UPDATE 15. June 2021: The Five Stages of Manipulation - and now the #6: Counterforce must set in.

UPDATE 10. June 2021: Citizens' Grand Jury – Fauci Indictment Prosecutor Larry Klayman Presents Expert Witness Testimony

UPDATE 05. June 2021: SIXTH TRIBUNAL on the Corona Pandemic - 1. Organic Consumers Association’s COVID-19 Tribunal

UPDATE 03. June 2021: The Nuremberg Code explained regarding the experimental COVID injection.20. May + CITIZENS' GRAND JURY INDICTMENT OF DR. ANTHONY FAUCI WITH DR. JUDY MIKOVITS & KENT HECKENLIVELY

UPDATE 20. May 2021: Citizen's Grand Jury with Prosecutor Larry Klayman – Dr. Judy Mikovits & Kent Heckenlively Testify

UPDATE 18. May 2021: U.S. CITIZENS CAN CONVENE OWN GRAND JURY IN FIVE STATES

ICYMI: FIRST CORONA TRIBUNAL - Tribunal on the Corona Pandemic - EMERGENCY HEARINGS​ 2020 (02. April 2020 - 09. June 2020) + the 2nd - 5th TRIBUNALS

SET UP CORONA TRUTH COMMISSIONS WORLDWIDE

- and start the Independent International Trial on the Corona Crisis (IITCC) based on a new collaboration between those UN states that are not implicated and the First Nations of this world. (If you need help write to )

https://marcodewit.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/truth-commission-300x300.jpgBy Venatrix Fulmen - 26. April 2021

Send the video below to all your so called political "representatives" and put them on notice that since they have now been clearly informed in a way even the dumbest can understand, they will be put in the dock at a Nuremberg-style trial, if they continue to impose on their electorate directly or indirectly enforced measures like so-called vaccines that in reality are nothing but illegal gene experiments and thereby – based on the Nuremberg Codex and the Rome Statute - warcrimes, as well as violations of your fundamental human rights like lockdowns that damage the economies and livelihoods of people or devices like facemasks that make them sick from oxygen deprivation as well as collected and accumulated real pathogens and toxins.

And immediately start your own local Truth Commission to investigate these criminals and their crimes in order to provide evidence for the state-wide trials (in state or people's courts) of your country as well as the Independent International Trial on the Corona Crisis (IITCC). Send the notice and video also to all officials and civil servants, including law enforcement, as well as medical doctors and other professionals with duties to protect and help people, in order to tell them that they likewise will be put on trial and punished, if they continue to enforce harmful orders they receive "from above".

Why You Can't Catch A Virus - Great Explanation

First published on BITCHUTE - April 26th, 2021.

channel image

TheTruthHunter

TheTruthHunter

Mirrored - https://brandnewtube.com/watch/why-you-can-039-t-catch-a-virus_yaIkEBSS5wFSpw3.html

Prosecute the Corona Criminals - Nuremberg-style Trials for All Covid Criminals NOW

COMMON LAW:
Learn Common Law With Knowledge Is Power (Work your way through tabs at the top of page) - https://knowledgeispower-uk.weebly.com/

Meet Your Strawman (Article) - https://www.ruralmoney.com/meet-your-strawman/

Common Law In 10 Minutes (Video) - https://www.bitchute.com/video/AgZYTwDm1giy/

Strawman - The Best Common Law documentary you will find (video) - https://www.bitchute.com/video/GjfLdTpxMAlc/

Common Law Court - Register the living breathing you - https://www.commonlawcourt.com/

BEWARE: Don't get confused about COMMON LAW, which is CASE-LAW in difference to STATUTE-LAW, and NATURAL LAW

COVID19:
The UK Government downgraded the danger of Covid19 from a high consequence infectious disease on 19th March 2020 (1 week BEFORE the first lockdown) - https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid

Global Covid Report - A Brilliant 73 page flip book style article - https://online.anyflip.com/inblw/ufbs/mobile/index.html?s=08

A 113 page pdf full of information from frontline workers & the VAERS - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YK0JR_lFy88Zu3rcC3L5NvL_Xr3ib6zY/view

18 Reasons I won't be getting a Covid19 'vaccine' - https://www.deconstructingconventional.com/post/18-reason-i-won-t-be-getting-a-covid-vaccine

Covid19 is a manufactured pandemic - https://www.globalresearch.ca/manufactured-pandemic-testing-people-any-strain-coronavirus-not-specifically-covid-19/5707781

Doctor demolishes Covid vaccine - https://davidicke.com/2021/01/12/doctor-demolishes-gates-covid-vaccine-in-devastating-analysis/

If there is no virus why are people dying (article) - https://davidicke.com/2021/01/31/covid-if-there-is-no-virus-why-are-people-dying/

5 Questions to ask people who plan on getting a Covid19 'vaccine' - https://off-guardian.org/2021/02/15/5-questions-to-ask-your-friends-who-plan-to-get-the-covid-vaccine/

Dr Andrew Kaufman - Sars Cov 2 has not been isolated. It doesn't exist (article) - https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi/

A brilliant article explaining why the number of cycles (CT) of the PCR Test is pushing out false positives everywhere - https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pcr-testing-incorrect-use/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=b2c12bbb-ac81-4cb4-9987-6f4bd15c26f0

MP's & SAGE are heavily invested in the vaccine industry - https://naturallyhealthynews.info/investigation-mps-and-sage-heavily-invested-in-vaccine-industry/?smclient=9e1e643a-d9ec-41cf-a803-a15f88e07abe&utm_source=salesmanago&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=default

Face masks are neither effective or safe (article) - https://www.technocracy.news/masks-are-neither-effective-nor-safe-a-summary-of-the-science/

Bill Gates: Vaccines are phenomenal profit makers - https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/gates-vaccines-phenomenal-profit-makers/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=a7546458-0f14-44d8-8e60-226218335bd8

ILLUMINATI:
The Empire of the City - How 3 independent states controls the world together - https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_globalelite177.htm

The UNITED STATES isn't a country, it's a corporation - https://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/us_corporation.htm#definitions

There are 2 Constitutions in the United States - https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/two-us-constitutions

The Rockefeller's own Western medicine - https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia2/ciencia_industrybigpharma219.htm

The City Of London (The Crown) owns the UNITED STATES - https://truedemocracy.net/hj31/20.html

EXPOSED: All the Queens agents that control the world - https://aim4truth.org/2018/04/17/exposed-all-the-queens-agents-and-corporations-that-control-the-world/

Who Are The Jesuits? - https://stillnessinthestorm.com/2019/06/the-jesuit-order-exposed/

The Crown Empire & The City of London - https://wakeup-world.com/2013/11/05/the-crown-empire-and-the-city-of-london-corporation/

3 Corporations rule the world - https://www.sinhalanet.net/three-corporations-run-the-world-city-of-london-washington-dc-and-vatican-city

The City of London Empire - https://humansarefree.com/2013/11/the-british-crown-empire-and-the-city-of-london-corporation.html

The Rothschilds, Vatican & City of London - https://humansarefree.com/2014/09/the-top-of-the-pyramid-the-rothschilds-the-vatican-and-the-british-crown-rule-world.html

The Council of 13 - https://www.seawapa.co/2013/11/nwo-crown-council-of-13-bloodlines.html

The Committee of 300 - https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_committee300_11.htm

Empire of the City - https://www.shiftfrequency.com/empire-of-the-city-states-the-crown-washington-dc-the-vatican/

The Real Controllers of Humanity: The Papal Bloodlines - https://www.dtss.us/blog/the-real-controllers-of-humanity-the-papal-bloodlines/

---

Stages of Manipulation

By Christopher Langan - 15. June 2021

"The Stages of Manipulation are: #1 Fear, #2 Flattery, #3 Bribery, #4 Threat, #5 Force."

On the supposition that it will get to #5 - and unfortunately, it already has - let's not forget to add

#6: Counterforce.

Dragging these lazy self-entitled pea-brained conspirator$ out of their luxury $h*tboxes and taking care of business, if need be going right through their stinking army of Judas-emulating subhuman thugs by dragging themout of their suburban cubbyholes and taking care of business. (There are several levels of trash to deal with. It's a tall pile.)

Now, I feel a little funny saying this, as I actually agree that human overpopulation must be confronted. But it cannot be confronted and adequately dealt with absent quality control, and these freaks know nothing about that except for "We have all the money and power, hence we have all the genetic quality and everyone else has none!" It's a clean parasitic divergence.

Thus, we differ regarding the means and method. These elite scum are killing advanced Western populations while allowing the Third World to continue to procreate and overpopulate and occupy our territory in our stead, leading to the moral and intellectual degradation and debilitation of the human species. If the elite were cattle ranchers forced to make their livings on the cattle - and in fact, it is on our backs that they make their livings - they'd be as poor as San Francisco street people in a matter of months. The only difference: the street people are addicted to drugs and alcohol, whereas the elite are addicted to wealth, power, and control, of which they already have a lifetime supply.

The right idea has always been to do things in the gentlest and most rational way...the human way. But the elite have decided on another methodology entirely, one so inhuman that it has seemingly been provided by alien freakazoids from Planet X.

That's a no-go. The moral thing to do is fight like hell and let God Almighty mop up. I really wish it didn't have to be this way, but indiscriminate mass murder and mass enslavement is where the line must be drawn.

It's time to sell that cloak, buy a sword, learn how to use it, and develop the clarity to know when you have no other choice but to do so. Cooperate with evil, and you can forget about Heaven.

#chrislangansposts   https://ctmu.org/ (Read: The Reality Self-Simulation Principle: Reality is a Self-Simulation)

---

Say

NO to vaccines that are genetic experiments and banned by the NUREMBERG CODE

NO to measures that harm your FUNDMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS and destroy your LIVELIHOOD

NO to orders you receive from “above” that may harm you and the people for whom you have a duty to care.

YES to YOUR local TRUTH COMMISSIONS on the CORONA CRISIS

YES to a state-wide TRIAL on the CORONA CRISIS, set up for your country to prosecute those citizens of your country that have been found guilty.

