SET UP CORONA TRUTH COMMISSIONS WORLDWIDE

- and form the Independent International Tribunal on the Corona Crisis (IITCC) based on a new collaboration between those UN states that are not implicated and the First Nations of this world.

https://marcodewit.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/truth-commission-300x300.jpgBy Venatrix Fulmen - 26. April 2021

Send the video below to all your so called political "representatives" and put them on notice that since they have now been clearly informed in a way even the dumbest can understand, they will be put on trial in a Nuremberg-style tribunal, if they continue to impose on their electorate directly or indirectly enforced measures like so-called vaccines that in reality are nothing but illegal gene experiments and thereby – based on the Nuremberg Codex - warcrimes, as well as violations of your fundamental human rights like lockdowns that damage the economies and livelihoods of people or devices like facemasks that make them sick from oxygen deprivation as well as collected and accumulated real pathogens and toxins.

And immediately start your own local Truth Commission to investigate these criminals and their crimes in order to provide evidence for the state-wide tribunals of your country as well as the Independent International Tribunal on the Corona Crisis (IITCC). Send the notice and video also to all officials and civil servants, including law enforcement, as well as medical doctors and other professionals with duties to protect and help people, in order to tell them that they likewise will be put on trial and punished, if they continue to enforce harmful orders they receive "from above".

Why You Can't Catch A Virus - Great Explanation

First published on BITCHUTE - April 26th, 2021.

channel image

TheTruthHunter

TheTruthHunter

Mirrored - https://brandnewtube.com/watch/why-you-can-039-t-catch-a-virus_yaIkEBSS5wFSpw3.html

COMMON LAW:
Learn Common Law With Knowledge Is Power (Work your way through tabs at the top of page) - https://knowledgeispower-uk.weebly.com/

Meet Your Strawman (Article) - https://www.ruralmoney.com/meet-your-strawman/

Common Law In 10 Minutes (Video) - https://www.bitchute.com/video/AgZYTwDm1giy/

Strawman - The Best Common Law documentary you will find (video) - https://www.bitchute.com/video/GjfLdTpxMAlc/

Common Law Court - Register the living breathing you - https://www.commonlawcourt.com/

COVID19:
The UK Government downgraded the danger of Covid19 from a high consequence infectious disease on 19th March 2020 (1 week BEFORE the first lockdown) - https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid

Global Covid Report - A Brilliant 73 page flip book style article - https://online.anyflip.com/inblw/ufbs/mobile/index.html?s=08

A 113 page pdf full of information from frontline workers & the VAERS - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YK0JR_lFy88Zu3rcC3L5NvL_Xr3ib6zY/view

18 Reasons I won't be getting a Covid19 'vaccine' - https://www.deconstructingconventional.com/post/18-reason-i-won-t-be-getting-a-covid-vaccine

Covid19 is a manufactured pandemic - https://www.globalresearch.ca/manufactured-pandemic-testing-people-any-strain-coronavirus-not-specifically-covid-19/5707781

Doctor demolishes Covid vaccine - https://davidicke.com/2021/01/12/doctor-demolishes-gates-covid-vaccine-in-devastating-analysis/

If there is no virus why are people dying (article) - https://davidicke.com/2021/01/31/covid-if-there-is-no-virus-why-are-people-dying/

5 Questions to ask people who plan on getting a Covid19 'vaccine' - https://off-guardian.org/2021/02/15/5-questions-to-ask-your-friends-who-plan-to-get-the-covid-vaccine/

Dr Andrew Kaufman - Sars Cov 2 has not been isolated. It doesn't exist (article) - https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi/

A brilliant article explaining why the number of cycles (CT) of the PCR Test is pushing out false positives everywhere - https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pcr-testing-incorrect-use/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=b2c12bbb-ac81-4cb4-9987-6f4bd15c26f0

MP's & SAGE are heavily invested in the vaccine industry - https://naturallyhealthynews.info/investigation-mps-and-sage-heavily-invested-in-vaccine-industry/?smclient=9e1e643a-d9ec-41cf-a803-a15f88e07abe&utm_source=salesmanago&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=default

