The Israeli People Committee (IPC), a civilian body made of leading Israeli health experts, has published its April report into the Pfizer vaccine’s side effects indicating damage to almost every system in the human body.
If the findings by IPC are genuine, then Pfizer vaccine is linked to more deaths in Israel than AstraZeneca’s in the whole of Europe.
The findings are catastrophic on every possible level. This is a detailed report that highlights the most devastating findings.
Their verdict is that “there has never been a vaccine that has harmed as many people.” The report is long and detailed (read full report below).
“We received 288 death reports in proximity to vaccination (90% up to 10 days after the vaccination), 64% of those were men.”
Yet the report states, “according to data provided by the Ministry of Health, only 45 deaths in Israel were vaccine related.”
If these are the genuine numbers, then Israel has failed to report on its experimental results genuinely.
We have been hearing a lot about the rare side effects of the AstraZeneca vaccine and more than 300 cases of blood clots found in Europe.
German scientists have found the exact 2 step process how the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine causes blood clots in recipients. They describe a series of events that has to happen in the body before the vaccines create these large clots.
If the findings by IPC are genuine, then Pfizer vaccine is linked to more deaths in Israel than AstraZeneca’s in the whole of Europe.
Meanwhile, the US CDC and FDA have lifted their recommended pause on use of Johnson & Johnson’s coronavirus vaccine with a condition that it will now include a safety label warning that its vaccine comes with blood clot risks.
“According to Central Bureau of Statistics data during January-February 2021, at the peak of the Israeli mass vaccination campaign, there was a 22% increase in overall mortality in Israel compared with the previous year.”
“In fact, January-February 2021 have been the deadliest months in the last decade, with the highest overall mortality rates compared to corresponding months in the last 10 years.”
The IPC finds that “amongst the 20-29 age group the increase in overall mortality has been most dramatic. In this age group, we detect an increase of 32% in overall mortality in comparison with previous year.”
“Statistical analysis of information from the Central Bureau of Statistics, combined with information from the Ministry of Health, leads to the conclusion that the mortality rate amongst the vaccinated is estimated at about 1: 5000 (1: 13000 at ages 20-49, 1: 6000 at ages 50-69, 1: 1600 at ages 70+).”
“According to this estimate, it is possible to estimate the number of deaths in Israel in proximity of the vaccine, as of today, at about 1000-1100 people.”
If this is a genuine statistical analysis, then numbers reported by health authorities of Israel are misleading to a very great extent.
“There is a high correlation between the number of people vaccinated per day and the number of deaths per day, in the range of up to 10 days, in all age groups.”
“Ages 20-49 – a range of 9 days from the date of vaccination to mortality, ages 50-69 – 5 days from the date of vaccination to mortality, ages 70 and up – 3 days from the date of vaccination to mortality.”
The IPC also reveals that the “the risk of mortality after the second vaccine is higher than the risk of mortality after the first vaccine.”
This is not only about the death risk, as per the reports of IPC, “as of the date of publication of the report, 2066 reports of side effects have accumulated in the Civil Investigation Committee and the data continue to come in.
These reports indicate damage to almost every system in the human body. Our analysis found a relatively high rate of heart-related injuries.
26% of all cardiac events occurred in young people up to the age of 40, with the most common diagnosis in these cases being Myositis or Pericarditis.
Also, a high rate of massive vaginal bleeding, neurological damage, and damage to the skeletal and skin systems has been observed.
It should be noted that a significant number of reports of side effects are related, directly or indirectly, to Hypercoagulability (infarction), Myocardial infarction, stroke, miscarriages, impaired blood flow to the limbs, pulmonary embolism.”
Read the Israeli People Committee report in Hebrew below.Israeli-People-Committees-Report-Find-Catastrophic-Side-Effects-Of-Pfizer-Vaccine-To-Every-System-In-Human-Body
We need your support to carry on our independent and investigative research based journalism on the Deep State threats facing humanity. Your contribution however small helps us keep afloat. Kindly consider supporting GreatGameIndia.
Myitosis is weakening of the muscle from a virus. These mRNA vaccines contain a virus which then attaches to the RNA (the messenger) of man’s DNA which can never be undone. This means that the RNA/messenger will always carry a virus; the very one they inject into the body! This is pure wickedness and those whom are doing such things will have to answer for what they have done. God clearly told us in scripture to not mess with HIS creation by changing the DNA which is exactly what these ‘vaccines’ do! All of it is by design – all of it. Who are the puppet masters many call the ‘elites’ which also entails the minions or ‘useful idiots’ as the real puppet masters call them. Who are the real puppet masters?
I have done a lot of historical research of their own documentations and bible study to find out who the people are who have been controlling this world in wickedness; creating this free slave world in which we all now live in a debt based, fiat economic system and you can read about them here; if you care to and if you do, read to the end to learn all of the truth. It is slow going in the beginning because the ground work had to be laid so you will understand how it all ties together; be patient it will be worth your time. tinyurl.com/matrixofgog OPERATION LOCKSTEP FROM THE ROCKEFELLER PLAYBOOK:
“1st Phase: Common/cold/Flu. Mild symptoms at most. Media endorsement of mass paranoia and fear. Flawed testing system utilized, which picks up any genetic material in the body and triggers a positive result. Inflation of Covid case numbers, through changing of death certificates, double-counting, and classifying all deaths including other diseases and natural causes as Covid19. Lockdown will condition us to life under Draconian laws, prevent protests and identify public resistance.
2nd Phase: The 1st Phase will lead to compromised and frail immune system through lack of food, social distancing, wearing of masks, and lack of contact with sunlight and healthy bacteria. Exposure to 5G radiation will further attack the immune system. Thus, when people re-emerge into society, more people will fall ill. This will be blamed on Covid19. This will all occur before the vaccination is ready to justify it. A longer and more potent lockdown will follow until everyone takes the vaccine.
3rd Phase: If majority of people resist the vaccine, a weaponized SARS/HIV/MERS virus will be released. A lot of people will die from this. It will be survival of the fittest. It will also be the ultimate push for everyone to be vaccinated, in order to return to normality. Those who have taken the vaccine will be at war with those who have not. It will be anarchy from all sides.”
I think there is an antidote : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYHrmmmoX30
THE ANTIDOTE w/ Dr. Mikovits
•Apr 21, 2021
Just the other day, I had the honor of interviewing Dr. Judy Mikovits for “The Academy of Divine Knowledge” and she went DEEP. Have you ever heard of “suramin”? Well... if you haven’t, look it up. And when you do, I suggest reading the link titled “Suramin & Autism” published by the University of California San Diego. Did you know that it’s ILLEGAL to use “suramin” for any therapeutic purposes in the United States? Hmm... I wonder why?!?! Throughout this interview, Dr. Mikovits shares insights regarding different antidotes that can be used to treat the ill-effects of the “you know what”. She also speaks about the misuse of “suramin” in the past (in regards to improper dosage) along with steps that can be taken to END this plague of corruption once and for all! I seriously look forward to releasing this full interview on our new platform dedicated to FREE SPEECH & EXPANSIVE KNOWLEDGE... THE ACADEMY OF DIVINE KNOWLEDGE! Join the academy at: www.AcademyofDK.com
N.B.: DO NOT SELF-MEDICATE - GET ADVICE FROM A LICENCED MEDICAL DOCTOR
Suramin is a century-old drug used to treat African sleeping sickness or trypanosomiasis. It works by inhibiting ATP signaling. In animal studies and in a small Phase I/II clinical trial completed in 2017, we reported that suramin produced dramatic reductions in classic ASD symptoms, such as social abnormalities and learning disabilities. Dr.Robert Naviaux had success with the 100 year old drug suramin in a small double-blind, placebo controlled trial of children with autism. All the children who received a single dose of suramin showed improvements in the core symptoms of autism.Suramin may cause serious side effects.
Suramin is a polysulfonated naphthylamine that is a primary agent in the treatment of African trypanosomiasis (African sleeping sickness) caused by Trypanosoma brucei gambiense or Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense. Suramin is a secondary agent in treatment of Onchocerciasis (river blindness), but because of its toxicity, it is rarely used. It is given by injection into a vein. Suramin causes a fair number of side effects. Suramin works by causing the parasites to lose energy, which causes their death. Suramin is available under the following different brand and other names: Suramin sodium.
Suramin is on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines, which has the safest and most effective medicines needed in a health system.
Anyone who has had these Experimental Gene Therapy Toxins is going to be in serious trouble just like the Ferrets nearly all died in the Animal trials about 20 years ago for MRNA Gene Therapy by getting a wild virus and since the Humans are the real Animal trials a common cold could wipe out most or all during Flu Season. When you add 5G in the mix it’s a powder Keg as did you know that when Wuhan had the entire city connected to 5G that’s when people died on the street and when Whuan turned off the Grid maybe only have small clusters of 5G running that when 5G hits the human body kicks into gear Flu like symptoms so Covid 19 is really the 5G flu.
David Icke explains that the Experimental Gene Therapy Toxins contains Nanoparticles with the PCR test has a live organism that can penetrative the brain barrier so the Nanoparticles can attach itself to the brain ready to receive transmission and with the Spike Protein the Nanoparticles in the blood will disable the human DNA Antenna. David believes those who get these Toxic injections will create human 2.0 what’s to say he could be on the money with this. We should refuse these injections and continue social distancing with no masks because the unvaccinated will receive the transmission from the Vaccinated its possibly why women now experiencing irregular menstrual cycles, miscarriages and women on menopause now starting to have menstrual cycles again. The first message is to change the DNA in women who will only have boy babies or never carry a baby to delivery. Until 2030 will be heading towards Depopulation until only 500M human species exists.
- earlier info see: THE VACCINE CONUNDRUM & THE VACCINE CONUNDRUM II & THE VACCINE CONUNDRUM III & THE VACCINE CONUNDRUM IV & THE VACCINE CONUNDRUM V & THE VACCINE CONUNDRUM VI & Covid-19 is Social Murder - Hold Governance Accountable
FOR U.S. CITIZENS:
MEDICAL CHOICE IS A
You can be FORCE VACCINATED BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY under this unconstitutional law! Read it.
We need legislators to insert this amendment in likely-to-pass legislation
Any discrimination on the basis of VACCINATION STATUS is prohibited
Government is using the private sector as a back door to enforce unconstitutional mandates by government. NO American citizen should be subjected to intimidation or pressure (by government or surrogates in the private sector) into taking vaccines in order to use public accommodations, go in a store or office or school, access services, maintain hospital privileges or a job, or do financial transactions. Businesses are planning these limitations, and patents for enabling technology like nanochips and smart-dust exist. Microsoft's international Patent wo/2020/060606 filed in the World International Patent Organization on 3/26/2020 "Cryptocurrency system using body activity data" (vaccination status) harbingers a dangerous totalitarian Government-Business partnership.