YES to an INDEPENDENT INTERNATIONAL TRIAL on the CORONA CRISIS (IITCC) to prosecute those guilty on trans-national and international crimes committed in the Corona Crisis or those that cannot be brought to justice in their own countries, because there the governance in itself is so corrupt that due legal process can not be guaranteed. Nuremberg-style Trials for All Covid Criminals NOW

TRUTH COMMISSIONS

Start with your own core and wider family effort to get the truth and link up with others to cover the whole local community. Set up your local Truth Commission with teams for investigation, documentation, legal or medical advice etc. Much work has already been done e.g. by the  or the Extra-parlamentarian Investigation Committee in Austria and similar efforts in Spain, France, the Netherlands and even Italy. You can rely on the independent experts who could speak out through these organizations and others like Childrens Health Defence in the USA. Use this knowledge to build your own local cases an establish all the medical, health, social and economic damages (also important for further class actions that will seek compensation). 

Link up your commission with the Truth Commissions of other communities and form county or regional commissions with whom you share your local findings and the evidence, e.g. on corrupt politicians, fraudulent courts of law or greedy hospitals, on criminal law enforcement officers or corrupted medical personnel (incl. doctors, pharmacists) or those in charge of corrupting corporations (especially Big Pharma) or the bribed mainstream media etc.

Especially all First Nations and Indigeous Communities all over our wonderful planet, living on their own territories and even still on unceded lands or being displaced must join this worldwide effort. And all 79.5 million humans, who are living deprived as genuine refugees in detention communities or as IDPs (Internally Displaced People), are encouraged to set up their own Truth Commissions right where they are in the moment and link up internationally.

This truth revolution is the last chance to walk the peaceful path of justice and evolution and to avoid armed resistance, revolt and war. Send the contact information of the Truth Commissions in your area/country to  for furhter cooperation and networking.

Choose your means of communication very wisely (avoid FascistBook, YouTube, G-mail / WhatsApp and other dishonest Big Tech) that will spy on you, undermine and/or disrupt your communications in order to stall and stop your investigations. Be aware that your adversaries are planning for June or July 2021 an international shutdown of the internet – have alternative networks and means in place. Minimum is peer-to-peer (p2p) encryption (like freedomcells), but better is completely decentralized networks using BRIAR or TOX.

The Freedom Cell Network

freedomcells. org

---

THE CHARGES READ OUT

On BRIGHTEON

---

The Nuremberg Code

Published June 3, 2021

Rumble — The Nuremberg Code explained.
Dr. Simone Gold from America's Frontline Doctors discusses some important topics regarding the experimental COVID injection.

---

The Last Surviving Prosecutor Of The Nuremberg Trials Has A Message For Us

First published on BITCHUTE April 26th, 2021.

---

Thomas Buergenthal reflects on the value of truth commissions

Judge Thomas Buergenthal was one of the youngest survivors of the Auschwitz and Sachsenhausen concentration camps. He immigrated to the United States at the age of 17. Judge Buergenthal has devoted his life to international and human rights law. A former chairman of the Museum’s Committee on Conscience, he is currently the Lobingier Professor of Comparative Law and Jurisprudence at the George Washington University Law School and served for a decade as the American judge at the International Court of Justice in The Hague. He served as a judge and president of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and of the Administrative Tribunal of the Inter-American Development Bank, and was the first US national to be elected to the UN Human Rights Committee, a member of the UN Truth Commission for El Salvador, and vice chairman of the Claims Resolution Tribunal for Dormant Accounts in Switzerland. With a unique perspective shaped by his experiences as a Holocaust survivor and international jurist, Judge Buergenthal has taught at several leading law schools and written more than a dozen books and numerous articles on international law and human rights.

Transcript

In my view, the value of a truth commission is that it can establish a credible picture of the historical elements that contributed to the crimes that were committed. You simply cannot try people for 40,000 rapes, for example. But you can have a truth commission that can record that and have that accepted so that history is not continuously rewritten in the future by those who have an interest in changing the reality. So the truth commission to me is critical for the evolution -- peaceful evolution -- of a country that has gone through terrible things like El Salvador and Guatemala or South Africa have gone through. But of course it's at the same time important that there exist an international tribunal or some other method to bring at least the major criminals to justice, for the deterrent effect.

 

Important questions for those who are responsible:

(N.B.: This list is in no way complete or exhaustive - please send further important questions that need to be asked to - but do you realize that these questions so far are never asked in public?)

On Corporate Level:

1. In which way is your corporation / company involved in the Corona Crisis?

2. In which way did your corporation / company profit so far?

3. In which way has your corporation / company planned to profit in future from the present Corona Crisis or similar future events?

4. Have you or someone else in your corporation / company received governmental or civilian intelligence reports on the Corona Crisis or similar events? If so, can you present those? If not (to both questions), why?

6. Have you or someone else from your corporation / company been involved in exercises on pandemic event planning - previous, present, future?

7. Have you or someone else in your corporation / company received international, governmental or private funding in connection with the present Corona Crisis or similar, earlier events? If so, can you present the details? If not (to both questions), why?

8. In which way have you or someone else in your corporation / company tried to influence governmental decision makers in the context of the present Corona Crisis or similar earlier or similar anticipated events?  Which governments and with which specifics? Where did you succeed for the benefit of your corporation / company or for personal gains?

9. Have you or someone else in your corporation / company received any threats in connection with the present Corona Crisis? If so, which threats were directed against you or your family directly (personally) and which threats were directed against the corporation / company. Can you specify the details?

10. Have you or someone else in your corporation / company given instructions to mainstream media how and what to report to the public in context with the Corona Crisis or earlier, similar events, like SARS, MERS etc. ?

(N.B.: If an employee of a corporation / company involved in the present Corona Crisis is living in your neighbourhood, invite him or her to testify at a hearing of your local Truth Commission. If the person refuses, advise the next level (county, regional, state) Truth Commission to call that person again to testify. Obviously those with the COVID-19 producing, selling or distributing companies, corporations or organizations require a special set of questions.)

On Government Level:

1. Have you or someone else in your government / cabinet received intelligence reports on the Corona Crisis?

- If so: Can you present these reports to the Truth Commission? If not (concerning both questions), why?

2. Have you or someone else in your government / cabinet been approached and in connection with the Corona Crisis or similar events been told that:

- if you don't do "this or that" the consequences will be "xyz". Means: Have you personally or in your governmental function been blackmailed in connection with the Corona Crisis or similar, earlier events? - If so: By whom, in which specific context and with which threat exactly?

3. Do you or someone else in your government / cabinet have any knowledge about nano-bio-chemical weapons research and development or similar (incl. 'dual-use') activities within the boundaries of your country or abroad? If so, can you specify in detail?

4. Have you or someone else in your government apparatus received international, governmental or private funding in connection with the present Corona Crisis or similar, earlier events? If so, can you present the details? If not (to both questions), why?

5. Have you or someone else in your government / cabinet have in connection with the Corona Crisis commissioned research, studies or similar work to:

a) develop counter-measures? If so, can you specify?

b) develop policies and strategies on what to tell the public? If so, can you specify?

6. Have you or someone else in your governmental apparatus given instructions to mainstream media how to report and what to report to the public in context with the Corona Crisis or earlier, similar events, like SARS, MERS etc. 

7. Which personal benefits or advantages have you received in context with the present Corona Crisis

- a) based on your insider knowledge.

- b) based on your governmental position of power and the instructions you gave. 

(N.B.: If a civil servant or other governmental / public employee involved in the present Corona Crisis is living in your neighbourhood, invite him or her to testify at a hearing of your local Truth Commission. If the person refuses, advise the next level (county, regional, state) Truth Commission to call that person again to testify.)

CAVEAT: Some of these questions will obviously not or only be answered with false statements, based on governmental or corporate 'secrecy' prescriptions or assumptions. It is, however, important to ask these questions and to document the answers for future references. To find the real truth is never an easy or short process - it will take time and effort, but for the sake of humanity it has to be done - now.

Amnesty Granting Powers

First Nations like state-governments can determine if, at which level and at which stage of the truth-finding process they want to bestow in the Truth Commission the powers to grant amnesty and/or witness protection to a forthcoming witness, who might have to implicate him- or herself by telling the full truth. This option can be important to find out about and stop still ongoing, secret operations, but must not be open to abuse by granting it a priori and in general.

---

How can we end the Corona madness and create a good life for all?

The following strategy could be a solution.

Lawyers and judges, police officers and soldiers, as well as journalists and local decision-makers must be educated as efficiently and effectively as possible! Their world views are decisive in determining whether this unnecessary catastrophe will run its course or whether it will be possible to stop the ruling misanthropic elites.

Strategy for freedom

for a world in peace and justice

The basis of the following reflections is the realisation that the world is ruled by a network of influential unscrupulous people, as well as that Corona is part of a long-planned agenda and resembles a 3rd World War. In addition to the goals of total control over everything, the complete enslavement of humanity and the fusion of humans and technology (transhumanism), evidence is mounting that humanity is to be radically decimated. Since this agenda is obviously already very far advanced and of course any kind of resistance has been taken into account, there is – if it is still possible at all – most probably not much time left to stop this madness.

If you have not yet come to this conclusion, please watch the following two free documentaries: „Thrive“ from 2011 and „Plandemic“ from 2020.

If one asks how it is possible to dissolve the current power structures as smoothly and sustainably as possible, then this raises numerous other questions, such as:

What reactions can be expected from the ruling elites and their puppets?

Which people, positions or professions are crucial in such a change of power and system?

What role do petitions or elections, demonstrations, blockades, tax boycotts, general strikes play in this?

How can education or disenchantment succeed as efficiently and effectively as possible?

How could such a global change take place in concrete terms?

How can people be motivated to actively work for such a change?

The power structures of globally cooperating elites that have existed for centuries can in all likelihood only be dissolved through a global resistance that is as simultaneous as possible and specifically directed against these power structures.

The brought about Corona crisis could be called a true blessing in this respect, because it has already triggered a sustained or even growing global resistance, which is even partly already directed precisely against such elites. One sub-goal is therefore not only to maintain this resistance but to strengthen it. Another sub-goal is to inform the majority of the demonstrators (who are probably mostly pure opponents of the measures and more or less „only“ pursue the goal of returning to the old normality) about the global power structures and about solutions and alternatives, e.g. by convincing the organisers of this strategy or by informing the participants directly with flyers and talks.