Face masks are neither effective or safe (article) - https://www.technocracy.news/masks-are-neither-effective-nor-safe-a-summary-of-the-science/

Bill Gates: Vaccines are phenomenal profit makers - https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/gates-vaccines-phenomenal-profit-makers/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=a7546458-0f14-44d8-8e60-226218335bd8

ILLUMINATI:
The Empire of the City - How 3 independent states controls the world together - https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_globalelite177.htm

The UNITED STATES isn't a country, it's a corporation - https://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/us_corporation.htm#definitions

There are 2 Constitutions in the United States - https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/two-us-constitutions

The Rockefeller's own Western medicine - https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia2/ciencia_industrybigpharma219.htm

The City Of London (The Crown) owns the UNITED STATES - https://truedemocracy.net/hj31/20.html

EXPOSED: All the Queens agents that control the world - https://aim4truth.org/2018/04/17/exposed-all-the-queens-agents-and-corporations-that-control-the-world/

Who Are The Jesuits? - https://stillnessinthestorm.com/2019/06/the-jesuit-order-exposed/

The Crown Empire & The City of London - https://wakeup-world.com/2013/11/05/the-crown-empire-and-the-city-of-london-corporation/

3 Corporations rule the world - https://www.sinhalanet.net/three-corporations-run-the-world-city-of-london-washington-dc-and-vatican-city

The City of London Empire - https://humansarefree.com/2013/11/the-british-crown-empire-and-the-city-of-london-corporation.html

The Rothschilds, Vatican & City of London - https://humansarefree.com/2014/09/the-top-of-the-pyramid-the-rothschilds-the-vatican-and-the-british-crown-rule-world.html

The Council of 13 - https://www.seawapa.co/2013/11/nwo-crown-council-of-13-bloodlines.html

The Committee of 300 - https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_committee300_11.htm

Empire of the City - https://www.shiftfrequency.com/empire-of-the-city-states-the-crown-washington-dc-the-vatican/

The Real Controllers of Humanity: The Papal Bloodlines - https://www.dtss.us/blog/the-real-controllers-of-humanity-the-papal-bloodlines/

---

Say

NO to vaccines that are genetic experiments and banned by the NUREMBERG CODE

NO to measures that harm your FUNDMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS and destroy your LIVELIHOOD

NO to orders you receive from “above” that may harm you and the people for whom you have a duty to care.

YES to YOUR local TRUTH COMMISSIONS on the CORONA CRISIS

YES to a state-wide TRIBUNAL on the CORONA CRISIS, set up for your country to prosecute those citizens of your country that have been found guilty.

YES to an INDEPENDENT INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL on the CORONA CRISIS (IITCC) to prosecute those guilty on trans-national and international crimes committed in the Corona Crisis or those that cannot be brought to justice in their own countries, because there the governance is in itself is so corrupt that due legal process can not be guaranteed.

Start with your own core and wider family effort to get the truth and link up with others to cover the whole local community. Set up your local Truth Commission with teams for investigation, documentation, legal or medical advice etc. Much work has already been done e.g. by the  or the Extra-parlamentarian Investigation Committee in Austria and similar efforts in Spain, France, the Netherlands and even Italy. You can rely on the independent experts who could speak out through these organizations and others like Childrens Health Defence in the USA. Use this knowledge to build your own local cases an establish all the medical, health, social and economic damages (also important for further class actions that will seek compensation). 

Link up your commission with the Truth Commissions of other communities and form county or regional commissions with whom you share your local findings and the evidence, e.g. on corrupt politicians, fraudulent courts of law or greedy hospitals, on criminal law enforcement officers or corrupted medical personnel (incl. doctors, pharmacists) or those in charge of corrupting corporations (especially Big Pharma) or the bribed mainstream media etc.

Especially all First Nations and Indigeous Communities all over our wonderful planet, living on their own territories and even still on unceded lands or being displaced must join this worldwide effort. And all 79.5 million humans, who are living deprived as genuine refugees in detention communities or as IDPs (Internally Displaced People), are encouraged to set up their own Truth Commissions right where they are in the moment and link up internationally.

