UPDATE 20. October 2020: U.S. Justice Department Sues 'Monopolist Google' For Violating Antitrust Laws

UPDATE 19. October 2020: Doctors For Truth: Tens Of Thousands Medical Professionals Suing And Calling For End To COVID Tyranny

UPDATE - 17. October 2020: A legal challenge to Covid-19 measures has been filed against the Ontario and Federal Government in Canada

UPDATE 15. October 2020: Crimes against Humanity & CORONA CLASS ACTION


Class Action Lawsuits Related to Coronavirus Spike Across the USA


The crisis resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic has set off a maelstrom of legal disputes stemming from forced business closures and allegations of fraud, among many other complaints. Class-action lawsuits, in particular, have been used to address some of the most egregious reports of misconduct.

These kinds of legal actions are perfect vehicles for frauds perpetrated on consumers and shareholders, where the wrongdoing alleged is so widespread that plaintiffs benefit from banding together.

"There is a tsunami of class-action cases in three principal areas," Kent Schmidt, a California attorney who specializes in business and class-action litigation, explained to Newsweek. "These early filings can be indicative of the liabilities that companies should take into consideration and inform their practices now to avoid getting hit with one of these costly lawsuits."

Consumer and shareholder fraud, in addition to violations of employment law, have become the most common harms committed during the crisis. Consumers and shareholders are often alleging that they were misled about the risks of COVID-19, and employees caught up in the ensuing economic downturn have objected to mass-scale firings.

Cruise Ship
The Norwegian Encore cruise ship is seen on April 02, 2020, in Miami Beach, Florida. Norwegian Cruise Lines was sued in a class-action complaint for allegedly representing “positive outlooks for the company in spite of the COVID-19 outbreak.” CLIFF HAWKINS/GETTY

Schmidt, a partner at the firm Dorsey & Whitney, has compiled a running count of the new COVID-19-related class-action suits.

One notable class-action case was filed in mid-March against Norwegian Cruise Lines by a shareholder, remarking how the cruise line represented "positive outlooks for the company in spite of the COVID-19 outbreak."

Among the most startling accusations in the lawsuit, the complaint alleges that the company made "unproven" and "blatantly false" statements regarding COVID-19 in order to "entice customer to purchase cruises, thus endangering the lives of both their customers and crew members."

Norwegian Cruise Lines did not return a request for comment.

"There is a duty not to misrepresent facts and not to underestimate a risk or overstate your capabilities," Schmidt explained about these types of cases. "This is where it overlaps with the duties in communications with shareholders," consumers and others.

While an influx of new legal action may be providing aggrieved plaintiffs with some method of accountability, it has also bolstered a cottage industry of COVID-19 litigation that may be very lucrative for some firms.

Some consumer protection statutes allow plaintiffs to collect punitive damages to deter future misconduct. In other cases, judges may be able to award attorneys' fees, "including multipliers that are sometimes applied by a court," further ratcheting up the collections.

New York Sports Clubs
A New York Sports Clubs at 41st Street is temporarily closed as the coronavirus continues to spread across the United States on March 16, 2020, in New York City. New York Sports Clubs has been sued for allegedly defrauding members during statewide gym shutdowns. CINDY ORD/GETTY

Among the scores of COVID-19 plaintiffs seeking to hold alleged wrongdoers accountable is a Washington State civic organization that has filed suit against Fox News for what it claims were direct injuries caused by the company's "representations that the [corona]virus is a hoax."

Schmidt called that complaint "the silliest thing I ever heard," in terms of its legal viability, owing to the multitude of First Amendment issues that come into play.

"I understand the impulse, but the same thing can be said of lots of different outlets," he observed. "I just don't think that could ever fly."

In response to a request for comment about criticisms of her suit, Elizabeth Hallock, an attorney representing the Washington State organization, said anyone is "welcome to bring the defense that claiming a pandemic is a hoax is not harmful."

"This is a consumer protection case under a remedial statute designed to protect the public from unfair practice and competition," she added.

The emerging lawsuits pertaining to COVID-19, many of them class-action complaints, span a wide variety of industries. For instance, New York Sports Clubs has been sued for allegedly defrauding members during statewide gym shutdowns. In another case, Inovio Pharmaceuticals was sued for allegedly "falsely claiming that [it] had developed a vaccine" for COVID-19. And the state of Alaska was sued by a union of around 8,000 state employees for allegedly subjecting them to "health and safety risks" during the pandemic.

(A court denied the union's request for a temporary, judicial work-from-home order, which the state's attorney general applauded as a way to keep "the state functioning to provide essential services.")

As employers across the country adjust to new work-from-home requirements, all sorts of new liabilities can arise that human resources managers have not traditionally had to consider. Interactions between workers and colleagues can suddenly appear more intimate, blending the home and professional settings in a way that isn't germane to a standard, office workplace.

The sudden rise in employees making use of the telecommuting application Zoom, due to COVID-19 social distancing policies, has caused a re-examination of the program's privacy protections. This, in turn, has led to another class-action lawsuit.

"I think we're going to see these cases play out for years," Schmidt remarked. While many court systems have instituted caseload reductions in order to slow their operations, "the filing of new cases does not seem to be impaired."

"The number of cases we've seen in this time of crisis shows that plaintiff's class-action lawyers see this as an opportunity," he added


There is some disturbing, information at this link.

One posted today Oct 4, 2020 is extremely disturbing. CTV W5 investigation into Care Homes for the elderly in Canada.

Doctors Speaking out Against Covid Measures Taken

Wearing Masks are also dangerous as well.


MUST READ: Let the Blame Games Begin


Justice Department Sues 'Monopolist Google' For Violating Antitrust Laws

By Chris Menahan - 20. October 2020


The Department of Justice on Tuesday announced they filed a much-needed antitrust lawsuit against "monopolist Google" for dominating the search and search advertising markets online.