Ask a doctor - If a someone has antibodies against Covid, should they be compelled to get a Vaccination Certificate in order to work in a hospital? How about if they have personal/professional reservations about this vaccine? World Health Organization Chief Scientist Swaminathan acknowledged lack of evidence that vaccines inhibit transmission. Whether or not your personal preferences are to take a vaccine, it is a PRINCIPLE of American values that we respect people's personal choices. My Body, My Choice! We can protect the public by teaching how to build immunity, but never force a vaccine.
New England Journal of Medicine article: "The current status of mRNA vaccines is EXPERIMENTAL and therefore prohibited by the international Nuremberg Code."
The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) may prohibit discrimination, but we never know what renegade judges will dictate.
Take a mighty stand to get us back to Constitutional core values.
1. Please contact legislators and the governor, and ask for their commitment to push this amendment in multiple pieces of legislation:
2. Request that Senate and House members on medical-related committees insert this amendment into existing fast-track relevant legislation.
America’s Frontline Doctors Medical Discrimination Petition
647,000 signatures so far. Add yours. This issue has legs (public support).
Florida Bills Filed
These bills show good intent, but are too narrow - aimed only at government, not business. This one-line Amendment can go into any fast-moving relevant legislation Next year will be too late.
Rep Anthony Sabatini, proposes to remove the word vaccination from the law (see below), but his bill would still allow businesses to stomp on our freedom.
HB6003 by Rep Anthony Sabatini 352-989-9100 only proposes to remove authority of State Health Officer to order forced vaccinations in 381.00315 FS
SB364 by Sen. Joe Gruters 941-378-6309 only applies to government, and has too many qualifiers. Keep it SIMPLE.
|For additional documentation:
Focus on your
This page URL 4brevard.com/discrimination.shtml
THE COVID VACCINE EPIDEMIC
First published on BITCHUTE May 20th, 2021.
The Covid Origin Theory Dam Breaks; An India Insider Tells All; Is Covid Vax Triggering Deaths? Texas Bans Mandates; The #MagnetChallenge: Truth, or Hoax?
#MagnetChallenge #India #WuhanLab #Covid19 #TheHighWire #DelBigtree
JIM STONE REPORTS
20. May 2021
Investigative journalist Jim Stone (www.jimstone.is) reports:
WE GOT STRONG INTRINSIC EVIDENCE THAT 60 PERCENT OF THE COVID SHOTS ARE JUST SALINE
and that's approximately the ratio of "I am fine" to maimed they need to keep their plausible deniability afloat.
Here is what happened: A youtuber set up a "magnet challenge" site on a public street, telling people to test to see if the magnet sticks to their arm after the shot. 15 people were tested and 6 had the magnet stick. Since they probably go by rounded numbers (that's the most logical way to do it) 4 out of 10 jabs is the actual shot. That's why they need endless repeat vaccinations, to make sure they get everyone. And my guess is that if the first shot is the real one, records are kept to make sure the second shot is the real one.
Alarming Casualty Rates for mRNA Vaccines Warrant Urgent Action
By F. William Engdahl - 19. May 202
As official government data is emerging in Europe and the USA on the alarming numbers of deaths and permanent paralysis as well as other severe side effects from the experimental mRNA vaccines, it is becoming clear that we are being asked to be human guinea pigs in an experiment that could alter the human gene structure and far worse. While mainstream media ignores alarming data including death of countless healthy young victims, the politics of the corona vaccine is being advanced by Washington and Brussels along with WHO and the Vaccine Cartel with all the compassion of a mafia “offer you can’t refuse .”
The alarming EMA Report
On May 8 the European Medicines Agency (EMA) an agency of the European Union (EU) in charge of the evaluation and supervision of medical products, using the data base EudraVigilance which collects reports of suspected side effects of medicines including vaccines, published a report that barely warranted mention in major mainstream media. Through May 8, 2021 they had recorded 10,570 deaths and 405,259 injuries following injections of four experimental COVID-19 shots: COVID-19 mRNA VACCINE of MODERNA (CX-024414); COVID-19 mRNA VACCINE of PFIZER-BIONTECH; COVID-19 VACCINE of ASTRAZENECA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19); and Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen COVID-19 VACCINE (AD26.COV2.S).
A detailed analysis of each vaccine gives the following: The Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA gene-edited vaccine resulted in the largest fatalities– 5,368 deaths and 170,528 injuries or nearly 50% of the total for all four. The Moderna mRNA vaccine was second with 2,865 deaths and 22,985 injuries. That is to say, the only two gene manipulated mRNA experimental vaccines, Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, accounted for 8,233 deaths of the total registered deaths of 10,570. That’s 78% of all deaths from the four vaccines currently in use in the EU.
And among the serious side effects or injuries recorded by the EMA, for the two mRNA vaccines which we focus on in this article, for the Pfizer “experimental” vaccine, most reported injuries included blood and lymphatic system disorders including deaths; cardiac disorders including deaths; musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders; respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders, and vascular disorders. For the Moderna mRNA vaccine, most serious injuries or causes of death included blood and lymphatic system disorders; cardiac disorders; musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders; disorders of the central nervous system.
Note that these are only the most serious injuries related to those two genetically manipulated mRNA vaccines. The EMA also notes that it is believed that only a small percent of actual vaccine deaths or serious side effects, perhaps only 1% to 10%, are reported for various reasons. Officially more than 10,000 persons have died after receiving the coronavirus vaccines since January, 2021 in the EU. That is a horrifying number of vaccine-related deaths, even if the true numbers are far greater.
CDC as well
Even the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) a notoriously political and corrupt agency with for-profit ties to vaccine makers, in its official Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), shows a total of 193,000 “adverse events” including 4,057 deaths, 2,475 permanent disabilities, 25,603 emergency room visits, and 11,572 hospitalizations following COVID-19 injections between December 14, 2020 and May 14, 2021. That included the two mRNA vaccines, Pfizer and Moderna, and the far less prevalent J&J Janssen vaccine. Of the reported deaths, 38% occurred in people who became ill within 48 hours of being vaccinated. The official US vaccine-related death toll is greater in just 5 months than all the vaccine-related deaths from the past 20 years combined. Yet the major media worldwide and the US Government virtually bury the alarming facts.
Some 96% of the fatal results were from the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, the two variants funded and promoted by the Gates Foundation and Tony Fauci’s NIAID with the experimental mRNA genetic technology. Moreover, Dr. Tony Fauci, the US Biden Administration vaccine czar and his NIAID Vaccine Research Center co-designed the Moderna mRNA vaccine and gave Moderna and Pfizer each $6 billion to produce it. That’s also a blatant conflict of interest as Fauci and his NIAID are allowed to financially benefit from their patent earnings in the vaccine under a curious US law. The NIAID developed the coronavirus spike proteins for the development of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines using taxpayer money. They licensed it to Moderna and Pfizer.
“never seen in nature…”
In a tragic sense, the experience with reactions to the two unprecedented mRNA experimental vaccines since rollout in unprecedented speed “warp speed” as the US Government called it, is only now beginning to be seen, in real trials of human guinea pigs. Few realize that the two mRNA vaccines use genetic manipulations that never before have been used in humans. And under the cover of urgency, US and EU health authorities waived normal animal trials and did not even approve the safety, but gave an “emergency use authorization.” Moreover, the vaccine makers were made 100% exempt from damage litigation.
The general public was reassured of the vaccine safety when Pfizer and Moderna published reports of 94% and 95% “efficacy” of these vaccines. NIAID’s Fauci was quick to call it “extraordinary” in November 2020, and Warp Speed was off and running as was the stock price of Pfizer and Moderna.
Peter Doshi, Associate Editor of the British Medical Journal pointed to a huge flaw in the 90+% reports for efficacy of Moderna and Pfizer vaccines. He noted that the percentages are relative, in relation to the select small healthy young test group, and not absolute as in real life. In real life we want to know how effective the vaccine is among the large general population. Doshi points to the fact that Pfizer excluded over 3400 “suspected COVID-19 cases” that were not included in the interim analysis. Moreover individuals “in both Moderna and Pfizer trials were deemed to be SARS-CoV-1- (the 2003 Asian SARS virus) positive at baseline, despite prior infection being grounds for exclusion,” Doshi notes. Both companies refused to release their raw data. Pfizer in-house scientists did their tests. In short 95% is what Pfizer or Moderna claim. We are told, “Trust us.” A more realistic estimate of the true efficacy of the two vaccines for the general public, using data supplied by the vaccine makers to the FDA, shows the Moderna vaccine at the time of interim analysis demonstrated an absolute risk reduction of 1.1%, while the Pfizer vaccine absolute risk reduction was 0.7%. That is very poor.
Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, says, “Ideally, you want an antiviral vaccine to do two things . . . first, reduce the likelihood you will get severely ill and go to the hospital, and two, prevent infection and therefore interrupt disease transmission.” As Doshi notes, none of the trials were “designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus.” Moderna’s chief medical officer even admitted that, “Our trial will not demonstrate prevention of transmission.”
Possible effects of mRNA vaccines
In a major new study just published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research, Dr. Stephanie Seneff, senior scientist at the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, and Dr. Greg Nigh, Naturopathic oncology specialist, analyze in detail the possible pathways in which the experimental mRNA vaccines of Pfizer and Moderna could be causing such adverse effects in the vaccinated. First they point out that both the Pfizer and Moderna gene-edited vaccines are highly unstable: “Both are delivered through muscle injection, and both require deep-freeze storage to keep the RNA from breaking down. This is because, unlike double-stranded DNA which is very stable, single-strand RNA products are apt to be damaged or rendered powerless at warm temperatures and must be kept extremely cold to retain their potential efficacy.” Pfizer recommends minus 70’ Celsius.
The authors point out that to keep the mRNA from breaking down before it could produce protein, both vaccine makers substitute methyl-pseudouridine to stabilize RNA against degradation, allowing it to survive long enough to produce adequate amounts of protein antigen. The problem they point out is that, “This form of mRNA delivered in the vaccine is never seen in nature, and therefore has the potential for unknown consequences… manipulation of the code of life could lead to completely unanticipated negative effects, potentially long term or even permanent. ”
PEG Adjuvants and Anaphylactic Shock
For various reasons to avoid using aluminum adjuvants to boost the antibody response, both mRNA vaccines use polyethylene glycol, or PEG, as adjuvant. This has consequences. The authors point out, “…both mRNA vaccines currently deployed against COVID-19 utilize lipid-based nanoparticles as delivery vehicles. The mRNA cargo is placed inside a shell composed of synthetic lipids and cholesterol, along with PEG to stabilize the mRNA molecule against degradation.”
PEG has been shown to produce anaphylactic shock or severe allergenic reactions. In studies of prior non-mRNA vaccines, anaphylactic shock reactions occurred in 2 cases per million vaccinations. With the mRNA vaccines initial monitoring revealed that, “anaphylaxis occurred at a rate of 247 per million vaccinations. This is more than 21 times as many as were initially reported by the CDC. The second injection exposure is likely to cause even larger numbers of anaphylactic reactions.” One study noted, “PEG is a high-risk ’hidden’ allergen, usually unsuspected, and can cause frequent allergic reactions due to inadvertent re-exposure.” Among such reactions are included life-threatening cardiovascular collapse.
