UPDATE 06. June 2021: China’s Bioweapons Hatchery Included Numerous Chinese Research Centers Like Those in Wuhan and U.S. Collaborators as Well
UPDATE 05. June 2021: REPORT: High-Ranking Chinese Defector Working With DIA Has ‘Direct Knowledge’ of China’s Bioweapons Program—and It’s Very Bad #UnrestrictedBioweapon
UPDATE 04. June 2021: EXCLUSIVE: High-Ranking Chinese Defector Has 'Direct Knowledge' of Several Chinese Special Weapons Programs + Chinese virologist says Fauci’s emails ‘verify’ her Wuhan lab leak claims
UPDATE 29. May 2021: Canadian Connection
UPDATE 24. May 2021: This World has become crazy: What we had reported since January 2020 and consistently continued to report and provide evidence, only now comes slowly into the mainstream. Gravitas | COVID Origins: What happened inside the Wuhan Lab in November 2019?
UPDATE 21. May 2021: PRESSURE CONTINUES ON VIRUS ORIGIN
UPDATE 19. May 2021: PODCAST: China Lied, People Died Inside China's Death Labs
UPDATE 13. May 2021: VISUAL PROOF: Bioweapon Spike Protein - BILLIONS Injected Into EVERYONE!
UPDATE 09. May 2021: Chinese document discussing weaponising coronaviruses provides 'chilling' information + EXCLUSIVE: BILLIONS in US Money, Knowledge and Skills Were GIVEN to China’s Virus Research Programs, Ultimately Resulting to COVID-19 Pandemic + Insane Biden Wants to Rely on China, the WHO (Led by a Ranking Member from a Terrorist Nation), and a Conflicted US Doctor, to Investigate COVID-19 Origins
UPDATE 01. May. 2021: Explosive! WaPo Reporter Tells Joe Rogan: Fauci Behind Wuhan COVID-19 Leak
UPDATE 20. April 2021: Chinese Agent Charles Lieber & His Virus Transmitters
UPDATE 18. April 2021: Wake up and fight back! Covid-19 vaccines depopulation plan exposed!
UPDATE 17. April 2021: Chinese Communist Party Constructing Nearly 100 More Bio Labs Like at Wuhan Institute of Virology
UPDATE 14. April 2021: Harvard/MIT Researcher: COVID Definitely Could Have Leaked From a Lab
UPDATE 12. April 2021: Scientific community rejects WHO report on origin of Covid-19
UPDATE 08. April 2021: SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028: A Repeat Rehearsal of Event 201?
UPDATE 04. April 2021: Emergency Broadcast! World Shocked By SPARS 2025-2028 Document
UPDATE 02. April 2021: Dr. Yan: Covid-19 is a Chinese Military Bioweapon That Can Be Used More Than Once
UPDATE 30. March 2021: SECRET HARVARD AGENT CHARLES LIEBER’s WUHAN LAB ACTIVITIES TIE U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY AND CHINESE MILITARY TO COVERT COVID NANO-VACCINOLOGY CONFIRMING THE ‘PLANDEMIC‘. + The covid bio-terrorism trail leads back to CCP collaborators, Anthony Fauci and Peter Daszak
PROLOGUE: What ECOTERRA has been emphasising since January 2020, namely that SARS-CoV-2 is a man-made pathogen, has been clearly confirmed by several independent scientists. Therefore now the clear demand: Lock and freeze immediately all Chinese, USAmerican, Dutch and French assets worldwide for the compensation of all people damaged by the global disaster !!! The final evidence provided below adds to 21 already proven facts: Covid-19 Was Planned for New World Order - China, the USA, France and Holland must be held accountable for the creation and others - like Canada, Italy, Germany et al. and especially the UN/WHO, who colluded in these crimes against humanity, must be brought to justice in a Nuremberg style trial too. All acting heads of government of the 196+ states of the UN (United Nations) who do not support these demands must themselves be automatically brought before the International Criminal Court (ICC) as war criminals and held responsible immediately for their collaborationinthe current crimes against humanity.
ICYMI: Important: Revised version of the evidence collection on COVID-19 by Pofessor Jean-Bernard Fourtillan et al.: The contagion set free in Wuhan is the one patented by the French Pasteur Institute + Dr. Robert Redfield, Former CDC Director, Says He Believes Virus 'Escaped' From Lab In Wuhan + Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney: ‘We are in World War III. We did not have a pandemic… we had a biological attack’ + + The Overwhelming Evidence of the Origin of the COVID-19 Pandemic Was Covered Up by US Government Officials, US Scientific Authorities and Their Chinese Counterparts + EXCLUSIVE: New Evidence Shows U.S. Government and the American Scientific Establishment Involved in Cover Up of COVID-19’s Origin + New Study By Dr. Steven Quay Concludes that SARS-CoV-2 Came from a Laboratory - 99.8% probability + Top government official says China lab leak “most credible” source of coronavirus outbreak + Investigators to probe 'hidden' Wuhan virus theory + 2015: Lab-made coronavirus triggers debate + Jane Bürgermeister - pandemic update 25 June 2012 (swine-flu and prediction for the next pandemic)
MUST WATCH 24. December 2020: VIDEO: YOUR FUTURE THE SPARS PANDEMIC 2025 TO 2028 - Diana Lenska
HISTORY CHECK: Japan's secret Unit 731 – where biological warfare was conceived + The Manic Experiments Performed By Nazi Doctors + The Crimes of The Auschwitz Doctors + Japan's Secret World War II Death Lab + The technology has far advanced, but the mentality hasn't changed: BEFORE CORONAVIRUS... BIO-WARFARE STARTED BY US NAVY IN 1952
IMPORTANT BACKGROUND: 'PROJECT COAST' HAS NOW BEEN EXPANDED TO ATTACK THE WHOLE WORLD + List of publicly known BSL-4 facilities worldwide - secret laboratories do exist.
-- likewise important: CUI BONO? - or "There exit Coincidences, that possibly couldn't exist at all!"
CHINA DEVELOPED SARS-CoV-2 AS NANO-WEAPON SINCE 15 YEARS
- Internationally binding Nano-Weapon Convention demanded -
The evidence proofs now that the nano-bio-chemical contagion SARS-CoV-2 and also the widely unknown SARS-CoV-3 is worked on in China since at least 2007 - without international oversight, control or scrutiny.
New global assembly of honest Nations must implement the Independent International Trial on Covid (IITC) to clean up and stop th madness.
By Venatrix Fulmen - 29. March 2021 - Deutsche Version - engl. version updated 10. May 2021
"A mysterious new type of pneumonia linked to a seafood market in Wuhan, China, is caused by a novel coronavirus", Chinese state media reported on 09. January 2020, but did not reveal that in Germany a virologist with the name Dr. Drosten already had worked since new years eve on a potential test array for the contagion based on information he allegedly had received from Chinese researchers..
At the time, when the World Health Organization (WHO) finally released the information they had received from China concerning an outbreak of a contagious respiratory disease, the discredited organization of the United Nations (UN) called the pathogen at first Novel Coronavirus and dubbed it "2019-nCoV" on 21. January 2020. They based this on a quickly published study from China, which had been investigating patients with pneumonia, whereby a SARS-like coronavirus was allegedly isolated by Chinese scientists, who called their group 'the China Novel Coronavirus Investigating and Research Team'. From 20. January 2020 onward fear was spread, but no true and no substantial background information came forward - only piecemeal, though the knowledge was there.