“Today, millions of Americans rely on the Internet and online platforms...Competition in this industry is vitally important, which is why today’s challenge against Google...for violating antitrust laws is a monumental case both for the DOJ and for the American people.” — AG Barr pic.twitter.com/CG8UKXDtZo

— Justice Department (@TheJusticeDept) October 20, 2020

Justice Department Sues Monopolist Google For Violating Antitrust Laws

Department Files Complaint Against Google to Restore Competition in Search and Search Advertising Marketshttps://t.co/JTFDO5kJ9d

— Justice Department (@TheJusticeDept) October 20, 2020

From Justice.gov:
Justice Department Sues Monopolist Google For Violating Antitrust Laws

Department Files Complaint Against Google to Restore Competition in Search and Search Advertising Markets

Today, the Department of Justice — along with eleven state Attorneys General — filed a civil antitrust lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to stop Google from unlawfully maintaining monopolies through anticompetitive and exclusionary practices in the search and search advertising markets and to remedy the competitive harms. The participating state Attorneys General offices represent Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, South Carolina, and Texas.
Note: unfortunately, every last one of those AGs is a Republican. Google has bought off the Democratic Party. If Trump is ousted by Biden I fear this case will simply be shut down.
“Today, millions of Americans rely on the Internet and online platforms for their daily lives. Competition in this industry is vitally important, which is why today’s challenge against Google — the gatekeeper of the Internet — for violating antitrust laws is a monumental case both for the Department of Justice and for the American people,” said Attorney General William Barr. “Since my confirmation, I have prioritized the Department’s review of online market-leading platforms to ensure that our technology industries remain competitive. This lawsuit strikes at the heart of Google’s grip over the internet for millions of American consumers, advertisers, small businesses and entrepreneurs beholden to an unlawful monopolist.”

“As with its historic antitrust actions against AT&T in 1974 and Microsoft in 1998, the Department is again enforcing the Sherman Act to restore the role of competition and open the door to the next wave of innovation—this time in vital digital markets,” said Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey A. Rosen.

As one of the wealthiest companies on the planet with a market value of $1 trillion, Google is the monopoly gatekeeper to the internet for billions of users and countless advertisers worldwide. For years, Google has accounted for almost 90 percent of all search queries in the United States and has used anticompetitive tactics to maintain and extend its monopolies in search and search advertising.

As alleged in the Complaint, Google has entered into a series of exclusionary agreements that collectively lock up the primary avenues through which users access search engines, and thus the internet, by requiring that Google be set as the preset default general search engine on billions of mobile devices and computers worldwide and, in many cases, prohibiting preinstallation of a competitor. In particular, the Complaint alleges that Google has unlawfully maintained monopolies in search and search advertising by:

- Entering into exclusivity agreements that forbid preinstallation of any competing search service.
- Entering into tying and other arrangements that force preinstallation of its search applications in prime locations on mobile devices and make them undeletable, regardless of consumer preference.
- Entering into long-term agreements with Apple that require Google to be the default – and de facto exclusive – general search engine on Apple’s popular Safari browser and other Apple search tools.
- Generally using monopoly profits to buy preferential treatment for its search engine on devices, web browsers, and other search access points, creating a continuous and self-reinforcing cycle of monopolization.

These and other anticompetitive practices harm competition and consumers, reducing the ability of innovative new companies to develop, compete, and discipline Google’s behavior.

The antitrust laws protect our free market economy and forbid monopolists from engaging in anticompetitive practices. They also empower the Department of Justice to bring cases like this one to remedy violations and restore competition, as it has done for over a century in notable cases involving monopolists over other critical industries undergirding the American economy like Standard Oil and the AT&T telephone monopoly. Decades ago the Department’s case against Microsoft recognized that the antitrust laws forbid anticompetitive agreements by high-technology monopolists to require preinstalled default status, to shut off distribution channels to rivals, and to make software undeletable. The Complaint alleges that Google is using similar agreements itself to maintain and extend its own dominance.

The Complaint alleges that Google’s anticompetitive practices have had harmful effects on competition and consumers. Google has foreclosed any meaningful search competitor from gaining vital distribution and scale, eliminating competition for a majority of search queries in the United States. By restricting competition in search, Google’s conduct has harmed consumers by reducing the quality of search (including on dimensions such as privacy, data protection, and use of consumer data), lessening choice in search, and impeding innovation. By suppressing competition in advertising, Google has the power to charge advertisers more than it could in a competitive market and to reduce the quality of the services it provides them. Through filing the lawsuit, the Department seeks to stop Google’s anticompetitive conduct and restore competition for American consumers, advertisers, and all companies now reliant on the internet economy.

Google is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, and is headquartered in Mountain View, California. Google is owned by Alphabet Inc., a publicly traded company incorporated and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware and headquartered in Mountain View, California.
This is a solid case and much of what I've been asking for but it really should have been filed three years ago.

Google controls 91-92 percent of the search market whereas Standard oil controlled 91 percent of the oil refinery market at its peak.

Google is so powerful at this point a case like this can't stop them but it's good to at least throw roadblocks in their way. Hopefully, this is just the beginning and if Trump gets a second term the DOJ can file additional suits.

Section 230 reform, which the GOP has been pushing, is likely going to be a red herring which will be used to increase censorship rather than fight it.

That said, the GOP caved on fighting Big Tech in a matter of hours so it's not likely to go anywhere.


The Senate Judiciary Committee postponed plans to vote on subpoenas to compel the CEOs of Twitter and Facebook to testify on allegations of anti-conservative bias after some panel Republicans expressed reservation about the maneuverhttps://t.co/mhnTNQIu7e

— POLITICO (@politico) October 20, 2020

These platforms need to be regulated as public utilities like the phone companies and forbidden from cutting off service to customers because they don't like their political views.

The same way monopoly power companies are forced to let smaller companies use the power grid and infrastructure they built, Google should be forced to allow other companies to use their search algorithms. DuckDuckGo, Startpage and others should be allowed to not merely scrape Google results but delete all the garbage censorship algorithms they've put in place to rig their results in favor of CNN, The New York Times and The Washington Post and purge all results outside of a few dozen whitelisted controlled-media companies.

Other companies should be allowed to provide Google's organic search results rather than results which are censored by Google's 10,000 strong "army" of social justice warriors.



— Doomer yellow dog (@LeutScoob) October 19, 2020

That would truly knock this tyrannical company, which is actively trying to steal the November election, down a peg.

BREAKING: @Google Program Manager Confirms Election Interference In Favor of @JoeBiden

Search “skewed by owners and drivers of the algorithm”

“Plain and simple trying to play god”

“If Trump wins, there will be riots...if the left wins, they will be ecstatic”

#ExposeGoogle pic.twitter.com/2b8xUxUuj1

— James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) October 19, 2020

Follow InformationLiberation on Twitter, Facebook, Gab and Minds.\




Doctors For Truth: Tens Of Thousands Medical Professionals Suing And Calling For End To COVID Tyranny

By Brian Shilhavy 19. October 2020

[N.B.: If you don't see the tweet above this means only that your browser does not allow twitter to spy on you.]

Tens of thousands, and perhaps now even hundreds of thousands of doctors, nurses, and many other medical professionals worldwide are taking action to combat the misinformation being propagated by governments and government-controlled media that continue to publish false propaganda regarding COVID.

The vast majority of medical professionals worldwide now seem to agree that the COVID “pandemic” and the government actions still being implemented in response to COVID are causing much more harm than COVID itself.

