UPDATE 26. January 2021: AstraZeneca rejects ‘completely incorrect’ claim that Covid vaccine is less than 10 percent effective among elderly

UPDATE 22. January 2021: W.H.O. Comes Clean, Pandemic Over! The Plot to Steal America

UPDATE 21. January 2021: Vaccine skeptics now being labeled part of “extremist” groups in latest merger of Big Pharma and the police state government

UPDATE 16. January 2021: 55 Americans Have Died Following COVID Vaccination, Norway Deaths Rise To 29

UPDATE 15. January 2021: 23 Dead In Norway After Taking COVID Vaccine + COVID-19 vaccine reactions being blamed on PEG, but could it be the body responding to mRNA transhumanist genetic reprogramming?

UPDATE 13. January 2021: EMA hacked with BioNtech covid vax files released (get the data-set)

UPDATE 12. January 2021: Rate of adverse events caused by coronavirus vaccines 50x higher than flu shots

UPDATE 09. January 2021: “Let’s make sure we are clear… This is not a vaccine." - Discussion between Dr. David Martin, Rocco Galati, Judy Mikovits, Ph.D und Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on the Inocculations - it is a synthetic pathogen used in the mass-"vaccinations"!

UPDATE 06. January 2021: Vaxxed v. Unvaxxed: Lawsuit Seeks to Protect Americans From Discrimination Based on Vaccination Status + EU health authority approves Moderna mRNA vaccine

UPDATE 05. January 2021: MUST WATCH !!! -->>> FOCUS ON FAUCI

UPDATE 05. January 2021: Experimental COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Are Operating System Designed To Program Human DNA, Says Moderna

ICYMI: Say what? WHO says there is “no evidence” that COVID-19 vaccines will prevent spread of disease… so what good are they? + UK: MHRA awarded over £980,000 for collaboration with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Health Organisation

Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective” vaccines—we need more details and the raw data

Peter Doshi - 04. 

Five weeks ago, when I raised questions about the results of Pfizer’s and Moderna’s covid-19 vaccine trials, all that was in the public domain were the study protocols and a few pressreleases.

Today, two journal publications and around 400 pages of summary data are available in the form of multiple reports presented by and to the FDA prior to the agency’s emergency authorization of each company’s mRNA vaccine.

While some of the additional details are reassuring, some are not. Here I outline new concerns about the trustworthiness and meaningfulness of the reported efficacy results.

“Suspected covid-19”

All attention has focused on the dramatic efficacy results: Pfizer reported 170 PCR confirmed covid-19 cases, split 8 to 162 between vaccine and placebo groups. But these numbers were dwarfed by a category of disease called “suspected covid-19”—those with symptomatic covid-19 that were not PCR confirmed. According to FDA’s report on Pfizer’s vaccine, there were “3410 total cases of suspected, but unconfirmed covid-19 in the overall study population, 1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group.”

With 20 times more suspected than confirmed cases, this category of disease cannot be ignored simply because there was no positive PCR test result. Indeed this makes it all the more urgent to understand. A rough estimate of vaccine efficacy against developing covid-19 symptoms, with or without a positive PCR test result, would be a relative risk reduction of 19% (see footnote)—far below the 50% effectiveness threshold for authorization set byregulators. Even after removing cases occurring within 7 days of vaccination (409 on Pfizer’s vaccine vs. 287 on placebo), which should include the majority of symptoms due to short-term vaccine reactogenicity, vaccine efficacy remains low: 29% (see footnote).

If many or most of these suspected cases were in people who had a false negative PCR test result, this would dramatically decrease vaccine efficacy. But considering that influenza-like illnesses have always had myriad causes—rhinoviruses, influenza viruses, other coronaviruses, adenoviruses, respiratory syncytial virus, etc.—some or many of the suspected covid-19 cases may be due to a different causative agent.

But why should etiology matter? If those experiencing “suspected covid-19” had essentially the same clinical course as confirmed covid-19, then “suspected plus confirmed covid-19” may be a more clinically meaningful endpoint than just confirmed covid-19.

However, if confirmed covid-19 is on average more severe than suspected covid-19, we must still keep in mind that at the end of the day, it is not average clinical severity that matters, it’s the incidence of severe disease that affects hospital admissions. With 20 times more suspected covid-19 than confirmed covid-19, and trials not designed to assess whether the vaccines can interrupt viral transmission, an analysis of severe disease irrespective of etiologic agent—namely, rates of hospitalizations, ICU cases, and deaths amongst trial participants—seems warranted, and is the only way to assess the vaccines’ real ability to take the edge off the pandemic.

There is a clear need for data to answer these questions, but Pfizer’s 92-page report didn’t mention the 3410 “suspected covid-19” cases. Nor did its publication in the New England Journal of Medicine. Nor did any of the reports on Moderna’s vaccine. The only source that appears to have reported it is FDA’s review of Pfizer’s vaccine.

The 371 individuals excluded from Pfizer vaccine efficacy analysis

Another reason we need more data is to analyse an unexplained detail found in a table of FDA’s review of Pfizer’s vaccine: 371 individuals excluded from the efficacy analysis for “important protocol deviations on or prior to 7 days after Dose 2.”  What is concerning is the imbalance between randomized groups in the number of these excluded individuals: 311 from the vaccine group vs 60 on placebo. (In contrast, in Moderna’s trial, there were just 36 participants excluded from the efficacy analysis for “major protocol deviation”—12 vaccine group vs 24 placebo group.)

What were these protocol deviations in Pfizer’s study, and why were there five times more participants excluded in the vaccine group?  The FDA report doesn’t say, and these exclusions are difficult to even spot in Pfizer’s report and journal publication.

Fever and pain medications, unblinding, and primary event adjudication committees

Last month I expressed concern about the potential confounding role of pain and fever medications to treat symptoms. I posited that such drugs could mask symptoms, leading to underdetection of covid-19 cases, possibly in greater numbers in people who received the vaccine in an effort to prevent or treat adverse events. However, it seems their potential to confound results was fairly limited: although the results indicate that these medicines were taken around 34 times more often in vaccine versus placebo recipients (at least for Pfizer’s vaccine—Moderna did not report as clearly), their use was presumably concentrated in the first week after vaccine use, taken to relieve post-injection local and systemic adverse events. But the cumulative incidence curves suggest a fairly constant rate of confirmed covid-19 cases over time, with symptom onset dates extending well beyond a week after dosing.

That said, the higher rate of medication use in the vaccine arm provides further reason to worry about unofficial unblinding. Given the vaccines’ reactogenicity, it’s hard to imagine participants and investigators could not make educated guesses about which group they were in.  The primary endpoint in the trials is relatively subjective making unblinding an important concern. Yet neither FDA nor the companies seem to have formally probed the reliability of the blinding procedure, and its effects on the reported outcomes.