How will the elites react when the people’s education about the abuses is fulfilled and erupts in great indignation? A possible loss of power very likely means life imprisonment or even death for certain elites and their puppets. They will therefore try to nip any serious resistance in the bud and defend their status to the extreme with all conceivable means (war of aggression, civil war, blackout, concentration camps, etc.). Because many of them are obviously completely unscrupulous or completely insane, it cannot be ruled out that they will try to drag everyone down with them as soon as they realise that their power is slipping away.

The prevention of possible kamikaze actions and genocide attempts on the part of the elites (e.g. through forced vaccinations), should therefore take a central role in the planning and implementation of a global takeover.

Apart from the power of elites, the power of each individual and the power of united masses of people, much of the power lies in the decisions of lawyers and judges, police officers and soldiers, as well as journalists and local politicians. In a sense, they stand between humanity and the ruling elites. They can protect the elites from the masses through violent oppression and manipulation. But they could also, conversely, protect the masses from the rushed, by exposing, condemning and preventing their crimes. Above all others, they are the ones who could organise the smoothest and most coordinated change possible.

The findings of the „Milgram experiment“ are also important in this respect. Briefly and loosely defined, it proves that people will do almost anything that an authority they recognise tells them is the right thing to do. From this it can be concluded that one can disappoint a large part of the subordinate people if one succeeds in disappointing an officer or even a general, a police commissioner or chief police commissioner, a constitutional judge, an editor-in-chief, a chief physician or a school headmaster etc.

The targeted and professional education or disenchantment of these „key target groups of change“, first and foremost the leadership positions, should therefore be one of the top priorities of all resisters.

The challenge we face is not only (generally) to educate people who are convinced they are sufficiently educated and have a natural aversion to questioning or even changing their beliefs, but also to emancipate people from their anticipatory obedience and deceptive trust in authority – government, journalism, superiors.

I see one possibility for enlightenment and disenchantment in presenting as professional an overview and summary as possible to all those who are potentially open and interested in other views but cannot see the wood for the trees. E.g. of the biggest and most questionable inconsistencies concerning Corona or other essential connections of our reality. For example, the fact that wealth and power could hardly be distributed more unfairly and that there are many influential and unscrupulous people who, through certain structures and institutions, form a global network that most people, remarkably, still cannot properly imagine.

Basically, education is about reaching people and getting them to consume certain pre-selected information. This kind of education is also about making people doubt the official narratives and encouraging them to inform themselves and find out the truth. There are many ways to get people to consume certain information. For example, by repeating the information, in different formats, by different people, on different occasions. E.g. by calling, writing letters, talking on the street, etc.

Another possibility is to build up a certain social pressure, e.g. by writing a mail or letter to all police stations in the country with the subject: „this message went to all…“. Another positive side effect of this method is that it additionally stimulates exchange among each other, because everyone knows that everyone has received this information.

In the text, I also called on others to show whether they doubt the public narrative or whether they are against or in favour of the measures, e.g. by drawing a cross on their mask or, if possible, not wearing one at all, but at least talking openly about it with as many people/colleagues as possible and coming out. On the one hand, the idea behind this is that this can lead to a (in this case intentional) split. Because only when there are two groups within the police or the military, for example, is it possible to choose a side or even change sides. On the other hand, it makes general sense that all opponents of Corona measures, all opponents of imperialism and all opponents of tyranny would permanently identify themselves as such.

A little story about this: A senator in the Roman slave empire had made the suggestion to mark all slaves with white bands… His advisor replied to this suggestion: „If you mark them like this, they will only realise how many they actually are… And then they will rise up against us“.

How many have held back their opinion until now, for whatever reason, could then become apparent when more and more get over themselves to demonstrate to everyone else how they think. That, in turn, would encourage others to do so. And it might even turn out that there is already a majority. How important it is for people’s world view to see or know how others think is impressively demonstrated by Asch’s „conformity experiment“. Our need to belong to a group even takes on such proportions that we pretend to believe obvious untruths to be true.

Many of these processes have already begun! Worth mentioning are, for example, the organisation of panel discussions with local decision-makers and the organised and targeted distribution of information material to local politicians, as well as the organised nationwide distribution of flyers to independently educate the general population.

How could such a global change take place in concrete terms?

In the course of the increasingly successful dissemination of these thoughts and the resulting increasingly successful enlightenment of these target groups, one could (globally) make the demand for transitional governments with integrity unmistakably loud. For a successful launch of a transitional government, the following two factors are likely to be crucial:

  1. Firstly, it requires ever louder accusations of a collective mistrust of the incumbent government from the population, from recognised authorities, role models and other influential people, but also from the opposition parties, as has already happened twice recently in Austria, for example (5/2019 and 12/2020).
  2. Secondly, a network of renowned politicians, journalists, lawyers, police officers and soldiers of integrity is needed, as well as a body of recognised experts of integrity, who together can form a trustworthy transitional government that would be accepted or even endorsed by the broad mass of the population.

The current military coup in Myanmar (Burma/Burma) is proof that such a thing is not only conceivable but also feasible!

After the successful establishment of transitional governments with integrity, they could then try to implement the following priorities as quickly, simultaneously and comprehensively as possible:

– Stop the corrupt networks and think tanks of influential people. High nobility, oligarchs, bankers, media monopolists, lobbyists, leading politicians and other system puppets should be deprived of their power, for example by judicial sentencing according to international laws (Nuremberg Trial!), and by a social order in which such elitist, intransparent groupings can no longer be possible.

– Takeover of the sovereignty of interpretation, through a targeted takeover of the broadcasting stations of the leading media; proclamation of a transitional government and the further course of action.

– Initiation of public, free dialogues and discourses on the essential connections of our reality, whereby not only the truth gradually comes to light, but also all the solutions and alternatives that already exist.

– Call for the organisation of mutual psychological support as widely as possible, because certain facts probably cannot be processed by many without help.

– Prepare the population for a possible crisis and social unrest, while maintaining stability, peace and order: e.g. by calling for networking with local farmers and other local suppliers and, if necessary, organising local citizens‘ vigils.

– Creation of independence at all levels – food, energy, electricity, medicine, money… – through regional, local, self-sufficient and crisis-proof structures (decentralisation of socially essential systems).

– Stabilisation of the economy and the financial system, through the introduction of value-covered (full money) and circulation-secured (free money) regional currencies (see „free economy“ and „the miracle of Wörgl“).

– Understanding, networking and cooperation with the key target groups or already existing transitional governments of all neighbouring countries and worldwide.

– Establishment of holistic and transparent decision-making processes and power structures: e.g. through more direct democracy, citizens‘ parliaments, „systemic consensus building“ (SK principle, sociocracy, consensus-building, deliberative democracy).

– Establishment of „social threefolding“ according to Rudolf Steiner (freedom in spiritual life, equality in legal life, fraternity in economic life).

– Establishment of holistic systems at all levels (education, health, etc.)

The right to unlimited private ownership, as well as the right to private ownership of limited resources (water, oil or gas sources; mines; more arable land than one needs, etc.), are among the thickest roots of all evil and should therefore be urgently reconsidered and renegotiated. These rights should always, but especially in times of change, be the focus of enlightenment movements! No one should be expropriated! No citizen should be forcibly expropriated! On the contrary, only the expropriation of the people by a few oligarchs should be reversed! It is not the „normal citizen“ who is to be expropriated, but the oligarch who is to be prevented from appropriating limited resources of nature to which all people have a right.

„The first man who surrounded a piece of land with a fence and had the idea of saying „This is mine“ and who found people simple-minded enough to believe him, was the real founder of civil society. How many crimes, wars, murders, how much misery and horror would the human race have been spared if someone had pulled out the stakes and shouted to his fellow men: „Beware of believing the deceiver; you are lost if you forget that while the fruits belong to all, the earth belongs to no one.“
-Jean Jacques Rousseau, Discourse on Inequality (ed. Meier). UTB, 2008, P. 173

A peaceful, just and sustainable economic-financial solution could lie in the global establishment of a mixture of the following 3 models/concepts: the free economy according to Silvio Gesell, the resource-based economic model according to Jacque Fresco and the common good economy according to Christian Felber. A truly „unconditional“ basic income would only be fair if all people worldwide received it, but then the question arises as to what it is still needed for, the dear money.

Money has mutated into a kind of religion. Most people believe that life without money is impossible, although 99.9 percent of all species prove the opposite every day. It is possibly one of the most crucial questions for the future of humanity: whether the everyday use of money is more useful or more harmful for the socialisation of people, for peaceful coexistence and a sustainable way of life. As well as answering the question of how a world worth living in could function without money. A recommendation for further reading on the topic of the debt-money system and the credit system is the book „Debt – the first 5,000 years“ by David Graeber.

How can people be motivated to actively work for such change?

There are several factors that play a decisive role. For example, the belief in various visions of the future. If one believes that it is possible to create a significant improvement in living conditions for oneself and others, then one is more motivated to do something about it than if one does not believe in it. From propaganda theory we know that and how it is possible to create and consolidate a certain belief. The following realisation must be brought to people’s attention: If our knowledge and the resources of the earth were to benefit all people approximately equally, then we would very likely only have to invest a fraction of the current working time, with the average standard of living being many times higher than today. Water, food, housing, energy, mobility, education, medical care, etc. could be free for all people. We already have the means to do this, it is just a question of our imagination, our priorities and our will. Equally motivating is the belief that the future will bring much worse living conditions if we ourselves and an increasing number of people do not act or resist soon. Other factors are fears and lack of courage, which need to be addressed specifically.

What role do petitions or elections, demonstrations, blockades, tax boycotts, general strikes play in this?

If petitions, referendums and elections could fundamentally change the established system, then this would either already have succeeded or would have been banned long ago. As long as the prevailing opinion is the opinion of the rulers (sovereignty of interpretation of the government and the leading media) and as long as the electoral system allows electoral fraud, it is highly unlikely that a party that promotes peace, freedom and justice will take over the government. And even if the people were to vote out the corrupt elite, the next day there would probably be a civil war forced by the elites.