For several weeks this terminus '2019-nCoV' was then used for the vector of the very fast spreading disease outbreak until the WHO called a special session in Geneva, identified with the help of a group on virus specialists on 11. February 2020 the contagion as SARS-CoV-2 and they baptized the disease it causes as CoViD-19 - short for 'Corona Virus Disease 2019' or as commonly written today: COVID-19.
But, was this the first time insiders and specialists had heard of SARS-CoV-2?
The answer to this question can now be given by stating a clear NO and it must be assumed that at the meeting in Geneva those with a deeper knowledge in the virus and bio-weapon research fields advised that the contagion could under no circumstances be called "novel" in any way. Right they were and they may have even revealed a bit more from their expertise to the UN bureaucrats and told them what is really going on concerning SARS in the secretive weapons-labs of the world. These whispers might have triggered the first big fear-response that made it to the politicians and scientists the world over and via mainstream- and gutter-press later to the public. This fear soon evolved into a fear-strategy that was then only convenient for those, who wanted to create an economic crisis anyway, and as such was also worked out in detail by government psychologists in their consulting papers - even for media control.
SARS-COV-2 Research - was conducted since at least 2007 in China and published in 2008
Indeed, it is even not really hidden, but at least since 2007 research on - among others - specifically the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome causing coronavirus types SARS-CoV1 and SARS-CoV2 was conducted in China. The evidence is provided below further down in form of the peer reviewed study by Wei et al.
The EU funding for this type of R&D (Research and Development) actually started already in 2004 and the "French Connection" was a driving force.
"In the ocean of virology studies we have found a dozen with the use of the now burning SARS-HIV combination, also previously carried out: in Beijing in 2004 and 2005, in New York in 2005, in Switzerland and Taiwan in 2006," writes investigating journalist Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio, who also looks into the Mafia ties between Big Parma and the Italian government.
'But it wasn’t the European Parliament that put a potential deadly weapon in the hands of the cynical scientists of the Chinese Communist Party. No. It was that technical body of political appointment called the European Commission through a specific project called Program EPISARS of which, mysteriously, almost all traces on the web have disappeared…," he states.
"Today, however, we have irrefutable proof that a Genetically Modified Organism had already been engineered in China 13 years ago, with analogous molecular biologic characteristics as the ones found by illustrious scientists in the genomic sequences of the new devastating and highly deadly SARS-CoV-2 viral strain," he adds.
Since it was done with at least co-funding provided by the European Union (EU), also Brussels and thereby all the EU member-states must or should have been aware of these facts. Cross-references certainly still can and must be traced at the EU. (Whistle-blowers can drop further information - also anonymously - by email to a relatively secure mailbox )
Prof. Fourtillan of France even goes a step further and points directly to the French Insitut Pasteur. But his papers are also a source for some confusion, because he insists that the very contagion the world calls today SARS-CoV-2 was patented as a 'virus' named 'COVID-19' by the Pasteur Institute, though with the term 'COVID-19' nowadays everbody means the disease.
However, he and the Pasteur Institute will have to clarify this at the Covid Trials, where it then also will have to be clarified, if the secretive French bio-weapons research collaborated by giving their patented strain only to China, where money from the French taxpayers had financed and built the BSL-4 laboratory at the Wuhan Institute for Virology, or also to the BSL-4/P4 lab in Winnipeg, Canada. What also would be important to know are the answers to the question, if the on-going research was set-up to continue gain of function development of the contagion or to develop an antidote or 'vaccine' - most likely it was and is for both.
Prof. Fourtillan even goes so far as to state that, though the Chinese researchers had the patented 'virus' they were given from France, it was not them but the French themselves who released it into the wild at Wuhan.
|The head of the infectious disease research center of the Wuhan Institute of Virology Shi Zhengli is a close friend of Peter Daszak.|
What is also clear is that the USA gave SARS-CoV-2 variants to the CCP to be further worked on at WIV and Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and at present a member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force paid the $3.7 million the U.S. granted to China for coronavirus research in 2014 of which a substantial part went to the Wuhan lab and the rest to Peter Daszak of meanwhile infamous 'EcoHealth' and his Chinese counterpart, a lady dubbed 'bat-woman', Shi Zhengli, the head of the Center for Research on Infectious Diseases in China.
Former mayor turned Trump-attorney Rudy Giuliani suspected China was experimenting with viruses at the lab for the purpose of "weaponizing them."
"Despite that, Dr. Fauci gave $3.7 million to the Wuhan laboratory — and then even after the State Department issued reports about how unsafe that laboratory was, and how suspicious they were in the way they were developing a virus that could be transmitted to humans," Giuliani reportedly said.
In the meantime, however, it is believed that this story, which was peddled to the mainstream media and made the headlines worldwide, was only a red herring thrown out to distract the media from the narrative China had provided, which culminated in the official CCP statement accusing the Americans to have spread the 'virus' already at the time of the Military Olympics in autumn 2019.
The U.S. media, however, also created with the transfer story the wrong impression that the USA had given up bio-weapon research on U.S. soil. But Obama’s 2014 temporary ban on government funding for such “dual-use” research didn't last. The moratorium was lifted in 2017 and experiments have continued. Enhanced Potential Pandemic Pathogens (PPPs) experiments are still legal in the USA. Such experiments aim to increase the transmissibility and/or virulence of pathogens.
In addition and to make it even more difficult to untangle the origin sagas - and now it get interesting - fact is that the strain that infected the people in Taiwan clearly did not come from China, as established by Taiwanese top-virologists. It was a completely different strain and variant, which only Australia an the USA had at the time. Since Taiwan was not infected by Australians, the infection in Taiwan could have come only from the USA. The basic logic thereby is that the geographical location with the greatest diversity of virus strains must be the original source - since a single strain cannot emerge from nothing. Only the USA had all the five known strains of the virus (while Wuhan and most of China have only one, as do Taiwan and South Korea - Korea and Taiwan have a different haplotype - Thailand and Vietnam, Singapore, and England, Belgium and Germany), constituting a thesis that the haplotypes in other nations may have originated in the USA. The earliest known strain of the virus, termed by the scientists as "Type A", is commonly detected in the US and Australia. Type A is the ancestral strain
Neither Iran nor Italy were included in the above tests, but both countries have now deciphered the locally prevalent genome and have declared them of different varieties from those in China, which means they did not originate in China but were for sure introduced from another source. The haplotype in Iran appears to be the deadliest of all with a very high fatality rate. Iran suffered - unlike all other countries - from real excess mortality. The point, however, is here again that this is known since now over a year, but the truth - revealing how Iran was infected with this aggressive strain - has not been independently established.
'Virus Ping-Pong' - Spread and dissemination of the 5 different SARS-Cov-2 strains and 8 variants spring 2020
It is important to note that empirically collected data on 'SARS-like' illnesses show that the pathogens were already circulating for example in East Africa in October 2019 with severe cases and deaths peaking in November that year. But most cases of the subsequently developing pneumonia were treated successfully with the known and traditional medicines. This is why for example Tanzania refused to give into the hype that was triggered internationally from February 2020 onwards.
However, in August of 2019 the US had a flurry of lung pneumonias or similar, which the Americans blamed on 'vaping' from e-cigarettes, but which, according to the scientists, had symptoms and conditions that could not be explained by e-cigarettes.
Immediately prior to that, the CDC totally shut down the U.S. Military's main bio-lab at Fort Detrick, Maryland, because a leak had occured and based on subsequent findings that established the absence of safeguards against pathogen leakages. The CDC issued a complete "cease and desist" order to the military. Between 2005 and 2012 the USA had experienced 1,059 events where pathogens had either been stolen or escaped from American bio-labs - so much for bio-safety in the USA.