Nor do we know enough about the processes of the primary event adjudication committees that counted covid-19 cases. Were they blinded to antibody data and information on patients’ symptoms in the first week after vaccination?  What criteria did they employ, and why, with a primary event consisting of a patient-reported outcome (covid-19 symptoms) and PCR test result, was such a committee even necessary? It’s also important to understand who was on these committees. While Moderna has named its four-member adjudication committee—all university-affiliated physicians—Pfizer’s protocol says three Pfizer employees did the work. Yes, Pfizer staff members.

Vaccine efficacy in people who already had covid?

Individuals with a known history of SARS-CoV-2 infection or previous diagnosis of Covid-19were excluded from Moderna’s and Pfizer’s trials. But still 1125 (3.0%) and 675 (2.2%) of participants in Pfizer’s and Moderna’s trials, respectively, were deemed to be positive for SARS-CoV-2 at baseline.

Vaccine safety and efficacy in these recipients has not received much attention, but as increasingly large portions of many countries’ populations may be “post-Covid,” these data seem important—and all the more so as the US CDC recommends offering vaccine “regardless of history of prior symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.” This follows on from the agency’s conclusions, regarding Pfizer’s vaccine, that it had ≥92% efficacy and “no specific safety concerns” in people with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.

By my count, Pfizer apparently reported 8 cases of confirmed, symptomatic Covid-19 in people positive for SARS-CoV-2 at baseline (1 in the vaccine group, 7 in the placebo group, using the differences between Tables 9 and 10) and Moderna, 1 case (placebo group; Table 12).

But with only around four to 31 reinfections documented globally, how, in trials of tens of thousands, with median follow-up of two months, could there be nine confirmed covid-19 cases among those with SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline? Is this representative of meaningful vaccine efficacy, as CDC seems to have endorsed? Or could it be something else, like prevention of covid-19 symptoms, possibly by the vaccine or by the use of medicines which suppress symptoms, and nothing to do with reinfection?

We need the raw data

Addressing the many open questions about these trials requires access to the raw trial data. But no company seems to have shared data with any third party at this point.

Pfizer says it is making data available “upon request, and subject to review.” This stops far short of making data publicly available, but at least leaves the door open. How open is unclear, since the study protocol says Pfizer will only start making data available 24 months after study completion.

Moderna’s data sharing statement states data “may be available upon request once the trial is complete.” This translates to sometime in mid-to-late 2022, as follow-up is planned for 2 years.

Things may be no different for the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine which has pledged patient-level data “when the trial is complete.” And the ClinicalTrials.gov entry for the Russian Sputnik V vaccine says there are no plans to share individual participant data.

The European Medicines Agency and Health Canada, however, may share data for any authorized vaccines much earlier.  EMA has already pledged to publish the data submitted by Pfizer on its website “in due course,” as has Health Canada.

Peter Doshi, associate editor, The BMJ

Competing interests: I have been pursuing the public release of vaccine trial protocols, and have co-signed open letters calling for independence and transparency in covid-19 vaccine related decision making.


Calculations in this article are as follows:  19% = 1 – (8+1594)/(162+1816); 29% = 1 – (8 + 1594 – 409)/(162 + 1816 – 287). I ignored denominators as they are similar between groups.

FeaturedPeter Doshi


UDATES: - earlier info see: 


AstraZeneca rejects ‘completely incorrect’ claim that Covid vaccine is less than 10 percent effective among elderly

By RT - 26. January 2021

AstraZeneca rejects ‘completely incorrect’ claim that Covid vaccine is less than 10 percent effective among elderly

A person receives a dose of the Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine at the Winter Gardens in Blackpool, Britain January 25, 2021. ©  Peter Byrne/Pool via REUTERS

AstraZeneca has denied claims circulating in German media that its Covid-19 vaccine has low efficacy among people 65 and over. The sensational reports have emerged as the EU mulls approval for the drug.

Two German outlets, Handelsblatt and Bild, cited government sources alleging that the AstraZeneca/Oxford drug has a poor performance record with senior citizens. Bild reported that among adults 65 and older, efficacy was “less than 10 percent,” while Handelsblatt put the figure at eight percent. The papers claimed that due to the worrying data, German officials did not expect the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to approve the drug for use on over-65s. 

In a written response to the reports, AstraZeneca said the claims about lackluster efficacy were “completely incorrect,” noting that in the UK the drug received emergency approval for the age group in question. The British-Swedish pharmaceutical company also pointed to data published in The Lancet in November, which demonstrated that “older adults showed strong immune responses to the vaccine, with 100 percent of older adults generating spike-specific antibodies after the second dose.”

AstraZeneca sought EU regulatory approval for its vaccine last month, and a final decision is anticipated by the EMA as early as this week. German Health Minister Jens Spahn stressed on Tuesday that European authorities would closely examine all available data before making a determination, but declined to comment on the reports about the vaccine’s alleged poor results among the elderly.

AstraZeneca has already found itself in hot water with Brussels, after the firm announced that there would likely be delays in delivering doses of the vaccine to member states once the vaccine receives approval, due to reduced yields at a manufacturing site used to supply the EU. 

In August, the EU paid the pharmaceutical €336 million ($409 million) in order to secure 300 million doses of the drug. Production issues could result in as few as 31 million doses being initially delivered to the bloc, according to EU officials speaking to the media. 

EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen told AstraZeneca CEO Pascal Soriot on Monday that the bloc expects its contractual agreements to be honored.

The EU has already given the green light to two other vaccines, developed by Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech.


W.H.O. Comes Clean, Pandemic Over!

From BIN - Friday, January 22, 2021 23:02

The Plot to Steal America


World Health Organization (WHO) Comes Clean, Pandemic Over 

We expose the lies from the WHO and how they and congress used the crisis as a political weapon to unseat a duly elected president and push an earth-shattering agenda. Experimental genome therapy injection on an unsuspecting public. Grab a pen and notebook and enjoy the report.

King Of Vaccines Comes Clean! Aborted Babies In Vaccines… 

King Of Vaccines Comes Clean!

Dr. Stanley Plotkin, MD – The world’s leading authority on vaccines details the use of aborted babies in vaccines while under oath. Leaked Video! Head U.N. Scientist Admits Vaccines Are Killing People – Soumya Swaminathan, the Chief Scientist of the WHO, admitting in a secret meeting that vaccines kill people and they do not know why.

On Dec 2nd and 3rd 2019 the UN funded WHO held a Global Vaccine Safety Summit where scientists admitted that vaccines are killing people, adjuvants in the vaccines are part of the problem, they have not conducted adequate safety studies.
Original video https://www.brighteon.com/283a0f6a-e109-42bb-867a-1c6bf646d330  

The Alex Jones Show
January 12 2020
On Dec 2nd and 3rd the UN funded WHO held a Global Vaccine Safety Summit where scientists admitted that vaccines are killing people, adjuvants in the vaccines are part of the problem, they have not conducted adequate safety studies. This is a bombshell report. See the links below for more videos.



Original Videos courtesy of Del BigTree

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPSpyEi01VI&feature=emb_logo (VIDEO CENSORED by GooTube!)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2IujhTdCLE&feature=emb_logo (VIDEO CENSORED by GooTube!)