This truth revolution is the last chance to walk the peaceful path of justice and evolution and to avoid armed resistance, revolt and war. Send the contact information of the Truth Commissions in your area/country to  for furhter cooperation and networking.

Choose your means of communication very wisely (avoid FascistBook, YouTube, G-mail / WhatsApp and other dishonest Big Tech) that will spy on you, undermine and/or disrupt your communications in order to stall and stop your investigations. Be aware that your adversaries are planning for June or July 2021 an international shutdown of the internet – have alternative networks and means in place. Minimum is peer-to-peer (p2p) encryption (like freedomcells), but better is completely decentralized networks using BRIAR or TOX.

The Freedom Cell Network

freedomcells. org

---

The Last Surviving Prosecutor Of The Nuremberg Trials Has A Message For Us

First published on BITCHUTE April 26th, 2021.

---

Thomas Buergenthal reflects on the value of truth commissions

Judge Thomas Buergenthal was one of the youngest survivors of the Auschwitz and Sachsenhausen concentration camps. He immigrated to the United States at the age of 17. Judge Buergenthal has devoted his life to international and human rights law. A former chairman of the Museum’s Committee on Conscience, he is currently the Lobingier Professor of Comparative Law and Jurisprudence at the George Washington University Law School and served for a decade as the American judge at the International Court of Justice in The Hague. He served as a judge and president of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and of the Administrative Tribunal of the Inter-American Development Bank, and was the first US national to be elected to the UN Human Rights Committee, a member of the UN Truth Commission for El Salvador, and vice chairman of the Claims Resolution Tribunal for Dormant Accounts in Switzerland. With a unique perspective shaped by his experiences as a Holocaust survivor and international jurist, Judge Buergenthal has taught at several leading law schools and written more than a dozen books and numerous articles on international law and human rights.

Transcript

In my view, the value of a truth commission is that it can establish a credible picture of the historical elements that contributed to the crimes that were committed. You simply cannot try people for 40,000 rapes, for example. But you can have a truth commission that can record that and have that accepted so that history is not continuously rewritten in the future by those who have an interest in changing the reality. So the truth commission to me is critical for the evolution -- peaceful evolution -- of a country that has gone through terrible things like El Salvador and Guatemala or South Africa have gone through. But of course it's at the same time important that there exist an international tribunal or some other method to bring at least the major criminals to justice, for the deterrent effect.

 

Important questions for those who are responsible:

(N.B.: This list is in no way complete or exhaustive - please send further important questions that need to be asked to - but do you realize that these questions so far are never asked in public?)

On Corporate Level:

1. In which way is your corporation / company involved in the Corona Crisis?

2. In which way did your corporation / company profit so far?

3. In which way has your corporation / company planned to profit in future from the present Corona Crisis or similar future events?

4. Have you or someone else in your corporation / company received governmental or civilian intelligence reports on the Corona Crisis or similar events? If so, can you present those? If not (to both questions), why?

6. Have you or someone else from your corporation / company been involved in exercises on pandemic event planning - previous, present, future?

7. Have you or someone else in your corporation / company received international, governmental or private funding in connection with the present Corona Crisis or similar, earlier events? If so, can you present the details? If not (to both questions), why?

8. In which way have you or someone else in your corporation / company tried to influence governmental decision makers in the context of the present Corona Crisis or similar earlier or similar anticipated events?  Which governments and with which specifics? Where did you succeed for the benefit of your corporation / company or for personal gains?

9. Have you or someone else in your corporation / company received any threats in connection with the present Corona Crisis? If so, which threats were directed against you or your family directly (personally) and which threats were directed against the corporation / company. Can you specify the details?

10. Have you or someone else in your corporation / company given instructions to mainstream media how and what to report to the public in context with the Corona Crisis or earlier, similar events, like SARS, MERS etc. ?