Almost all of these doctors and medical professionals now seem to agree that COVID is no worse than a typical flu season, and the main test being used to supposedly test for COVID, the PCR Test, is not reliable.

The main question left, and indeed perhaps the question from which the answer may very well determine the future fate of our planet, is will enough people in the general public stop believing the lies their government and the corporate media continue to broadcast, using bureaucratic “doctors” who are only “doctors” in name and are instead politicians who hang letters before and after their names (Dr. – MD) to try and give them credibility, but never actually examine real patients nor practice medicine, and instead look elsewhere to find out the truth, particularly from the REAL doctors and medical professionals who have all now figured out that COVID is nothing worth shutting down society over and implementing a New World Order?

These doctors and medical professionals are fighting censorship and ridicule from the ruling classes, the corporate media, and the Big Tech Social Media giants.

COVID is, first and foremost, an INFORMATION WAR, and unless Americans can learn how to turn off their cable news programs with their BILLIONS in funding, mainly from Big Pharma, and take the time to research the issues for themselves, the Globalists will unleash their vaccines and other untested products while also causing social unrest in their effort to implement their New World Order.

The Great Barrington Declaration

Earlier this month (October, 2020), three of the world’s most renowned doctors, Dr. Martin Kulldorff, Harvard Medical School Professor, Dr. Sunetra Gupta, Oxford University Epidemiology Professor, and Dr. Jayanta Bhattacharya, Stanford Epidemiology Professor, authored the Great Barrington Declaration.

Since its publication, at the time of writing of this article, it has been signed by 29,202 Medical Practitioners, 10,576 Medical & Public Health Scientists, and 532,027 Concerned Citizens.

Here is the Declaration:

The Great Barrington Declaration – As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.

Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people.

Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health.

The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.

Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.

Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young.

Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.

As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls.

We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine.

Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.

The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection.

Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19.

By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent PCR testing of other staff and all visitors.

Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside.

A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals.

Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal.

Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold.

Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home.

Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume.

People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.

Doctors for Truth Sues the Netherlands

Doctors For Truth Sues The Netherlands

Dr. Elke De Klerk, the founder of Doctors for Truth in the Netherlands, recently appeared with several other doctors from various nations to announce that they were suing the Netherlands for their actions related to COVID which they say has caused great harm.

Dr. Klerk commented:

I want to state that we do not have a medical pandemic or epidemic. We also state that COVID-19 should not be on list A for any longer, because we now know that it is a normal flu virus.

We are also starting a lawsuit to the State of the Netherlands to bring this in with a large group of doctors and a really large group of nurses also, because we have contact with 87,000 nurses that do not want the vaccine that is being prepared for us.

The panic is caused by these false positive PCR tests. 89 to 94% of these PCR tests are false positive. They don’t test for the COVID-19.

Medical doctors need to stop looking at those tests. Let’s go back to the clinics and the facts.

Listen to the comments of Dr. Klerk:

There are many more of these “Doctors for Truth” around the world.

According to Dr. James Fetzer of Principia Scientific International, there are over 500 medical doctors in Germany called ‘Doctors for Information’ who made a shocking statement during a national press conference recently and stated:

‘The Corona panic is a play. It’s a scam. A swindle. It’s high time we understood that we’re in the midst of a global crime.’

According to Dr. Fetzer:

This large group of medical experts publishes a medical newspaper on 500,000 copies every week, to inform the public about the massive misinformation in the mainstream media.

They also organize mass protests in Europe, like the one on August 29, 2020 where 12 million people signed up and several millions actually showed up.

Why do these 500+ medical doctors say the pandemic is a global crime? What do they know, that we don’t?

Planned Pandemic Protest Berlin 1

Dr. Fetzer also stated that in Spain, a group of 600 medical doctors, also called ‘Doctors for Truth’, made a similar statement as the German doctors did during a press conference.

He goes on to write:

Germany and Spain are just two examples. Similar large groups of hundreds of medical experts exist in countries across the world.

In the USA a documentary called PLANDEMIC, which exposes COVID-19 as a criminal operation, is supported by over 27,000 medical doctors!

Why are these thousands of medical professionals worldwide saying the pandemic is a crime? What information do they have access to, that we are not getting from the mainstream media?

I invite you to look at the following facts with an open mind and then come to your own conclusions…

Read the full article here.



Money Talks Update 1 English

•Oct 15, 2020

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich


Crimes against Humanity & CORONA CLASS ACTION

As expected, Youtube - the now biggest internet censor without brains - deleted this video when it had reached 1.5 million views, but we have plenty of backups.


Eric E. Schmidt and Larry (Lawrence Edward) Page of Alphabet Inc. who own Google and its Youtube will now be sued for the unbelievable havoc they create by forcing their tracker-dogs to take Youtube content down, though these brainless minders have no scientfic qualification whatsoever and only follow the BigPharma narrative.


YouTube is employing a new trick to not make it so obvious that they delete thousands and thousands of videos they banned, because their parent Google and godfather Alphabet are in bed with the medical Mafia. YouTube allocates now the banned URL of the deleted video with first priority to any new upload, so that people, who had embedded the original video in their website, do not see immediately when it has been banned, because there is then no more just no content (and the text that that video had been banned), but some other video. Many viewers will wonder what crap video the website manager offers them out of context, but it is not the webmaster - it is Youtube who creates that havoc.

•Oct 3, 2020 [In case YouTube deletes this video: BACKUP on BITCHUTE and on BRANDNEWTUBE ]

English: Mirror 1 | Mirror 2 | Mirror 3 | Mirror 4 | 

Spanish: crímenes contra la humanidad - en español

German: Money Talks V - Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit


Dr. Reiner Fuellmich


⁣Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and the #coronavirus investigative committee have prepared a class action for fraud and crimes against humanity. https://www.corona-schadensersatzklage.de/

German Lawyer Dr. Reiner Fuellmich says that along with an international panel of attorneys, they are planning to file a class action lawsuit in the USA / or Canada against the perpetrators of the coronavirus scam based on notoriously useless PCR tests.

Clients from First Nations and Developing Nations can contact  to get advise how to join. For Africa please contact


The German Corona Investigative Committee (SCA) has taken testimony from a large number of international scientists and experts since July 10, 2020.

Hundred of experts heard, thousands of testimonies scrutinized and compiled - the SCA Commission of Inquiry is determined to bring the culprits to justice and to get compensation for the victims.