This other link will lead you to the first infowars report where they put out this news for the very first time: https://www.brighteon.com/44062308-e212-4182-84b1-cd658761d2b2


Vaccine skeptics now being labeled part of “extremist” groups in latest merger of Big Pharma and the police state government

By  - 21. January 2021

Image: Vaccine skeptics now being labeled part of “extremist” groups in latest merger of Big Pharma and the police state government

(Natural News) The rise (and success) of President Donald Trump and the threat his tens of millions of supporters pose to the existing establishment order (the deep state) is so immense there is a movement afoot by the powers that be to eliminate them before they grow strong and organized enough to take America back.

One of the ways this effort is taking shape is to simply designate Trump’s supporters, among them Americans who remain skeptical of vaccines, as “extremist” groups, enemies of the state and terrorists.

As Big Pharma — bolstered by the former president’s COVID-19 vaccine push — grows in wealth and power, the industry is emulating Corporate America and Big Tech by growing closer to the leviathan federal government.

As noted by Technocracy News, last month The Hill claimed the “anti-vaccination movement sees COVID-19 as an opportunity” to shore up its opposition, adding: As public health officials seek to reassure Americans on the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine, anti-vaccine efforts could prevent the country from reaching herd immunity.”

Meanwhile, a separate report in The Times said the British “government regards tackling false information about COVID-19 vaccination as a rising priority,” likely for the very same concern.

And yet, how do ‘democracies’ justify utilizing cyber warfare against citizens just to implement public health policies that not all may agree with (and certainly policies that ‘the science’ doesn’t always prove)?

Aren’t concerns over the safety of vaccines legitimate? Should they not be part of the policy debate and discussion? Since when is it okay to impose uncertain healthy policies on supposedly free people the same way a dictatorial leader would? (Related: After abandoning objective science and endorsing left-wing political agendas, how is the Lancet still considered a medical journal?)

Not if the objective, the real objective, is control over the population; when control is the overriding goal, then discussion is an impediment.

And along those lines, ‘opponents’ to government policy — in this case, when governments have decided that ‘vaccines are good’ and ‘dissent to vaccines is bad,’ the powers that be then must not simply disagree with their opponents, they have to demonize, dehumanize and de-legitimize them, even if it means putting their lives in danger with false accusations of “extremism.”

Consider, per Technocracy News: 

In July 2020, Imran Ahmed, a member of the Steering Committee on Countering Extremism Pilot Task Force under the British government’s Commission for Countering Extremism and the chief executive of the Centre for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), told The Independent he considers anti-vaxxers “an extremist group that pose a national security risk,” because “once someone has been exposed to one type of conspiracy it’s easy to lead them down a path where they embrace more radical world views that can lead to violent extremism.”

Who thinks like this? Authoritarians do. Dictators. Tyrants. There is absolutely nothing to link concern over vaccines to violent extremism. Nothing.

But the same kind of tyranny is brewing in the ‘land of the free’ — across the pond in America.

Before President Trump even boarded Air Force One out of D.C., Democrats and their sick, twisted media lapdogs began fantasizing about “deprogramming” his 74 million-plus supporters by sending them all to ‘reeducation camps’ so they can indoctrinate them back into the Biden/Democrat/Deep State fold.

Some of them have actually said as much out loud, including Marxist-Anarchist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. The New York Post reported:

Ocasio-Cortez said the House subcommittee on civil rights she serves on has held hearings over the prior two years on white supremacy and said there are programs to “de-radicalize” brain-washed adherents.

But she said funding was not a priority for those programs during the Trump years.

“There are people who are radicalized right now. It’s going to take a very long time to de-radicalize these people and a lot of effort,” she said.

Just a few years ago, she would have been run out of Congress for saying things like that. Now, post-Trump, she not only gets away with it, she is celebrated for it and her thoughts are echoed across other platforms — including so-called “news” networks like CNN, whose ‘media watchdog’ doesn’t even push back on calls to censor competitors.


See more at Vaccines.news.

Sources include:





55 Americans Have Died Following COVID Vaccination,

Norway Deaths Rise To 29

By Tyler Durden - 16.January 2021

Amid increasing calls for suspension of the use of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines produced by companies such as Pfizer, especially among elderly people, the situation in Norway has escalated significantly as the Scandi nation has now registered a total of 29 deaths among people over the age of 75 who’ve had their first COVID-19 vaccination shot.

As Bloomberg reports, this adds six to the number of known fatalities in Norway, and also lowers the age group thought to be affected from 80.

Until Friday, Pfizer/BioNTech was the only vaccine available in Norway, and “all deaths are thus linked to this vaccine,” the Norwegian Medicines Agency said in a written response to Bloomberg on Saturday.

“There are 13 deaths that have been assessed, and we are aware of another 16 deaths that are currently being assessed,” the agency said.

All the reported deaths related to “elderly people with serious basic disorders,” it said.

“Most people have experienced the expected side effects of the vaccine, such as nausea and vomiting, fever, local reactions at the injection site, and worsening of their underlying condition.”

Norway’s experience has prompted the country to suggest that Covid-19 vaccines may be too risky for the very old and terminally ill... the exact group that 'the science' shows are actually at risk from this virus.

Pfizer and BioNTech are working with the Norwegian regulator to investigate the deaths in Norway, Pfizer said in an e-mailed statement. The agency found that “the number of incidents so far is not alarming, and in line with expectations,” Pfizer said.

However, it's not just Norway as The Epoch Times' Zachary Stieber reports that fifty-five people in the United States have died after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine, according to reports submitted to a federal system.

Deaths have occurred among people receiving both the Moderna and the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines, according to the reports.

In some cases, patients died within days of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine.

One man, a 66-year-old senior home resident in Colorado, was sleepy and stayed in bed a day after getting Moderna’s vaccine. Early the next morning, on Christmas Day, the resident “was observed in bed lying still, pale, eyes half open and foam coming from mouth and unresponsive,” the VAERS report states. “He was not breathing and with no pulse.”

In another case, a 93-year-old South Dakota man was injected with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine on Jan. 4 around 11 a.m. About two hours later, he said he was tired and couldn’t continue with the physical therapy he was doing any longer. He was taken back to his room, where he said his legs felt heavy. Soon after, he stopped breathing. A nurse declared a do-not-resuscitate order.

In addition to the deaths, people have reported 96 life-threatening events following COVID-19 vaccinations, as well as 24 permanent disabilities, 225 hospitalizations, and 1,388 emergency room visits.

It's not just the old and frail, in Israel, which proudly lays claim to the greatest vaccination effort in the world (largest percentage of the population inoculated),

As RT reports, at least 13 Israelis have experienced facial paralysis after being administered the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine, a month after the US Food and Drug Administration reported similar issues but said they weren’t linked to the jab.

Israeli outlet Ynet reported, citing the Health Ministry, that officials believe the number of such cases could be higher.