Demonstrations give courage and hope and are outlets for frustration and anger, but they have little or no influence on political decisions. Moreover, protests and demonstrations are planned and sometimes even desired by the elites, e.g. to create various images to better defame the critical mass in the media. Blockades could achieve a lot, but obviously we are not in a position to organise something like „Occupy Wall Street“ regularly and across countries. It would be interesting, for example, to blockade the main headquarters of the public media for several days, demanding free public dialogue and discourse. However, we are obviously too well-behaved and too comfortable for this kind of resistance, or most resisters do not see the need for it.

The same applies to a tax boycott or general strike, with additional factors that make these very effective methods extremely unlikely: a critical mass that is (still) too small, as well as disunity within this mass and in the general public.

Conclusion:
Trying to change something fundamental in pseudo-democratic dictatorships by means of elections, new parties or demonstrations, or to withdraw from the influence of a global power elite – is like going to a gunfight with a knife… better than nothing, but in reality completely inappropriate and in all likelihood completely futile!

WE muSt become cReAtIvE! NOW or NEVER! 
Instead of the weekly „silent marches“, rallies, walks and revolutionary car honking, we must start to resist creatively: in front of our town halls, media, courts, police stations, barracks or even in front of the residences of various traitors to the people…

#OccupyMainstreamWhat’s 
wrong with that? Instead of demonstrating weekly, we could also block the entrances of our propaganda/truth ministries: our leading media for weekse.g. with the demand for a daily independent „Corona Committee“ and „free public dialogues and discourses“ and that in prime time!

#Flashmobs and „covert theatre“
Where are you, you creative rebels? What’s wrong with meditating regularly in front of our police stations with a simple question/demand? Theoretically, you could also trigger a bank run with this means, if you wanted to…
They exist, these creative people who drop tons of manure in front of the city hall or concrete certain entrances in night & fog actions… 
Please more of them!

#marking
What’s wrong with all people who are against the C-measures, or even all people who are against the power structures, marking themselves as permanently as possible? as soon as we see how many we are...

The prerequisite for implementing such a strategy is logically the broadest possible, growing and widespread (global) understanding of its necessity, which can result in sufficient motivation to implement it. This is only possible through its dissemination and the resulting increasing engagement with it.

This is – not only – a first draft of a possible „strategy of change“, but – above all – also a cordial invitation to think along, reflect, think ahead, network and argue. I see the most significant progress in terms of positive change in the fact that more and more people are dedicating themselves to such topics and joining together in a kind of „Thinking Factory of Change“ in order to exploit our swarm intelligence as much as possible in this regard as well. If you are interested in working together, please get in touch and forward this invitation to potentially interested people.

Many thanks and hopeful greetings! 
Only together we are strong!

strategy4freedom.org

 

 

===

UPDATES:

Citizens' Grand Jury – Fauci Indictment Prosecutor Larry Klayman Presents Expert Witness Testimony

•Streamed live on 10 Jun 2021

 

Freedom Watch

Prosecutor Larry Klayman presents the Citizens' Grand Jury with expert witness testimony from Kent Heckenlively and John Cullen.

visit www.freedomwatchusa.org

===

SIXTH TRIBUNAL on the Corona Pandemic

Das erste COVID-Tribunal

1. Organic Consumers Association’s COVID-19 Tribunal

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola - 05. June 2021

PROCEEDINGS - pdf

Partcipants

The speakers and panelists featured in this first COVID-19 tribunal sponsored by the Organic Consumers Association, were in addition to Dr. Mercola:

Dolores Cahill, Ph.D., a molecular biologist and immunologist, founder of the World Freedom Alliance and a member of the World Doctors Alliance, which is committed "to debate the causes of harm resulting from the coronavirus act measures and to raise issues that expose harmful medical and life-limiting practices detrimental to the well-being of all living men women and children"

Kimberly and Foster Gamble, creators of two THRIVE documentaries

Kevin Jenkins, executive director of the Urban Global Health Alliance and producer of the censored documentary film "Medical Racism: The New Apartheid"

Dr. Peter McCullough, vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and co-author of "Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Infection" in the American Journal of Medicine. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8,9 McCullough is one of the top five most-published medical researchers in the United States

Joy Fritz, a former death records clerk and contributor to The Defender Ronnie Cummins, co-founder and international director of the OCA and its Mexican affiliate Via Organica Tara Thorton, co-founder of the Freedom Angels Foundation, which fights against tightening vaccination regulations

Dr. James Lyon Weiler, Ph.D., a research scientist, president and CEO of The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge Anna Garner, founder of New Mexico Stands Up!, a volunteer-driven organization that provides public interest legal services to restore essential rights and health freedom

Dr. Henry Ealy ("Dr. H"), a certified holistic nutritionist, founder and executive community director of the Energetic Health Institute

Sayer Ji, founder of GreenMed Info David "Avocado" Wolfe, a raw food advocate The Truth About COVID-19

The first roundtable discussion started off with a prerecorded video featuring Cummins and Mercola. Our full-length discussion was summarized in "The Book You'll Want to Read Before It Disappears."

The book in question is "The Truth About COVID-19," which we wrote together. In that book, we review how the COVID-19 pandemic was never a pandemic in any real, historical sense, the tactics used to keep the fraud going, the likely origin of the virus, 

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • The first COVID-19 tribunal, sponsored by the Organic Consumers Association, features scientists, doctors, authors, activists and attorneys who expose the willful misconduct that runs like a red thread through the entire pandemic narrative
  • Collectively, the panelists, which include yours truly, have spent well over 75,000 hours investigating myriad events that make up the global response to COVID-19
  • Something very unusual happened in 2020. For the first time, doctors around the world were actively discouraged from helping, and prevented from saving, their patients
  • Esteemed doctors and medical facilities have developed effective treatment protocols for COVID-19, including Harvard, Johns Hopkins and Emory, yet all been suppressed and censored in an apparent effort to cause as much suffering and death as possible
  • Anne Garner, attorney and founder of New Mexico Stands Up! is filing a number of groundbreaking lawsuits on behalf of the American people to reestablish and protect rights and freedoms

The video above features the first of several tribunals1 on COVID-19, in which we expose the willful misconduct that runs like a red thread through the entire pandemic narrative. This first one is sponsored by the Organic Consumers Association (OCA), a 501c3 nonprofit organization chartered to educate and empower you with information that promotes health and happiness for you and your family.

The panel, consisting of a number of experts from different fields, including scientists, doctors, authors, activists and attorneys, is hosted by Alexis Baden-Mayer. The topic, of course, is COVID-19, which has risen as the most important topic of our lifetime.

Collectively, the panelists, which include yours truly, have spent well over 75,000 hours investigating myriad events that make up the global response to COVID-19, from its likely lab origin, to where we are at present. As noted by Baden-Mayor, we find ourselves "trapped in a web of questionable science and rampant acts of alleged willful misconduct with no apparent and insight."

"Collectively, our panelists have published groundbreaking books, lawsuits and peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts on the subject of COVID-19 that currently form the foundation of many ongoing legal efforts, attempting to protect the inalienable rights of billions of good people worldwide," Baden-Mayor says.

"It has been more than a year since the SARS-CoV-2 virus came into public awareness, and what began as two weeks to flatten the curve has morphed into a never-ending emergency. Is this still an emergency? And if so, why are we empowering the same people to lead us who have already proven their own incompetence?

At the very least tonight, we will take up the work that should have been performed long ago by mainstream media networks that have consistently vacated their duty to impartially investigate and objectively inform their audiences. We will ask the hard questions to people who have been censored and vilified simply for lifting their voices to help people throughout the world.

Some of the questions we pose may feel uncomfortable at first, but are nevertheless essential to our collective freedom and our children's future. And some of the answers you hear may challenge the narratives you've been conditioned to accept. We will listen as our expert panelists share verifiable information, and invite you to decide for yourself whether the information you are hearing has merit.

This tribunal does not exist to tell you what to think or what you need to know. This tribunal of experts has gathered to empower you, to think for yourself and create opportunities for you to take action.

The alleged acts of willful conduct threaten not only our freedom, but also unnecessarily prolongs the crisis by preventing the free exchange of ideas and clinical information that saves lives. We will embark on a historic journey together in search of answers to hard questions and solutions to challenging problems …

If you are like the billions of people who have felt that something just isn't right, and you don't know who to trust. I assure you, you are not alone. Take heart and have courage together. We are going to make sure COVID-19 comes to an end. And most importantly never happens again."

Speakers List

The speakers and panelists featured in this first tribunal, in addition to myself, are:

Dolores Cahill, Ph.D., a molecular biologist and immunologist,2 founder of the World Freedom Alliance3 and a member of the World Doctors Alliance,4 which is committed "to debate the causes of harm resulting from the coronavirus act measures and to raise issues that expose harmful medical and life-limiting practices detrimental to the well-being of all living men women and children"

Kimberly and Foster Gamble, creators of two THRIVE documentaries5

Kevin Jenkins, executive director of the Urban Global Health Alliance6 and producer of the censored documentary film "Medical Racism: The New Apartheid"7

Dr. Peter McCullough, vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and co-author of "Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Infection" in the American Journal of Medicine.8,9 McCullough is one of the top five most-published medical researchers in the United States

Joy Fritz, a former death records clerk10 and contributor to The Defender11

Ronnie Cummins, co-founder and international director of the OCA and its Mexican affiliate Via Organica12

Tara Thorton, co-founder of the Freedom Angels Foundation, which fights against tightening vaccination regulations13

Dr. James Lyon Weiler, Ph.D., a research scientist, president and CEO of The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge14

Anna Garner, founder of New Mexico Stands Up!, a volunteer-driven organization that provides public interest legal services to restore essential rights and health freedom15

Dr. Henry Ealy ("Dr. H"), a certified holistic nutritionist, founder and executive community director of the Energetic Health Institute16

Sayer Ji, founder of GreenMed Info17

David "Avocado" Wolfe, a raw food advocate18

The Truth About COVID-19

Download Interview Transcript

The first roundtable discussion starts off with a prerecorded video featuring Cummins and me. Our full-length discussion was summarized in "The Book You'll Want to Read Before It Disappears." I've included it again, above, for your convenience. The book in question is "The Truth About COVID-19," which we wrote together.

