blindness, or more likely direct complicity, in the spread of cancers from contaminated vaccines. The Wistar contract clearly states the “significance to biomedical research” of his group’s NCI contract was to “isolate and test virus-induced tumor-specific transplantation antigens in animal model systems.” The group worked to “rescue human oncogenic (i.e., cancer-causing) viruses using co-cultivation, fusion (i.e., genetic engineering by mutating and hybridizing viruses) and chemical activation” of viruses to produce cancers. Specifically, the cancers sought to be produced in this 1971-72 contract was the AIDS-cancers “Sarcomas and Leukemias” as noted on the contract’s title.
This evidence of Plotkin’s censorship to conceal the Wistar Institute’s complicity in the vaccine-transmitted epidemics leukemias, sarcomas and AIDS, is shocking and criminally-indicting. This industry-wide censorship serves to silence critical thinking. Scientific and lay media silence prevents and controls opposition to global genocide financed by corporate fascists.
This ploy of censorship imposing widespread silence and criminal negligence is most commonly abused by the Deep State’s “fake news media” and “captured” science journals that influences public and professional attitudes and behaviors concerning every aspect of life, including vaccinations.
The unconscionable objective of such MKULTRA/MKNAOMI social and viral-cancer engineering is to replace human immunity with ‘vaccinology.’ To do this, everything honest, including opposition, must be silencing under totalitarian controls.
Controlling all opposition by forming the opposition groups, creating the opposition media, financing opposition programming, and bribing scientists like Plotkin, Offit, Fauci and Reiss, is part of the program.
These agents and their actions substantially discredit all viable opposition leaders, thus disabling them. Deceptive agents and agencies divert attention like magicians. Here, for example, Plotkin disappears his group’s activities in manufacturing cancers and cancer viruses. The entire operation is falsely presumed to defeat cancers using preventative vaccines. Professionals are captured and entranced by the strongest propagandists, like Offit and Anthony Fauci. Their strong messages give false assurances that the ‘herd’ simply accepts. People, including medical professionals, remain oblivious to the tricks of this MKULTRA social engineering advancing the MKNAOMI biowarfare against civilization.
Compounding evidence of Plotkin’s pattern-and-practice of lying, proving his criminal psychopathology, is viewed in the video below. You can witness Plotkin perjuring himself under oath in an effort to magically disappear his use of aborted human fetuses to manufacture experimental vaccines. He and his pro-vaccine cohort has likewise disappeared the creation of cancer pandemics from monkey viruses mutated in their labs. This can be known by simply reading the Wistar SVCP contract. Here you can see that “SV40,” that is, the monkey virus known to cause cancers and known to have been transmitted by contaminated polio vaccines to humanity beginning in the early 1960s, was manipulated by Plotkin’s group. They tested these cancer triggers and their protein ‘antigens’ in other animals and humans as well in their cancer studies.
At the same time this video recording Dr. Plotkin’s perjury was made known, 82 pages of leaked emails surfaced evidencing correspondence between Plotkin and other leading vaccines propagandists: Dorit Reiss and Paul Offit. The mail shows the group engaged in a conspiracy to defraud society by omissions and misrepresentations. They conceal vaccine risks and falsely defend vaccine safety in what reads like frantic dialogue among criminals facing public exposure and mounting furor. There are now widespread calls for criminal investigations into conspiracy to commit genocide.
The leaked e-mails show the group desperate to contrive new ways to push their vaccines, and prevent anti-vaxxers from getting the truth out to save lives and children’s brains.
One of the e-mails sources from the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Pediatrics, the medical profession’s leading vaccine advocacy publication. Here, Dr. Lewis R. First hypocritically coached Plotkin in how to respond to “groups that are out to convince families to disregard scientific evidence on a variety of issues relevant to child health.” Ironically, First disregards scientific evidence of vaccine-transmitted cancer viruses and cancers. He has either been hoodwinked, or complicit by willful-blindness in the genocide as evidenced by the SVCP Wistar contract and Plotkin’s involvements therein.
Dr. First’s Pediatrics represents the American Academy of Pediatrics that is the main vaccine-pushing entity influencing the CDC, the U.S. Congress, and the Rockefeller/US Navy Intelligence enterprise. The latter administers the American Public Health Association, a virtual Big Pharma racket that promotes childhood ‘immunization schedules.’ Evidencing their conflicting interests, the Pediatrics “Index to Advertisers” lists Glaxo Wellcome, Wyeth-Ayerst Labs, and Warner Lambert as financial supporters.