“For at least 28 hours I walked around with it [facial paralysis],” one person who had the side effect told Ynet. 

“I can't say it was completely gone afterwards, but other than that I had no other pains, except a minor pain where the injection was, but there was nothing beyond that.”

Ynet quoted Prof. Galia Rahav, director of the Infectious Diseases Unit at Sheba Medical Center, who said she did not feel “comfortable” with administering the second dose to someone who had received the first jab and subsequently suffered from paralysis.

“No one knows if this is connected to the vaccine or not. That's why I would refrain from giving a second dose to someone who suffered from paralysis after the first dose,” she told the outlet.

Finally, as we noted yesterday following the news of rising post-vaccination deaths in Noway, health experts from Wuhan, China, called on Norway and other countries to suspend the use of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines produced by companies such as Pfizer, especially among elderly people.

China's Global Times reports Chinese experts said the death incident should be assessed cautiously to understand whether the death was caused by vaccines or other preexisting conditions of these individuals.

Yang Zhanqiu, a virologist from Wuhan University, told the Global Times on Friday that the death incident, if proven to be caused by the vaccines, showed that the effect of the Pfizer vaccine and other mRNA vaccines is not as good as expected, as the main purpose of mRNA vaccines is to heal patients.


A Beijing-based immunologist, who requested anonymity, told the Global Times on Friday that the world should suspend the use of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine represented by Pfizer, as this new technology has not proven safety in large-scale use or in preventing any infectious diseases.

Older people, especially those over 80, should not be recommended to receive any COVID-19 vaccine, he said.

All of which is a problem since it is the elderly who are at most risk (quite frankly at any real risk at all) and thus who need the protection the most.

The Chinese health experts instead say that the most elderly and frail should be recommended to take medicines to improve their immune system.

Of course, one cannot help but note the irony of scientists from the source of the plague that has killed millions around the world and destroyed lives/economies almost everywhere, is now calling for the cessation of the process to protect against the plague.


Tyler Durden's Photo

Tyler Durden


COVID-19 vaccine reactions being blamed on PEG, but could it be the body responding to mRNA transhumanist genetic reprogramming?

By  - 15. January 2021

Image: COVID-19 vaccine reactions being blamed on PEG, but could it be the body responding to mRNA transhumanist genetic reprogramming?

(Natural News) The medical establishment is playing dumb concerning the adverse events caused by Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines, blaming their occurrence on a relatively common, yet toxic, vaccine additive known as polyethylene glycol (PEG). However, untested modified RNA (mRNA) technology is more than likely the real culprit.

According to the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), “at least six severe allergic reactions” to the Pfizer / BioNTech China virus jab have been reported thus far. At least two cases of anaphylaxis have also been reported in the United Kingdom.

Tiptoeing around the vaccine’s mRNA component, which has never before been used in a vaccine, the mainstream media has pegged PEG as the potential cause – PEG being the petroleum-based industrial additive that surrounds mRNA like a bubble in order to deliver it into cells.

The oily lipid molecules that surround mRNA are stabilized by PEG, allowing the entire sequence to insert itself into human cells for reprogramming. The end result is the cell-based production of synthetic “spike” proteins that the body supposedly recognizes as the WuFlu, prompting it to fight the disease as part of a genetically modified (GMO) immune response.

“Although I think we’re just speculating here … it is known that one of the components that is present in both of the vaccines – polyethylene glycol – can be associated, uncommonly, with allergic reactions,” stated Peter Marks, director of the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, at a Dec. 18 press conference.

“What we’re learning now is that those allergic reactions could be somewhat more common than the highly uncommon that we thought they were because people do get exposed to polyethylene glycol in various pharmaceutical preparations,” Marks added, noting that the FDA is planning to also watch the Moderna vaccine rollout “very closely” since both jabs contain PEG.

In its own statement, Pfizer indicated that it, too, plans to “closely monitor all reports suggestive of serious allergic reactions following vaccination.” Pfizer also stated that its prescribing information includes a warning about how “appropriate medical treatment and supervision should always be readily available in case of a rare anaphylactic event following the administration of the vaccine.”

If you take a COVID-19 vaccine, you’ll become a GMO

The assumption, in other words, is that PEG is the problem, and people who are allergic to it should simply avoid the shot – simple enough. But what if PEG is not what is actually causing serious adverse events? What if Chinese virus vaccines are so serious of an affront to the human body and its natural DNA blueprints that these anaphylaxis reactions are a sign of permanent autoimmunity?

To be clear, we know that PEG is harmful and should not be injected into humans. At the same time, it would be remiss to ignore the fact that mRNA technology is a form of genetic engineering that permanently alters the human genome in ways that are still largely unknown.

At the very least, mRNA vaccines are bombarding the bodies of those who receive them with “alien protein” compounds that the immune system does not recognize. As a result, it induces anaphylaxis, which Nobel Prize-winning scientist Charles Richet described as a “universal defence mechanism against the penetration of heterogenous substances in the blood, whence they can not be eliminated.”

Especially when mixed with antigens, the poisonous chemicals used in vaccines are an affront to human immunity, hence why the immune system rejects them, oftentimes violently and sometimes leading to death. And the introduction of mRNA technology only worsens that threat.

According to some, these mRNA “vaccines” are not even vaccines at all. They are a completely different animal that has been designed to recode a person’s genetics and turn him or her into some kind of transhuman.

As one Zero Hedge commenter posed it, perhaps these anaphylactic reactions are simply the “external manifestations of the internal change to transhumanism.” Another wrote that the goal of the globalists is to “change humanity into their imag(e)ination and control them like livestock.”

Still another wrote that one of the unanswered questions about these mRNA vaccines has to do with how the jabs themselves are a type of virus “that takes over the normal functions of healthy cells and reprograms them to produce synthetic spike proteins.”

“Once those cells are reprogrammed, they can not ever go back to the way they were. The cells are now spike protein factories, constantly causing the immune system to neutralize these particles … If the body is now constantly producing antibodies to counteract trillions of inert spike proteins, you have now caused that person to have an autoimmune disorder.”

In the opinion of this writer, these COVID-19 jabs are the start, if not the fulfillment, of the Mark of the Beast written about in the book of Revelation – especially if they become a requirement in order to buy, sell, travel and live.

More of the latest news about Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines can be found at Pandemic.news.

Sources for this article include:






23 Dead In Norway After Taking COVID Vaccine

Government regulator says “We see nothing alarming”

By Steve Watson - 15. Janury 2021

Reports emerging from Norway indicate that at least twenty three people have died after taking the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, yet the government

EMAregulator has said they don’t see anything alarming in the cases.

Norway was one of the first countries to start vaccinating people before the end of last year, beginning in nursing homes with the elderly.

Reports from local media there note that there have been 23 deaths among those who have taken the shot, with 13 so far positively linked to the side effects of the shot.

However, Dr. Steinar Madsen, the medical director of the national drug regulator, the Norwegian Medicines Agency commented “We do not see anything alarming with these figures. All deaths are in elderly and frail people with underlying diseases.”