This is far from all the undeclared risks of the experimental mRNA coronavirus vaccines.
Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE) is an immunological phenomenon. Seneff and Nigh note that, “ADE is a special case of what can happen when low, non-neutralizing levels of… antibodies against a virus are present at the time of infection. These antibodies might be present due to… prior vaccination against the virus…” The authors suggest that in the case of both Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines, “non-neutralizing antibodies form immune complexes with viral antigens to provoke excessive secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and, in the extreme case, a cytokine storm causing widespread local tissue damage.”
To be clear, normally cytokines are part of the body’s immune response to infection. But their sudden release in large quantities, a cytokine storm, can cause multisystem organ failure and death. Our innate immune system undergoes an uncontrolled and excessive release of pro-inflammatory signaling molecules called cytokines.
The authors add that pre-existing “antibodies, induced by prior vaccination, contribute to severe pulmonary damage by SARS-CoV in macaques…” Another cited study shows that the much more diverse range of prior exposures to coronaviruses such as seasonal flu experienced by the elderly might predispose them to ADE upon exposure to SARS-CoV-2.” This is a possible explanation for the high incidence of post-mRNA vaccination deaths among elderly.
The vaccine makers have a clever way of denial as to the toxicity of their mRNA vaccines. As Seneff and Nigh state, “it is not possible to distinguish an ADE manifestation of disease from a true, non-ADE viral infection.” But they make the telling point, “In this light it is important to recognize that, when diseases and deaths occur shortly after vaccination with an mRNA vaccine, it can never be definitively determined, even with a full investigation, that the vaccine reaction was not a proximal cause. “
The authors make numerous other alarming points including emergence of auto-immune diseases such as Celiac disease, a disease of the digestive system that damages the small intestine and interferes with the absorption of nutrients from food. Also Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) that causes progressive muscle weakness and paralysis. Additionally, Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in which a person has unusually low levels of platelets — the cells that help blood to clot– could occur following vaccination “through the migration of immune cells carrying a cargo of mRNA nanoparticles via the lymph system into the spleen… ITP appears initially as petechiae or purpura on the skin, and/or bleeding from mucosal surfaces. It has a high risk of fatality through haemorrhaging and stroke.”
These examples are indicative of the fact that we are literally exposing the human race via untested experimental gene edited mRNA vaccines to incalculable dangers which in the end may exceed by far any potential risk of damage from something which has been called SARS-Cov-2. Far from the much-touted miracle substance proclaimed by WHO, Gates, Fauci and others, the Pfizer, Moderna and other possible mRNA vaccines clearly hold potentially tragic and even catastrophic unforeseen consequences. Little wonder some critics believe it is a disguised vehicle for human eugenics.
F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”
Image: Author: Bicanski on Pixnio. License: Personal & commercial use (CC0) https://pixnio.com/media/injection-medication-needles-syringe-vaccination# includes link to license
The WHO is now saying the 2nd year of Covid19 will be far DEADLIER
This is INSANE. The WHO is now saying the 2nd year of Covid19 will be far DEADLIER. That would mean, for the first time in HISTORY a Virus would gain momentum and become more lethal, usually a virus loses strength. What on earth is going on...👊 pic.twitter.com/aswS5QsLts— ✖️GAME➕OVER✖️ (@umustrise) May 18, 2021
Bombshell: Nobel Prize Winner Reveals - Covid Vaccine is 'Creating Variants'
By Renee Nal - 18. May 2021
Prof. Luc Montagnier said that epidemiologists know but are “silent” about the phenomenon, known as “Antibody-Dependent Enhancement” (ADE).
While it is understood that viruses mutate, causing variants, French Virologist and Nobel Prize Winner Luc Montagnier contends that “it is the vaccination that is creating the variants.”
The 2008 Nobel Laureate made the explosive comments as part of a larger interview with Pierre Barnérias of Hold-Up Media earlier this month. The clip was exclusively translated for RAIR Foundation USA, and is quite damning for the agenda-driven left-wing establishment.
As reported at RAIR in April of last year, Prof. Montagnier presented a powerful case that the coronavirus was created in a lab. His comments at the time offended the left-wing establishment so much that they aggressively attempted to discredit his statement. Now, the media is backpedaling on the origin of the coronavirus after prominent scientists called for further scrutiny.
|Receiving the Nobel Prize in 2008|
Vaccines are Creating the Variants
Prof. Montagnier referred to the vaccine program for the coronavirus as an “unacceptable mistake”. Mass vaccinations are a “scientific error as well as a medical error,” he said. “It is an unacceptable mistake. The history books will show that, because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants,” Prof. Luc Montagnier continued.
The prominent virologist explained that “there are antibodies, created by the vaccine,” forcing the virus to “find another solution” or die. This is where the variants are created. It is the variants that “are a production and result from the vaccination.”
Prof. Montagnier said that epidemiologists know but are “silent” about the phenomenon, known as “Antibody-Dependent Enhancement” (ADE). In the articles that mention ADE, the concerns expressed by Prof. Montagnier are dismissed. “Scientists say that ADE is pretty much a non-issue with COVID-19 vaccines,” an article at Medpage Today reported in March.
Prof. Montagnier explained that the trend is happening in “each country” where “the curve of vaccination is followed by the curve of deaths.”
The Nobel Laureate’s point is emphasized by information revealed in an open letter from a long list of medical doctors to the European Medicines Agency. The letter stated in part that “there have been numerous media reports from around the world of care homes being struck by COVID-19 within days of vaccination of residents.”
Earlier this month, RAIR reported on a statement by French Virologist Christine Rouzioux:
“…the rise in new cases is occurring in vaccinated patients in nursing homes in ‘Montpellier, in the Sarte, in Rheims, in the Moselle…”
Prof. Luc Montagnier continued to say that he is doing his own experiments with those who become infected with the coronavirus after getting the vaccine. “I will show you that they are creating the variants that are resistant to the vaccine,” he said.
Watch the clip (transcribed below):
Many thanks to HeHa and Miss Piggy for the translation!
(Questions are bolded)
If we look at the curve from the WHO, since the vaccinations started in January, the curve showing new infections (contamination) has exploded, along with deaths.
Notably among young people.
—Yes. With thromboses, etc.
How do you view the mass vaccination program? Mass vaccination compared to treatments that work and aren’t expensive.
—It’s an enormous mistake, isn’t it? A scientific error as well as a medical error. It is an unacceptable mistake. The history books will show that, because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants.
—For the China virus, there are antibodies, created by the vaccine. What does the virus do? Does it die or find another solution?
—The new variants are a production and result from the vaccination. You see it in each country, it’s the same: the curve of vaccination is followed by the curve of deaths.
—I’m following this closely and I am doing experiments at the Institute with patients who became sick with Corona after being vaccinated. I will show you that they are creating the variants that are resistant to the vaccine.
Should we be vaccinating during a pandemic?
—They’re silent… many people know this, epidemiologists know it.
—It is the antibodies produced by the virus that enable an infection to become stronger.
—It’s what we call Antibody Dependent Enhancement, which means antibodies favor a certain infection. The antibody attaches to the virus, from that moment it has the receptors, the antibodies, we have them in the macrophage etc.
—It pokes the virus and not accidentally, but because of the fact that they’re linked to the antibodies.
—It is clear that the new variants are created by antibody-mediated selection due to the vaccination. OK?
Read more of RAIR’s coverage on coronavirus vaccines:
- Exposed: Virologist Reveals New Covid Cases Appearing in Vaccinated Patients in French Nursing Homes (Video)
- Warning: Vaccines are Not ‘Approved’ – Media and Big Tech are Lying to You
- Vaccine Coercion: Racist Democrats Target Pregnant Black Christian Women (Watch)
- BEWARE: Disgraced Lincoln Project Unites with Left-Wing Group to Coerce Conservatives to Take Vaccine (Watch)
- Warning: Young Women Experience Highest Blood Clot Risk from Leading Vaccines
- WARNING: EU Medical Chief Pushing Fatal AstraZeneca Vaccine Exposed as Pharma Lobbyist (Video)
- WARNING: Left-Wing Fights To Morph Pandemic Lockdowns into Climate Lockdowns
- COVID PLOT: Gay Man Who Fled Venezuela Warns Communists Are Taking Over Canada (Video)
- Breaking: Famous Doctor Develops Safe Vaccine Against COVID; Germany Prosecutes Him (Video)
- BEWARE: Biden Targets ‘Vaccine Deniers;’ Smears Trump
- 5 Questions To Answer Before You Get the Coronavirus Vaccine
- Virologist Sucharit Bhakdi: ‘Healthy People Aren’t Dangerous’ but the Vaccine IS (Video)
- Netherlands Vaccine Propaganda: ‘Until We Are All Vaccinated – Wait To Get Pregnant’ (Video)
- ALERT: Socialist Spain Keeps Register of Vaccine Refusers – 27 Countries Receive List of Names
- Dire Warning: Prominent Virologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi Exposes ‘Major Risks’ of Gene-Altering Vaccine (Video)
- BREAKING: Left-Wing ‘Trusted News Initiative’ will Ban Posts Challenging Coronavirus Vaccine (Plot Exposed)
- WARNING: Renowned Virologist Sucharit Bhakdi Warns Against Hastily Created Gene-Altering Coronavirus Vaccine (video)
- ALERT: Mandatory Coronavirus Vaccinations Coming to Spain (Video)
- Merkel Releases Ultimatum: Get Vaccinated or Be Banished (Video)
New Mexico / USA government and employers receive CEASE & DESIST letters concerning COVID-19 inoculations
- The Facts:In March, Harvard epidemiologist and vaccine expert Dr. Martin Kulldorff was subjected to censorship by Twitter for sharing his opinion that not everybody needed to take the COVID vaccine.
- Reflect On:Why are so many opinions, evidence and research receiving no mainstream media attention at all? Why are some of them ridiculed and censored? Why do we always get one narrative from government health authorities?
Martin Kulldorff, one of the world’s preeminent and most cited infectious disease epidemiologists from Harvard University’s School of Medicine has experienced what many others in the field have experienced during this pandemic, censorship and ridicule. Kulldorff has been quite critical of the response to COVID by multiple governments, including the measures put in place to combat the spread of the virus. Sometimes it seems as if scientists and doctors who question these measures are actually in the majority, while the minority seem to get all of the attention and praise within the mainstream media. Who knows what these numbers actually look like.
–> Become A CE Member: The only thing that keeps our journalism going is YOU. CE members get access to exclusive benefits and support our shared mission.. Click here to learn more!
Lockdown measures are a great example. A wealth of data has been published in peer-reviewed science and medical journals suggesting that not only have lockdowns been inadequate for stopping the spread of the virus, but they’ve also caused a great deal of damage in both the health and economic sector. Two renowned Swedish scientists, Professor Anna-Mia Ekström and Professor Stefan Swartling Peterson, have gone through the data from UNICEF and UNAIDS and come to the conclusion that least as many people have died as a result of the restrictions to fight COVID as have died of COVID.