Screenshot from The New York Times August 08, 2019 Source © New York Times
We also had the Japanese citizens getting infected in September of 2019, and in Hawaii people, who had never been to China, got sick. These infections were clearly occurring on US soil long before the outbreak in Wuhan but only shortly after the locking down of Fort Detrick.
Fort Detrick, Maryland, actual source of the 'Wuhan' Flu?
There has been much public speculation that the coronavirus had been deliberately transmitted to China, but - according to Chinese sources - a less sinister alternative is possible: If some members of the U.S. team at the World Military Games (18-27. October 2019) had become infected by the vcontagion from an accidental outbreak at Fort Detrick, it is possible that, with a long initial incubation period, their symptoms might have been minor, and those individuals could easily have 'toured' the city of Wuhan during their stay, infecting potentially thousands of local residents in various locations
Unfortunately one sinister element remains: US troops are routinely vaccinated with god-only-knows-what, some of them as literal guinea pigs for highly experimental 'cutting-edge' body-enhancing or behavioural modification injections containing genetically modified DNA and mRNA strands - even from viral material - and thereby they could have spread what now is said to be infecting even those people that got the experimental anti-COVID-19 jabs that are globally rolled out.
J. Bart Classen, MD, stated earlier:
"A little over 30 years ago I trained in the Laboratory of Immunology, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, MD. I witnessed first hand what I concluded was an illegal bioweapons research operation. Not surprisingly to me one individual from a nearby NIH satellite facility, Fort Detrick in Fredrick Maryland, was linked to the anthrax attack in 2001. The result of the anthrax attack was that Congress infused billions of dollars for bioweapons “defense” research to NIAID. Since my training at NIAID I have been following the field of bioweapons closely. and "... concern existed about a bioweapons attack involving MMR vaccine. The aggressive campaign to immunize with MMR vaccine in 2018 –2019 became suspicious after CDC data showed the measles epidemic in the US all but vanished in the months surrounding the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein."
Classen also hints that the alleged severe E-Vaping Acute Lung Injury (EVALI) in THC vapers that occurred primarily in the USA starting in April of 2019 and peaked in September of 2019 were actually COVID-19 occurances from the leak at Ft. Detrick that was only sealed in July 2019.
These all are valuable hints in the quest, but the observations come from people who still follow the meanwhile debunked "germ-theory". They fail to walk the last mile to reach the already well developed research-field in which infamous Dr. Lieber and others were and are working: The creation of self-replicating and contagious nano-biochemical agents that act as toxins for human cells as well as the antidotes to such weapons in form of engineered gene-altering methods rendering human body-cells less susceptible to such attacks.
That such methods are now tested and already applied on a global scale, lets Claasen warn that the COVI-19 'vaccines' utilizing novel RNA technology are extremely dangerous and he assumes that these injections could be a bioweapon, which is even more dangerous than the original 'infection'. He concludes with a call that every decent human must fully support:
Many of us in the biomedical field have witnessed potential illegal bioweapons experiments in the civilian medical research field. We all must do our part to stop this activity and should not hesitate to report when we see questionable activity or we risk a future of recurrent bioweapons attacks. The only way we can truly stop bioweapons attacks is to become more open about reporting suspected illegal bioweapons research. We must demand individuals engaged in this activity are fully prosecuted. Failure to allow FBI agent Richard Lee Lambert to complete his investigation of the anthrax attack may have led to the problem we have today." - J. Bart Classen, MD
In public, however, only few raised the necessary questions so far or challenged the obvious lies peddled by the WHO or the governmental narratives on the whole timeline, though COVID-19 related patent registrations were revealed to have been filed pre-2019 and official test-kit ordering platforms for COVID-19 tests were found and still can be found on the internet - all with dates long ago and years before the actual spill and outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 that happened in 2019 and was declared "novel" by the culprits in 2020. The whole of all stories on the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market can safely be discarded.
The Whole World is Affected - The Whole World Has A Right To Know
From June 2021 onward it will in this context also be interesting to see who had filed which patent for what SARS-CoV-2 strain, variant or new creation since January 2020 with the European Patent Office, because from that time on the secrecy period of 18 months will expire. In 2003, when the SARS-CoV virus was discovered, several institutions were quick to unilaterally file patent applications for the total or partial sequence of the coronavirus genome. However, in the face of the global attack, we are of the opinion that all these "secrecies" must be stopped and a fully transparent investigation be made possible. There can no longer 'intellectual property rights' being protected, while the whole world suffers.
Despite the fact that Chinese scientists published in January 2019 their findings on the sequencing of the 2019-nCoV genome (or parts of it) of the contagion from a lung-swap taken from a sick patient, so far nobody has been able to prove the successful isolation and identification of the 'virus' and consequently the sequencing of the whole genome of the contagion is still missing. Even the CDC admitted that they simply do not have it. What is, however, going ballistic now is the sequencing of genetic information from patients that tested positive with the controversial PCR test, while, interestingly, most of those in charge of lockdown orders or other draconian measures imposed with medical-martial law, can often not even keep track of the mutations, the clades, strains or the variants.
Clear is so far only that the whole complex in terms of research and development of SARS-CoV-2 started much earlier than the CCP-paid WHO, while still maintaining the 'animal-origin' and 'animal-pathway' lies, the governments and certain deeply involved corporations want to admit and want the citizens of all and specifically the severely affected countries to know.
Consequently, and because even the recent and long-overdue WHO-mission to Wuhan in China did not reveal the slightest bit of evidence concerning the true origin of the outbreak, it once again must now not only be demanded to engage a truly independent investigation, but an International Triall in a similar form as the NUREMBERG TRIALS must be constituted and set in motion to reveal the truth and punish the culprits.
This has to be done also to prevent any similar or even worse pandemic, which seems to be not so far off, because the Chinese researchers already since 2007/8 are experimenting also with a potential pathogen classified already as SARS-CoV3 - as the peer-reviewed study cited below reveals. The peers therefore must likewise be questioned what this is all about.
To let truth and justice prevail - with a fully fledged Trial - and to come subsequently to more severe punishments for those engaged in gain of function or outright illegal bioweapon research that has terribly gone wrong or for those responsible for the subsequent crimes against humanity - ranging from cover-ups to strictly prohibited genome experiments on living humans without their consent - is more important than a new, toothless United Nations (UN) treaty that aims at just streamlining international 'vaccine' distribution or pandemic response-cost sharing. That elected heads-of-state - as B. Johnson, A. Merkel and E. Macron - can even hold consultations on such treaty, while a known war-criminal is still head of the WHO can only be interpreted in one way: The syndicates fostering and promoting crimes against humanity hold people in highest positions in their grip. Passages of secret contracts between Big Pharma and governments like Israel and Italy already have been revealed and proof the crimes as well as their deep entanglement in highly corrupt arrangements.
What is needed is not a UN treaty on global governance collusion against the people, but what is needed urgently is an internationally binding convention to outlaw nano-weapons, since the Biological Weapons Convention as well as the Chemical Weapons Convention are out-dated, not applicable in many cases of modern nano-weapon development and toothless.
«Finally we should be able to systematically check, when the “fake news” label is attributed to news where the news is in fact not a fake news but that of “the fake news labelling” is itself “a fake news“! Unfortunately, this is probably not the last pandemic due to reckless human actions on the wild environment (Bricage, 2011). The problem is that they are getting closer and closer and the associated viruses are getting more and more aggressive. How to stop this escalation of the violence of interactions between the human species and its host ecosystem? Should environmental faults be used as an alibi to hide technological faults, whatever the reasons? Primarily aren’t they all societal, economic or/and political faults?».