The reports also indicate that a further 29 people who took the vaccine have developed significant side effects. Nine of those cases are said to be critical.

The developments prompted the Norwegian Public Health Institute to update its Covid-19 vaccination guidelines to suggest that the benefit of the jab to already ill people “may be marginal or negligible.” 

“For those with the most severe frailty, even relatively mild vaccine side effects can have serious consequences,” the Institute noted, adding “For those who have a very short remaining life span anyway, the benefit of the vaccine may be marginal or irrelevant.”

While there are hundreds of deaths in nursing homes every month, this development is sure to be concerning, given that globally the vaccine is being rolled out to elderly people first.

In the UK, the government has announced that more than a third of people over 80 have already received the jab.

The number equates to over a million people in the UK.


EMA hacked with BioNtech covid vax files released

By Jim Stone - 13. January 2020

The most important files in the batch are HERE

You will need a picture viewer (like IrfnView) and open office or Microsoft word to get the information.

It was an easy read of only about 20 documents. BioNtech's vax is not as bad as the others, (but still bad) and Polyethelene Glycol has been given the name ALC-0159 so it does not show up on the ingredient label. My opinion: Don't take this crap, since even in THIS DOCUMENT it clearly states that the vax has two ingredients that have never been approved for use in people before. And their labeling is not honest.

The product lingers in tissues for a long time, especially the liver, this is all in the document I linked, which is a lengthy read. From what I managed to get to quickly it is evident only animal testing was done and the date of the document proves there's no way this stuff is safe in humans.

The document was released on November 30 2020 and at that time they did not even have approval for ANY human studies. If any were claimed by them publicly (I have not looked into that,) they lied. Here is one of the many comments in the document regarding testing:

"The pharmacology dossier is based on initial studies of the functionality of the BNT162b2 (V9) RNA-based product and the encoded SARS-CoV-2 P2 S protein as well as on supporting studies of SARS-CoV-2 P2 S protein structure. This is followed by characterization of the humoral and cellular immune response in mouse and nonhuman primate upon immunization with BNT162b2 (V9) and ends up with a SARS-CoV-2 challenge study of BNT162b2 (V9) immunized nonhuman primates. No secondary pharmacodynamic, safety pharmacology or pharmacodynamic drug interaction studies with BNT162b2 have been conducted due to the nature of the RNA-based vaccine product, which is according to applicable guidelines."

I REPEAT: AS OF NOVEMBER 30, "No secondary pharmacodynamic, safety pharmacology or pharmacodynamic drug interaction studies with BNT162b2 have been conducted due to the nature of the RNA-based vaccine product, which is according to applicable guidelines." Let's clarify: As of November 30, NO STUDIES AT ALL with regard to the safety of the product were complete, and their own document says it over and over again, (that is just one example) they focus on studies done with monkeys and rats. Not people. Gotta love that.

Bottom line: BioNtech does not have a marketable product. It could not have been safely analyzed since Nov 30, there would be no way to do human trials that fast, and their own documents say no human trials were done or even scheduled, as of Nov 30. If anyone gets jabbed with that sh*t they are the victim of a con job.


First published on BITCHUTE January 13th, 2021.

channel image


Hackers posted confidential documents regarding Covid-19 medicines and vaccines on the internet after a data breach late last year at the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

Caught up in the hack were some documents submitted by Pfizer and BioNTech during a regulatory review of their vaccine, approved last month.

Download while you can:
Password for locked files is "Moses".


Rate of adverse events caused by coronavirus vaccines 50x higher than flu shots

By  - 12. January 2021

Image: Rate of adverse events caused by coronavirus vaccines 50x higher than flu shots

The number of people suffering serious adverse events following vaccination for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) is 50 times higher than the number for seasonal flu shots, new reports indicate.

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is seeing a surge in new cases of COVID-19 vaccine injury that is massively outpacing similar cases for influenza vaccines and other jabs.

Through Dec. 22, with fewer than one million doses of China virus vaccines distributed, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) VAERS platform received 307 reports of emergency room visits, as well as 17 “life threatening” events.

There have also been a number of deaths reported, which is deeply concerning when considering the fact that Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines have only been available to the public for less than a month.

“In 2019-2020, about 175 million flu vaccine doses were given,” tweeted former New York Times reporter and Tell Your Children author Alex Berenson.

“1220 ER visits and 73 ‘life threatening’ events were reported. The data is on the CDC VAERS Website.”

Despite offering a few caveats for why there is this massive disparity, Berenson was basically forced to conclude that something is seriously wrong with COVID-19 vaccines that is causing a much higher share of patients to fall seriously ill or die after getting jabbed.

“… the first Covid vaccine doses have mostly been given to healthy people in settings where problems can be quickly treated,” Berenson notes, further indicting the jabs for affecting healthy people in a profoundly negative way.

“These problems are occurring BEFORE the rollout to older, less healthy people – and before the 2nd dose, which is known to be far more dangerous.”

Put bluntly, only stupid people are getting vaccinated for coronavirus

In the end, all of this simply confirms what Berenson admits was recognizable in the clinical trials – even though we know that clinical trials tend to understate real-world problems rather than overstate them.

“… because any smart drug company will try to bias the trials in its favor,” Berenson says.

All of that to say, getting vaccinated for the WuFlu is an exceptionally dangerous endeavor, especially since Big Pharma holds no liability for injury or death. Vaccine-injured people are completely on their own, in other words.

Considering the risk of getting sick, let alone dying, from the Chinese virus itself is next to nil, it makes no sense whatsoever to get vaccinated for it – especially when the risk of being harmed from the vaccine is higher than the risk of developing symptoms from natural infection.

The medical deep state will continue to push it on the masses, of course, even try to make it mandatory, but stand your ground and just say no, for the protection of you and your family.

And kudos to Berenson for being brave enough to tell the truth about these shots when so many others refuse to do so. Anthony Fauci and everyone else peddling them are guilty of crimes against humanity, and their day will come – hopefully sooner rather than later.

“It’s an experimental vaccine, i.e. not fully tested even according to the manufacturer’s schedule, and therefore must fall under the umbrella of human rights violations if it’s forced upon people,” wrote one Zero Hedge commenter.

“It also violates the Nuremberg Code of informed consent,” another responded. “These vax companies and Bill Gates know just how deadly they are … and vax companies are immune from prosecution for death or injury from the vax. Gates needs to be hanged from a lamppost and left swinging like a piñata while we have a shot at him with bats.”

More of the latest news about the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) can be found at Pandemic.news.

Sources for this article include:




Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Docs Were Hacked From European Agency

BioNTech's docs on its COVID-19 vaccine candidate were illegally accessed at a European agency.

By  - 09. December 2020

Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Docs Were Hacked From European Agency

Science in HD / Unsplash

BioNTech — a COVID-19 vaccine manufacturer in partnership with Pfizer — announced its regulatory submission was subject to a cyber-attack from the European Medicines Agency on Wednesday, according to a brief statement on the agency's website.