In that book, we review how the COVID-19 pandemic was never a pandemic in any real, historical sense, the tactics used to keep the fraud going, the likely origin of the virus, the less-than-humanitarian intentions driving the pandemic narrative as a whole, censored prevention and treatment strategies, the potential hazards of COVID-19 "vaccines," why vaccine passports are a ticket to totalitarianism and much more.

Shocking Statistics Are Being Ignored

Anyone who has looked at the U.S. federal vaccine adverse events reporting system (VAERS) will be struck by the shockingly high number of serious injuries and deaths occurring after receiving the COVID-19 "vaccine."

Many of these occur within the first 24 to 48 hours after taking the vaccine, which ought to raise automatic questions. Yet the timing of these injuries and deaths are ignored, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration insists that none of them has any relation to the vaccines,19 which simply isn't believable. As noted by Baden-Mayor:

"As of April 16 [2021], the following information is confirmed: At least 3,186 Americans have died after receiving experimental COVID injections. At least 1,015 of those deaths have occurred within 24 hours. According to the various medical records, at least 115 expecting mothers have spontaneously aborted their babies or given birth to stillborn babies after receiving experimental COVID injections.

At least 86,080 Americans have reported some form of injury post-injection, including at least 6,282 people who have required hospitalization due to the severity of their injuries.

We support everyone's right to access experimental COVID injections, but it is important to note that they are not FDA approved. Currently the clinical trials are ongoing until October 27, 2022, for Moderna, the NIH study until January 2, 2023, for Johnson & Johnson, and April 6, 2023, for the Pfizer-BioNTech.

Under current informed consent laws, you have the right to decline the use of any experimental product without fear of job loss, discrimination or segregation from the society that you paid taxes to support. It is your body. It is your choice."

Side Effect Reports Are Skyrocketing

These numbers are skyrocketing by the day. As of April 23, 2021, the total number of adverse reports had jumped to 118,902, 12,618 of which were serious and 3,544 of which died.20 While shocking as is, the real numbers are undoubtedly even higher, as VAERS is a passive surveillance system that relies on voluntary reporting.

Historically, less than 10% of vaccine side effects are reported to VAERS.21 An investigation by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services put it as low as 1%.22,23

What this means is side effects may actually be 10 times or even 100 times higher than reported. We could, in reality, be looking at anywhere from 126,000 to 1.2 million serious side effects, and anywhere from 35,440 to 354,400 vaccine-related deaths already.

Making matters even worse, it appears VAERS is backlogged by about three months, so the data you see on VAERS does not reflect the true, real-time numbers of adverse reactions being reported.

This is important to know, since the system's primary goal is to "detect new, unusual or rare vaccine adverse events" as a way to monitor safety of vaccines, and the greater the backlog, the more people will be exposed to a potentially dangerous vaccine. A backlog by months also suggests an enormous number of adverse effects are happening, and that in and of itself is incredibly disturbing.

It is also highly likely that the majority of the deaths from the vaccine will be due to antibody‐dependent enhancement (ADE) or paradoxical immune enhancement (PIE), as detailed in "How COVID-19 Vaccine Can Destroy Your Immune System" and "Will Vaccinated People Be More Vulnerable to Variants?"

We will not see these deaths until the fall, because that is the typical season when coronavirus infections occur, be it SARS-CoV2 or other coronaviruses responsible for the common cold. So, when exposed to a wild coronavirus, there is indeed a risk that ADE response, due to pathogenic priming, will produce an excessive and potentially lethal immune reaction.

Steadfast Suppression of Attempts to Save Patients

As noted by McCullough during the roundtable discussion, something very unusual happened in 2020. For the first time, doctors around the world were actively discouraged and prevented from saving their patients. There was "an enormous, complete, pervasive, steadfast suppression of any attempts to help patients with COVID-19," he says.

He points out that esteemed medical facilities have developed effective treatment protocols for COVID-19, including Harvard, Johns Hopkins and Emory, yet these have all been suppressed and censored.

"It's stunning," McCullough says. "By this time, we should be using the Harvard protocol, the Emory protocol. How about Hopkins? I'll take any one of them … We seem to somehow have developed a uniform game plan … to do nothing to help patients with COVID-19, passively allow as much suffering hospitalization and death as possible, create enormous amounts of fear in our society, and then be prepared for mass vaccination."

Willfully Inflated Death Counts

Fritz, a certified death reporting clerk who has worked for years assisting doctors and acting as an interface between funeral homes and state and federal reporting agencies, is now helping families correct death certificates that inaccurately list COVID-19 as the cause of death.

March 24, 2020, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published a COVID alert that some say has led to significantly inflated and therefore fraudulent death counts.

In response to Baden-Mayor's questions, "Did the COVID alert No. 2 lead to inflated dead counts? And what are some of the problems associated with the death certificate reporting that make the process susceptible to data manipulation and therefore significant inaccuracy?" Fritz replies:

"For context, the COVID No. 2 alert and the follow-up NBSS April guidance was issued within two weeks of the emergency being declared in March 2020. Their explicit guidance was given before there was any population-wide testing available to statistically determine the infection fatality rates, so we didn't have probability [data] yet.

Yet, without any population surveillance available, any good data, they asserted that COVID would be the underlying cause of death 'more often than not.' They made a declaration of statistical probability before there was national statistics available. Then they disseminated this unfounded probabilistic rationale to those who officially report, approve, code and tally our mortality statistics.

People need to understand the importance of the underlying cause of death. If you look at a death certificate, it has a bunch of information on it. The underlying cause of death is the diagnostic code you pick to report in our mortality statistics. That's the one cause that's going to be reported about that patient. It's very important.

Normally, before this, infections were not given as the underlying cause of death, for the most part, for patients over 60 years old. I got a lot of cases where the doctor is saying it was MRSA, an antibiotic-resistant form of staph that's really hard to treat and can kill people.

The vital records registrars would reject death certificates that had underlying cause of death with MRSA and say, 'Go back and ask the doctor what they were on medication for. Did they have diabetes? Did they have chronic illnesses?' So, this flies in the face of what I was used to, as far as infections being highlighted as the underlying cause of death as a rule."

Illogical COVID Rules Have Created a Statistical Mess

Fritz goes on to review what happened the last time the National Center for Health Statistics had a governing committee make recommendations regarding contagious or vaccine-preventable disease. On page 139 of the 2003 report from this panel, the committee asked how to address questions such as "Was a contagious disease present at time of death, or did the death result from a vaccine preventable disease?"

"The committee subgroup on death certificates decided against the death certificate being updated to include those risk factors," Fritz says. The committee stated that "the death certificate is not a medical record and is not intended to include prevalence data."

"This is a very important part of what the precedence was, before this pandemic, about contagious and vaccine-preventable diseases on death certificates," Fritz says.

"They intentionally, in 2020, changed this with the COVID guidance. They created this lopsided reporting system — and they didn't make it for all contagious diseases — they just made it for COVID. So, it's naturally going to create a ballooning of reporting for this one contagious disease.

Then, if you look at the context, these are experts at our statistical regulatory bodies. They know about the statistics on death certificates and [the importance of] accuracy. These guys know that — according to peer-reviewed medical literature, across the board, in every continent in the world — 20% to 60% of our death certificates have the wrong or an inaccurate cause of death listed.

So, we have a major margin of error that these experts already knew about. And now they're manipulating the system to milk out the information … without fixing the system. That's very problematic."

While Fritz is trying to help families correct death certificates that incorrectly list COVID-19 as the cause of death, that task just got more difficult. She recently received a text from her local government in California, advertising that FEMA is now giving families $9,000 to cover funeral expenses if your loved one died from COVID-19, and the way you prove that is with a death certificate listing COVID-19 as the cause of death.

What's more, this payment program will go on to 2025, so it not only deincentivizes people from correcting death certificates issued in 2020, but incentivizes the continued mislisting of COVID-19 as the cause of death presently and into the future, using bribery.

Fritz is founding a nonprofit 501c3 organization called the Factual Reporting Advocacy Network to help educate families, medical officers, certifiers, mortuaries and others about the importance of accuracy in death certificates, because it affects national and global statistics, which in turn drive all sorts of funding, such as medical research.

She's also pushing for an independent national audit of COVID-19 death records to establish true cause of death and to update the certificates accordingly.

Roundtable 2: The Medical Ethics Panel

The OCA tribunal, which is three hours long, features roundtables with nine additional panelists. I hope you take the time to listen to all of them. Roundtable 2, which begins at the 50-minute mark, includes Sayer Ji, Dr. Ealy and Jenkins, who discuss willful misconduct as it pertains to medical ethics.

Ji reviews how public health officials have failed to honor the ethics of medicine and what can be done to correct course and serve those who are desperately looking for answers. As noted by Ji, you cannot make ethical medical decisions unless you know both the risks and the benefits, so the censorship of medical information is, in a very real sense, a violation of human rights.

March 23, 2021, Ealy published a peer-reviewed paper, "COVID-19: Restoring Public Trust During a Global Health Crisis — An Evidence-Based Position Paper to Ensure Ethical Conduct," available for free reading and download on GreenMedInfo.24

In it, he substantiates McCullough's allegation of rampant, wanton misconduct among public health officials, the active suppression of safe and effective treatments, and pandemic measures being implemented based on incorrect assumptions and outright lies.

One lie that allowed for the implementation of draconic measures was that SARS-CoV-2 was being spread asymptomatically. There's no evidence of this, and from a virology standpoint, having a respiratory infection without symptoms is highly unlikely.

The PCR test being used as a diagnostic tool is also problematic, as revealed in the Corman-Drosten review,25 headed by former Pfizer chief scientist Dr. Michael Eaton. The test was developed before a viral isolate was available, which means we don't even know if it's detecting the actual SARS-CoV-2 virus. On top of that, health agencies instructed labs to use excessive amplification cycles, known to result in massive numbers of false positives.

Ealy also discusses a paper26 written in collaboration with team of other investigators published in Science, Public Health Policy and the Law, titled, "COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective." This paper details how the CDC has enabled the corruption of case- and fatality-reporting data in violation of federal law.