These words of French professor Pierre Bricage are a severe punch into the stomach of the culprits, because they hit and sink the battleship of the mainstream media and politics with the unstoppable power of human logic in search of truth.
Professor emeritus Pierre Bricage, biological engineer expert in molecular genetics and former NATO lecturer
«Why does it only deal with “conspiracies” against the consensual version of the accidental appearance of SARS-CoV-2 from a wild animal? Why are the aspects validating this track the only accepted and published ones? Why are papers dealing with non-consensual versions systematically rejected? Is there a global attempt to hide part of the reality and re-write the history of both the origin of the virus and the pandemic? Can we be a judge and a part of such an important investigation for humanity?»,
he added and declared that based on his findings the contagion is an engineered lab creation - whereby he agrees with Prof. Luc Montagnier, who also observed the three insertions of HIV strands in the Wuhan virus genome..
Iran addressed the issues at hand directly with the Secretary General of the UN:
Letter by Former President Ahmadinejad to the UN Secetary General - picture: courtesy of GOSPANEWS
«Nowadays, it is clear to the world people that the mutated and intelligent coronavirus 2019 was produced in laboratories, and more clearly put, by the warfare stock house of biologic war belonging to world hegemonic powers, and is much more anti-human, destructive and horrible than the other anti-human weapons such as the nuclear and chemical ones, as well as HAARP»,
wrote former Iranian President Mahmoud-Ahmadinejad in a letter sent to the UN Secretary General, Antonio Guterres, but he even didn't receive a response. With HAARP he referred to the High Altitude Aurora Research Project facility, which over many years had been influencing the ionosphere of Earth and thereby the weather. It has now been superseded with much more powerful weather-modification technologies.
«You are expected strongly slam the anti-human action by world criminal powers in imposing the biological war on nations, aimed at domineering, and don’t allow the perpetrators of such crimes realize their political-economic crimes and evil plans and avert justice and penalty through the United Nations, by white washing their crimes»
Ahmadinejad wrote to the UN Secretary General, but Antonio Gutérres remained inactive.
Likewise Cardinals from Italy wrote to the head of the UN and demanded like Cardinal Ranjith of Sri Lanka a Tribunal. Ranjith also demands a ban and does not have any doubts that the CoVid-19 pandemic is the result
«of experiments by a rich and powerful nation. Some viruses we are talking about these days are the product of unscrupulous trials. We must ban this type of experimentation that leads to the result of loss of life and causes pain and suffering to all humanity».
Cardinal Albert Malcom Ranjith, Archbishop of Colombo, capital of Sri Lanka
Back in 2015 a study was compiled by top Chinese scientists and key officials from the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) in form of a whole book with 263 pages that was presented to the CCP leadership. The study clearly states that already the 2003 SARS outbreak was a deliberate foreign 'terrorist attack' with a man-made 'virus'.
The Chinese now call these self-replicating and thereby contagious pathogens - like here SARS - a new generation of 'genetic weapons'.
Xu Dezhong, today renowned epidemiology professor at the 4th Military Medical University of Xi'an, was the leader of the 2003 SARS Epidemic Analysis Group under the Chinese Ministry of Health, which completed in 2015 its 236 pages Chinese-language study paper: 'The Unnatural Origin of SARS and New Species of Man-Made Viruses as Genetic Bioweapons' – presented to the Central Committee of the CCP and Chinese President Xi Jinping.
Among the key authors of the 2015 study is Li Feng, the former deputy director of China's Bureau of Epidemic Prevention and the editor-in-chief of the huge paper was the leader of the SARS Epidemic Analysis Group under the Chinese Ministry of Health, Xu Dezhong, today renowned epidemiology professor at the 4th Military Medical University of Xi'an. The CCP Central Committee was informed of their clear findings and since that time the CCP leadership, the Chinese military as well as civilian researchers in China as well as their students work and live in the consciousness that SARS was a deliberate attack on China by a foreign 'terrorist group using a man-made gene-weapon. This mind-set also influences everything concerning approach to SARS-CoV-2, because they not only worked themselves on a programme with which they weaponized that contagion per gain-of-function experiments specifically on the spike protein and its human cell docking mechanism.
While the global population is intentionally distracted by most governments (Tanzania and Sweden are the rare exceptions) and is kept occupied with totalitarian orders of testing, travel restrictions, lockdowns, mask wearing, school, church, restaurant and shop closures, several scientists and analyst state that we are in the middle of a real bio-warfare and that the answers to the question, why the superpowers obviously are not willing to track the original source of the contagion that keeps the world in oppression, are:
Because these governments as well as the United Nations organization and the European Union are
- all involved in the bio-warfare and its economic ramifications
- all guilty in the nano- and bio-weapons race in the one or the other way
- all earning from the medications, vaccines and tech gambits together with BigPharma and BigTech
- all having a reason to impose medical martial laws that makes their ruling and staying in power easier despite their political and social abuses
- all having easy excuses now to camouflage financial problems deriving originally from misuse of governmental funds, mismanagement and outright corruption.
Since the implementation of the Independent International Trial on Covid (IITC), which has to have an initial phase in form of a Truth-Commission collecting evidence against a 'nolle prosequi' guarantee for the contestants, will not come forward from those powerful states, who are most likely implicated and have to fear that they will have to stand trial, the international community will have to come together in a new assembly comprising of all states that are presently members of the UN, but can also proudly state that they are sovereign, independent and not implicated, as well as all First Nations. It is believed that the first group of nations still resembles the majority of the current UN member-states, but with the additon of the Indigenous Nations, this body would then be even much more representative for the world community than the UN itself. Together as allied forces they then can declare their victory over the p(l)andemic and establish the IITC just like the Nuremberg Trial was implemented after WWII. The establishment of the IITC is already overdue
If the allegations made by Prof. Fourtillan can be proven at the Independent International Trial, and the outbreak in Wuhan involved a contagion that was patented by the Institut Pasteur in France and given for further work (like gain of function, nano-technological enhancements, development of antidotes or vaccines etc.) to the Wuhan Institute for Virology (WIV), then not only China, which is still covering up on what it knows, but also France have to face a trial.
If at the Trials it also can be proven that Taiwan got infected by a strain that only was existing at the time in the USA (the only country that had all five strains at the time of summer and autumn 2019) also the USA has to stand trial. The arrest of Prof. Lieber is thereby of particular interest and the indictment documents of this case must be made public in full for everybody to see. So far the U.S. Department of Justice sems only to have concentrated on his lying about his contractual agrements with the Wuhan Institute of Voirology (WIV). But also all details of the spill and subsequent contamination of areas outside the biosafety lab at Fort Detrick in July 2019 that led to the infection and death of a good number of people, but was blamed by Trump foolishly on the misuse of e-cigarettes or vaporisers, needs to be brought to light with all specifics. From there the strain that infected Taiwan could have come. If the release of the Wuhan strain was then a calculated gamble by the CCP involving the brutal containment in the own country while at the same time sending infected agents all over the world (first target was obviously Italy) to cause the pandemic, or if it was planted – as the CCP claims - needs to be fully investigated and no more distraction invoking wet-markets or wildlife should blur the minds.