The hack is under investigation.

Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine documents were hacked

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is working toward approving two COVID-19 vaccine candidates, expected to reach completion in two weeks, and the recent cyber-attack won't affect this timeline, according to BioNTech, the BBC reports.

The EMA didn't offer additional details on the extent or nature of the cyber-attack in a brief note on the hack on its website — except to say a full investigation was underway.

An agency spokesperson said it was still "functional," reports the BBC. But BioNTech said it was told documents relevant to the COVID-19 vaccine were accessed, in a different statement on its website.

BioNTech said hack will have 'no impact' on vaccine review timeline

"Today, we were informed [...] that the agency has been subject to a cyber-attack and that some documents relating to the regulatory submission for Pfizer and BioNTech's COVID-19 vaccine candidate, BNT162b2, which has been stored on an EMA server, had been unlawfully accessed," said the company's statement.

"EMA has assured us that the cyber attack will have no impact on the timeline for its review," added BioNTech's release.

UPDATE Dec. 9, 3:20 PM EST: EMA investigating safety of Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine for E.U. member nations

Regarding the possibility of medical study participants' personal data security, BioNTech said it was "unaware" of any compromise. The EMA is responsible for authorizing medicines and vaccines across the entire European Union (E.U.)

At present, the EMA is investigating whether the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine — which is still undergoing its initial rollout in the U.K., in addition to a different vaccine candidate from Moderna — is safe for use in E.U. member nations.

Whether Moderna's vaccine documents were also accessed has yet to be announced.

UPDATE Dec. 9, 3:26 PM EST: UK COVID-19 vaccine rollout remains unaffected, said country's cybersecurity center

This is the latest cyber-attack in a series of warnings of possible hacks against vaccine-developers, in addition to public health institutions.

In October, an India-based pharmaceutical company experienced a cyber-attack. Additionally, IBM recently said the cold storage supply chain — crucial for transporting viable vaccines — had already experienced cyber-attacks.

This latest hack comes one day before the European agency is slated to update the European Parliament on the progress made in assessing the vaccine.

The U.K.'s National Cyber Security Centre said no signs suggest the hack will alter the rollout schedule of the vaccine in the U.K., which began administering COVID-19 vaccines on Tuesday.

We have created an interactive page to demonstrate engineers’ noble efforts against COVID-19 across the world. If you are working on a new technology or producing any equipment in the fight against COVID-19, please send your project to us to be featured.



“Let’s make sure we are clear… This is not a vaccine!"

Discussion between Dr. David Martin, Rocco Galati, Judy Mikovits, Ph.D und Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on the Inocculations - it is a synthetic pathogen used in the mass-"vaccinations"! - by Sacha Stone

Important excerpt secured on BITCHUTE January 9th, 2021. From "FOCUS ON FAUCI" event 05. January 2020

Clarification from Dr. David Martin:
“Let’s make sure we are clear… This is not a vaccine. They are using the term “vaccine“ to sneak this under their public health exemptions. This is not a vaccine. This is mRNA packaged in a fat envelope that is delivered to a cell. It is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator. It is not a vaccine. Vaccines actually are a legally defined term under public health law; they are a legally defined term under CDC and FDA standards.
In the vaccine specifically, it has to stimulate both the immunity within the person receiving it and it also has to disrupt transmission. And that is not what this is. They have been abundantly clear in saying that the mRNA strand that is going into the cell is not to stop the transmission, it is a treatment. But if it was discussed as a treatment, it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health authorities because then people would say “what other treatments are there?“
The use of the term vaccine is unconscionable for both the legal definition and also, it is actually the sucker punch to open free discourse. Moderna was started as a chemotherapy company for cancer, not a vaccine manufacturer for SARSCOV 2. If we said we are going to give people prophylactic chemotherapy for the cancer they don’t have, we’d be laughed out of the room because it’s a stupid idea. That’s exactly what this is. This is a mechanical device in the form of a very small package of technology that has been inserted into the human system to activate the cell to become a pathogen manufacturing site.
And I refuse to stipulate in any conversations that this is, in fact, a vaccine issue. The only reason why the term is being used is to abuse the 1905 Jacobson case that has been misrepresented since it was written. And if we were honest with this, we would actually call it what it is: it is a chemical pathogen device that is actually meant to unleash a chemical pathogen production action within a cell. It is a medical device, not a drug because it meets the CDRH definition of a device. It is not a living system, it is not a biologic system, it is a physical technology and it happens to just come in the size of a molecular package.
So we need to be really clear on making sure we don’t fall for their game. Because their game is if we talk about it as a vaccine, then we are going to get into a vaccine conversation. But this is not, by their own admission, a vaccine...
In other words, nothing about this is going to stop you from transmitting anything. This is about getting you sick and having your own selves be the thing that gets you sick.

FULL TRANSCRIPT - Transcript of Focus on Fauci - January 5 2020.pdf


The LIVESTREAM ON 05th January 2021


If you missed the Livestream event, you can watch it here on Earth Heroes TV - this is a MUST WATCH


How many in the UK know about this?

It does say the UK gov is in the Gates and WHO's back pockets for sure.  They have been for some time. 

MHRA awarded over £980,000 for collaboration with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Health Organisation


Vaxxed v. Unvaxxed: Lawsuit Seeks to Protect Americans From Discrimination Based on Vaccination Status

In a federal complaint filed last month in the U.S. District Court of California, constitutional litigators Greg Glaser and Ray Flores presented results of a pilot study showing unvaccinated adults and children are healthier than their vaccinated counterparts.

By Greg Glaser - 06. January 2021

Vaxxed v. Unvaxxed: Lawsuit Seeks to Protect Americans From Discrimination Based on Vaccination Status

On George Washington’s birthday, Feb. 22, constitutional litigators Greg Glaser and Ray Flores will be in federal court in Sacramento to request an order immediately protecting all Americans from discrimination based on vaccination status.

Glaser and Flores represent The Control Group, which is a recently completed pilot survey of unvaccinated Americans showing 1,248% better health for unvaccinated adults and 1,099% better health for unvaccinated children.

In the federal complaint filed December 2020 in the U.S. District Court of California — Eastern District, Sacramento, Glaser and Flores state:

“As a matter of national security, this constitutional case is respectfully brought by scientifically focused patriotic Americans, including United States military family members. The American population is currently in the process of being decimated by chronic illness, due to injured and dysfunctional immune systems … The Control Group dataset provides profound proof that vaccine exposure is in fact the primary cause of this nation’s current public health crisis.”

According to Glaser, here is the case in a nutshell:

“America is dying from the current trajectory of chronic illness. Our Control Group pilot survey proved it is the vaccines causing our nation’s demise. And even the government’s own admissions make it clear vaccines are unavoidably unsafe. There is no single agency such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that can be petitioned to heal the whole nation, nor a single law such as SB277 that can be overturned to heal this nation from the current trajectory. That is why Ray Flores and I are requesting comprehensive relief in the form of an executive order preventing discrimination based on vaccination status. If we prevail, then every American will be protected from mandatory vaccination.”