Internationally, the lockdowns have placed 130 million people on the brink of starvation. The lockdowns in developed countries have devastated the poor in poor countries. The World Economic Forum estimates that the lockdowns will cause an additional 150 million people to fall into extreme poverty, 125 times as many people as have died from COVID at the time of the estimate. These are a few of many examples.
“Lockdowns are the single worst public health mistake in the last 100 yrs. We will be counting the catastrophic health & psychological harms, imposed on nearly every poor person on the face of the earth, for a generation” —Dr Jay Bhattacharya, Stanford Professor of Medicine.
That being said, an argument can, and has also been been made for lockdowns halting or slowing the spread of the virus, and there are examples of that as well. You can read about that more here.
The point is that one side of the argument is censored, ridiculed, and ignored most of the time, while the other gets front and centre stage. Why?
In Canada, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario put out a note stating that physicians who are publicly contradicting public health orders and recommendations, and there are many of them, will be subjected to an investigation, especially if they are communicating “anti-vaccine, anti-masking and anti-lockdown statements.”
How is science and data that calls into question government public health recommendations “anti” anything? Why are these labels always used? Why are physicians and scientists being bullied into silence and subjected to extreme amounts of censorship on their social media platforms? Kulldorff has been one many victims of this treatment, while scientists who agree with and promote the “accepted narrative” seem to receive interview requests from mainstream media outlets all the time. This isn’t normal, and it’s served as a catalyst for more people to ask, what’s really going on here?
What Happened: Kulldorff’s tweet in March suggesting that not everyone needed to be vaccinated, particularly those who have previously been infected, was labelled ‘misleading’ by Twitter. Tweeters were rendered unable to interact with his tweet and were instructed that ‘health officials recommend a vaccine for most people’. Twitter did not provide any explanation, links, or reasoning as to why his tweet was “misleading.”
Kulldorff’s opinion is something that many experts in the field have suggested. For example, Dr. Sunetra Gupta, considered by many to be the world’s preeminent infectious disease expert explained that the way COVID vaccines are being promoted and the idea that everybody needs to be vaccinated is unscientific and suspicious.
Why? For one, there is a wealth of data showing that previous infection to COVID can provide protection, and possibly even greater and longer lasting protection than any vaccine can or ever will. Dr. Suneel Dhand, an internal medicine doctor with a hefty following on YouTube explains:
I’m not aware of any vaccine out there which will ever give you more immunity than if you’re naturally recovered from the illness itself…If you’ve naturally recovered from it, my understanding as a doctor level scientist is that those antibodies will always be better than a vaccine, and if you know any differently, please let me know. (source)
This statement was also recently echoed by Viral immunologist, Professor at the University of Guelph, and vaccine expert Dr. Bryan Bridle, who said in a recent interview that he would prefer natural immunity as opposed to the COVID vaccine and explains why.
An analysis of millions of coronavirus test results in Denmark found that people who had prior infection, were still protected 6 months after the initial infection.
Another study also found that individuals who recovered from the coronavirus developed “robust” levels of B cells and T cells (necessary for fighting off the virus) and “these cells may persist in the body for a very, very long time.”
Dr. Daniela Weiskopf, Dr. Alessandro Sette, and Dr. Shane Crotty from the La Jolla Institute for Immunology analyzed immune cells and antibodies from almost 200 people who had been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 and recovered. The researchers found durable immune responses in the majority of people studied. Antibodies against the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, which the virus uses to get inside cells, were found in 98% of participants one month after symptom onset. As seen in previous studies, the number of antibodies ranged widely between individuals. But, promisingly, their levels remained fairly stable over time, declining only modestly at 6 to 8 months after infection.
Virus-specific B cells increased over time. People had more memory B cells six months after symptom onset than at one month afterwards. Although the number of these cells appeared to reach a plateau after a few months, levels didn’t decline over the period studied.
Levels of T cells for the virus also remained high after infection. Six months after symptom onset, 92% of participants had CD4+ T cells that recognized the virus. These cells help coordinate the immune response. About half the participants had CD8+ T cells, which kill cells that are infected by the virus.
A recent study published in Clinical Microbiology and Infection explains:
Presence of cross-reactive SARSCoV2 specific Tcells in never exposed patients suggests cellular immunity induced by other coronaviruses. Tcell responses against SARSC0V2 also detected in recovered Covid patients with no detectable antibodies…Cellular immunity is of paramount importance in containing SARSCoV2 infection…and could be maintained independently of antibody responses. Previously infected people develop much stronger Tcell responses against spike protein peptides in comparison to infection-native people after mRNA vaccine.
The next question becomes, how many people have been infected? According to a meta-analysis by Dr John Ioannidis [Professor of Medicine at Stanford University] of every seroprevalence study conducted to date of publication with a supporting scientific paper (74 estimates from 61 studies and 51 different localities around the world), the median infection survival rate from COVID-19 infection is 99.77 per cent. For COVID-19 patients under 70, the meta-analysis finds an infection survival rate of 99.95 per cent.
The CDC’s [Centres for Disease Control] and Prevention] best estimate of infection fatality rate for people ages 70 plus years is 5.4 per cent, meaning seniors have a 94.6 percent survivability rate. For children and people in their 20s/30s, it poses less risk of mortality than the flu. For people in their 60s and above, it is much more dangerous than the flu.
These estimates haven’t really changed, and they are based off of the scientific consensus that more people are infected than what we have the capacity to test for. Imagine testing the entire population, how many people would have an infection? Imagine testing for antibodies, how many people would have antibodies? Some infectious viruses, like the Human metapneumovirus (hMPV) which was first identified in 2001 in Dutch children with bronchiolitis are quite infectious, just like COVID. The hMPV virus is an RNA and has been shown to have worldwide circulation with nearly universal infection by age 5. These types of viruses, including common coronaviruses, are responsible for the death of millions of children worldwide every single year.
The survival rate numbers above are largely based off the idea that many more people than what we can test for are infected. If you look at the actual data and compare the number of deaths to the number of cases, you won’t get a survival rate of 99.95 percent. In an interview with Greek Reporter, Dr.Ioannidis estimated that about 150-300 million or more people have already been infected by COVID-19 around the world, far more than the 10 million documented cases, and this was in June of 2020, so just think about how many people have been infected today. 162,891,712 have been infected up to now, that number is most likely well over a billion based on the above reasoning.
Furthermore we must ask: how effective is the vaccine? We know how effective natural immunity is, that’s well documented as illustrated above.
Prior to the rollout of these vaccines, the vaccine manufacturers claimed to have observed a 95 percent success rate. Dr. Peter Doshi, an associate editor at the British Medical Journal, published a paper titled “Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective” vaccines—let’s be cautious and first see the full data.” Even today, there is still not enough data to tell how effective the vaccine is.
A paper recently published by Dr. Ronald B. Brown, School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, outlines how Pfizer and Moderna did not report absolute risk reduction numbers, and only reported relative risk reduction numbers.
Unreported absolute risk reduction measures of 0.7% and 1.1% for the Pfzier/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, respectively, are very much lower than the reported relative risk reduction measures. Reporting absolute risk reduction measures is essential to prevent outcome reporting bias in evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy.
Brown’s paper also cites Doshi’s paper which makes the same point,
“As was also noted in the BMJ Opinion, Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna reported the relative risk reduction of their vaccines, but the manufacturers did not report a corresponding absolute risk reduction, which appears to be less than 1%.”
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) – also called risk difference (RD) – is the most useful way of presenting research results to help your decision-making, so why wouldn’t it be reported? (source)
Omitting absolute risk reduction findings in public health and clinical reports of vaccine efficacy is an example of outcome reporting bias. which ignores unfavorable outcomes and misleads the public’s impression and scientific understanding of a treatment efficacy and benefits…Such examples of outcome reporting bias mislead and distort the public’s interpretation of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine efficacy and violate the ethical and legal obligations of informed consent.” – Brown
Fully vaccinated individuals are still testing positive for COVID.
How safe is the vaccine? Reports and examples of injuries and deaths seem to be quite prevalent on social media. For example, take a look at the post below. It’s from a woman named Heidi Neckelmann. The post is from her Facebook Page, it went quite viral and her Facebook Page was eventually deleted.
This story is true, it was actually receiving so much attention that mainstream media picked up on it. She was the wife of Dr. Gregory Michael from California, and she claimed that in her mind, her 56-year-old husband’s death was “100% linked” to the vaccine. Now, at least one doctor has come forward publicly to say he also believes the vaccine caused Michael to develop acute idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), the disorder that killed him. According to the New York Times:
“Dr. Jerry L. Spivak, an expert on blood disorders at Johns Hopkins University, who was not involved in Dr. Michael’s care, said that based on Ms. Neckelmann’s description, ‘I think it is a medical certainty that the vaccine was related.’“
This is one of what may be hundreds of examples that have been shared across social media, which would still make it an extremely rare event given the amount of people who have been vaccinated in the United States.
According to the most recent data from the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, approximately 4000 people have died and more than 100,000 adverse reactions have been reported as a result of the vaccine. That being said, there is no way to determine or to verify wether any of these were actually a result of the vaccine, and therein lies the problem. Vaccine injury reporting systems are quite inadequate. Keep in mind more than 100 million people in the U.S. have been vaccinated. Adverse reactions seem to be more rare than prevalent, but what number qualifies as rare? What number qualifies as prevalent?
VAERS has come under fire multiple times, a critic familiar with VAERS’ bluntly condemned VAERS in The BMJ as “nothing more than window dressing, and a part of U.S. authorities’ systematic effort to reassure/deceive us about vaccine safety.”
So, we don’t really have a truly accurate number, when it comes to vaccine injuries in general, let alone the COVID vaccine. Anybody can make a report, this also means that some of them could be made up.
An HHS pilot study conducted by the Federal Agency for Health Care Research estimates that only 1 percent of vaccine injuries are actually captured by VAERS, but who knows? The point is we don’t have an accurate and reliable reporting system.
Some papers have raised concerns in the long term as well. For example, a study published in October of 2020 in the International Journal of Clinical Practice states:
COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.
In a new research article published in Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, veteran immunologist J. Bart Classen expresses similar concerns and writes that “RNA-based COVID vaccines have the potential to cause more disease than the epidemic of COVID-19.”
For decades, Classen has published papers exploring how vaccination can give rise to chronic conditions such as Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes — not right away, but three or four years down the road. In this latest paper, Classen warns that the RNA-based vaccine technology could create “new potential mechanisms” of vaccine adverse events that may take years to come to light.