Closely linked to the U.S. bio-warfare programmes and the Chinese projects is Canada, whose governmental P4 lab in Winnipeg has or had until the incident with the two Chinese researchers, close cooperation with the Chinese bio-weapons experts and programmes. Canada held a certain link function between France, the USA and China in this field and also in the field of 5 G and Chinese microwave technology of Huawei that was blacklisted by Trump. The class action brought by representatives from the Canadian Indigenous First Nations might shed some light into the oppressive and obviously wrong orders of the Canadian government, but since that case is pending on the Canadian court system, which is under the full control of the British crown, it will most likely not be the right court to reveal also the truth on possible crimes against humanity and war crimes committed by the Trudeau governance and its bio-warfare programme. Like for other countries that only could be handled by an International Triall with powers to which also the USA would have to adhere. The ICC is nit the right court, because the USA have not signed the Rome treaty.
Since Iran got infected by a strain that also was not the original Wuhan ‘virus’, further investigations will have to reveal the most likely culprit, who brought and started the disease outbreak there – completely off track from any natural distribution pattern. The USA, Israel or Saudi Arabia as possible culprit comes to one’s mind. The Iran will know best and the fact that Israel with top-urgency vaccinates all its citizens by force shows that they possibly fear retaliation, because also Iran has the capability to develop more aggressive and maybe more lethal strains. That scenario might already be on, because it was said that in Israel even vaccinated people do now get sick with COVID-19.
The most logical interim conclusion of all the above is therefore that those analysts who claim that it is already an outright tit-for-tat biological warfare with an economic background are correct and as result of this findings the immediate constitution of the Independent International Trial is mandatory. Otherwise, the present nano-bio-chemical world war will further escalate and the present lockdowns etc. were only excercises for what will then be unleashed. The Trial is the last and only chance to stop this and let justice prevail through a legal process rather than armed uprisings.
READ ALSO: U.S. Top Spy Claims to Have No Clue on SARS-CoV-2 and search EVENT 201 and Gates, WHO, Wuhan Bio-Lab Hacked
"I have never heard of SARS-CoV-3" most readers will say - be they scientists or lay-wo/men - but alas the admission by the Chinese researchers is there in the open and known, though the strain is not yet reflected on NextStrain. The latter most likely only because the SARS-CoV-3 strain seems not to have yet been accidentally spilled into the open or intentionally been released into the wild:
RNase-resistant, noninfectious virus-like particles containing exogenous RNA sequences (armored RNA) are good candidates as RNA controls and standards in RNA virus detection. However, the length of RNA packaged in the virus-like particles with high efficiency is usually less than 500 bases. In this study, we describe a method for producing armored L-RNA. Armored L-RNA is a complex of MS2 bacteriophage coat protein and RNA produced in Escherichia coli by the induction of a two-plasmid coexpression system in which the coat protein and maturase are expressed from one plasmid and the target RNA sequence with modified MS2 stem-loop (pac site) is transcribed from another plasmid. A 3V armored L-RNA of 2,248 bases containing six gene fragments-hepatitis C virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV1, SARS-CoV2, and SARS-CoV3), avian influenza virus matrix gene (M300), and H5N1 avian influenza virus (HA300)-was successfully expressed by the two-plasmid coexpression system and was demonstrated to have all of the characteristics of armored RNA. We evaluated the 3V armored L-RNA as a calibrator for multiple virus assays. We used the WHO International Standard for HCV RNA (NIBSC 96/790) to calibrate the chimeric armored L-RNA, which was diluted by 10-fold serial dilutions to obtain samples containing 10(6) to 10(2) copies. In conclusion, the approach we used for armored L-RNA preparation is practical and could reduce the labor and cost of quality control in multiplex RNA virus assays. Furthermore, we can assign the chimeric armored RNA with an international unit for quantitative detection.
- Armored long RNA controls or standards for branched DNA assay for detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
Zhan S, Li J, Xu R, Wang L, Zhang K, Zhang R.J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Aug;47(8):2571-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00232-09. Epub 2009 Jun 3.PMID: 19494069 Free PMC article.
- Construction of armored RNA containing long-size chimeric RNA by increasing the number and affinity of the pac site in exogenous rna and sequence coding coat protein of the MS2 bacteriophage.
Wei B, Wei Y, Zhang K, Yang C, Wang J, Xu R, Zhan S, Lin G, Wang W, Liu M, Wang L, Zhang R, Li J.Intervirology. 2008;51(2):144-50. doi: 10.1159/000141707. Epub 2008 Jul 1.PMID: 18594159 Free PMC article.
- Preparation of armored RNA as a control for multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR detection of influenza virus and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus.
Yu XF, Pan JC, Ye R, Xiang HQ, Kou Y, Huang ZC.J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Mar;46(3):837-41. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01904-07. Epub 2007 Dec 26.PMID: 18160451 Free PMC article.
- [Preparation of armored RNA containing M gene of influenza H3N2].
Yu XF, Pan JC, Huang ZC, Ye R, Kou Y.Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi. 2007 Dec;21(4):343-5.PMID: 18322598 Chinese.
- [Emergent viruses: SARS-associate coronavirus and H5N1 influenza virus].
Goffard A, Lazrek M, Schanen C, Lobert PE, Bocket L, Dewilde A, Hober D.Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2006 May-Jun;64(3):195-208.PMID: 16698555 Review. French.
Cited by 17 articles
- Comparison of Seven Commercial Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Nucleic Acid Detection Reagents with Pseudovirus as Quality Control Material.
Yan Y, Chang L, Luo W, Liu J, Guo F, Wang L.J Mol Diagn. 2021 Mar;23(3):300-309. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.12.002. Epub 2020 Dec 29.PMID: 33383210 Free PMC article.
- A conceptual framework for the development of iridium(iii) complex-based electrogenerated chemiluminescence labels.
Chen L, Hayne DJ, Doeven EH, Agugiaro J, Wilson DJD, Henderson LC, Connell TU, Nai YH, Alexander R, Carrara S, Hogan CF, Donnelly PS, Francis PS.Chem Sci. 2019 Jul 31;10(37):8654-8667. doi: 10.1039/c9sc01391a. eCollection 2019 Oct 7.PMID: 31803440 Free PMC article.
- Development and Evaluation of a Novel Armored RNA Technology Using Bacteriophage Qβ.
Yao L, Li F, Qu M, Guo Y, Jiang Y, Wang L, Zhai Y.Food Environ Virol. 2019 Dec;11(4):383-392. doi: 10.1007/s12560-019-09400-5. Epub 2019 Aug 21.PMID: 31435846
- Immunogenicity evaluation of MS2 phage-mediated chimeric nanoparticle displaying an immunodominant B cell epitope of foot-and-mouth disease virus.
Wang G, Liu Y, Feng H, Chen Y, Yang S, Wei Q, Wang J, Liu D, Zhang G.PeerJ. 2018 May 23;6:e4823. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4823. eCollection 2018.PMID: 29844975 Free PMC article.
- Internal control for real-time polymerase chain reaction based on MS2 bacteriophage for RNA viruses diagnostics.
Zambenedetti MR, Pavoni DP, Dallabona AC, Dominguez AC, Poersch CO, Fragoso SP, Krieger MA.Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2017 May;112(5):339-347. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760160380. Epub 2017 Apr 6.PMID: 28403327 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
But already in 2003 the SUNSHINE PROJECT wrote:
The most frightening developments can currently be witnessed in the US, where new technology is being exploited to create new types of biological and biochemical weapons, including material degrading microorganisms and psychoactive chemicals, raising the spectre of a new biological and chemical arms race.
Genetic engineering can contribute to offensive BW programs in a variety of ways. With genetic manipulation, classical biowarfare agents such as anthrax or plague may be made more efficient weapons. Barriers to access to agents such as smallpox, Ebola or the Spanish flu1 are being lowered by genetic and genomic techniques.