Glaser said he believes this case is the most comprehensive presentation of evidence to date on vaccine harm. For example, Glaser and Flores have 400+ top-level science exhibits offered for judicial notice, which requires the court to accept certain statements made by government officials and other authoritative sources. A key goal of this judicial notice technique is to help shift the legal burden to the state to prove vaccine safety. According to Glaser, because the State has no vaxxed versus unvaxxed study, the state cannot meet its legal burden.

Judicial Notice #1 connects all these chronic illnesses (i.e., digestive disorders, diabetes) to the immune system with the most authoritative citations on the planet.

Judicial Notice #2 shows that vaccines are dangerous and untested — once again all of these are authoritative citations the government cannot dispute.

And Judicial Notice #3 shows how vaccines are made and distributed through communist China.

Because the evidence is so voluminous, Glaser and Flores also filed infographics (demonstrative evidence) to help showcase some of the main points: Health Crisis In America, Vaccines Are Dangerous, Vaccines Are Made In Communist China.

A great deal of the complaint is devoted to insisting that control groups are necessary to the scientific method, and the court’s job is to preserve this particular vital evidence necessary to rescue America from the current trajectory of chronic illness.

Some evidence highlights from the case include:

  • National data of vaccinated children show approximately 54% have a chronic health condition. But in The Control Group of unvaccinated children, the number is only 6%. That means vaccination causes an 800% increased risk of chronic illness in children. This has now been proven with a 99% confidence interval. Moreover, this pattern is repeated over and over in The Control Group data with 99% confidence: diabetes (0% in the unvaccinated Control Group v. 10% in the vaccinated), digestive disorders (0.4% in the unvaccinated v. 18% in the vaccinated), ADHD (0.47% in the unvaccinated v. 9.4% in the vaccinated).
  • The Control Group provides numerical proof that vaccines are causing chronic illness. For example, the p-value (probability or odds) that the excess health conditions seen in the vaccinated population under the age of 18 are not due to vaccine exposure is:
    1 in 84,721,527,559,728,800,000,
  • The calculated Pearson correlation coefficient shows a “very high correlation” between the increase in the CDC vaccine schedule and the increase in these chronic illnesses. This is another numerical proof showing vaccines are causing chronic illness.
  • America is suffering an epidemic of chronic illness caused by vaccination. The nation will collapse on the current trajectory of vaccination.
  • Vaccination is unavoidably unsafe. It is a form of experimental biological alteration of the human immune system.
  • Improved living conditions (not vaccination) are responsible for historical improvement of public health.

All of the evidence filed in the complaint can be found on The Control Group litigation website.


Greg Glaser, Esq.'s avatar

Greg Glaser, Esq., J.D. is a vaccine rights attorney with a litigation and transactional law background. 


Coronavirus: EU health authority approves Moderna vaccine

06. January 2021

The US-developed COVID-19 vaccine was rubber-stamped by the European Commission after getting conditional market approval from the EU's medical watchdog. It is the second vaccine authorized for use in the 27-nation bloc.

A bottle of the Moderna vaccine

The Moderna vaccine has received conditional approval from the EU's medicine agency

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommended  Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine for conditional market authorization on Wednesday, the agency announced following a meeting.

Hours later, it was approved by the European Commission, a step that was considered a formality. The rubber stamp, announced by Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, means it is now the second vaccine available in the EU to fight the coronavirus. 

"With the Moderna vaccine, the second one now authorised in the EU, we will have a further 160 million doses. And more vaccines will come," von der Leyen said in a statement.

Ursula von der Leyen is deeply embedded with Bill Gates and BigPharma

Leaders of EU nations have come under fire for their slow vaccine rollout programs, compared with those in Israel and other countries.

The BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine is currently the only authorized coronavirus vaccination in the EU.

It received fast-track authorization by the EMA on December 21, but supply chain issues and low production capacity have marred the rollout of the mass vaccination programs across the bloc.

"This vaccine provides us with another tool to overcome the current emergency," Emer Cooke, Executive Director of EMA, said.

Wednesday's EMA meeting to discuss the Moderna vaccine was the second this week after an initial meeting on Monday proved inconclusive.

The United States, Canada and Israel have already authorized the Moderna shot.

The commission could finally approve the vaccine later on Wednesday, news agency Reuters reported, citing the Dutch medicines authority.

EU leaders welcome authorization

German Health Minister Jens Spahn said Germany was to receive around 50 million doses of the Moderna vaccine in 2021, including 2 million in the first quarter.

He told reporters in Berlin that he expected the vaccine to begin rolling out to EU nations next week, and that if further vaccines beyond the BioNTech-Pfizer and Moderna shots are approved "we'll be able to offer everyone in Germany a vaccine by the summer.''

Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz called the authorization "a further important step in the fight against the pandemic." 

"With it, we have more vaccines available in the EU to combat the pandemic."

What is the Moderna vaccine?

The mRNA-1273 vaccine from US company Moderna is a gene-based vaccine that is very similar in principle to the one from BioNTech-Pfizer.

It was about 95% effective at preventing the illness in clinical trials.

No serious safety issues were found during the clinical trials. Participants tolerated the vaccine well, according to the manufacturer and testing authorities. There were some common vaccination reactions, but these were mild or moderate and didn't last long. [N.B.: This statement has already been contested!]

Almost 10% of those vaccinated with mRNA-1273 experienced fatigue, according to an interim report by an independent surveillance panel.

The EU medicines agency did not specify at the time why it did not approve the vaccine following the initial EMA meeting on Monday. But it did say experts were "working hard to clarify outstanding issues with the company.

kmm/sms (AFP, Reuters, dpa)


Experimental COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Are Operating System Designed To Program Human DNA, Says Moderna

According to pharma giant Moderna, the COVID-19 mRNA based experimental vaccines being approved for emergency use for the first time in history are Operating System designed to program human DNA.

Experimental COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Are Operating System Designed To Program Human DNA, Says Moderna
Experimental COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Are Operating System Designed To Program Human DNA, Says Moderna

Messenger RNA (mRNA) is found in all living cells. These strands of genetic code act as chemical intermediaries between the DNA in our chromosomes and the cellular machinery that produces the proteins we need to function: mRNA provides the instructions this machinery needs to assemble these proteins.

Moderna’s mRNA-1273 is programmed to make your cells produce the coronavirus’ infamous spike protein that gives the virus its crown-like appearance (“corona” is crown in Latin) for which it is named.

Moderna has made public that mRNA platforms are an “operating system” designed to program human DNA and turn their cells into efficient drug delivery systems.

We set out to create an mRNA technology platform that functions very much like an operating system on a computer. It is designed so that it can plug and play interchangeably with different programs. In our case, the “program” or “app” is our mRNA drug – the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein.