Their conclusions are the following:

  • The corona crisis must be renamed the “Corona Scandal”
  • It is:
    • The biggest tort case ever
    • The greatest crime against humanity ever committed
  • Those responsible must be:
    • Criminally prosecuted for crimes against humanity
    • Sued for civil damages
  • Deaths
    • There is no excess mortality in any country
    • Corona virus mortality equals seasonal flu
    • 94% of deaths in Bergamo were caused by transferring sick patients to nursing homes where they infected old people with weak immune systems
    • Doctors and hospitals worldwide were paid to declare deceased victims of Covid-19
    • Autopsies showed:
      • Fatalities almost all caused by serious pre-existing conditions
      • Almost all deaths were very old people
      • Sweden (no lockdown) and Britain (strict lockdown) have comparable disease and mortality statistics
    • US states with and without lockdowns have comparable disease and mortality statistics
  • Health
    • Hospitals remain empty and some face bankruptcy
    • Populations have T-cell immunity from previous influenza waves
    • Herd immunity needs only 15-25% population infection and is already achieved
    • Only when a person has symptoms can an infection be contagious
  • Tests:
    • Many scientists call this a PCR-test pandemic, not a corona pandemic
    • Very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive
    • Likelihood of false-positives is 89-94% or near certainty
    • Prof. Drosten developed his PCR test from an old SARS virus without ever having seen the real Wuhan virus from China
    • The PCR test is not based on scientific facts with respect to infections
    • PCR tests are useless for the detection of infections
    • A positive PCR test does not mean an infection is present or that an intact virus has been found
    • Amplification of samples over 35 cycles is unreliable but WHO recommended 45 cycles
  • Illegality:
    • The German government locked down, imposed social-distancing/ mask-wearing on the basis of a single opinion
    • The lockdown was imposed when the virus was already retreating
    • The lockdowns were based on non-existent infections
    • Former president of the German federal constitutional court doubted the constitutionality of the corona measures
    • Former UK supreme court judge Lord Sumption concluded there was no factual basis for panic and no legal basis for corona measures
    • German RKI (CDC equivalent) recommended no autopsies be performed
    • Corona measures have no sufficient factual or legal basis, are unconstitutional and must be repealed immediately
    • No serious scientist gives any validity to the infamous Neil Ferguson’s false computer models warning of millions of deaths
    • Mainstream media completely failed to report the true facts of the so-called pandemic
    • Democracy is in danger of being replaced by fascist totalitarian models
    • Drosten (of PCR test), Tedros of WHO, and others have committed crimes against humanity as defined in the International Criminal Code
    • Politicians can avoid going down with the charlatans and criminals by starting the long overdue public scientific discussion
  • Conspiracy:
    • Politicians and mainstream media deliberately drove populations to panic
    • Children were calculatedly made to feel responsible “for the painful tortured death of their parents and grandparents if they do not follow Corona rules”
    • The hopeless PCR test is used to create fear and not to diagnose
    • There can be no talk of a second wave
  • Injury and damage:
    • Evidence of gigantic health and economic damage to populations
    • Anti-corona measures have:
      • Killed innumerable people
      • Destroyed countless companies and individuals worldwide
    • Children are being taken away from their parents
    • Children are traumatized en masse
    • Bankruptcies are expected in small- and medium-sized businesses
  • Redress:
    • A class action lawsuit must be filed in the USA or Canada, with all affected parties worldwide having the opportunity to join
    • Companies and self-employed people must be compensated for damage


The COVID-19 test is scientific fraud 

A list of arguments that illustrate the COVID-19 test, and PCR in general as a test, is scientific fraud.



Berlin court suspends bar curfew in backlash against anti-virus measures




Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Dr. Fuellmich

This link covers some of things

Reiner Fuellmich talks about.

Legal Action against Covid PCR Tests, Crimes Against Humanity


This one does as well.

PCR Covid 19 Tests are Worthless




Coronavirus Cruise Ship Class Action Lawsuits

Over $300 Million Recovered On Behalf Of Our Clients*

Representing Passengers And Crew Injured On Ships Worldwide


By  Michael A. Winkleman 

Our Firm is Representing Cruise Ship Passengers, Crew Members and Their Families in Class Action Lawsuits Related to the Coronavirus Outbreak

It has become clear that the global cruise industry dramatically mismanaged the coronavirus outbreak and in so doing put the lives of thousands at tremendous risk. Based on this, we are actively handling both passenger and crewmember cases against all of the major cruise lines related to the COVID19 pandemic. And you do NOT have to be a US citizen to seek our assistance, we have helped passengers and crew from all over the world for nearly 50 years!

Since the start of the novel coronavirus pandemic, passengers and crew members onboard numerous cruise ships have been diagnosed with COVID-19. Tragically, some of these individuals have lost their lives. Among those who have survived, some have been able to recover with minimal effects, but many are facing lifelong consequences.

Our firm has just filed the first of what we expect to be several class action lawsuits on behalf of cruise ship passengers, crew members and family members related to the COVID-19 outbreak. As we recently discussed, cruise ship companies have a legal obligation to keep their passengers and crew members safe, and early investigations have indicated that many companies failed to meet this obligation by allowing the novel coronavirus to spread throughout their cruise ships’ common areas and individual cabins.

We will be pursuing compensation awards for our clients, and we expect many more cases to come to light as victims continue to come forward. You can view information about our current coronavirus cruise ship class actions here:

Passenger COVID-19 Cases

Celebrity Eclipse – This Class Action lawsuit deals with Defendant CELEBRITY’s careless and continuous decision to continue sailing the Celebrity Eclipse despite knowing of the dangerous and explosive contagiousness presented by a COVID-19 outbreak aboard the vessel. As alleged, on or about March 2, 2020, a person(s) aboard the vessel displayed flu-like symptoms consistent with COVID-19. Despite knowing that COVID-19 was likely present aboard the vessel, CELEBRITY failed to follow even the most basic safety precautions after acquiring such notice, such as timely quarantining passengers and crew members aboard the vessel, timely providing passengers and crew members masks and/or timely requiring them to observe physical distancing measures. Instead, Celebrity continued to operate the vessel as normal, allowing a “full schedule of entertainment, activities and dining options” aboard the vessel. For example, on March 21, 2020, CELEBRITY arranged and held a gathering of hundreds of passengers and crew members aboard the vessel to recognize the heroics of medical professionals and first responders in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Astoundingly, CELEBRITY did not enforce any physical distancing measures during the event. To make matters worse, CELEBRITY actively attempted to pacify passengers in the midst of the COVID-19 outbreak aboard the vessel by offering them complimentary alcoholic beverages and downplaying the severity of the COVID-19 outbreak that was ravaging the vessel. Consequently, CELEBRITY negligently exposed thousands of passengers aboard the Eclipse to COVID-19. CELEBRITY’s alleged negligence has already resulted in at least 45 passengers who tested positive COVID-19 once they disembarked the vessel, and at least two COVID-19 related deaths. There are likely significantly more positive COVID-19 cases and/or deaths related to the subject cruise given that there was limited and/or non-existent testing performed aboard the vessel and immediately thereafter when passengers disembarked the vessel without proper screening before returning to their home states/countries.