Completely new types of weapons are also becoming possible, including the use of food crops as tools for biological warfare. Even ethnically specific weapons, hitherto thought to be impossible, have become a real possibility. We present data here showing that ethnic specific genetic sequences do exist in considerable high numbers.
Alarmed by the rapidly increasing technical possibilities, the International Committee of the Red Cross recently appealed to governments to take concrete steps to avert the hostile use of biotechnology.
A broad array of political measures will be needed to counter the threat of hostile exploitation of biotechnology. First and foremost, the Biological Weapons Convention needs to be strengthened through multilaterally agreed, legally binding verification measures. In addition, three immediate steps are of specific importance:
• All projects that violate the Chemical and Biological Weapons Conventions must be immediately abandoned, specifically development of so-called “non-lethal” chemical weapons, anti-material biowarfare agents, and fungi for the war on drugs. Failure to do so will encourage other countries to follow suit with R & D projects on biotechnological weapons, leading to an unravelling of two key disarmament treaties.
• There is an urgent need to ensure that governments restrict themselves and ensure maximum transparency in their biodefense programs, to prevent a race for offensive capabilities under cover of defense. All governments should adopt the ‘Government Undertaking on Biodefense Programs’, recently brought forward by the Sunshine Project2 . It contains, among others, a provision that “biodefense programs will not, for any purpose, utilize or construct, including single-gene changes, novel biological agents with an enhanced offensive potential” such as treatment resistance, environmental stability, or enhanced pathogenicity.
• For some particularly dangerous technologies, restrictions on research are required. These research prohibitions, which are an inherently more effective approach than imposing limits on publication, should apply in specific fields that
a) may easily be abused for hostile purposes,
b) where no effective global arms control or non-proliferation efforts are presently feasible, and
c) where other technical avenues to reach the same peaceful scientific goal are available.
First and foremost, the Biological Weapons Convention needs to be strengthened through multilaterally agreed, legally binding verification measures. In addition, three immediate steps are of specific importance:
• All projects that violate the Chemical and Biological Weapons Conventions must be immediately abandoned. In the United States, such projects include the development of material degrading microbes, development of so-called “non-lethal” (bio)chemical weapons (including delivery devices), and continued development of biological agents to eradicate narcotic crops. Other countries that are engaged in similar projects – such as Russia, which maintains stockpiles of incapacitating chemical weapons and, likely, an R & D program on them – must also halt such research. These agents undermine the Chemical and Biological Weapons Conventions, are lowering the political threshold for use of biological weapons, and are likely to have tremendous environmental and health impacts. Pursuit of these agents as weapons would be a step down a slippery slope, that, following the same logic, could easily lead to the use of other biochemical and biological warfare agents in conflict. Failure to stop these projects will encourage other countries to follow suit with R & D projects on biotechnological weapons, leading to an unravelling of key disarmament treaties.
• There is an urgent need to ensure that governments restrict themselves and ensure maximum transparency in their biodefense programs, to prevent a race for offensive capabilities under cover of defense. We call on all governments to adopt the ‘Government Undertaking on Biodefense Program’, which has recently been brought forward by the Sunshine Project. It contains, among others, a provision that “biodefense programs will not, for any purpose, utilize or construct, including single-gene changes, novel biological agents with an enhanced offensive potential” such as treatment resistance, environmental stability, or enhanced pathogenicity.
Today it has become clear that U.S. President Obama's moratorium of 2013 was circumvented and it anyway got scrapped in 2017. Since then the international arms race in bioweapons was propelled to ever more dangerous levels.
The 2019 outbreak of the relatively harmless nano-bio-chemical weapon dubbed SARS-CoV-2 is only the visible tip of the iceberg, but it did lead already to a dystopian situation worldwide.
To speak with the words of one of the top criminals in this desaster, Bill Gates on 23. June 2020: "We will have to prepare for the next one. And I say it will get their attention this time." And his wife Melinda looked at him with a smirk then and thought: The next one you will really feel!
All truth has three stages
First, it is ignored.
Second, it is widely ridiculed.
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
MUST WATCH: EYE-OPENING INFORMATION VIDEO BY DR. BILL DEAGLE
- many questions you have today were answered by him already in 2016
Allegedly CCP ordered virologist Deyin (firstname) Guo (lastname) to create the Wuhan coronavirus
SARS-CoV-2 is the first #UnrestrictedBioweapon the Chinese developed as contemporary gene-weapon according to their 2015 concept.
What does Shan-Lu Liu - Professor, Director - Viruses and Emerging Pathogens Program, Infectious Disease Institute - Ohio State University know?
===They stole genetic sequences from bats and pangolins, recombined the nucleotides in the lab to create the contagions, only then to blame those from whom they stole the information. What a shame and what a crime. We call internationally for the immediate suspension of any such program, a binding moratorium for all states and entities and thereby for a global ban.
- or "There exit Coincidences, that possibly couldn't exist at all!"
If one disregards for a brief moment all the political, military, scientific or media power struggles and follows only the money trail one makes the following observations:
The Chinese BSL-4 lab in Wuhan is owned by GlaxoSmithKline, which (purely coincidentally) is owned by Pfizer - the company that makes the vaccine against the virus, which (purely coincidentally) was developed in the biological lab in Wuhan, that (purely coincidentally) was funded by Dr. Fauci, who in turn (purely coincidentally) promotes vaccine use!
GlaxoSmithKline is managed (by pure coincidence) by the financial division of Black Rock, which (by pure coincidence) manages the finances of the Open Society Foundation organization (Soros Foundation), which (by pure coincidence) manages the French AXA!
This "Soros" also owns (by pure coincidence) the German-Swiss company "Winterthur", which (by pure coincidence) built with French finances a Chinese laboratory in Wuhan and was bought by the German Allianz AG, which (by pure coincidence) has Vanguard as a shareholder, that in turn (by pure coincidence) is a shareholder of "Black Rock", as well as (by pure coincidence) controls the central banks and manages about one third of the world's investment capital.
"Black Rock" also (purely coincidentally) is a major shareholder in MICROSOFT, which is owned by Bill Gates, who (purely coincidentally) is a shareholder in Pfizer - the very company that (remember?) sells that miracle vaccine - and who (purely by chance) is now the main sponsor of the 'WHO', the very organization that ordered a worldwide pandemic into existence, from which we can only escape once the whole world is vaccinated!
Now you understand how a dead bat sold at a fresh market in China infected the WHOLE PLANET - solely by coincidence!
We might add: The 'Virus' [Latin 'virus' = toxin, poison] is not just one. One model of the contagious pathogen escaped from Ft. Detrick and infected people, at least one or two were placed in Wuhan / China and infected people, one was further nano-switch enhanced by Dr. Lieber, one was mishandled at the BSL-4/P4 lab in Winnipeg/Canada, one was patented by Dr. DOOMnDEATH Fauxi, one was patented by the Institut Pasteur/Paris, one was shared with the Germans (possibly Dr. Drosten), one was shared with the Netherlands and several are even now commercially available with BioTech firms and vaccine companies worldwide. The USA, China, the European Union and France financed all this. The CCP is guilty big time and still tries to cover up, but so are the others. All must be tried , those found guilty to be key in these ongoing crimes against humanity must be severely punished and all the victims of the world be compensated.
There is a vast biological warfare complex in Jilin Province near the North Korean border, particularly in and around the city of Changchun.
It was the incubator if not the actual birthplace of COVID-19.
Based on an examination of Chinese-language documents and scientific publications, we believe that the Military Veterinary Research Institute, the Institute of Zoonotic Diseases in Changchun, and PLA-controlled laboratories in Jilin Province, led by General Ningyi Jin and retired General Xianzhu Xia, are core elements of China’s biowarfare program.