The panelists also address racial disparities, such as how communities of color are being disproportionately impacted by COVID-19, both the illness and pandemic measures, and the U.S. government's history of knowingly withholding evidence-based cures.

Ealy also points out that the CDC has known for the past 20 years that 35% to 45% of Americans are deficient in vitamin A; 37% to 46% are deficient in vitamin C; 65% to 95% are deficient in vitamin D; 60% to 84% are deficient in vitamin E; and 11% to 15% of Americans are deficient in zinc.

These are key nutrients to mount an effective immune response. Yet no guidance has been issued for correcting these widespread nutritional deficits — not in the past, and not now, even though a large body of research now shows vitamins C, D and zinc play a crucial role in preventing COVID-19 and improving outcomes.

You also don't want to miss Jenkins' impassioned speech in which he strips the pandemic down to the bare bones and exposes what it's really all about. It's about turning mankind into slaves. It's about systemic annihilation. They want to control our bodies and minds, and to do that, they must first strip us of our freedom. That's what this pandemic is all about.

"I'm here to hurt your feelings today," Jenkins says. "I'm not here to make you feel good. The bottom line is you are … locked out of the truth because you've allowed it to happen. This is the year of action.

A year of taking it all back. This is a year of flying free … We are at war for humanity. This has nothing to do with race. Race is a distraction … Are they censoring because you are black or white? They're censoring us because we're telling the truth.

Big tech, big pharma, finance, education — they're all working against us. We have failed, all of us. So, you've got to get up. Come join us at Urban Global Health. Come join us at Freedom Airways.27 Join all of the other groups."

Roundtable 3: Questionable Science

Roundtable 3, which starts around the 1 hour 30-minute mark, includes Cahill, Lyons, Weiler and Garner, who review issues revolving around questionable science and the law. Cahill begins by reviewing the absolute lack of empirical evidence supporting the use of face masks, social distancing and lockdowns as a mitigation strategies to reduce viral spread.

Cahill's organization, the World Freedom Alliance, recently launched the Hope & Accountability project, also known as The European Spring, which aims to hold decision-makers and doctors accountable for their scientific misconduct. Notices of liability are being sent off to members of the European Parliament, Presidents and Prime Ministers across Europe, as well as ministers for health and the regulators. She explains:

"A notice of liability, which is based in the rule of law, [specifies] that harm is not really done by big organizations. Harm is done by one man or woman to another man or a woman.

Responsibility rests on individual people, and on their roles, for example, the prime minister, the minister for health — but also the individual who is the head of the regulatory agency — that if there are several deaths in a country, the regulators … in each individual country, are required by law to stop the clinical trial.

They're also required to give full informed consent so that everybody enrolled in these gene therapy, so-called vaccinations, are required to be informed about the adverse events. And you are not allowed to enroll people that cannot give consent, such as those with dementia …

Under law, you are accountable as individuals for what you do, and what you fail to do. But of course, the person that's most responsible is the person that actually put that needle into those people. And that, in our law is a severe crime, contributory manslaughter. So, the people who are involved in administering [these injections] … and cause huge [numbers of] adverse events and death, they will be accountable."

Weiler delves into further details about the unscientific use of PCR tests, serious flaws in the tests' design, the many ways in which false positives can be created, and the mechanics of how your immune system actually works to fight infection.

Landmark Court Filings Underway

Garner, an attorney and founder of New Mexico Stands Up! discusses potentially landmark cases filed in defense of American people, and the importance of relying evidence-based science when making public health decisions.

"We were doing what we can to get the word out and get it to the courts, which may be our last bastion — the wall that could fall down in terms of the lies that we're being told," she says. "We have been told so many lies, we've been told lies about the number of cases, we've been told lies about the number of deaths caused by COVID.

Fear has absolutely wrecked everybody's sense of proportion of what's right and wrong. And this is a battle of right versus wrong, because those of us who haven't drunk the cocaine, as I call it, rather than the Kool-Aid, know that everything about this is so wrong.

We've been deprived of our fundamental inalienable God-given rights, our right to breathe oxygen, for goodness sake, our rights to socialize with our fellow man. We need hugs, we need socialization, especially as developing children. And that's where our next level of litigation is going to take us."

Garner recently sued the New Mexico Governor, challenging the state of public health emergency, which is based on lies, including the use of a basically meaningless test to diagnose infection.

"If that PCR test is considered to be the bottom card of this house of cards that we have been dealt, if we pull that out, I think the rest of the house of cards has to collapse," she says. "And that means that the orders, the mandates, the restrictions that have been put in place as a result of this declaration are all null and void."

Garner is also filing a case on behalf of children, based on a German victory, in which a mother sued, saying forcing her child to wear a mask at school and during fitness classes was child abuse. The judge agreed, ruling that it constitutes child abuse and granted injunctive relief. Garner's case will be the first of that kind in the U.S.

"I can't emphasize how much that people need to know what their rights are. If they don't know what their rights are, they're going to continue giving them up. And that's exactly what they've done. They've given that their right to breathe.

They've given up their right to have free exercise of their religion with fellowship and singing, and sitting close to people in the bench. They have given up their rights to be able to assemble with their friends and family in numbers greater than five.

This whole thing is just insane. And those of us who are looking at this and going, 'This is insane,' need to realize that we're the ones who aren't insane, and try to help people come back to some level of reasonableness."

Garner is in need of donations and volunteers, including brave, hard-nosed attorneys willing to fight for the rights and freedoms of Americans, so please donate or sign up to volunteer on NMstandup.org.

Roundtable 4: Creative Action

In Roundtable 4, starting around the 2 hour 18-minute mark, Wolfe, Thorton and the Fosters turn to the more spiritual side of things and discuss how we can nourish and inspire ourselves and others to take action on behalf of humanity. Again, I hope you watch this video in its entirety, and share it widely with everyone you know. Together, we can get through this, and, as you can see, you're not alone.

===

CITIZENS' GRAND JURY INDICTMENT OF DR. ANTHONY FAUCI WITH DR. JUDY MIKOVITS & KENT HECKENLIVELY

Download Video June 3, 2021

Freedom Watch

As Anthony Fauci's fabricated world of lies comes crashing down on him in an unprecedented manner, Dr. Judy Mikovits continues her expert testimony. Dr. Mikovits has long maintained, and provided detailed supporting evidence, that Fauci was deeply involved in gain of function research and other dangerous, high risk activities.

Visit. https://www.freedomwatchusa.org/

Please sponsor the Crowdsource the Truth Counterlawfare Fund at https://www.crowdsourcethetruth.com.

===

Citizen's Grand Jury with Prosecutor Larry Klayman – Dr. Judy Mikovits & Kent Heckenlively Testify

•Streamed live on 20 May 2021

 

Freedom Watch

In the indictment of Dr. Anthony Fauci, Prosecutor Larry Klayman presents the Citizen's Grand Jury with testimony from expert witness Dr. Judy Mikovits and her co-author Kent Heckenlively.

Visit. https://www.freedomwatchusa.org/

Please sponsor the Crowdsource the Truth Counterlawfare Fund at https://www.crowdsourcethetruth.com.

===

U.S. CITIZENS CAN CONVENE OWN GRAND JURY IN FIVE STATES

19. May 2021

In five states of the USA citizens, who were frustrated by the given court system in their anti-Corona law suits, can invoke a 19th century frontier law of the U.S. to convene a grand jury.

<p>File US Supreme Court in Washington, DC. The woman used 19th century law to fight her case</p>

This 1887 frontier law can be applied after acquiring a certain number of signatures in support.

The legal provision is only applicable in five states of the USA.

One of them is Kansas, where a 22-year-old rape-crime survivor, whose case has been first rejected and then delayed by the Kansas courts, invoked a Grand Jury after collecting 327 signatures.

The Grand Jury hearing is schedued for 29 September 2021.

This shows that this important law can still be successfully invoked and used to uphold justice

===

FIFTH TRIBUNAL on the Corona Pandemic

NATURAL AND COMMON LAW TRIBUNAL  FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND JUSTICE

Note: BigTech issues browser-warnings for the Link above, but the website is safe. BigTech just tries to disturb. 

- see in detail: Judgment in the Matter of Genocidal Technologies

What is a "Common Law Tribunal"? 

Natural / Common Law judicial processes may be a pathway to support positive change, since they invoke higher jurisdictions.

And sometimes, we've seen that they can indeed have real-world results. Their role is perhaps more important at times when it can be demonstrated that the typical / legal / in-the-box approaches are not working. 

In my opinion, we must exhaust all available options for remedies. In this way we can successfully rebut the agendists' claim that they have told us what we are doing, and that we are "going along with their program."

Natural & Common Law Tribunal Established to Address Gross Abuse of Power by UK’s Response to COVID-19

•Mar 27, 2020

Natural And Common Law Tribunal For Public Health And Justice: Judges Seven [UK] & Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd

Judge Seven [UK] -Plaintiff, High Court, SevenGate – Sued 10 corrupt corporations & individuals and won largest case in the history of international media broadcasting. Case: Seven vs. Gossage et al [Nine other defendants] Judge Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, Med -Judge, 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal -Judge, Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal -Certificate, Community Health Centers, Harvard -School of Public Health FINDINGS OF FACT & LAW DONE AND ISSUED THIS 26 DAY OF MARCH, 2020. TRIBUNAL

CONTACT: Email:

Skype: peaceinspace

Website: www.Peaceinspace.org

Natural & Common Law Tribunal Established to Address Gross Abuse of Power by UK’s Response to COVID-19 (Video)

WATCH ON TRUETUBE.CO: https://youtu.be/bxNOGKHQusE

ACCESS NEWSINSIDEOUT: https://newsinsideout.com/2020/03/nat...

Posted on March 28, 2020 by State of the Nation https://stateofthenation.co/?p=10085

===

FOURTH TRIBUNAL on the Corona Pandemic

WORLD DOCTORS ALLIANCE

WORLD DOCTORS ALLIANCE

UNITING AROUND THE WORLD WITH INTEGRITY AND RIGHT ACTION.