(N.B.: If an employee of a corporation / company involved in the present Corona Crisis is living in your neighbourhood, invite him or her to testify at a hearing of your local Truth Commission. If the person refuses, advise the next level (county, regional, state) Truth Commission to call that person again to testify. Obviously those with the COVID-19 producing, selling or distributing companies, corporations or organizations require a special set of questions.)

On Government Level:

1. Have you or someone else in your government / cabinet received intelligence reports on the Corona Crisis?

- If so: Can you present these reports to the Truth Commission? If not (concerning both questions), why?

2. Have you or someone else in your government / cabinet been approached and in connection with the Corona Crisis or similar events been told that:

- if you don't do "this or that" the consequences will be "xyz". Means: Have you personally or in your governmental function been blackmailed in connection with the Corona Crisis or similar, earlier events? - If so: By whom, in which specific context and with which threat exactly?

3. Do you or someone else in your government / cabinet have any knowledge about nano-bio-chemical weapons research and development or similar (incl. 'dual-use') activities within the boundaries of your country or abroad? If so, can you specify in detail?

4. Have you or someone else in your government apparatus received international, governmental or private funding in connection with the present Corona Crisis or similar, earlier events? If so, can you present the details? If not (to both questions), why?

5. Have you or someone else in your government / cabinet have in connection with the Corona Crisis commissioned research, studies or similar work to:

a) develop counter-measures? If so, can you specify?

b) develop policies and strategies on what to tell the public? If so, can you specify?

6. Have you or someone else in your governmental apparatus given instructions to mainstream media how to report and what to report to the public in context with the Corona Crisis or earlier, similar events, like SARS, MERS etc. 

7. Which personal benefits or advantages have you received in context with the present Corona Crisis

- a) based on your insider knowledge.

- b) based on your governmental position of power and the instructions you gave. 

(N.B.: If a civil servant or other governmental / public employee involved in the present Corona Crisis is living in your neighbourhood, invite him or her to testify at a hearing of your local Truth Commission. If the person refuses, advise the next level (county, regional, state) Truth Commission to call that person again to testify.)

CAVEAT: Some of these questions will obviously not or only be answered with false statements, based on governmental or corporate 'secrecy' prescriptions or assumptions. It is, however, important to ask these questions and to document the answers for future references. To find the real truth is never an easy or short process - it will take time and effort, but for the sake of humanity it has to be done - now.

Amnesty Granting Powers

First Nations like state-governments can determine if, at which level and at which stage of the truth-finding process they want to bestow in the Truth Commission the powers to grant amnesty and/or witness protection to a forthcoming witness, who might have to implicate him- or herself by telling the full truth. This option can be important to find out about and stop still ongoing, secret operations, but must not be open to abuse by granting it a priori.

---

Tools, Resources and Information:

RULE- OF-LAW

Truth commissions

Extra-parlamentarian Investigation Committee in Austria

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR NATURAL JUSTICE

Universal Declaration of Human Rights | United Nations

Universal Declaration of Human Rights - Wikipedia

European Convention on Human Rights

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

United Nations Convention against Torture - Wikipedia

---

---

The Nuremberg Code

NURENBERG TRIAL - The Doctor Trial

On December 9, 1946, an American military tribunal opened criminal proceedings against 23 leading German physicians and administrators for their willing participation in war crimes and crimes against humanity. This case is known as the "Doctors Trial"  (USA v. Karl Brandt et. al).

<p>Chart used by the prosecution in the Doctors' Trial illustrates the organization of the Medical Services of the Wehrmacht (German armed forces). Nuremberg, Germany, December 9, 1946-August 20, 1947.</p>

In order to provide for a fair trial and justice the court had to conclude on "Permissible Medical Experiments", which subsequently was compiled as the ‘Nuremberg Code’ and remains as a landmark document on medical ethics and one of the most lasting products of the "Doctors Trial."

Nuremberg Code
Rights enunciated in the 1947 Nuremberg Code are for the protection of individuals being studied in research protocols. If the case can be made that a population is being studied as research subjects, then provisions of the Nuremberg Code would apply to individuals in that population

The Nuremberg Code

(1947)

The great weight of the evidence before us is to the effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

1.The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion, and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random or unnecessary in nature.