So not only do the co-conspirators in treason and genocide avoid discussing the SVCP and the epidemics of cancers caused by Plotkin’s and Offit’s cohorts in viral-vaccine research, but also their own conflicting financial interests. It is public knowledge these doctors hold lucrative patents on the vaccines they developed while neglecting and concealing the risks of vaccine transmitted cancers, auto-immune diseases and more.
A further example of criminal negligence and psychopathology is given by Dorit Rubinstein Reiss in her mail. Reiss is a Professor of Law. She discussed the data initially censored by the CDC officials in the government’s major vaccine-autism study, “DeStefano et. al.” She makes no mention to her fellow willfully-blind co-conspirator Plotkin about William Thompson—the whistleblower whose revelations are subject to further scrutiny.
Anthony Fauci’s Genocidal Perjury At PharmWhore
In the meantime, on Feb. 27, 2019, Dr. Fauci was recorded committing perjury before the U.S. Congress’s House Committee on Energy & Commerce at a “Heaing on ‘Confronting a Growing Public Health Threat: Measles Outbreaks in the U.S.” sponsored by PharmaWhores Frank Pallone Jr. (D-NJ) and Diana DeGette (D-CO). Fauci’s facial features gave-away his ‘scienter’–knowledge that he was lying as you can view on the CSPAN recording. Fauci denied that cases of encephalitis have been caused by the measles vaccine is commonly known in medicine, as clearly stated in the vaccine package insert supplied by Merck. That publication states under ADVERSE REACTIONS:
Encephalitis; encephalopathy; measles inclusion body encephalitis (MIBE) (see CONTRAINDICATIONS); subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE); Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS); acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM); transverse myelitis; febrile convulsions; afebrile convulsions or seizures; ataxia; polyneuritis; polyneuropathy; ocular palsies; paresthesia. Encephalitis and encephalopathy have been reported approximately once for every 3 million doses of M-M-R II or measles-, mumps-, and rubella-containing vaccine administered since licensure of these vaccines.
It should be noted that the misrepresentation of “once for every 3 million doses” omits the fact that adverse reactions are typically not reported. The lack of mandatory and enforced adverse injury reporting by health agencies defies logic and reliability of Merck’s statement.
Nonetheless, blatantly bribed by Big Pharma, Rep. Pallone and DeGette insisted that vaccines are the solution to measles, and demanded to know what Fauci and the government was doing to stop the purported threat. Pallone’s and DeGette’s campaign finance statements are summarized below. They evidence the true cause of these criminal psychopaths making recent measles outbreaks sound like Ebola was ravaging the entire population.
One might reasonably ask, “What does measles have to do with the Energy and Commerce Committee?” Mainly bribery by the Energy Cartel that is synonymous with the Drug Cartel. Here is the evidence for the charge of bribery:
Controlled opposition leader of the NVIC, Barbara Loe Fisher minimized Fauci’s perjury and complicity in the vaccine genocide writing that he simply lied, under the caption: “Dr. Fauci, It’s Not Nice to Fool Congress About Vaccine Reactions.” That’s the equivalent of telling Hitler or Stalin during WWII, “It’ not nice to deny your genocides.”
More Evidence of MKULTRA Subversion in Fisher’s and Dr. Joseph Mercola’s Fraud Racket: Selling Natural Health Products along with ‘Safer Vaccines’
There is much more to be found upon closer scrutiny of the leading ‘grassroots’ ‘vaccine hesitancy’ champions, Fisher and Dr. Joseph Mercola. Mercola’s false advertising, conflicting interests, and views on ‘safer’ vaccines correspond with Fisher’s.
Years ago, Mercola rejected Dr. Horowitz’s good faith warning and petition to boycott known controlled-opposition leader Fisher and her unscrupulous National Vaccination Information Center (“NVIC”). Fisher’s NVIC was largely responsible for indemnifying vaccine makers against vaccine-injury lawsuits. Fishers NVIC evolved from the hostile takeover of Marge Grant’s legitimate activist organization, Dissatisfied Parents Together (“DPT”).