Why This Is Important: Information like this is important because the rights and freedoms of people who do not wish to take the COVID vaccine may be subjected to unfair treatment compared to those who are vaccinated. Unvaccinated individuals may be unable to travel internationally, and if they do, they may be required to quarantine. They may also be banned from certain public buildings, restaurants, sporting events and more. We have yet to see how this will all roll out. In the U.S., the CDC is allowing vaccinated individuals to take off their masks both inside and outside, while vaccinated ones are instructed to continue wearing them. That said, this doesn’t apply to public indoor spaces yet.
Is all of this justified given the information shared above? We are talking about people who are not even sick.
The scientific evidence now strongly suggests that COVID-19 infected individuals who are asymptomatic are more than an order of magnitude less likely to spread the disease compared to symptomatic COVID-19 patients. A meta-analysis of 54 studies from around the world found that within households – where none of the safeguards that restaurants are required to apply are typically applied – symptomatic patients passed on the disease to household members in 18 percent of instances, while asymptomatic patients passed on the disease to household members in 0.7 per cent of instances. A separate, smaller meta-analysis similarly found that asymptomatic patients are much less likely to infect others than symptomatic patients.
Furthermore, outside spread among asymptomatic individuals is virtually 0 percent.
Why do we give governments the power to implement measures that, to a large portion of the population, simply don’t make sense. How can we truly say that we live in a democracy when the will of the people, and science, is ignored and censored? Are vaccine passports and requirements to access other “amenities” we were used to prior to the pandemic truly justified? Why are governments pushing to vaccinate everybody so hard, using methods of coercion like passports and other incentives, when this type of push doesn’t match up with the science?
The answer to this question warrants reflection, but I will offer a hypothesis. In 2021, there is clearly a small, but vocal minority of individuals opposed to nearly all vaccinations… In response, there is a group of individuals on the other extreme. To them, either one must embrace all vaccines for all indications for all ages, or one can be lumped with the other extreme. They favor universal child vaccination of SARS-CoV-2 via an EUA, even before they have the data for that claim. They were quick to embrace vaccination for pregnant woman prior to appropriate trials establishing safety. Suppressing critical thinking to extol vaccines is also wrong and may backfire, but I believe this explains why it occurs. It is, to some degree, a counter-movement against the anti-vaxxers, which can go too far….A small faction of people vigorously opposed to all vaccination have done damage … As a reaction, many confuse [vaccine] cheerleading with science. A true scientist does not take reflexive extremes. Sadly, there are few scientists left.” – Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH
Prasad is an associate professor at the University of California San Francisco, and has also been quite vocal about Facebook “fact-checkers”, calling it scam and that what they are doing is nothing short of scientific censorship.
There is data showing the vaccines are indeed working. Even scientists who support COVID vaccinations and their efficacy, like Kulldorff, have been speaking up against taking away rights and freedoms of those who are not vaccinated. For example, 22 renowned scientists published an article titled “The vaccine worked, we can safely lift lockdown.”
In the article, they explain,
It is time to recognize that, in our substantially vaccinated population, Covid-19 will take its place among the 30 or so respiratory viral diseases with which humans have historically co-existed. This has been explicitly accepted in a number of recent statements by the Chief Medical Officer. For most vaccinated and other low-risk people, Covid-19 is now a mild endemic infection, likely to recur in seasonal waves which renew immunity without significantly stressing the NHS.
Covid-19 no longer requires exceptional measures of control in everyday life, especially where there have been no evaluations and little credible evidence of benefit. Measures to reduce or discourage social interaction are extremely damaging to the mental health of citizens; to the education of children and young people; to people with disabilities; to new entrants to the workforce; and to the spontaneous personal connections from which innovation and enterprise emerge. The DfE recommendations on face covering and social distancing in schools should never have been extended beyond Easter and should cease no later than 17 May. Mandatory face coverings, physical distancing and mass community testing should cease no later than 21 June along with other controls and impositions. All consideration of immunity documentation should cease.
Kulldorff and Bhattacharya recently published a piece in the Wall Street Journal condemning the idea of vaccine passports, a measure that seems to be gaining traction in multiple countries.
The Takeaway: At the end of the day, what can we really do to combat governments that continue to implement measures that seem to benefit the few, the rich and the powerful, while leaving everybody else to suffer? When so many people disagree, is peaceful protesting and voicing our concerns enough? I would argue that this is something we need to continue to do, because at some point you can only push a large group of people who disagree with governments so far, especially if you continue to spark this feeling in the majority of people.
Governments cannot implement measures without justifying them in the eyes of a large group of people. Vaccines, and vaccine passports are justified in the eyes of the majority, which makes it easy for these measures to be implemented and justified. My question is, were people properly educated, or were they manipulated and coerced to support vaccine passports?
We’ve seen what propaganda can do it the past, are we any different today? Does equality really exist in a day and age where so many people are having their voice censored, and their rights, freedoms and privacy taken taken away?
WITH THIS EVEN THOSE WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EMERGENCY USE APPROVAL HAVE TO FACE TRIAL
PFIZER/BioNTech DENY that nano-lipid SM-102 would be harmful
Lockdown-sceptic rock star Eric Clapton blasts vaccine safety 'propaganda' and claims he had a 'disastrous reaction' to AstraZeneca Covid jab which made him fear he'd never play again
By SCARLET HOWES - 16. May 2021
Eric Clapton has hit out at 'propaganda' over vaccine safety, claiming he suffered alarming side effects after his Covid jabs.
The legendary guitarist, a lockdown sceptic, said his hands and feet became 'useless' – prompting fears he would never play again.
In a message to his music producer, he said: 'I took the first jab of AZ [AstraZeneca] and straight away had severe reactions which lasted ten days.'
Eric Clapton has hit out at 'propaganda' over vaccine safety, claiming he suffered alarming side effects after his Covid jabs. He is pictured above at a concert in March 2020
The 76-year-old said he 'recovered eventually' but suffered further 'disastrous reactions' six weeks later after the second shot.
He added: 'My hands and feet were either frozen, numb or burning, and pretty much useless for two weeks, I feared I would never play again...
'I should never have gone near the needle.
'But the propaganda said the vaccine was safe for everyone.'
The musician, who has emphysema, ended his email to Italian music mogul Robin Monotti Graziadei, saying: 'I've been a rebel all my life, against tyranny and arrogant authority, which is what we have now.'
Clapton criticised the Government earlier this year in an anti-lockdown song called Stand And Deliver. The song was in collaboration with Van Morrison, who is also a critic of restrictions.
The 76-year-old said he 'recovered eventually' but suffered further 'disastrous reactions' six weeks later after the second shot.
Eric Clapton - I Shot The Sheriff [Crossroads 2010] (Official Live Video)
... now they shot him!
Watch Eric Clapton perform "I Shot The Sheriff" live from Chicago at Crossroads 2010. Originally written by Bob Marley, Clapton's version of I Shot the Sheriff appeared on his 1974 solo album, '461 Ocean Boulevard.' It is the most successful version of the song, peaking at #1 on the Billboard Hot 100 Eric Clapton's Crossroads Guitar Festival 2019 collection captures nearly four hours of highlights recorded live last year at the acclaimed charity music festival founded by the legendary guitarist. Get your copy here: https://rhino.lnk.to/Crossroads2019 Eric Clapton, one of the world’s pre-eminent blues/rock guitarists, once again summoned an all-star team of six-string heroes for his fifth Crossroads Guitar Festival in 2019. Held at the American Airlines Center in Dallas, Texas, the two-day concert event raised funds for the Crossroads Centre in Antigua, the chemical dependency treatment and education facility that Clapton founded in 1998.
Already in April Rock legend Sir Van Morrison has claimed that blind obedience to Covid-19 propaganda land enforced rules like lockdowns. "It is like a 'cult' and those who criticise his scepticism are attacking free speech."
The singer, known to fans as Van the Man, has written several anti-lockdown songs and warned that 'freedom is not a given any more' and needs to be fought for.
The singer, known to fans as Van the Man, has written several anti-lockdown songs and warned that 'freedom is not a given any more' and needs to be fought for
Van Morrison - Western Man (Official Audio)
The Official Audio for Western Man by Van Morrison. The new double album Latest Record Project Volume 1 is out now: https://vanmorrison.lnk.to/latestreco...
Western Man has no plan
Cause he became complacent
Stopped believing in himself
Let others steal his rewards
While he was dreaming
While he was dreaming
Others were scheming
Doing deals behind his back
Now Western Man is adrift, and under attack
What happened in between?
Now there’s no other bite of the cherry
Unless he’s prepared to fight
Start on a new path to freedom
New path to freedom
The horse has bolted from the stables
Lunatics have taken over the farm
Caretakers have taken over the main house
Plan to start meetings in the forest
Going back to the way it was
Now just seems near impossible
Western Man has no plan
They stole it while, while he was dreaming
Now there’s no other bite, bite of the cherry
Unless he’s prepared to fight
Start on a new path to freedom
Horse has bolted from the stables
Lunatics have taken over the farm
Caretakers have taken over the main building
The governors have gone over the wall
Plan to start meetings in the forest
Not going back, not going back to the way it was
Western Man has no plan
Since he became complacent
Stopped believing in himself
And let others steal his rewards
While he was dreaming
While he was dreaming
While he was dreaming
While he was dreaming
While he was dreaming
While he was dreaming
While he was dreaming
Others were scheming
Scheming while he was dreaming
Others were scheming
While he was dreaming
Others were scheming
While he was dreaming
A FINAL WARNING TO HUMANITY FROM FORMER PFIZER CHIEF SCIENTIST MICHAEL YEADON
First published on BITCHUTE May 16th, 2021.
Source (and mirror/download links): https://planetlockdownfilm.com/full-interviews/
FLCCC's COVID Prevention & Treatment Protocols: https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/
Ivermectin for COVID-19, summary of the current research: https://ivmmeta.com/
Summary of COVID early treatment studies, summary of the current research: https://c19early.com/
How to Get Ivermectin: https://covid19criticalcare.com/guide-for-this-website/how-to-get-ivermectin/
Dr. Michael Yeadon is the former Chief Scientist and Vice-President of Pfizer Respiratory & Allergy Research, and has worked for over 30 years in the pharmaceutical industry. At great personal cost, he has been sounding the alarm about some of the lies and half-truths coming out of public health agencies during this pandemic. He is deeply troubled by the use of emergency-use-authorized vaccines being given en masse to non high-risk patients, the lack of informed consent for those being given these EUA therapies, the prospect of vaccine passports, and many other public policy responses to this pandemic.
U.S. Senate Committee hearing: They stopped the covid-19 vaccine testing on animals because they were dying!
May 15, 2021 - They stopped the covid-19 vaccine testing on animals because they were dying, then proceeded to release it onto the global populace for continued trials. EVIL!
With the massive increase in vaccine hesitancy worldwide, Chinese scientists have proposed passively inhaled COVID-19 mRNA vaccines based on viral shedding for the unvaccinated.
Chinese scientists Qin Xiang Ng and Wee Song Yeo carried out a study proposing passive inhaled mRNA vaccination for SARS-Cov-2 for those who are not vaccinated.
“We propose the massive and passive immunization of the at-risk population via cohorting with individuals who have recently contracted SARS-CoV-2, but are deemed non-infectious albeit reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-positive.