3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problems under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

5.No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur, except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill, and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

From Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No 10 , Vol. II. Nuremberg, Germany, October 1946 - April 1949.

This document is the basis for subsequent codes governing all research which involves human subjects. Cf. codes by the American Medical Association, The World Medical Assembly’s declaration in Helsinki (1964) and revised in 1975 and 1983, The American Psychological Association, The Department of Defense, etc.

DOWNLOAD PDF

---

Thomas Buergenthal describes international tribunals

Judge Thomas Buergenthal was one of the youngest survivors of the Auschwitz and Sachsenhausen concentration camps. He immigrated to the United States at the age of 17. Judge Buergenthal has devoted his life to international and human rights law. A former chairman of the Museum’s Committee on Conscience, he is currently the Lobingier Professor of Comparative Law and Jurisprudence at the George Washington University Law School and served for a decade as the American judge at the International Court of Justice in The Hague. He served as a judge and president of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and of the Administrative Tribunal of the Inter-American Development Bank, and was the first US national to be elected to the UN Human Rights Committee, a member of the UN Truth Commission for El Salvador, and vice chairman of the Claims Resolution Tribunal for Dormant Accounts in Switzerland. With a unique perspective shaped by his experiences as a Holocaust survivor and international jurist, Judge Buergenthal has taught at several leading law schools and written more than a dozen books and numerous articles on international law and human rights.

The difference between Nuremberg and the ICC [International Criminal Court] of course, or the ICTY (the Yugoslav tribunal), is that the Nuremberg tribunal of course was a tribunal that consisted of judges drawn from the four victor countries and it was established by them, whereas these tribunals -- the Yugoslav tribunal and the Rwanda tribunal -- have been established by the Security Council. And the ICC has been established by treaty and the judges come from all parts of the world. That's progress, and in a sense it shows that it's not only one group of the international community but the entire international community which has an interest in these institutions and has a part in it.

---

The Difference of the Nurenberg Trial of 1947 and the IITCC

Since the ICC is not recognized by the USA, whose government, that has not subscribed to the Rome Statute, and corporations are key in the Corona Crisis, little hope can be placed into the ICC to indict, put on trial or to be able to prosecute those found guilty for te committed warcrimes like genocide or crimes against humanity.

Since also the Security Council (SC) of the United Nations (UN) cannot be trusted in the case of the Corona Crisis, because of the involvement of key governments that make the decicions in the SC and the clear guilt of the World Health Organization (WHO) in the planned pandemic, a new formula must be engaged to establish the IITCC.

It has been proposed (VF et. al.) that the international community will have to come together in a real WORLD ASSEMBLY comprising of states that are presently members of the UN, but who can at the same time proudly state that they are sovereign, independent and not implicated in the Corona Crisis, as well as all First Nations and large communities of Indigenous peoples. It is believed that the first group of countries still resembles the majority of the current UN member-states' assembly, but with the addition of the Indigenous Nations, this body would then be even much more representative for the whole world community than the present UN itself. Together as allied forces the peoples of this world then can declare their victory over the Corona p(l)andemic and establish the IITCC just like the Nuremberg Trial was implemented by the victors of the war after WWII. The establishment of the IITCC is already overdue. 

All acting heads of government of the 196+ states of the UN (United Nations), who do not support this process to establish the truth and to prosecute those found guilty, must themselves be automatically brought before the International Criminal Court (ICC) as war criminals and held responsible immediately for their deeds and/or collaboration in the current crimes against humanity.

---

International Human Rights Declarations, Conventions and Charters Relevant to Environmental Concerns

These documents are also available online at The University of Minnesota Human Rights Library, an online searchable collection of Human Rights documents, treaties, bibliographies and other educational materials

===

HISTORY:

Copy of an original letter signed by Adolf Hitler authorizing the T4 (Euthanasia) program.

Photograph | Photograph Number: 67072

Copy of an original letter signed by Adolf Hitler authorizing the T4 (Euthanasia) program.