Costa Luminosa – The Costa Luminosa set sail from Ft. Lauderdale on March 5, 2020, despite the fact that Costa Cruise Lines knew that at least one of the vessel’s passengers from its previous voyage had shown symptoms of COVID-19. When passengers called and expressed hesitation about travelling on the cruise, Costa Cruise Lines misrepresented to them that the vessel was completely safe and that passengers would not be allowed to cancel their trip without forfeiting the money they had already paid. Three days after the vessel left Ft. Lauderdale, the CDC issued a warning that “U.S. citizens, particularly travelers with underlying health conditions, should not travel by cruise ship.” Yet, passengers onboard the Costa Luminosa were not advised of this warning or given the opportunity to go home. Instead, passengers embarked across the Atlantic in a ticking coronavirus time bomb, which has resulted in at least seven deaths (as of April 7, 2020). Our class action complaint against Costa Cruise Lines seeks compensatory and punitive damages.


Grand Princess – This Class Action lawsuit involves Defendant Princess cruises knowing and intentional decision to proceed with a 16-day cruise on the Grand Princess knowing at least one of its passengers from the prior voyage had symptoms of coronavirus. As alleged, this fact was concealed from new passengers prior to boarding. Further, the Complaint alleges Princess delayed ordering passengers to isolate in their staterooms after being informed that the passenger who presented to the medical facility with symptoms of the virus on the prior cruise, tested positive for COVID19. And even after the quarantine was ordered across the ship, as alleged, Princess failed to use reasonable care to prevent the further, rampant spread of the virus. In so doing, Defendant Princess Cruises subjected thousands of passengers to the virus. This already resulted in hundreds of positive cases and numerous deaths, including those of families also represented by Lipcon, Margulies, Alsina & Winkleman, P.A.


Ruby Princess – This Class Action lawsuit involves Defendant Princess cruises failure to cancel the March 8, 2020, cruise of the Ruby Princess in light of its knowledge that at least one of its passengers from the prior voyage had symptoms of coronavirus. As alleged, Princess concealed from its boarding passengers that there were passengers on the prior voyage with symptoms of the virus. Without surprise, there was a massive outbreak of the virus just as there had been on the Diamond Princess and Grand Princess ships already. As alleged, by March 14, 2020 (after the CDC had entered its no sail order), five passengers developed symptoms of the coronavirus on board the ship. Yet, Defendant took no action and did not inform passengers. Instead, at all times material, passengers were allowed unfettered access to the pools, gym, and buffets and there were even mass gatherings aboard the ship. Defendant Princess’s actions and/or omissions were in direct violation of CDC guidelines for Ships on Managing Suspected Coronavirus. This alleged negligence resulted in hundreds of passengers and crewmembers contracting the virus. The Australian authorities have launched a criminal probe into the handling of this Ruby Princess cruise.


Crewmember COVID-19 Cases

Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines – We have filed yet another Class Action lawsuit related to the cruise industry’s dramatic mishandling of the Coronavirus pandemic. This Class Action lawsuit against Royal Caribbean Cruises seeks to help and protect the thousands of crewmembers on Royal Caribbean ships who have been exposed to COVID19 because of Royal Caribbean’s careless and continuous failure to protect its crew. As alleged therein, despite having notice that COVID-19 was likely was present aboard the vessels, Royal Caribbean blatantly failed to follow even the most basic safety precautions, such as timely quarantining crewmembers, timely providing crew members with masks and/or timely requiring social distancing measures aboard the vessels. Instead, in an disturbing lack of caution, RCCL threw St. Patrick’s Day (March 17, 2020) parties for its crew members aboard the vessels – with over 1,000 crew members in attendance – even after RCCL suspended cruise operations on March 13, 2020. Royal Caribbean also continued to allow its crew members to eat in buffet settings, and even mandated participation in shipboard drills. Royal Caribbean’s flagrant failure to protect its crew has already resulted in hundreds of positive COVID-19 cases and what is more likely thousands given that there is limited testing being done on its ships.


Celebrity Cruise Lines – CELEBRITY CRUISES’s careless and continuous failure to protect its crewmembers assigned to work aboard its cruise ships from COVID-19. The Complaint alleges that despite having notice that COVID-19 was present aboard the ships, CELEBRITY glaringly failed to follow even the most basic safety precautions after acquiring such notice, such as timely quarantining crewmembers, timely providing crewmembers with masks and timely requiring them to observe social distancing measures aboard the vessels. Instead, in an alarming lack of urgency, CELEBRITY allowed its crewmembers to eat in buffet settings aboard the vessels, mandated their participation in shipboard drills, and even permitted crewmembers to attend crew parties. CELEBRITY’s alleged egregious failure to protect its employees already resulted in hundreds of positive COVID-19 cases and what is more likely thousands given that there is limited testing being done on its ships.


What Should You Do if You or a Loved One Was Diagnosed with Coronavirus on a Cruise Ship?

If you or a member of your family has been diagnosed with the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) after traveling onboard a cruise ship, we encourage you to contact us promptly. We are pursuing cases on behalf of passengers and crew members, and we can help you take the steps necessary to join one of our existing or future claims.

We are continuing to hear from new passengers, crew members, and family members every day and we intend to seek justice on behalf of all of those harmed by the cruise lines’ failure to properly respond to this pandemic. If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with COVID-19 onboard any cruise ship operated by any cruise line, we encourage you to contact us promptly for more information.


School Lunch Aide Claims NYC Department of Education Failed to Timely Pay Workers During COVID-19 Crisis



New York

Orthodox Jewish groups slap lawsuit against Cuomo, claim COVID-19 lockdown measures violate First Amendment rights



Children’s Health Defense Responds to Accusation of Spreading “Misinformation” on Facebook

Children’s Health Defense has been accused of spreading vaccine “misinformation”, but it’s the government and major media who are deceiving the public.



This is not about Covid - It is about the FCC they are ones who deal with  wireless.

October 22, 2020

Press Conference: Response Brief Filed in Landmark Case Against FCC



The Michigan Governor lost

Gov. has no authority to continue state of emergency, Michigan Supreme Court rules



Unlock Michigan turns in 539k signatures to limit Gov. Whitmer’s emergency powers

“They want her out of office. They are sick and tired of her draconian, communistic agenda. And so that’s why they are working hard they want to keep our state moving in the direction that it was moving in and so they want her out of office,” Clark said.