Testing RT-PCR positive would imply the continued spread of non-viable mRNA particles into the surroundings”.
“Multiple studies have noted that individuals who has had SARS-CoV-2 for more than 10 days were non-infectious, though they remained RT-PCR-positive.
The above finding is in line with current US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance that “persons with mild to moderate COVID-19 remain infectious no longer than 10 days after symptom onset” and persons with “more severe to critical illness or severe immunocompromise likely remain infectious no longer than 20 days after symptom onset.“
This is because of a concept called viral shedding or vaccine shedding. It’s a process of the body releasing viral particles from a vaccine and creating a risk of infection to others.
According to the University of Alabama at Birmingham, vaccinated individuals can still catch and spread COVID-19, even after the second dose.
Chinese scientists are now proposing to passively vaccinate those who are unvaccinated based on the same concept.
“Passive mRNA immunization also experiences fewer safety issues due to its non‐integrative and transient nature, the latter of which contributes to better and/or easier control of protein expression.”
“The feasibility of inhaled RNA for passive transfection has also been proven in a number of studies.”
“On a mechanistic level, the inhaled RNA may lead to passive synthesis of non-infectious spike proteins using cell transfection machinery, hence leading to immunization of the individual.”
On similar lines targeting those who are resistant to vaccination there is also a proposed project funded by Bill Gates to create genetically modified mosquitoes that inject vaccines into people when they bite them.
With the rising cases of multiple adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine, now governments worldwide are resorting to vaccination propaganda videos with no scientific basis to nudge you to just love vaccines and ask no questions.
A group of 57 leading scientists, doctors and policy experts has released a report calling in to question the safety and efficacy of the current COVID-19 vaccines and are now calling for an immediate end to all vaccine programs. We urge you to read and share this damning report.
There are two certainties regarding the global distribution of Covid-19 vaccines. The first is that governments and the vast majority of the mainstream media are pushing with all their might to get these experimental drugs into as many people as possible. The second is that those who are willing to face the scorn that comes with asking serious questions about vaccines are critical players in our ongoing effort to spread the truth.
You can read an advanced copy of this manuscript in preprint below. It has been prepared by nearly five dozen highly respected doctors, scientists, and public policy experts from across the globe to be urgently sent to world leaders as well as all who are associated with the production and distribution of the various Covid-19 vaccines in circulation today.
There are still far too many unanswered questions regarding the Covid-19 vaccines’ safety, efficacy, and necessity. This study is a bombshell that should be heard by everyone, regardless of their views on vaccines. There aren’t nearly enough citizens who are asking questions. Most people simply follow the orders of world governments, as if they have earned our complete trust. They haven’t done so. This manuscript is a step forward in terms of accountability and the free flow of information on this crucial subject. Please take the time to read it and share it widely.
DON'T KILL THE ELDERLY !
Medical doctor warns Australian health boss in Victoria
By Dr Mark Hobart - 08. May 2021
- ALL PATIENTS IN NURSING HOMES IN VICTORIA MUST BE TESTED FOR COVID ANTIBODIES PRIOR TO GETTING ANY COVID VACCINE.
- PATIENTS SHOULD NOT RECEIVE THE VACCINE IF THEY ARE
This urgent recommendation is based on my unique and extensive experience as a GP
treating Covid-19 positive patients in Nursing Homes in Melbourne and is also supported
by the latest literature. My urgent recommendation is also supported by some leading
Australian and international immunologists and specialists.
THERE WILL LIKELY BE HUNDREDS OF COVID ANTIBODY POSITIVE
PATIENTS IN NURSING HOMES IN VICTORIA.
THESE PEOPLE MUST BE TESTED BEFORE THEY ARE VACCINATED.
Covid Antibody +ve patients, or their ‘next of kin’, must be informed of their
increased risk and the fact that they almost certainly already have immunity to
Given the danger of immunising post-Covid patients and the high level of protection that
follows Covid illness, which is now well documented, there is a moral and legal reason to
fully inform such recipients of these realities.
This is basic duty of care.
A failure to test affected nursing home patients or to inform them, or their ‘next of kin’,
of the potential risks could be considered a dereliction of duty.
My duty as a doctor is to alert the health authorities of dangerous medical practices.
DOWNOAD LETTER pdf
Science’s COVID-19 reporting is supported by the Heising-Simons Foundation.
A team of prominent scientists has doubled down on its controversial hypothesis that genetic bits of the pandemic coronavirus can integrate into our chromosomes and stick around long after the infection is over. If they are right—skeptics have argued that their results are likely lab artifacts—the insertions could explain the rare finding that people can recover from COVID-19 but then test positive for SARS-CoV-2 again months later.
Stem cell biologist Rudolf Jaenisch and gene regulation specialist Richard Young of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who led the work, triggered a Twitter storm in December 2020, when their team first presented the idea in a preprint on bioRxiv. The researchers emphasized that viral integration did not mean people who recovered from COVID-19 remain infectious. But critics charged them with stoking unfounded fears that COVID-19 vaccines based on messenger RNA (mRNA) might somehow alter human DNA. (Janesich and Young stress that their results, both original and new, in no way imply that those vaccines integrate their sequences into our DNA.)
Researchers also presented a brace of scientific criticisms, some of which the team addresses in a paper released online today by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). “We now have unambiguous evidence that coronavirus sequences can integrate into the genome,” Jaenisch says.
SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, has genes composed of RNA, and Jaenisch, Young, and co-authors contend that on rare occasions an enzyme in human cells may copy the viral sequences into DNA and slip them into our chromosomes. The enzyme, reverse transcriptase, is encoded by LINE-1 elements, sequences that litter 17% of the human genome and represent artifacts of ancient infections by retroviruses. In their original preprint, the researchers presented test tube evidence that when human cells spiked with extra LINE-1 elements were infected with the coronavirus, DNA versions of SARS-CoV-2’s sequences nestled into the cells’ chromosomes.
Many researchers who specialize in LINE-1 elements and other “retrotransposons” thought the data were too thin to support the claim. “If I would have had this data, I would have not submitted to any publication at that point,” says Cornell University’s Cedric Feschotte, who studies endogenous retrovirus chunks in the human genome. He and others also said they expected higher quality work coming from scientists of the caliber of Jaenisch and Young. In two subsequent studies, both posted on bioRxiv, critics presented evidence that the supposed chimeras of human and viral DNA traces are routinely created by the very technique the group used to scan for them in chromosomes. As one report concluded, the human-virus sequences “are more likely to be a methodological product, [sic] than the result of genuine reverse transcription, integration and expression.”
In their new paper, Jaenisch, Young, and colleagues acknowledge that the technique they used accidentally creates human-viral chimeras. “I think it’s a valid point,” Jaenisch says. He adds that when they first submitted the paper to a journal, they knew it needed stronger data, which they hoped to add during the review process. But the journal, like many, requires authors to immediately post all COVID-19 results to a preprint server. “I probably should have said screw you, I won’t put it on bioRxiv. It was a misjudgment,” Jaenisch says.
In the new PNAS paper, the team provides evidence that artifacts alone can’t explain the detected levels of virus-human chimeric DNA. The scientists also show that portions of LINE-1 elements flank the integrated viral genetic sequence, further supporting their hypothesis. And they have collaborated with one of the original skeptics, Stephen Hughes of the National Cancer Institute, who suggested an experiment to clarify whether the integration was real or noise, based on the orientation of the integrated viral sequences relative to the human ones. The results support the original hypothesis, says Hughes, a co-author of the new paper. “That analysis has turned out to be important,” he says.
“The integration data in cell culture is much more convincing than what was presented in the preprint, but it’s still not totally clean,” says Feschotte, who now calls Jaenisch’s and Young’s hypothesis “plausible.” (SARS-CoV-2, he notes, can also persist in a person for months without integrating its genes.)
The real question is whether the cell culture data have any relevance to human health or diagnostics. “In the absence of evidence of integration in patients, the most I can take away from these data is that it is possible to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA retroposition events in infected cell lines where L1 is overexpressed,” Feschotte says. “The clinical or biological significance of these observations, if any, is a matter of pure speculation at this point.”
Jaenisch’s and Young’s team do report hints of SARS-CoV-2 integration in tissue from living and autopsied COVID-19 patients. Specifically, the researchers found high levels of a type of RNA that is only produced by integrated viral DNA as the cell reads its sequence to make proteins. But, Young acknowledges, “We do not have direct evidence for that yet.”
Harmit Malik, a specialist in ancient viruses in the human genome at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, says it’s a “legitimate question” to ask why people who should have cleared the virus sometimes have positive polymerase chain Reaction tests for its sequences. But he also remains unconvinced that the explanation is integrated virus. “Under normal circumstances, there is so little reverse transcription machinery available” in human cells, Malik says.
The controversy has grown decidedly more civil since December. Both Young and Jaenisch say they received more intense criticism for their preprint than any studies in their careers, in part because some researchers worried it played into the hands of vaccine skeptics spreading false claims about the newly authorized mRNA vaccines. “If there ever was a preprint that should be deleted, it is this one! It was irresponsible to even put it up as a preprint, considering the complete lack of relevant evidence. This is now being used by some to spread doubts about the new vaccines,” Marie-Louise Hammarskjöld, a microbiologist at the University of Virginia, posted in a comment on bioRxiv at the time.
And what of the original journal submission? “They rejected it,” Jaenisch says.
Most Vaccinated Country on Earth Closes Schools and Sports as COVID Cases Surge
| 35% of New Cases Are Fully Vaccinated Residents
By Jim Hoft - 05. May 2021
Seychelles, the most vaccinated country in the world, is seeing a surge in coronavirus cases.
The island country shut down schools and sporting events this week due to the outbreak.
35% of the cases are people who were already vaccinated.
TRENDING: Most Vaccinated Country on Earth Closes Schools and Sports as COVID Cases Surge -- 35% of New Cases Are Fully Vaccinated Residents
Seychelles, which has fully vaccinated more of its population against Covid-19 than any other country, has closed schools and canceled sporting activities for two weeks as infections surge.
The measures, which include bans on the intermingling of households and the early closure of bars, come even as the country has fully vaccinated more than 60% of its adult population with two doses of coronavirus vaccines. The curbs are similar to those last imposed at the end of 2020.
Jim Hoft is the founder and editor of The Gateway Pundit, one of the top conservative news outlets in America. Jim was awarded the Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media Award in 2013 and is the proud recipient of the Breitbart Award for Excellence in Online Journalism from the Americans for Prosperity Foundation in May 2016. Contact
Within 5 years, 80% or more of those who have been vaccinated, either by choice or by coercion, will at worst be dead, and at best, will be deathly injured due to prions, spike proteins, Messenger RNA converted into transhumanist DNA; anaphylactic shock, paralysis of the lungs, fatal blood clotting, and a cocktail of aborted fetal and animal tissue containing viruses which include AIDS. Same curtain call, just more pain.