Within that core are the laboratory of Molecular Virology and Immunology, the Military Genetic Engineering Key Laboratory, the Jilin Province Recombinant Vaccine Research and Development Engineering Center, and an Animal Biosafety Level 3 testing facility, both a stationary and a mobile unit.
Biao He from the Military Veterinary Research Institute and Changjun Wang of the PLA Eastern Theater Command in Nanjing isolated the bat coronaviruses ZC45 and ZXC21, claimed by Chinese whistleblower Dr. Li-Meng Yan to be the viral backbones for COVID-19.
Those and other potential COVID-19 backbones were harvested and underwent experimentation in the Changchun and Jilin Province biowarfare facilities.
At least four subordinates of Ningyi Jin and Xianzhu Xia have been engaged in a massive domestic and international virus collection effort for over eight years: Biao He, Quanshui Fan, Changchun Tu, and Zhiqiang Wu.
The virus samples collected number in the thousands.
All the capabilities for producing COVID-19 were already in place in the Changchun and Jilin Province facilities by 2015 and that capability was demonstrated in a single scientific publication.
The authors used “gain of function” by genetic engineering, viral reassortment to capture the ideal functionality of different viruses, and serial passaging in animal models to “pre-adapt” a virus for maximal infectivity and lethality.
Chuan Qin is considered by many as China’s national expert on animal models and serial passaging.
A number of U.S.-based or funded scientists have been directly collaborating with the PLA Military Veterinary Research Institute, all supported by Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases or other U.S. government departments.
They include Stanley Pearlman of the University of Iowa, Pei-Yong Shi(2021) and Vineet Menachery (October 2020) of the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, Linfa Wang of the Duke University-National University of Singapore, Martha Stokes of the Biological Threat Reduction Program, Defense Threat Reduction Agency (February 2021) and Scott McVey of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
The debate about the origin of COVID-19 is over. It was made in a laboratory, the Military Veterinary Research Institute likely being instrumental in that process.
There are two tasks remaining.
First, to identify the exact methods used and the timeline involved in the creation of COVID-19 and the PLA members involved.
Second, to expose all the U.S.-based or funded scientists that helped the PLA do it.
Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is retired from an international career in business and medical research with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. His email address is .
Joe Hoft is the twin brother of TGP's founder, Jim Hoft. His posts have been retweeted by President Trump and have made the headlines at the Drudge Report. Joe worked as a corporate executive in Hong Kong and traveled the world for his work, which gives him a unique perspective of US and global current events. He has ten degrees or designations and is the author of three books. His new book: 'In God We Trust: Not in Lying Liberal Lunatics' is out now - please take a look and buy a copy. @joehoft
"Dr. Fauci does have a lot to hide, he should have been sounding the alarm well before this disease broke out."— Newsmax (@newsmax) June 5, 2021
Dr. Li-Meng Yan and @GordonGChang react to Dr. Fauci's emails. @Tom_Basile https://t.co/VlT7z8drtO pic.twitter.com/dHTFHLguid
Insider Reveals Chinese Communist Cover-up Of Mass Murder
| Dr. Li-Meng YAN and Maria Ryan
•5 Jun 2021
Chinese scientists said a third world war would be fought with biological weapons, while Democrat communists stand in solidarity with this totalitarian enemy, banning the term China virus.Make no mistake: this is war. Failure to recognize reality will be brutal.
REPORT: High-Ranking Chinese Defector Working With DIA Has ‘Direct Knowledge’ of China’s Bioweapons Program—and It’s Very Bad
By: Paula Bolyard, PJM, June 4, 2021:
In an exclusive story at RedState, Jen Van Laar reports that sources inside the intelligence community say a high-ranking defector from China has been working for months with the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). According to Van Laar’s confidential sources, that high-ranking defector claims to have knowledge of special weapons programs in China—that include bioweapons.
Adam Housley first reported via Twitter on Thursday that “the increased pressure on China in recent days is due to a defector with intimate knowledge” of the program. According to Housley, FBI director Christopher Wray “didn’t know right away because they wanted to make sure they got all they needed before telling him.”
In fact, Wray was “ambushed” with the information, according to Van Laar’s sources, as was the CIA. “Sources say DIA leadership kept the defector within their Clandestine Services network to prevent Langley and the State Department from accessing the person, whose existence was kept from other agencies because DIA leadership believes there are Chinese spies or sources inside the FBI, CIA, and several other federal agencies,” according to the report.
Why was the defector so important that he had to be kept under wraps?
Housley says it’s because the defector has information on the origins of the Wuhan virus: “China is trying to produce variants that suggest it came from bats to cover up that coronavirus originally came from a lab.” He later clarified: “US intelligence has a Chinese defector with Wuhan info. AND China is trying to produce variants that suggest it came from bats to cover up that coronavirus originally came from a lab.”
According to RedState’s sources, “the defector has been with the DIA for three months” and has provided “an extensive, technically detailed debrief to US officials.”
“In DIA’s assessment, the information provided by the defector is legitimate,” wrote Van Laar. “Sources say the level of confidence in the defector’s information is what has led to a sudden crisis of confidence in Dr. Anthony Fauci, adding that U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) personnel detailed to DIA have corroborated very technical details of information provided by the defector.”
All of this raises many questions. Why, “suddenly,” did the U.S. legacy media en masse turn-tail and start pointing fingers at China and doubting Fauci? Why did left-wing outlets like the Washington Postand BuzzFeed “suddenly” decide it was the right time to drop Fauci’s emails—just days after the lab-leak story was “suddenly” no longer verboten on social media? Fauci’s emails revealed what we’ve been reporting here at PJ Media for months (mostly behind the paywall for our VIP subscribers to avoid the
Gestaposocial-media censors): that Fauci was working with a Chinese scientist from the Wuhan lab; that he asked Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg to help with COVID messaging; and that he signed off on funding for dangerous gain-of-function research in Wuhan.
One gets the sense that a dam the size of Three Gorges on the Yangtze River is about to blow. The question will be, as it almost is when political figures are caught in a coverup: What did they know and when did they know it? And who knew what was really going on?
If any of this turns out to be true—particularly the suggestion that China may have intentionally unleashed the most deadly bioweapon in world history—you might want to begin thinking about where you’re going to spend the U.S.-Sino War. If, as Housley claims, the FBI, CIA, and other federal agencies are swarming with Chinese spies, it would constitute the biggest national security failure in U.S. history—and the most deadly.
The implications are terrifying.
- VIRUS WARFARE: Documents Reveal China Plan to WEAPONIZE Coronaviruses Prior to Pandemic
- Wuhan Lab Leak Illuminates Why U.S. Corporate Media Amplify Communist Propaganda
- Newly leaked documents reveal how China LIED, COVERED UP, bungled COVID-19’s early days
- Scientists Believe Signs of ‘Human Intervention’ are in Coronavirus Strain Cultured to Attack Human Cells
Dr.Zelenko nailed the nature of #COVID19 as #UnrestrictedBioweapon!— Dr. Li-Meng YAN (@DrLiMengYAN1) June 5, 2021
Dr. Fauci, advanced technology & US taxpayers’ money are grabbed by China Gov, in a sophisticated manner, by taking advantage of weakness of laws/individuals, to use in the development and misinformation campaign https://t.co/TTdZtrGPqC
Chinese virologist says Fauci’s emails ‘verify’ her Wuhan lab leak claims
A Chinese virologist who was among the first to suggest COVID-19 leaked from a Wuhan lab has said that Dr. AnthonyFauci’s emails prove she was right all along.