Experimental COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Are Operating System Designed To Program Human DNA
Moderna has made public that mRNA platforms are an “operating system” designed to program human DNA and turn their cells into efficient drug delivery systems. Courtesy: Moderna

These mRNA vaccines alter the coding region – the actual genetic code that instructs ribosomes to make protein.

Utilizing these instruction sets gives our investigational mRNA medicines a software-like quality. We also have the ability to combine different mRNA sequences encoding for different proteins in a single mRNA investigational medicine.

Moderna mRNA COVID19 vaccine alters DNA
Within a given modality, the base components are generally identical across development candidates – formulation, 5’ region and 3’ region. Only the coding region varies based on the protein/s the potential medicine is directing cells to produce. Courtesy: Moderna

There are unique and unknown risks to messenger RNA vaccines, including the possibility that they generate strong type I interferon responses that could lead to inflammation and autoimmune conditions.

Scientists have raised concerns that an immune reaction to RNA could lead to some autoimmune diseases like lupus.



Say what? WHO says there is “no evidence” that COVID-19 vaccines will prevent spread of disease… so what good are they?

By  - 03. January 2021

Image: Say what? WHO says there is “no evidence” that COVID-19 vaccines will prevent spread of disease… so what good are they?

(Natural News) The World Health Organization was busted earlier this year carrying water for the Chinese government in terms of helping Beijing cover up its responsibility for COVID-19 and the resulting global pandemic the virus caused.

In fact, the cover-up was so egregious that President Donald Trump took the extraordinary step of cutting off the WHO from American tax dollars.

But now it appears as though the global health agency is attempting to atone for its past mistakes involving Beijing’s coronavirus cover-up with some damning new information regarding the highly controversial COVID-19 vaccines — namely, that they don’t do anything to stop the spread of the disease.

During a virtual press conference earlier this week, WHO chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan was specific: “I don’t believe we have the evidence on any of the vaccines to be confident that it’s going to prevent people from actually getting the infection and therefore being able to pass it on.”

"I don't believe we have the evidence on any of the vaccines to be confident that it's going to prevent people from actually getting the infection and therefore being able to pass it on”, says WHO Chief Scientist @doctorsoumya pic.twitter.com/QdTvzj7Nyd

— Disclose.tv 🚨 (@disclosetv) December 28, 2020


Mind you, that is the entire purpose behind a vaccine in the first place — to not only inoculate people, but to prevent the spread of the disease the vaccine is meant to target.

So if they don’t actually do what they’re supposed to do, why are governments, including ours, spending billions of dollars to manufacture and distribute them?

As noted by Zero Hedge, “a close look at the research released by Pfizer and Moderna shows the studies haven’t actually tested whether the vaccines actually prevent transmission of the virus; the goal of the trials was to see whether vaccinated patients presented with COVID symptoms at a rate that was substantially less frequent than individuals who hadn’t been vaccinated. That’s pretty much it.”

Though the available data may sorta, kinda, suggest that the vaccines will lower transmission rates, apparently scientists (and the vaccine makers) don’t have that information yet.

That seems awfully important data to have, though, considering the objective behind mass vaccination. 

It all just seems rather obvious (again) that this vaccine, though Trump’s heart was obviously in the right place, has been little more than a mechanism by which Big Pharma and co-opted scientists can make an mint off the people’s suffering (and tax dollars).

There’s more: The vaccines may actually be killing people already.

Israeli media reported this week that a 75-year-old man from Beit Shean died after getting his first Pfizer vaccine (two are required for ‘full immunity’). Naturally, according to the country’s health ministry, Israelis and the rest of the world are being told that the vaccine had absolutely nothing to do with the death (and yet, people who die from heart disease or lung problems and are COVID-19 positive are counted as ‘COVID deaths’).

Israel National News reported

The man received the vaccine at 8:30 in the morning, and waited for the customary time at the health clinic before he was released to his home feeling well.

Some time later, the man lost consciousness and was later confirmed dead from heart failure.

Heart failure while positive with coronavirus is due to COVID; heart failure and death after getting a COVID vaccine is…due to “heart failure.” Got it?

Meanwhile, health officials in Switzerland said a person from the Swiss Canton of Lucerne also died after being one of the country’s first to get the vaccine. 

“We are aware of the case,” a spokesperson said, noting further that the case had been referred to the country’s medications regulator Swissmedic.

One more thing: A San Diego-based emergency room nurse got sick with COVID this week after being vaccinated, though again, the ‘experts’ are telling everyone the vaccines are super effective and there’s nothing at all to worry about.

Which generally means there is plenty to worry about. 

See more reporting like this at Pandemic.news.

Sources include:





UK: MHRA awarded over £980,000 for collaboration with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Health Organisation

How many in the UK know about this? It does say the UK gov is in the Gates and WHO's back pockets for sure.  They have been for some time. 

MHRA today announced a partnership worth over £980,000 to improve the safety monitoring of medicines in low and middle-income countries.

Published 15 December 2017

From: Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
LogoWe are delighted to announce a new partnership with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Health Organisation that aims to extensively improve the safety monitoring of medicines in low and middle-income countries (LMIC).

New medicines and vaccines, for diseases such as malaria and HIV, may be introduced for the first time in LMIC’s where there are weak or no regulatory systems in place for effective safety monitoring. These new treatments have been developed with urgent public health needs in mind and therefore the need to gather and analyse information quickly on their safety and effectiveness is important. The healthcare and regulatory systems in these settings may often lack the tools, training and capacity to operate a robust safety monitoring system. Whilst great progress has been made with many of LMIC’s now involved as members of the World Health Organization Program for International Drug Monitoring, the experience in collecting, assessing and acting on adverse reaction data, and risk management planning is limited.

Without an effective system, public health programs are at risk and patients may be affected, should they suffer from adverse drug reactions (ADRs) which are not promptly identified and treated. This can consequently undermine the program and result in a loss of trust in the product or a vaccine. Ultimately, this may lead to lower uptake and therefore, the disease not being effectively treated.

WHO and the Gates Foundation have launched ‘Project Smart Safety Surveillance’ (also known as Project 3-S) to help LMIC’s identify, assess, and adequately manage the risks associated with new products. MHRA will be joining this initiative to bring regulatory expertise to the project. This will be for a 3-year period where it is intended to run three pilot exercises in different LMIC settings.

Dr Ian Hudson, Chief Executive Officer at MHRA said:

We are delighted to be involved in such an important global initiative. New drugs and vaccines are being brought to the market for the first time in public health programmes in settings where the safety monitoring and regulatory systems need strengthening. The expertise we can bring to the project will help national safety monitoring centres identify risks and benefits early and take appropriate regulatory action to support global heath.

Dr Dan Hartman of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation said:

The Triple S project is vitally important to the success of public health programmes to combat some of the world’s major diseases. When a new medicine or vaccine is being used it is critical that potential risks are identified early and well understood. The involvement of MHRA in this project will ensure scientific and regulatory expertise are developed within the national centres.

Dr Ian Hudson discusses a new partnership with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Health Organisation