Michigan AG will no longer enforce governor’s executive orders after court ruling

The announcement from Nessel’s office comes after the Michigan Supreme Court decision on Friday, Oct. 2, ruled the governor does not have authority to extend emergency orders under two emergency acts -- the Emergency Management Act from 1976 and the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act from 1945.



Some Lawyers in the USA are helping those with the mandatory Mask problems. They are doing it for free. 




- 17. October 2020

A legal challenge to Covid-19 measures has been filed against the Ontario and Federal Governments claiming they are unconstitutional as Justin Trudeau, Dr. Theresa Tam, Doug Ford, the CBC and many others are facing litigation. The challenge was launched by Vaccine Choice Canada who stated in a press release:

We are living in unprecedented times. The mass and indiscriminate containment of citizens, the restriction of access to parliament, the courts, medical and educational services, the destruction of local economies and livelihoods, and the requirement to physically distance, along with the forced use of non-medical masking are extraordinary measures that have never before been imposed on the citizens of Canada.

The impact of these aberrant measures on our physical, emotional, psychological, social and economic well-being is profoundly destructive and these actions are unsustainable, unwarranted, extreme and unconstitutional. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth speaks with Constitutional lawyer Rocco Galati who is representing Vaccine Choice Canada, Denis Rancourt and others in a lawsuit against the Federal government and their reaction to Covid-19 which destroyed small and medium sized businesses, caused suicides and murders to go up, cancelled church and forced mandatory face masks on a supposed free society.

A must watch If you are Canadian

CANADA: Legal Challenge to COVID19 On July 6, 2020

Vaccine Choice Canada formally filed legal action in the Ontario Superior Court to hold multiple parties accountable for their actions with respect to COVID-19 measures. Defendants include: the Government of Canada, the Government of Ontario, the Municipality of Toronto, various public health officers, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, among others. 



Constitutional Violations Until the truth actually appeared in a legal document, most people would 'never' believe our present reality.

The 191-page Statement of Claim in the link below, Is a wake-up call to every Canadian because fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code are being disappeared in plain sight. Details of Constitutional violations 


One in BC Canada



Lawsuit Against Quebec,  Canada Claims Unreasonable Confinement Amid COVID-19



Legal rights about Masks


For more information check the link

The Constitutional Rights Centre


The Civil Liberties Association

They help as well.



The Netherlands 

Doctors For Truth: Tens Of Thousands Medical Professionals Suing And Calling For End To COVID Tyranny



One of State’s biggest restaurant and pub groups starts legal action over Covid-19 measures




Well this court and the court cases, will be interesting to watch. They may even get some jail time.

Homes of gov’t officials who presided over France’s lockdown raided, investigation ongoing



Spain lost

Spain court annuls Government's COVID restrictions on Madrid as second wave sweeps Europe

Regional government chief Isabel Diaz Ayuso had opposed the order, saying it would ravage the region's economy, and argued the Ministry had no power to impose such curbs on a region.

The Madrid regional court sided with her in its ruling, calling the restrictions "interference by public authorities in citizens' fundamental rights without the legal mandate to support it".



UK Court cases

The Coronavirus Act 2020 is Null and Void!

We are a legal research and campaign group and right now we are fighting for the Democracy and Rights of the People of the UK.



UK Legal Action Launched over Missing £3 Billion Tories Spent on Private Coronavirus Contracts




Google, Facebook, Neuralink Sued for Weaponized AI Tech Transfer, Complicity to Genocide in China and Endangering Humanity with Misuse of AI

By The AI Organization - 19. December 2019

Lawsuit of The Century
Google, Deepmind, Alphabet, Facebook, Tesla, Nearalink, Sergey Brin, Larry Page, Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, Sandar Pichai, PR Newswire and John Does

This is the most significant and important lawsuit of the 21st century, and it impacts the entire world. CEO’s and Founders Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, Sergey Brin, Larry Page and Sandar Pichai are also named as defendants along with their companies.



Endangering Humanity with the misuse of Artificial Intelligence, Complicity and Aiding in Physical Genocide inside of China by transferring AI Technology, Engaging in Cultural Genocide of Humanity, & Controlling and programming the Human Race by Social Engineering via AI coding and AI algorithmic biometric manipulation

This is phase 1 of first lawsuit. We are open for support at a global level. We have a network of thousands around the world and tens of thousands in China, who are witnesses and have been harmed in China from the defendants technology and data transfer.The following are Federal Case Compliant Summary Facts Extracted from the official document filed in San Diego, California. To find out details of financial, personal and corrective behavioral demands, you may access the case in the federal court data base.

1. Endangering and Threatening all of the world’s citizens, and humanity by misusing and weaponizing Artificial Intelligence, Quantum Computing, Robotics, 5G, Machines, Smart Phones, Smart Homes, Smart Cities, IoT’s, Holograms, Mixed Reality, Nano-Technology, Cloning, Gen-Editing, Cybernetics, Bio-Engineering, and the creation of a digital AI Brain linked to Google’s Search engine with the use and extraction of humanities bio-Metrics data, digital bio-metric codes including facial, voice, health, organ, neural network and body recognition technology. Thus, controlling humanities thoughts, actions, biology, bio-metrics, brain neural pathways, the human bodies neural networks that reprograms all human beings through social engineering and bio-digital social programming, without their consent, knowledge, understanding, or free will.  Extracting humanities digital footprints in breach of the Nuremberg Laws, FTC Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 4158 and Engaging in irresponsible and unsafe Research and development of Artificial General Intelligence or Artificial Super Intelligence that could enslave or kill off humanity or give the power to the defendants to enslave humanity in numerous ways on the 5G and other developing networks.

2. Negligence and Complicity in Persecution and Genocide of millions in China, per Article’s 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Genocide Convention, and 18 U.S.C.A. § 1091§ 1091. Genocide, not limited to Democracy Activits, Falun Dafa Practitioners, Christians, Uyghurs, Tibetans, Journalists, Judges, Lawyers, and Academics inside of China.