To gain control over DPT, Fisher, allied with vaccine industry lobby-linked attorney Jeffrey Schwartz. They stole the contacts of parents of vaccine-injured children generated by Marge Grant, a mother of a DPT vaccine-injured child who appeared on the Phil Donohue Show. Fisher and Schwartz ousted Grant to form the NVIC that has, ever since, commandeered near exclusive mainstream media coverage of the public’s opposition to vaccinations using the “Big Lie”–that vaccines are generally good.
Thus, from the NVIC’s conception, the Rockefeller banking and petrochemical cartel has enabled it as “controlled opposition” to advance world vaccination programs.
Murder by injection is the “sacred cow” of “public health”–the “Big Lie” commanding genocidal depopulation and promoting profitable wars against germs and humanity in general.
Fisher pushed decisively for the fraudulent National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 that left millions of families devastated by uncompensated for vaccine injuries. The burden on society of having to care for generations of brain-damaged children and adults is shocking beyond comprehension.
Then there is Dr. Mercola and his partner in deceptive advertising, Erin Elizabeth Finn, who work closely with Fisher, the NVIC, and rake in money all along the way. As mentioned in the last article in this series, these con-artists, especially Finn advertising for Mercola, pushed the measles vaccine as an alleged cancer cure.
Mercola and Finn were exposed by Kane after the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) fined Mercola$5,334,067 for five counts of unfair and deceptive trade through Mercola.com. Curiously, barely any media reported on Mercola’s instant settlement.
You would think Big Pharma’s media opposing natural healthcare would blitz that opportunity to demean the anti-vaccination movement’s most profitable proponent. Just the opposite—near total silence occurred. Business at Mercola.com continued as usual. Why? Because Mercola is being used. He is the epitome of ‘controlled opposition.’
A year later, Kane discovered “The Health Nut” committing more fraud to sell Mercola’s weight loss products. Their photo-shopped false advertisement above shows Finn before and after her supposed diet. The trouble is, there is an alteration of Finn’s head and neck. Side-by-side the photos show two different body types claimed to be hers standing in a similar position. The photos make it appear that Mercola’s health supplements, in one year, grew entirely different shoulders on Erin. Broad square shoulders appear on Erin’s photo on the right, compared with noticeably sloped shoulders on the “Erin” on the left. Also, on the before photo on the left, her head and neck appear off center. The cut and paste is conveniently concealed by a white scarf. Compare this with the perfectly centered neck beneath the turtle-neck on the right.
Upon closer examination, by tilting and lowering your computer screen slowly (forward), you can watch Finn’s white scarf turn purple and get super-pixelated. You can actually view the altered pixels beneath the white scarf.
In other words, it appears the Photoshop “blending” left telltale signs of fraud. It shows discoloration of the pixels in Erin’s “cut-and-pasted” alteration above another person’s body image. (Observe when you do this test that no other parts of either photo change color except for that white scarf.)
Finn and Mercola disparaged Dr. Horowitz throughout the anti-vaccination community while promoting ‘safer’ vaccines–a ridiculous notion in naturopathic medicine. As mentioned in our opening article, you can never make injected mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, spermicide, chopped-up aborted fetuses, dead animal parts such as monkey kidney tissues, bovine fetal serum, cow pus, mutated viruses, and GMO-sourced DNA, any ‘safer.’
The anti-vaccination community, well represented in the vegan and non-GMO movments, should be up in arms. The fact that they are not evidences MKULTRA programming–mind control and social-engineering consistent with ‘Brave New World’ indoctrination and political administration.
Mercola’s and Finn’s support for this menacing reality, and the Deep State, are undeniable. Mercola’s ‘natural’ health products company was heavily promoted by the Chicago Tribune Media Group, owned by Oaktree Capital Management and JP Morgan Chase. The Chicago Tribuneheavily promotes vaccines.
Oaktree became the successor in interest to Goldman Sachs and Apollo Global Management in 2011. The Apollo group, Kane and Horowitz discovered, had converted the majority of the 911 World Trade Center reconstruction fund to the MGM Grand Co. in Las Vegas. That money was used to build the new “City Center” in Las Vegas rather than the New World Trade Center in NYC.