WHEN GOOD SCIENCE IS SUPPRESSED: KAMRAN ABBASI, EXECUTIVE EDITOR, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL.

FIRST DO NO HARM

 

Today the World Freedom Alliance demands accountability from the Press in Sweden.

07. June 2020

Tune in at 1 pm CET for the World Freedom Alliance, live from Sweden, Stockholm at the center of the Swedish press.

Maneka Helleberg will be holding the Swedish Press accountable by delivering a Notice of Liability  letting them know that their lies and deceit regarding COVID-19 will no longer be acceptable. Spread the word!  

We are demanding the press take responsibility for their actions and start reporting the truth.

Live stream on Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?v=328635632122296&ref=notif&notif_id=1623064707921586&notif_t=live_video

June 7, 2021

WORLD FREEDOM ALLIANCE: STOCKHOLM PART 1

WORLD DOCTORS ALLIANCE

Original Removed by the criminal censors of GooTube

This documentary surrounds the establishment of the World Freedom Alliance (WFA) in Stockholm, Sweden, in November 2020.
The World Freedom Alliance will provide a worldwide platform linking with various associations and organisations offering access to justice, true dialogue for health science and politics while holding worldwide officials to account under the law.

We will offer transparent evidence-based solutions and encourage robust debate with media, scientists and governments to ensure our fundamental freedoms of the people of the world are restored and maintained.

Our mission is to PROTECT our cherished freedoms, PROMOTE collaborations and links between groups of doctors, scientists, lawyers, professionals and freedom campaigners worldwide.

We will PROVIDE transparent analysis of the data for business and innovative solutions to build a wonderful world for us, our children and future generations.

President of the WFA - Prof Dolores Cahill, a professor in Molecular Biology and Immunology.
Vice President of the WFA - Heiko Schöning, M.D, a founding member of ACU2020.org
Chairman of the WFA - Maneka Helleberg, Chairman of People’s Court and Member of New Earth.
Legal Advisor for the WFA - Martin Byrne, Barrister at Law practising in the Superior Courts, Dublin.
Treasurer of WFA - Mads Palsvig, Chairman of Political Party JFK21, a former investment banker.
General Secretary for the WFA - Fiona Hine, Political Activist and Events Manager, Founder of CoviLeaks.

see also: https://www.vaccinechoiceprayercommunity.org/blog/introducing-the-world-freedom-alliance

WORLD FREEDOM ALLIANCE STOCKHOLM PART 2

WORLD DOCTORS ALLIANCE

Original Removed by the criminal censors of GooTube

===

THIRD TRIBUNAL on the Corona Pandemic

The Corona Investigation Committee

Close to 300 hours of public hearings by the SCR team of four lawyers in Germany - see all SESSIONS HERE and the overview.

===

SECOND TRIBUNAL on the Corona Pandemic

ACU - Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss

Alle Bürger können Vorschläge für Sachverständige machen -   www.acu2020.org

All citizens can provide suggestions for experts -   www.acu2020.org

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Watch all hearings HERE and HERE and HERE or via www.acu2020.org

see also 11 August 2020 BEFRAGUNG DER CORONA-TASKFORCE AUSTRIA

===

FIRST TRIBUNAL on the Corona Pandemic

PROLOG 01. June 2021: It is absolutely astonishing and appalling that only after over a year from when the statements below were made, the U.S. administration and the mainstream media start realizing the truth - while previously they targeted the ITNJ with slander.

CAVEAT LECTOR: The internet is spiked with some negative statements and reports about the ITNJ [International Natural Justice Tribunal (ITNJ.org)]. Why do we then still list the Tribunal Hearings on COVID-19 here?

a) The most important reason is that those who had testified did provide very important and fact-checked information. The testimonies e.g. of Dr. David E. Martin or Prof. Dr. D. Cahill et. al. present very crucial details which will also play a serious role in the trials that will bring the criminals in the Corona crisis to justice.

b) Nobody has provided to us the evidence for the slanderous musings propagated on the internet by the ITNJ-critics on the internet and we know - also from own past experiences - that defamation and slander are the last resort of those, who do not hold evidence for any wrongdoing, but need to stop an action or campaign and essentially want to stop the truth to come to light.

===

​EMERGENCY HEARINGS​ 2020

Watch all the testimonies https://commission.itnj.org

Emergency Tribunal Hearing 7 - Corona Pandemic and the Planetary Shutdown - Dr Dolores Cahill - Dr Mikael Nordfors

On 9th June, 2020 the ITNJ heard the testimonies of Prof. Dolores Cahill & Mikael Nordfors - 7th Seating
They gave testimony to the ITNJ. 

Corona Emergency Hearing 7 on BITCHUTE

On 22nd May, 2020 the ITNJ heard from Andrew Wakefield & Dr. Sherri Tenpenny - 6th Seating 

They gave testimony to the ITNJ

Corona Emergency Hearing 6 on BITCHUTE

BACKUP on Brighteon

Corona Emergency Hearing 5 Dr David E Martin and Pastor Dr Aaron Lewis 2020-05-07

On 7th May, 2020, the ITNJ heard the testimonies of Dr. David E. Martin and Pastor Dr. Aaron Lewis - 5th Seating

They gave testimony to the ITNJ Commission of Inquiry into Weaponisation of the Biosphere.

Corona Emergency Hearing 5 on BITCHUTE

Corona Emergency Hearing 4 Dr Rashid A. Buttar and Dr Judy Mikovits 2020-04-30

Corona Emergency Hearing #4: Dr. Rashid Buttar & Dr. Judy Mikovits - 4th Seating

Original Removed by the criminal censors of GooTube "This video has been removed for violating YouTube's Community Guidelines."

On the 28th April, 2020, Dr Rashid A. Buttar, DO, FAAPM, FACAM, FAAIM and Dr. Judy Mikovits, Molecular Biologist, gave testimony to the ITNJ Commission of Inquiry into Weaponisation of the Biosphere.

Corona Emergency Hearing #4 on BITCHUTE

Emergency-Tribunal-Hearing-Corona-Pandemic-and-the-Planetary-Shutdown-2020-04-13-3rd-seating

Emergency Tribunal Hearing: Corona Pandemic and the Planetary Shutdown - 3rd Seating ((picture link goes to the BITCHUTE backup)

Original Removed by the criminal censors of GooTube "This video has been removed for violating YouTube's Community Guidelines."

On 13th April, 2020 the ITNJ held its third sitting of the Emergency Tribunal Hearing: Corona Pandemic and the Planetary Shutdown.
ITNJ Founder – Sacha Stone moderates this hearing with:
ITNJ Commissioner, Dr. Sandra Rose Michael
Former CIA Spy – Robert David Steele
German Frontline Physician, Dr. in Virology – Dr. Jo (Witness Protected)
Expert on Stealth Adapted Viruses –Dr. John Martin MD, PhD
Paramount Chief: Ivory Coast – Chief Sylvestre Gnakale
Fmr. Snr. Veteran UN Nurse & Currently commissioned to the USNS Mercy & Comfort Hospital Ships – Paula Woodley
Natural and Common Law Tribunal for Public Health and Justice – Judge Alfred Lambremont Webre
Natural and Common Law Tribunal for Public Health and Justice – Judge Seven
ITNJ Trustee – Thomas J. Brown
ITNJ Trustee –Dr. Nancy Ash,
ITNJ Chief Justice – Sir John Walsh of Brannagh.

BANNED Corona Emergency Hearing 3 on BITCHUTE

Emergency-Tribunal-Hearing-Corona-Pandemic-and-the-Planetary-Shutdown-2020-04-09-1

Emergency Tribunal Hearing: Corona Pandemic and the Planetary Shutdown - 2nd Seating

On the 7th April 2020, the ITNJ held an emergency hearing to discuss the Corona Pandemic and the Planetary Shutdown.

ITNJ Founder – Sacha Stone with Commissioners, Del Bigtree, G. Edward Griffin, Dr. Sandra Rose Michael, Former CIA Spy – Robert David Steele, Filmmaker – Sean Stone along with ITNJ Trustee – Thomas J. Brown and Chief Justice – Dr John Walsh of Brannagh.

Emergency Tribunal Hearing #2 on BITCHUTE

Emergency Hearing #2 (Highlights)

Link to Sean Stone’s short film: ‘Singularity’. https://m.imdb.com/video/vi2602107673

Emergency 5G Coronavirus Hearing 2020-04-02

Emergency 5G: Coronavirus Hearing (picture link goes to the BITCHUTE backup)

Original Removed by the criminal censors of GooTube "This video has been removed for violating YouTube's Community Guidelines."

On the 2nd of April 2020, the ITNJ held an emergency hearing to discuss 5G and possible connection to the CoronaVirus / COVID19.

Attending: Sacha Stone – ITNJ Founder, Robert David Steele – Fmr. CIA Spy, Mark Steele – Weapons Expert, Sue Grey – ITNJ Commissioner, Dounne Alexander, MBE – ITNJ Commissioner , Tomas J Brown – ITNJ Trustee

Emergency Tribunal Hearing #1 on BITCHUTE

Emergency Tribunal Hearing #1 on BITCHUTE - BACKUP

Emergency Corona Hearing #1 (Highlights)

Sacha Stone - ITNJ Founder, Sir John Walsh of Brannagh - IJNJ Chief Justice, Robert David Steele - Fmr. CIA Spy, Mark Steele - Weapons Expert, Sue Grey - ITNJ Commissioner, Dounne Alexander, MBE - ITNJ Commissioner , Thomas J Brown - ITNJ Trustee"

covid ~ divoc (word flipped) ~ hebrew possessed, meme virus

Don't panic: Its mostly harmless https://is.gd/QP6CJ7

Patent CORONAVIRUS application filed July 23 2015 and granted November 20 2019 so do the math https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/1d/4e/4a/ac8914e765d645/EP3172319B1.pdf

As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious diseases (HCID) in the UK. https://is.gd/gbBKn3

URGENT WARNING FOR AMERICA + https://is.gd/jaPDgp

World Economic Forum Strategic Intelligence Global Issue COVID-19 project overview https://intelligence.weforum.org/topics/a1G0X000006O6EHUA0?tab=publications

Petition: 26,000 Scientists Oppose 5G Roll Out - The Flu Is an "Electrical Disease" - The Axe Has a Wooden Handle https://abeldanger.blogspot.com/2020/03/petition-26000-scientists-oppose-5g.html

Good news. CV Part 6. Know the cause/know the solution. Take action today. Clive de Carle https://is.gd/5sgqPA

Claire Edwards: Electricity and flu connection may explain "coronavirus" https://is.gd/RONirq

2020 10 on top videos in right column https://is.gd/80GXZw

Watch all the testimonies https://commission.itnj.org

===

Tools, Resources and Information:

RULE- OF-LAW

Truth commissions

Extra-parlamentarian Investigation Committee in Austria

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR NATURAL JUSTICE

Universal Declaration of Human Rights | United Nations

Universal Declaration of Human Rights - Wikipedia

European Convention on Human Rights

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

United Nations Convention against Torture - Wikipedia

RESISTANCE & CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE

---

---

The Nuremberg Code

NURENBERG TRIAL - The Doctor Trial

On December 9, 1946, an American military tribunal opened criminal proceedings against 23 leading German physicians and administrators for their willing participation in war crimes and crimes against humanity. This case is known as the "Doctors Trial"  (USA v. Karl Brandt et. al).