By Steven Fishman - 03. May 2021
Illustrator David Dees was an inspired visionary. Note the Biden 2020 button on zombie.
In his 1859 book, “The Origin of the Species,” Charles Darwin stated that only the strongest will survive.
But in times of our Vaccine Holocaust, strength comes from researching the issues, becoming thoroughly informed, following real science, and knowing how to overcome an onslaught of demons in Government and in the media.
Politics have little to do with this issue anymore. Both the 45th and 46th Presidents are in a pissing contest – seeing which one will amass the most credit for “Operation Warp Death.” Not helpful.
Face reality here: Within 5 years, 80% or more of those who have been vaccinated, either by choice or by coercion, will at worst be dead, and at best, will be deathly injured due to prions, spike proteins, Messenger RNA converted into transhumanist DNA; anaphylactic shock, paralysis of the lungs, fatal blood clotting, and a cocktail of aborted fetal and animal tissue containing viruses which include AIDS. Same curtain call, just more pain.
But I am not talking to the “vaccinated.” They are the Walking Dead. There is no cure for the “vaccine,” because it is not a “vaccine,” but rather Experimental Eugenics Depopulation Gene Therapy by Bill Gates and Big Pharma exported under the guise of an “Emergency Use Authorization.”
It has been craftily designed to make people want something “appealing” that will kill them. And the end [for them] is very near. Life Insurance companies are already talking about not paying the Vaccinated. No compensation for insanity, stupidity, or gullibility!
It is we, the unvaccinated that need protection from the Walking Dead. I am an older guy that admires beautiful women. But if a Victoria’s Secret Model or a James Bond Girl told me she was “vaccinated,” I would run like hell!
The persecuted “Unvaccinated” are waking up. Heroes and heroines like Health Ranger Mike Adams, Dr. Christiane Northrup, Dr. Carrie Madej, Dr. Simone Gold, Henry Makow and others are beacons of light and who will some day soon be heralded into the realm of “Vaccine Holocaust Sainthood” for saving the lives of people willing to listen and follow the real science, not the madness of Dr. Phony Fauci and his ilk of mass murderers.
Why am I writing this paper? Because we, the “unvaccinated,” need protection from THEM ! And by “THEM,” I mean all of those who are now spreading their Messenger RNA contagion through a form of Frequency Transmissibility called “Shedding.” Dr. Sherri Tenpenny has done incredible research on this issue. “Contagious” doesn’t even mildly describe what it is.
Thousands of couples are headed for divorce over this problem. Families are splitting apart. We are in a civil war of the mind, which we will ultimately win, because we won’t be the ones who all wind up dead, because we KNOW what is happening around us and they don’t!
I hope someone designs a T-shirt that reads: “If you have been vaccinated, then stay the f— away from me!” We need at least a hundred million of those right now !
For those who have been vaccinated, there is nothing we can do. There is no cure. They are deathly sick, and they will die. Most do not know it yet, but it will hit them all like a ton of bricks.
Our society as we know it will collapse. Our monetary system, the “great reset,” as the Globalists call it, will be in full swing. Federal Reserve Notes are worthless anyway, because they are debt notes, and you can never repay debt with debt. Real Estate values will plummet and fall into the largest housing crash ever, because dead people won’t be selling their houses and demand from unvaccinated survivors will drop to nothing!
After all, would you buy a Vaccine Death House? So, what’s a good business to get into? I guess the funeral business: lots of demand there; but make sure you get paid in gold or silver, not even in sh-tcoins, because the banking system will collapse.
So why is this “Darwinian Natural Selection?” Because none of us, the “unvaccinated,” will ever want to be within a feather’s throw of the dead and the dying.
Ever wonder why the TV series “The Walking Dead” was produced? Creative minds wanted to test-market the idea of a caste society where only those humans who are sane, capable or discernment, students of truth, and those capable of evaluating genuine data buried within a quagmire of lies, Governmentally-false narratives, and media quicksand will emerge as “Darwinian Survivors.”
The only way to “win the human race” is to avoid the “vaccine” like the plague [because that’s what it is]! Anyone who has ever had faith in a “vaccine” instead of a higher power probably deserves to sacrifice his or her brain, heart, and lungs to Bill Gates at the bottomless pit of the Georgia Guidestones, which he worships, mandating human population at 500 million or less, which is why he wants the rest of the 7 billion to die!
I am writing this not to scare you [although being aware of the impending terror is undoubtedly a good thing], but to rather to keep you safe and alive! Even if means never getting on a plane or going to a sporting event or a store on Black Friday, stay the hell away from vaccinated people – unless you are a psychic and can tell the sane ones from the inoculated “sheeple.”
I hate to sound heartless, but let natural selection take its course and after five years of seeing funeral pyres on every block, we sane ones may have a fighting chance to inherit the earth.
The good news is that the Walking Dead eventually will die. Sorry if it’s a loved one. There was grief and heartbreak in the TV series too.
And I hope that we, the unvaccinated and “never-will-be-vaccinated” flourish and prosper long enough to see true justice prevail, where Bill Gates and Dr. Fauci and the Globalists at “[mRNA]” Moderna, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, and Nazi-Zeneca get tried and convicted in Nuremberg-style proceedings, and then get slowly lowered into a boiling vat of hydro-sulfuric acid to compensate for the deaths of billions of people. And I wish that for them happily and without the slightest bit of anger, I say in subtle sarcasm.
Stay safe, healthy, and far away from the Walking Dead!
Dr Naomi Wolf comments
Gates said: ‘The animal trials are giving us pretty good hope that one of these (vaccines) will work.’
THE COVID JAB
Questionnaire to show people to wake them up
Here are 12 important questions and answers before considering getting the COVID-Jab:
‘1. "If I get 'vaccinated' can I stop wearing a mask(s)?"
2. "If I get 'vaccinated' will the restaurants, bars, schools, fitness clubs, hair salons, etc. reopen and will people be able to get back to work like normal?
3. "If I get 'vaccinated' will I be resistant to Covid?"
Government: "Maybe. We don't know exactly, but probably not."
4. "If I get 'vaccinated', at least I won't be contagious to others - right?"
Government: "NO. The 'vaccine' doesn’t stop transmission."
5. "If I get 'vaccinated', how long will the 'vaccine' last?"
Government: "No one knows. All Covid 'vaccines' are still in the experimental stage."
6. "If I get 'vaccinated', can I stop social distancing?"
Government: "NO" [N.B.: The opposite: You have to keep distace more strictly. Do not hug, kiss or sleep with people, who do not know that you have been inocculated with the FrankenJab. Like with HIV you can be prosecuted in numerous jurisdictions if you infect another person thereby on purpose.]
7. "If my parents, grandparents and myself all get 'vaccinated' can we hug each other again?"
8. "So, what's the benefit of getting 'vaccinated'?"
Government: "Hoping that the virus won't kill you."
9."Are you sure the 'vaccine' won't injure or kill me?"
10. "If statistically the 'virus' won't kill me (survival rate 99.7%- 99.9% depending on variant), why should I get vaccinated?
"Government: "To protect others."
11. "So, if I get 'vaccinated', I can protect all the people I come in contact with"
12. "If I experience a severe adverse reaction, long term effects (still unknown) or die from the 'vaccine' will I (or my family) be compensated from the 'vaccine' manufacturer or the Government"
Government: "NO - the government and the 'vaccine' manufacturers have 100% zero liability regarding this experimental drug."
This is a Dilettante Presumption Theorem: All statements of fact, opinion, or analysis expressed do not necessarily reflect official positions or views of any other entity, past or present. Nothing in the contents should be construed as asserting or implying endorsement of interpretations and factual statements.
(MS Word Format)
The best way to claim and protect your rights is IN WRITING. The free download documents here have value and utility for anyone who wishes to secure their lives and protect themselves and their families from a rigged and hostile civic and corporate infrastructure.
These documents provide answers, claims and notice to many of the bad actors and wrongdoers in government and corporations who think it is their privilege to violate your rights, seize your wealth and property, invade your privacy and assault your health and safety.
When you are silent, when you fail to clearly state your position on the record, you are presumed to agree with whatever is being done to you! You are presumed to be a servant, slave and ATM card to the system. These documents help you correct that problem.
This document "accepts" vaccination on the condition that ALL administrators of that vaccine accept that there are risks and accept personal liability for all harm they cause with their vaccine. They will not sign it because they know vaccines are hazardous. When they refuse to sign, that is their admission of risk, and, with that admission, you may rightfully refuse the vaccine. A more complete explanation of this vaccination notice is below.
We may soon be facing "mandated" vaccines. Those who have studied vaccines know that vaccines come with severe hazards and we must resist and oppose unlawful forced medical treatments. If you do not state your position you can be presumed to agree with any offer made to you! This document is a formal refusal of medical testing. This document should be given to anyone who threatens to force medical treatment on us.
If you are concerned that medical testing may be forced on you, and that results of that test may be used as an excuse to violate your rights, at the very least have a statement printed and ready which states your position. If you do not state your position you may be presumed to agree with any offer or demand made of you. You may download and print the REFUSAL OF MEDICAL TESTING at the link above and you may edit that as you wish to suit your own views.
Some employers seem to have the foolish, ignorant and unlawful notion that they have privilege to force vaccination as a condition of employement. This is not only wrong, it is extremely unfair and difficult for employees who wish to protect their health and safety and control their own medical options. Employers who attempt to require medical treatments for their employees should receive a stern demand to cease with notice of major consequences if they fail to do so. The download template above is such a document/notice. It can be very powerful to share this form with fellow employees so that the employer will face major disruption if medical rights are not observed. This site does not contain professional advice, only layman opinion. If you are being coerced to receive medical treatments it may be wise to seek legal counsel and take legal actions to protect your health, safety and rights.
This document is published by the U.S. Federal Agency HRSA (Health Resources & Services Administration) under HHS (Health and Human Services). The document lists the various vaccines and their known risks for specific injuries, disabilities, illnesses, conditions and deaths and the time frames for which compensation may be paid to the victim by HRSA. Anyone who believes vaccination is risk-free should see this document. If you believe you have been injured by a vaccine this is a good place to start to determine your path to remedy, then contact: https://www.hrsa.gov/
This document was taken from the HRSA web site in March, 2021, for a current copy we recommend accessing this information directly from the HRSA web site at https://www.hrsa.gov/
Vaccinations have been proven to be extremely hazardous, unsafe, contaminated and often completely ineffective. They have even been used to fraudulently deliver sterility drugs under guise of "Malaria" vaccines!
Tens of thousands of people are killed every year by vaccines, millions are injured permanently worldwide. Correlation to autism is now scientifically confirmed, yet the same vaccine regimens are still prescribed!
Even after decades of tragedies and atrocities caused by vaccinations, pharmaceutical interests have been allowed to buy corrupt legislation to try and force literally every American to accept this invasive and dangerous treatment.