3. Transferring and Providing to China, China’s Government and its Companies, knowledge, data, capabilities and technology to weaponize Artificial Intelligence, Quantum Computing, Machines, Robotics, 5G, Bio-Metrics, Cybernetics, Bio-Engineering, IoT’s, Computer Vision, and Human Tracking Technology, and technology that can give China access to Artificial General Intelligence or Artificial Super Intelligence, that endangers the world, and all of humanity, including AI weaponry for assassination.  In violation of Breach of  Arms Control and Disarmament Act [22 U.S.C. 2551 and Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended [22 U.S.C. 2151, 22 U.S. Code § 2752.Coordination with foreign policy, 22 U.S. Code § 2753. Eligibility for defense services or defense articles, 22 U.S. Code § 2754. Purposes for which military sales or leases by the United States are authorized; report to Congress, Arms Control and Disarmament Act of 1961, 22 U.S.C. § 2551, Atomic Energy Act of 1954, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2011-2021, 2022-2286i, 2296a-2297h-13,

4. Providing to China and Chinese Companies, AI, Health Data and Bio-Metric Technology used for surveillance, tracking, hunting, quarantine, capture, arrest, torture, concentration camps, organ harvesting, and organ trafficking that contributed to the death of Chinese Citizens, including Falun Dafa Practitioners, Uyghurs, Democracy activists, Christians, Tibetans, judicial representatives, professors, journalists, and minority groups, not limited to any gender, race, political affiliation, faith, or persons residing in China.  Same violation of fact numbers 2 and 3.

5. Providing to China’s government, their corporations and nefarious entities, Facial Recognition, Voice Recognition, Body Detection, Skeleton Detection, Vital Organ Recognition, Emotion detection, Skin and Health Biometric and other AI technology that led to persecution, torture, organ harvesting, death and cremation of human beings in China, not limited to Uighur, Falun Dafa, Christian, Tibetan, Democracy activists, judges, attorneys, common citizens and other minority groups. Endangering the world by Weaponizing China’s AI Capabilities that is be laid on the (BRI) One Belt One Road linking Asia, Middle East, Africa and Europe, endangering all of humanity. Same violations of facts number 1, 2 and 3.

6. Misrepresenting to the world and deceiving the U.S on Google’s activities in China and their technology transfers that contributed to China’s Quantum AI advancements, surveillance, abuse, torture, concentration camps and murder of its own citizens. Same violations of facts number 1, 2 and 3.

7. Providing health, bio-metric, financial and social network data of Americans, and the world citizenry that is in the hands of the Chinese government, endangering the world and all its peoples on the 5G network.

8. Creating an interconnected platform between Facebook, Google, Alphabet, all entities under Neuralink, and DeepMind that allows for a digital brain to connect to the internet, all digital and bio-digital networks, human bodies, machines, robotics, IoT’s, Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, Mixed Reality, Holograms and other technologies, that can be used for surveillance, to track, manipulate, control, social engineer, re-engineer, reprogram, brain wash,  hunt, quarantine, threaten, arrest, commit cultural genocide, and kill human beings by machines, Bio-Digital AI, Digital AI, and robotics connected to the 5G, 6G and other networks and corporate command centers

9. Creating platforms that is on the verge of developing Artificial General Intelligence and the Subsequent Super Intelligence that will be beyond the control of the human beings working at Neuralink, Alphabet, DeepMind, Google, Facebook or governments.

10. In violation of Article 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Genocide Convention for weaponizing China’s Artificial Intelligence, Facial, Voice and Other Bio-Metric technology that were used on Chinese citizens.  Not to exclude genetic experimentation of human beings in Chinese concentration camps, including hybrid human experiments within the concentration camps.

11. Introducing, planning, promoting and engaging in physical and cultural genocide to humanity by replacing their neural network operating systems with Artificial Intelligence and Machines, merging humans with machines with the interconnection of the internet, internal tech experimentation’s of defendants and consumer products promoted, provided and transferred by the defendants to the public directly and indirectly.

12. Reprogramming and social engineering humanities thoughts and brain chemistry via AI algorithms in the internet, social media, apps, smart phones, IoT’s, computers, wearable devices, implanted technology, virtual reality, augmented reality, mixed reality, holograms, and alternate reality. Not informing and explaining to humanity that their brain chemistry is altered by a replicating software as they engage with the defendants products and services, nor that their thoughts and actions can be manipulated and controlled by smart phones, apps and IoT in connection with the network platforms, technologies and initiatives Google, Alphabet, Facebook, Neuralink, DeepMind, and Tesla are providing and introducing to the public, in turn giving these tech giants complete control and influence over Americans, and humanity.  

13. Weaponizing AI by Utilizing humanities bio-metric and social media data and misusing the technology by Controlling the Human Race and its thoughts through Social Engineering and bio-digital social programming by using people’s bio-metric systems through Google and Facebooks eco systems, coding, algorithm unfairness, with the use of social media data, their emotions, weaponization of the internet, smart phones, IoT’s and computers, thus controlling human thoughts, and humanity at a global scale against their free-will and knowledge.  Not informing the public that their dependency on smart phones, is due to frequencies and Artificial Intelligence software emitting from the AI systems and devices that is connecting to the neural networks of humans, creating a symbiotic process, making them a cyborg, dependent, reliant, controlled and programmed by the products and services provided by Google, Facebook, Alphabet, Deep Mind, Tesla, and Neuralink.  In essence, putting the entire human race in a state of pet and owner relationship, via their bio-metrics, biology, and digital selves neural network operating systems. The Owner being the Artificial Narrow Intelligence, other AI forms, provided by the defendant’s companies, organizations and personal initiatives within their companies and Machine Software’s operating inside the bio-metric systems of human beings.

 14. Negligence in Algorithm Fairness that allows hate speech, misinformation and slander to cast doubt on google search engines against people’s efforts to notify and inform the world’s people that millions have been subject to Organ Trafficking, Organ Harvesting, Concentration Camps, Torture, and Abuse and that the risks of Artificial Intelligence is multi-faceted and enormous.

15. Writing Code and Creating Algorithms that has been and is currently engaging in cultural genocide including introduction of cybernetics, robotics, and creating an ecosystem that allows for Beastiality to exist and be forefront on Google’s search engines, affecting societies, and youth’s bio-metrics system after viewing the videos and articles via their smart phones and computers, influencing their thoughts through their bio-metric systems, paving the next generation to degenerate and accept this type of behavior with the introduction and experimentation of bio-engineering and cybernetics.

16. Research and Development conducted by Alphabet, Facebook, Google, DeepMind, Nueralink and other ventures in Silicon Valley have created algorithms and coding that supports, promotes  and achieves brain washing of humanity through social engineering and bio-digital social programming, that endangers the human race in its entirety via the interconnection of their platforms, social media, and technology distributed in physical and digital format to society.

17. Writing Code and Having Algorithms that influenced liberals and conservatives to exponentially increase their hate for each other via their bio-metric systems and emotions while attached to smart phones, IoT’s, apps, digital media, Google, Facebook and other interconnected platforms. Causing harm to the nation and the world, and endangering humanity at the geo-political level with nation state leaders undergoing social engineering and bio-digital social programming and control by their platforms to ignore human rights atrocities in China and around the world stemming from the defendant’s algorithm misuse and AI technologies. Implicating world leaders and their citizens to be charged under article 2, 3 and 4 of the genocide conventions. This includes Canadian Prime Minister, the Majority of European Leaders, and the leadership at the United Nation, the media, press, their reporters, and others who have and are still censoring awareness for human rights violations in China or working against it. Writing code and algorithms that controls reporters, media and the press’s thoughts and actions beyond the normal manipulation they receive from special interest groups, producers, or friends who may manipulate them, other reporters and their covered content, thus Weaponizing the media for Google’s development against the media’s free will and knowledge.