The text of the letter states that "Reichsleiter [Philipp] Bouhler and Dr. med. [Karl] Brandt are charged with responsibility to broaden the authority of certain doctors to the extent that [persons] suffering from illnesses judged to be incurable may, after a humane, most careful assessment of their condition, be granted a mercy death. [signed] Adolf Hitler."

Copy of an original letter signed by Adolf Hitler authorizing the T4 (Euthanasia) program.

The text of the letter states that "Reichsleiter [Philipp] Bouhler and Dr. med. [Karl] Brandt are charged with responsibility to broaden the authority of certain doctors to the extent that [persons] suffering from illnesses judged to be incurable may, after a humane, most careful assessment of their condition, be granted a mercy death. [signed] Adolf Hitler."

===

The Doctors Trial: The Medical Case of the Subsequent Nuremberg Proceedings

 

Historical Photographs

  • Brigadier General Telford Taylor, Chief of Counsel, during the Doctors Trial, which was held in Nuremberg, Germany, from December 9, 1946, to August 20, 1947.

    Brigadier General Telford Taylor, Chief of Counsel, during the Doctors Trial, which was held in Nuremberg, Germany, from December 9, 1946, to August 20, 1947.

On December 9, 1946, an American military tribunal opened criminal proceedings against 23 leading German physicians and administrators for their willing participation in war crimes and crimes against humanity. In Nazi Germany, German physicians planned and enacted the Euthanasia Program, the systematic killing of those they deemed "unworthy of life." The victims included people with severe psychiatric, neurological, or physical disabilities. Further, during World War II, German physicians conducted pseudoscientific medical experiments utilizing thousands of concentration camp prisoners without their consent. Most died or were permanently injured as a result. Most of the victims were Jews, Poles, Russians, and also Roma (Gypsies). After almost 140 days of proceedings, including the testimony of 85 witnesses and the submission of almost 1,500 documents, the American judges pronounced their verdict on August 20, 1947. Sixteen of the doctors were found guilty. Seven were sentenced to death. They were executed on June 2, 1948.

In commemoration of the fiftieth anniversary of the Doctors Trial, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum presented excerpts from the official trial record, with accompanying photographs:

Sentences

The defendants Paul Rostock, Kurt Blome, Siegfried Ruff, Hans Wolfgang Romberg, Georg August Weltz, Konrad Schaefer, and Adolf Pokorny were judged not guilty of the charges listed in the indictment.

The defendants sentenced to death - KARL BRANDT, KARL GEBHARDT, RUDOLF BRANDT, JOACHIM MRUGOWSKY, WOLFRAM SIEVERS, VIKTOR BRACK, WALDEMAR HOVEN - were hanged at Landsberg prison in Bavaria on June 2, 1948.

The sentences of the remaining defendants were reduced during the appeal process: SIEGFRIED HANDLOSER and KARL GENZKEN's sentences were commuted to 20 years; OSKAR SCHROEDER, GERHARD ROSE and, FRITZ FISCHER's to 15 years; HERMANN BECKER-FREYSENG, WILHELM BEIGLBOECK, and HERTA OBERHEUSER's to 10 years; and HELMUT POPPENDICK's to time served.

One key culprit JOSEF MENGELE, also known as the Angel of Death, who was a German Schutzstaffel officer and physician during World War II, esacped and was never tried.

He is mainly remembered for his actions at the Auschwitz concentration camp, where he performed deadly experiments on prisoners, and was a member of the team of doctors who selected victims to be killed in the gas chambers as well as one of the doctors who administered the deadly gas.

Nickname(s): Angel of Death (German: Todesengel), White Angel (German: der weiße Engel or weißer Engel), Wolfgang Gerhard (burial name)

Born: March 16, 1911, Günzburg, Kingdom of Bavaria, German Empire

Died: February 7, 1979, South Atlantic Ocean, off Bertioga, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil

Until he died Mengele was an unrepentant Nazi, who claimed he had never personally harmed anyone and only carried out his duties as an officer.

If he had been tried in Nuremberg he would have received several death sentences.                   Josef Mengele