In our book—The Las Vegas Deep State Massacre—we indicted MGM’s CEO, James Murren, complicit with Steve Wynn and multiple CIA-enterprise financiers in the most deadly shooting in American history. Their “blood money” was “laundered” through the entertainment and communications industries, well represented by NBC News, NBC Universal Music Group, and the Texas Pacific Group (TPG). (12) Apollo Management Holdings, L.P. is a major institutional investor in the Chicago Tribune Media Group that promoted Mercola, Dr. Oz and vaccines.
Mercola and Finn advertise Mercola’s interview by Oz, who was made “America’s Doctor” by Oprah Winfrey. Oz’s vaccine-hypocrisy is shocking. Oz’s wife refuses to get their children vaccinated. But NBC’s darling Oz tells audiences to do otherwise. Beyond enabling Mercola’s ‘safer vaccine’ heresy, Oz promoted Anthony Fauci and his lies about the safety and efficacy of vaccines.
Sales at Mercola.com skyrocketed after his Oz appearance presumably representing the views of ‘alternative doctors.’ This helps explain why Mercola rejected Dr. Horowitz’s good faith efforts to warn Mercola about Big Pharma’s influence over Barbara Loe Fisher and the anti-vaccination movement.
Click to return to:
PART 2: The VAXXED v. UN-VAXXED controversy;
Or continue to read more in:
Sherri Kane is an investigative journalist who defected from FOX News, Los Angeles, for ethical reasons. She has co-investigated, co-authored, and co-hosted with Dr. Leonard Horowitz many works, including the multiple award-winning film UN-VAXXED: A Docu-Commentary for Robert De Nero,that won “Best Film-2016” a the EuroCinema festival in Geneva, and the CineMagic London Film Festival. Sherri has written extensively on Barack Obama’s history, counter-intelligence methods used by Internet “gang stalkers,” and the “PharmaMedia,” detailing links between the wealthiest Wall Street investors in mass media and the pharmaceutical industry. Sherri also specializes in women’s and children’s health issues and child sex trafficking whistleblowing. She is a dedicated animal rights advocate, launching the “Conscious Species Channel” on RevolutionTelevision.net. Her programming includes many of the most heart-warming and humorous videos on the Internet in this genre. Ms. Kane is the Vice President of Medical Veritas International, Inc., that launched with Dr. Horowitz the LOVE/528 Revolution, 528Records.com, and the 528Radio Network impacting recording artistry and natural healing internationally. Online DVDs featuring Dr. Horowitz and Ms. Kane include: NSA/CIA Trolls Destroy Heroes to Profit Villains: Snowden/Wikileaks Evidence Protection Racket for the Death Industry. Ms. Kane recommends Dr. Horowitz most recent video performance and acknowledges the public support she and Dr. Horowitz receive through their financial sponsors at CureShoppe.com and HealthyWorldStore.com.
J.T. Kong is a research scholar who opposes fraud in government. He facilitates investigations of corruption that damages people’s health and safety. He has contributed to a number of Sherri Kane’s and Dr. Horowitz’s books, articles, and films, including The Las Vegas Deep State Massacre and SpaceGate: The Militarization of Sacred Mauna Kea.
Dr. Leonard Horowitz
Dr. Leonard Horowitz, D.M.D., M.A., M.P.H., D.N.M. (hon.), D.M.M. (hon.), is the author of twenty-two books, including the prophetically titled Death In The Air: Globalism,Terrorism and Toxic Warfare that came out three months before 9-11-01. That book deals with biological and energy weapons being used for population control. His three American best-sellers include: Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola–Nature, Accident or Intentional? that was largely responsible for prompting explosive interest in vaccination risks and biological warfare; Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse, that revealed the ancient Solfeggio musical scale secreted for millennia; and Healing Celebrations: Miraculous Recoveries Through Ancient Scripture, Natural Medicine and Modern Science in which Dr. Horowitz presents his protocol for administering prevention and speedy recoveries. His most recent text, The Book of 528: Prosperity Key of LOVE, has prompted a revolution in the music industry improving recording artistry and music therapy with the use of C=528Hz(A=444Hz) tuning that produces “medicinal music.” Dr. Horowitz’s documentary, UN-VAXXED: A Docu-commentary for Robert De Niro won five international awards, including “Best Film – 2016” in London and Geneva competitions.