<p>Chart used by the prosecution in the Doctors' Trial illustrates the organization of the Medical Services of the Wehrmacht (German armed forces). Nuremberg, Germany, December 9, 1946-August 20, 1947.</p>

In order to provide for a fair trial and justice the court had to conclude on "Permissible Medical Experiments", which subsequently was compiled as the ‘Nuremberg Code’ and remains as a landmark document on medical ethics and one of the most lasting products of the "Doctors Trial."

Nuremberg Code
Rights enunciated in the 1947 Nuremberg Code are for the protection of individuals being studied in research protocols. If the case can be made that a population is being studied as research subjects, then provisions of the Nuremberg Code would apply to individuals in that population

The Nuremberg Code

(1947)

The great weight of the evidence before us is to the effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

1.The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion, and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random or unnecessary in nature.

3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problems under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

5.No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur, except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill, and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

From Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No 10 , Vol. II. Nuremberg, Germany, October 1946 - April 1949.

This document is the basis for subsequent codes governing all research which involves human subjects. Cf. codes by the American Medical Association, The World Medical Assembly’s declaration in Helsinki (1964) and revised in 1975 and 1983, The American Psychological Association, The Department of Defense, etc.

DOWNLOAD PDF

---

Thomas Buergenthal describes international tribunals

Judge Thomas Buergenthal was one of the youngest survivors of the Auschwitz and Sachsenhausen concentration camps. He immigrated to the United States at the age of 17. Judge Buergenthal has devoted his life to international and human rights law. A former chairman of the Museum’s Committee on Conscience, he is currently the Lobingier Professor of Comparative Law and Jurisprudence at the George Washington University Law School and served for a decade as the American judge at the International Court of Justice in The Hague. He served as a judge and president of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and of the Administrative Tribunal of the Inter-American Development Bank, and was the first US national to be elected to the UN Human Rights Committee, a member of the UN Truth Commission for El Salvador, and vice chairman of the Claims Resolution Tribunal for Dormant Accounts in Switzerland. With a unique perspective shaped by his experiences as a Holocaust survivor and international jurist, Judge Buergenthal has taught at several leading law schools and written more than a dozen books and numerous articles on international law and human rights.

The difference between Nuremberg and the ICC [International Criminal Court] of course, or the ICTY (the Yugoslav tribunal), is that the Nuremberg tribunal of course was a tribunal that consisted of judges drawn from the four victor countries and it was established by them, whereas these tribunals -- the Yugoslav tribunal and the Rwanda tribunal -- have been established by the Security Council. And the ICC has been established by treaty and the judges come from all parts of the world. That's progress, and in a sense it shows that it's not only one group of the international community but the entire international community which has an interest in these institutions and has a part in it.

---

The Difference of the Nurenberg Trial of 1947 and the IITCC

Since the ICC (Interational Criminal Court in The Hague) is not recognized by the USA, whose government, that has not subscribed to the Rome Statute, and corporations are key in the Corona Crisis, little hope can be placed into the ICC to indict, put on trial or to be able to prosecute those found guilty for te committed warcrimes like genocide or crimes against humanity.

Since also the Security Council (SC) of the United Nations (UN) cannot be trusted in the case of the Corona Crisis, because of the involvement of key governments that make the decicions in the SC and the clear guilt of the World Health Organization (WHO) in the planned pandemic, a new formula must be engaged to establish the IITCC.

It has been proposed (VF et. al.) that the international community will have to come together in a real WORLD ASSEMBLY comprising of states that are presently members of the UN, but who can at the same time proudly state that they are sovereign, independent and not implicated in the Corona Crisis, as well as all First Nations and large communities of Indigenous peoples. It is believed that the first group of countries still resembles the majority of the current UN member-states' assembly, but with the addition of the Indigenous Nations, this body would then be even much more representative for the whole world community than the present UN itself. Together as allied forces the peoples of this world then can declare their victory over the Corona p(l)andemic and establish the IITCC just like the Nuremberg Trial was implemented by the victors of the war after WWII. The establishment of the IITCC is already overdue. 

All acting heads of government of the 196+ states of the UN (United Nations), who do not support this process to establish the truth and to prosecute those found guilty, must themselves be automatically brought before the International Criminal Court (ICC) as war criminals and held responsible immediately for their deeds and/or collaboration in the current crimes against humanity.

---

International Human Rights Declarations, Conventions and Charters Relevant to Environmental Concerns

These documents are also available online at The University of Minnesota Human Rights Library, an online searchable collection of Human Rights documents, treaties, bibliographies and other educational materials

===

HISTORY:

Copy of an original letter signed by Adolf Hitler authorizing the T4 (Euthanasia) program.

Photograph | Photograph Number: 67072

Copy of an original letter signed by Adolf Hitler authorizing the T4 (Euthanasia) program.

The text of the letter states that "Reichsleiter [Philipp] Bouhler and Dr. med. [Karl] Brandt are charged with responsibility to broaden the authority of certain doctors to the extent that [persons] suffering from illnesses judged to be incurable may, after a humane, most careful assessment of their condition, be granted a mercy death. [signed] Adolf Hitler."

Copy of an original letter signed by Adolf Hitler authorizing the T4 (Euthanasia) program.

The text of the letter states that "Reichsleiter [Philipp] Bouhler and Dr. med. [Karl] Brandt are charged with responsibility to broaden the authority of certain doctors to the extent that [persons] suffering from illnesses judged to be incurable may, after a humane, most careful assessment of their condition, be granted a mercy death. [signed] Adolf Hitler."

===

The Doctors Trial: The Medical Case of the Subsequent Nuremberg Proceedings

 

Historical Photographs

  • Brigadier General Telford Taylor, Chief of Counsel, during the Doctors Trial, which was held in Nuremberg, Germany, from December 9, 1946, to August 20, 1947.

    Brigadier General Telford Taylor, Chief of Counsel, during the Doctors Trial, which was held in Nuremberg, Germany, from December 9, 1946, to August 20, 1947.

On December 9, 1946, an American military tribunal opened criminal proceedings against 23 leading German physicians and administrators for their willing participation in war crimes and crimes against humanity. In Nazi Germany, German physicians planned and enacted the Euthanasia Program, the systematic killing of those they deemed "unworthy of life." The victims included people with severe psychiatric, neurological, or physical disabilities. Further, during World War II, German physicians conducted pseudoscientific medical experiments utilizing thousands of concentration camp prisoners without their consent. Most died or were permanently injured as a result. Most of the victims were Jews, Poles, Russians, and also Roma (Gypsies). After almost 140 days of proceedings, including the testimony of 85 witnesses and the submission of almost 1,500 documents, the American judges pronounced their verdict on August 20, 1947. Sixteen of the doctors were found guilty. Seven were sentenced to death. They were executed on June 2, 1948.

In commemoration of the fiftieth anniversary of the Doctors Trial, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum presented excerpts from the official trial record, with accompanying photographs:

Sentences

The defendants Paul Rostock, Kurt Blome, Siegfried Ruff, Hans Wolfgang Romberg, Georg August Weltz, Konrad Schaefer, and Adolf Pokorny were judged not guilty of the charges listed in the indictment.

The defendants sentenced to death - KARL BRANDT, KARL GEBHARDT, RUDOLF BRANDT, JOACHIM MRUGOWSKY, WOLFRAM SIEVERS, VIKTOR BRACK, WALDEMAR HOVEN - were hanged at Landsberg prison in Bavaria on June 2, 1948.

The sentences of the remaining defendants were reduced during the appeal process: SIEGFRIED HANDLOSER and KARL GENZKEN's sentences were commuted to 20 years; OSKAR SCHROEDER, GERHARD ROSE and, FRITZ FISCHER's to 15 years; HERMANN BECKER-FREYSENG, WILHELM BEIGLBOECK, and HERTA OBERHEUSER's to 10 years; and HELMUT POPPENDICK's to time served.

One key culprit JOSEF MENGELE, also known as the Angel of Death, who was a German Schutzstaffel officer and physician during World War II, esacped and was never tried.

He is mainly remembered for his actions at the Auschwitz concentration camp, where he performed deadly experiments on prisoners, and was a member of the team of doctors who selected victims to be killed in the gas chambers as well as one of the doctors who administered the deadly gas.

Nickname(s): Angel of Death (German: Todesengel), White Angel (German: der weiße Engel or weißer Engel), Wolfgang Gerhard (burial name)

Born: March 16, 1911, Günzburg, Kingdom of Bavaria, German Empire

Died: February 7, 1979, South Atlantic Ocean, off Bertioga, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil

Until he died Mengele was an unrepentant Nazi, who claimed he had never personally harmed anyone and only carried out his duties as an officer.

If he had been tried in Nuremberg he would have received several death sentences.                   Josef Mengele

===

V For Vendetta: Pathogen Path To Power

•Feb 10, 2008 - One of the greatest scenes in V For Vendetta. It's the story behind the entire movie.