Vaccines have been scientifically proven to have caused a worldwide Autism epidemic, Gardasil has been found to cause disability and death, and many other vaccines are known to cause host of crippling and life-threatening injuries, illnesses and unexpected consequences.
Pharmaceutical companies have even obtained legislation making themselves IMMUNE FROM LIABILTY for the harm they know vaccines cause! People only seek immunity when they KNOW THEY ARE GUILTY.
If you are being pressured to accept a vaccine for yourself or your children, DO NOT do so until you REQUIRE THE VACCINE PROVIDERS AND REGULATION ENFORCERS ACCEPT LIABILITY FOR THE DAMAGE THEY CAUSE with the free download contract form above titled "Vaccination Notice".
THIS IS NOT A FORM YOU SIGN. This is a form you present to your healthcare providers and REQUIRE THEM TO SIGN to insure the safety of their vaccinations, or at least accept personal responsibility to pay for any damages caused by their vaccinations.
Before accepting vaccinations for you or your child it is critical to get the providers of those vaccines to sign this form accepting liability and admitting the hazards so that you will have recourse against the many serious injuries and illnesses which vaccines are known to cause.
Of course, the healthcare providers may resist taking responsibility for what they are doing, but if they refuse to sign this form, you have legal grounds to refuse the vaccination.
You are welcome to modify the form or have an attorney do so, it is a free template.
Vaccine providers and regulators may refuse to sign this form because they know they are peddling poison, but refusal to sign the form is ADMISSION that harm may result from the vaccination. If vaccinations were truly harmless, they would gladly sign the form and accept liability.
If the vaccination providers do not sign the form, and thereby infer that vaccinations are hazardous, they have no right to demand that you accept their dangerous and ineffective medical treatments.
By the way, if you disagree with any of the above points and you believe people may be forced to accept risky medical treatments such as vaccines, then contact us. You may be invited to participate in a videotaped and published debate opposite medical researchers and scientists on the health effects and safety record of vaccines. Can you support the idea of mass forced vaccinations by non-physician politicians? Here's your chance!
Emergency rooms, clinics and even physicians usually have the terrible habit of NOT telling you what they plan to charge you until after they have provided the services! Then that bill is truly a shocker, packed with all kinds of overcharges, false charges, and services you would not have accepted if you knew how much they would cost.
Never accept any medical service without knowing and approving the charges IN ADVANCE. Simply by giving this form (see above link) to the receptionist you will obligate the medical facility to disclose all fees in advance and get your approval before providing the service! You are then entitled to refuse payment of any services that were not disclosed and approved by you in advance.
In terms of prosecutions PFIZER is by far the most criminal company
Récords de sanciones individuales:
Haga clic en la compañía o en el monto de la multa para obtener más información sobre cada caso.
Descargar resultados como
|EMPRESA||TIPO DE DELITO PRINCIPAL||AÑO||AGENCIA||MONTO DE LA MULTA|
|Pfizer Inc.||Promoción fuera de etiqueta o no aprobada de productos médicos.||2009||FDA||$2,300,000,000|
|Pfizer Inc.||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2016||DOJ_CIVIL||$784,600,000|
|Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc.||Promoción fuera de etiqueta o no aprobada de productos médicos.||2013||FDA||$490,900,000|
|Warner-Lambert||Promoción fuera de etiqueta o no aprobada de productos médicos.||2004||FDA||$430,000,000|
|Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2016||MULTI-AG||(*) $371,351,180|
|Pfizer, Inc.||comisiones ilegales y sobornos||2009||MULTI-AG||(*) $331,485,170|
|Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.||Promoción fuera de etiqueta o no aprobada de productos médicos.||2013||MULTI-AG||(*) $257,400,000|
|Warner-Lambert||Promoción fuera de etiqueta o no aprobada de productos médicos.||2004||MULTI-AG||(*) $190,000,000|
|King Pharmaceuticals||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2005||DOJ_CIVIL||$124,000,000|
|King Pharmaceuticals||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2006||MULTI-AG||(*) $124,000,000|
|Pfizer Inc.||Promoción fuera de etiqueta o no aprobada de productos médicos.||2008||MULTI-AG||$60,000,000|
|Pfizer Inc.||violación de seguridad de medicamentos o equipos médicos||2012||FDA||$55,000,000|
|Corporación Pfizer||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2002||DOJ_CIVIL||$49,000,000|
|Pfizer Inc.||Promoción fuera de etiqueta o no aprobada de productos médicos.||2012||MULTI-AG||$42,900,000|
|Alpharma Inc.||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2010||DOJ_CIVIL||$42,500,000|
|Pfizer Inc.||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2019||IL-AG||$41,047,101|
|Pfizer||Promoción fuera de etiqueta o no aprobada de productos médicos.||2014||MULTI-AG||$35,000,000|
|División de laboratorios Wyeth-Ayerst||violación de seguridad de medicamentos o equipos médicos||2000||FDA||$30,000,000|
|Pharmacia Corporation||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2013||WI-AG||$29,453,247|
|Pfizer Inc.||Ley de Prácticas Corruptas en el Extranjero||2012||SEGUNDO||$26,339,944|
|Pfizer, Inc.||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2018||DOJ_CIVIL||$23,850,000|
|Pfizer Inc.||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2002||MULTI-AG||(*) $21,084,700|
|Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc.||comisiones ilegales y sobornos||2007||USAO||$19,700,000|
|Pharmacia Corporation||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2019||IL-AG||$18,960,210|
|Wyeth LLC||Ley de Prácticas Corruptas en el Extranjero||2012||SEGUNDO||$18,876,624|
|Pfizer Inc.||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2013||TX-AG||$18,170,000|
|Pfizer HCP Corporation||Ley de Prácticas Corruptas en el Extranjero||2012||DOJ_CRIMINAL||$15,000,000|
|Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC||comisiones ilegales y sobornos||2007||USAO||$15,000,000|
|Pfizer Inc.||Promoción fuera de etiqueta o no aprobada de productos médicos.||2011||FDA||$14,500,000|
|Alpharma USPD, Inc. y Purepac Pharmaceutical Co.||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2011||KY-AG||$10,200,000|
|Pfizer Inc.||violación de seguridad de medicamentos o equipos médicos||2014||NV-AG||$9,500,000|
|Alpharma Inc.||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2010||MULTI-AG||(*) $8,900,000|
|Pfizer, Inc. y Pharmacia Corporation||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2010||HI-AG||$8,200,000|
|Pfizer||violación de seguridad de medicamentos o equipos médicos||2003||MULTI-AG||$6,000,000|
|Pfizer, Inc.||violación de seguridad de medicamentos o equipos médicos||2012||OR-AG||$3,340,000|
|Pfizer Inc. y Pharmacia Corp.||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2012||ID-AG||$2,900,000|
|Pfizer Inc.||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2011||MULTI-AG||(*) $2,621,154|
|Alpharma, Inc.||prácticas de fijación de precios o anticompetitivas||2004||FTC||$2,500,000|
|Pharmacia Corporation||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2011||NY-AG||$2,500,000|
|King Pharmaceuticals LLC||violación ambiental||2013||EPA||$2,200,000|
|REY FARMACÉUTICOS||violación ambiental||2013||EPA||(*) $2,200,000|
|Alpharma USPD, Inc.,||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2011||MS-AG||$2,010,667|
|Purepac Pharmaceutical Co., n / k / a Actavis Elizabeth, LLC||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2011||MS-AG||$2,010,667|
|Wyeth||violación del administrador del plan de beneficios||2013||demanda privada federal||$2,000,000|
|Pfizer||discriminación laboral||2009||demanda privada federal||$1,365,003|
|Pfizer Inc.||violación ambiental||2008||EPA||$975,000|
|Pfizer||violación de la protección del consumidor||2019||OR-AG||$975,000|
|FABRICACIÓN GLOBAL DE PFIZER||violación ambiental||2008||EPA||(*) $975,000|
|Alpharma, Inc.||prácticas de fijación de precios o anticompetitivas||2004||MULTI-AG||$750,000|
|Pfizer Pharmaceuticals LLC||violación ambiental||2014||EPA||$728,000|
|Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, LLC||violación ambiental||2014||EPA||(*) $728,000|
|Pfizer Inc.||violación de la protección del consumidor||2018||NY-AG||$700,000|
|Pharmacia & Upjohn Company||violación ambiental||2005||EPA||$676,250|
|Alpharma USPD, Inc.||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2010||ID-AG||$600,000|
|Purepac Pharmaceutical Co.||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2010||ID-AG||$600,000|
|Hospira Inc.||discriminación laboral||2015||OFCCP||$400,000|
|Pharmacia Corp.||Ley de Reclamaciones Falsas y afines||2009||OH-AG||$400,000|
|Pfizer Inc.||Promoción fuera de etiqueta o no aprobada de productos médicos.||2013||MA-AG||$375,000|
|Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, LLC||violación ambiental||2016||EPA||$190,000|
|HOSPIRA, INC.||violación de la seguridad o salud en el lugar de trabajo||2004||OSHA||$132,300|
|SEARLE LTD||violación ambiental||2002||EPA||$95,000|
|Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Company, Inc.||violación ambiental||2010||EPA||$77,000|
|Pfizer Pharmaceuticals LLC||violación ambiental||2005||EPA||$55,000|
|Punto de Wyeth Rouses||violación ambiental||2008||EPA||$44,500|
|Wyeth Biopharma||violación de salario y hora||2005||WHD||$40,187|
|PFIZER PHARMACEUTICAL (WARNER LAMBERT) 721450001000059||violación ambiental||2004||EPA||$37,000|
|Productos farmacéuticos de Wyeth Ayerst||violación ambiental||2004||EPA||$37,000|
|Pharmacia y Upjohn Company LLC||violación ambiental||2017||EPA||$34,170|
|FABRICACIÓN GLOBAL DE PFIZER 090110003800170||violación ambiental||2010||EPA||$31,266|
|PHARMACIA Y UPJOHN CARIBE||violación ambiental||2001||EPA||$27,168|
|EMPRESA DE FARMACÉUTICOS WYETH – OTC||violación ambiental||2000||EPA||$25,000|
|Productos farmacéuticos de Pfizer||violación ambiental||2010||EPA||$24,650|
|SITIO DE PFIZER INC / GROTON||violación ambiental||2005||EPA||$22,500|
|FABRICACIÓN GLOBAL DE PFIZER 090110003800129||violación ambiental||2006||EPA||$20,113|
|Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Ltd.||violación ambiental||2004||EPA||$20,025|
|Pfizer Inc.||violación de la seguridad del ferrocarril||2002||DESDE||$11,250|
|REY FARMACÉUTICOS||violación de la seguridad o salud en el lugar de trabajo||2001||OSHA||$7,200|
|PFIZER, INC.||violación de la seguridad o salud en el lugar de trabajo||2009||OSHA||$7,155|
|HOSPIRA||violación de la seguridad o salud en el lugar de trabajo||2006||OSHA||$6,750|
|PHARMACIA & UPJOHN (P&U) – KAPI Y EMU||violación ambiental||2004||EPA||$5,000|