18. Negligence on Google and Facebooks Algorithm unfairness caused liberals and conservatives to conflict and fight each other beyond the reasonable norm, affecting their thoughts and emotions via their bio-metric systems being controlled and enhanced by Artificial Narrow Intelligence systems inside the smart phones and the apps partially formed by bias and hateful content that created division and undue hate among Americans and the people of the world.

19. Division caused by misuse and negligence of Algorithms in Facebook and Google, hindered and delayed the U.S administrations efforts to pressure China in time to save more people from concentration camps, death and cremation, in addition to national security concerns that impacts Americans and the world citizenry. This is not limited to the Trump Administration, rather it affected the Obama, and Bush administrations as well. Google hurt America and China for 2 decades at a geo-political level. Google is guilty of Article 2, 3 and 4 of the genocide convention, in addition to complicity.

20. Masking posts and articles by The AI Organization, meant to bring awareness to human rights atrocities in China, on Facebooks Platform. Masking Content created by Cyrus A. Parsa meant to save people form dangers pertaining to human rights violations interlinked with Artificial Intelligence. Banning the book “AI, Trump, China & The Weaponization of Robotics with 5G” for advertisement and masking posts of people working on behalf of The AI Organization. Masking posts of “Artificial Intelligence Dangers to Humanity” book, on Facebooks platforms, and masking other posts from The AI Organization written by Cyrus A. Parsa. These posts related to China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Iran, big tech, Google, 5G, Robotics, Drones, and Bio-Metrics threats to and Enslavement of Humanity.  Releasing the Masks recently after coming under pressure and scrutiny. Hiring Chinese who committed espionage and attacked American companies, including The AI Organization and Cyrus A. Parsa, as well as his associates and victims of persecution.

21. Writing Code and Sustaining Algorithms that propagate an extreme amount of pornography, violent pornography, and insinuation of rape and prostitution, that denigrates females, young girls, altering humanities thoughts and family based concepts of traditional health based ethics via their bio-metric systems, hence, contributing to rape, sex and human trafficking and broken families.

22. Developing Code, Algorithms and Ecosystems that re-programed a generation of people’s bio-metric structure, and brain chemistry to be bio-digitally controlled by Google and every other tech industry with similar platforms that operate on varying types of Artificial Intelligence, including Artificial Narrow Intelligence.

23. Developing Code, Algorithm’s and Ecosystems that created a secondary digital brain inside the brains of AI Scientists to be subservient, controlled and programmed to create, sustain, promote, and grow Google, Alphabets, Facebooks, and other tech giants’ platforms. Elon Musk has also confirmed The AI Organization’s findings, that humans can have a secondary digital brain formed via their neural networks.

 24. Developing Code, Algorithms and Ecosystems that creates a secondary digital brain inside the brains of all human beings that can prevent the person from recognizing that they are being controlled, and bypassing any biological resistance to AI Control or human bodies innate capability to resist the formation of a symbiotic and parasitical relationships with AI software and cybernetic hardware via their rational thinking structure in their brain.

25. Not informing consumers that part of the defendants goals for AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) and ASP (Artificial Super Intelligence) has religious goals that can be dangerous to all of humanity, including attempts to retrieve or ask AGI about the inner working of the “simulation”, what, when, how and by whom the simulation was formed, and what is outside it. Neuralink, Google, Alphabet, Facebook, Tesla, and DeepMind have not registered as a religious institution, yet they are engaging in religion under the umbrella of science. In fact, they have turned their companies, into religious institutions with final aim goals identical to most religions.  The defendant and their companies are attempting to treat their Technological developments as God, taking all of humanities bio-metrics, data, and connecting it to their quantum, robotic and machine-based AI technology, and upload their digital selves into other bodies, networks or machines, mimicking the beliefs of a spirit or soul. In Fact, Elon Musk stated in an interview, that he wants to develop AI to a point, that it could “give him the answers to the simulation”. Elon Musk is agreeable to the risks that an AGI or Artificial Super Intelligence can go rogue, kill off humanity, or be hacked, yet as smart as he is, he doesn’t understand that the computing technology the AGI and ASI would have, would not go beyond the level of Atoms to observe more microscopic particles at its plane, hence, any answers to his sought questions to simulation is limited, and the endeavor of an AGI or ASI is putting humankind at risk. There is an alternative way to achieve his answers, that is 100%. safe and does not involve giving the power to a machine or Artificial Intelligence.

26. Defendants have created AI systems that can take in humanities facial, voice and other bio-metric information and decode whether they are resistant to AI, subject to its control, atheist or have a faith. This technology can enable AI, or any entity using AI to track, profile, hunt and kill targets it deems resistant to its control or resistant to AI. This can be done with drones, machines, robotics, or poison delivery systems such as Micro-Botic terrorism.

All Charges from 1-26 have led to physical genocide in China spearheaded by the Chinese Communist Government, and all charges from 1-16 are in breach and violations of penal codes stated in facts 1, 2 and 3. All Charges have and are leading to Cultural Genocide in America and around the World, endangering all of humanity to enter a stage of cultural and physical genocide with the interconnection of Artificial Intelligence, 5G, Robotics, Machines, Drones, Smart Cities, as it pertain to negligence and misuse by the main platforms  and companies of Google, Facebook, Alphabet, DeepMind, Neuralink, John Does, and their leadership. This does not exclude other players such as Amazon and Microsoft from guilt, and the very many Chinese companies who were trained by these Western companies.

Cyrus A. Parsa, The AI Organization

Censored and deleted by YouTube.

Cyrus A. Parsa, The AI Organization, Google, Facebook, Nueralink Lawsuit

To Learn more about the Dangers from China and Big Tech AI, Read “ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Dangers to Humanity



Still Questions about China?

Pete Santilli Interviews Serial Entrepreneur Chris Kitze

Published on Sep 25, 2020


It’s now well known that gain-of-function (intentional rendering of a naturally occurring virus so as to be lethal to humans) corona virus reasearch was done earlier done in the United States, then exported to Wuhan – while still being funded by a United States institution! Now the funding to Wuhan Insitute of Virology for that programme has reportedly been stopped. But who knows what still goes on???



December 2020
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31