Dr. Li-Meng Yan was one of the first to research the emerging coronavirus and previously revealed she was forced into hiding after accusing Beijing of a cover-up.
Now, as international leaders finally focus on her Wuhan lab-leak theory, the scientist told Newsmax that Fauci’s emails contain “a lot of useful information” suggesting he always knew more than he revealed.
“They verify my work from the very beginning, even from last January, that these people know what happened, but they choose to hide for the Chinese Communist Party and for their own benefits,” Yan insisted of the treasure trove of documents released this week.
“He knows all these things,” she insisted of Fauci and the apparent gain-of-function work carried out by the now-notorious Wuhan Institute of Virology in the heart of the city where the pandemic first emerged.
One email, she said, showed that “Dr. Fauci even back to 1st of February last year immediately realized that there would be gain-of-function experiment involved in the COVID-19 virus.”
He “definitely” feared that the lab was carrying out the experiments — which can increase the transmissibility of viruses — but “was worried not to tell this to the public,” the scientists insisted.
Yan has reportedly published three reports on the origins of the coronavirus — two last year and one in 2021.
In the latest, published on March 31, she insisted COVID was “a product of the bioweapons program of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) government, the network of which includes not only the CCP scientists but also certain overseas scientists and organizations.”
EXCLUSIVE: High-Ranking Chinese Defector Has 'Direct Knowledge' of Several Chinese Special Weapons Programs
By Jennifer Van Laar - 04. Jun 2021
A person believed to be among the highest-ranking defectors ever to the United States from the People’s Republic of China has been working with the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) for months, sources inside the intelligence community have told RedState on condition of anonymity. The defector has direct knowledge of special weapons programs in China, including bioweapons programs, those sources say.
The information provided to RedState corroborates and clarifies Thursday evening’s reporting by journalist Adam Housley.
RedState’s sources say that’s partially true. FBI Director Christopher Wray was “ambushed” with the information, they say, and Langley was also unaware. Sources say DIA leadership kept the defector within their Clandestine Services network to prevent Langley and the State Department from accessing the person, whose existence was kept from other agencies because DIA leadership believes there are Chinese spies or sources inside the FBI, CIA, and several other federal agencies.
More information will be published as it becomes available to RedState.
UPDATE 12:30 PM PDT, June 4, 2021
Sources tell RedState the defector has been with the DIA for three months and that he has provided an extensive, technically detailed debrief to US officials. In DIA’s assessment, the information provided by the defector is legitimate. Sources say the level of confidence in the defector’s information is what has led to a sudden crisis of confidence in Dr. Anthony Fauci, adding that U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) personnel detailed to DIA have corroborated very technical details of information provided by the defector.
(NOTE: Several former CIA officers have questioned the veracity of this story or termed it an outright fabrication. We are aware of those comments and stand by our sources.)
Jennifer Van Laar, RedState's Managing Editor, is an unapologetic California conservative (#ProTip: Do not tell her that it's time to leave the state), sports fanatic, and mom of 3 boys. She's also co-host of Sounds Right With Jen and Scott, and joins The Jen and Don Show on Salem Radio Network's AM 590 The Answer every Thursday for "Spill The Tea Thursday." Follow her work on Facebook and Twitter. Story tips: .
"Stop telling CA conservatives to leave. I'm not moving. I'm saving the state. Join me or get out of the way."
May 29, 2021
Gravitas | COVID Origins: What happened inside the Wuhan Lab in November 2019?
•May 24, 2021
What happened inside the Wuhan Lab in November 2019? A report claims that 3 researchers from the Wuhan Institute of Virology had to be taken to a hospital. Palki Sharma tells you more.
PRESSURE CONTINUES ON VIRUS ORIGIN
It is lab-made. They changed 5 Nucleotides. They patented it.
First published on BITCHUTE May 21st, 2021.
PRESSURE CONTINUES ON VIRUS ORIGIN
Last week, the undeniable evidence surrounding the origins of SARS-CoV2 officially led us to the conclusion that this deadly pathogen was man-made. Look back at the paper trail that links the virus to Tony Fauci’s US funded gain-of-function research and see even more politicians standing up to the CDC and NIH for the real answers as to its origin.
China Lied, People Died Inside China's Death Labs
First published on BITCHUTE May 19th, 2020.
VISUAL PROOF: Bioweapon Spike Protein - BILLIONS Injected Into EVERYONE! 😱
13. May 2021
The origins of COVID-19 are becoming increasingly clear, and Dr. Richard Fleming, cardiologist and researcher walks Del through a shocking paper trail surrounding the SARS-CoV2 virus and its link to Tony Fauci and US funded gain-of-function research. A visual image of this Frankenstein SARS-CoV2 Spike Protein tells the story of exactly how and what was done to turn it into a bioweapon. BILLIONS of these are now being INJECTED INTO EVERYONE on the planet via these COVID-19 Gene Therapy "Vaccines" 😱😱😱
This is a seamlessly edited version of an interview originally aired on May 13th 2021@The Highwire.
Dr. Richard Fleming
Chinese document discussing weaponising coronaviruses provides 'chilling' information
•May 9, 2021
Sky News host Sharri Markson has assessed "chilling" details from a document produced by Chinese military scientists, in which they discussed weaponising SARS coronaviruses five years before the COVID-19 pandemic hit.
Ms Markson said the book was written by People's Liberation Army scientists and senior Chinese public health officials in 2015. The documents describe SARS coronaviruses as heralding a “new era of genetic weapons” and said they can be "artificially manipulated into an emerging human - disease virus, then weaponised and unleashed in a way never seen before".
The Chinese-language paper is called 'The Unnatural Origin of SARS and New Species of Man-Made Viruses as Genetic Bioweapons'.
“The document also talks about the psychological terror that bioweapons can cause, it's chilling,” Ms Markson said.
“To be clear ... while intelligence agencies suspect, and they've been investigating this since early last year, that COVID-19 may be the result of an accidental leak from a Wuhan lab, there is no suggestion it was an intentional release. “The significance of this paper is that it offers a rare insight into how senior scientists at one of the PLA's most prominent military universities, where high levels of defence research were conducted, were thinking about biological research.”
Guest post by Lawrence Sellin, PhD
U.S. government officials, the media, and, in particular, members of the scientific community, for their own personal, political or financial advantage, have continued to promote the false narrative that COVID-19 came from nature.
It did not.
COVID-19 was one product of a wider program of gain of function virus research being conducted by Chinese Communist Party scientists within a dual use, military-commercial program.
That is, COVID-19 was made in a laboratory.
COVID-19 has a number of unusual features, which cannot be explained by a normal evolutionary process.
The only questions remaining are how and where COVID-19 was made and whether its release was accidental or deliberate.
In China, there is no difference between military and civilian virus research.
In recent months, I and other COVID-19 detectives have conducted a virus research network analysis of China’s virus biowarfare program.
Here, in this video, is what we have discovered about its origin and structure.
The CCP’s biowarfare program has three levels: a secret military level upon which civilian institutes and universities are layered.
That layer provides the means to interact with international virus research programs to access knowledge, skills, and funding, all of which is fed back into China’s program.
Over the last 30 years, China’s People’s Liberation Army has deeply infiltrated American virus research programs.
Much has been made in the media about Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance diverting up to 3 million dollars of funding from the National Institutes of Health to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
That is only the tip of the iceberg.
Billions with a “B,” billions of American taxpayer dollars in knowledge, skills, and money have directly or indirectly contributed to China’s virus research programs, ultimately leading to COVID-19.
Much of that funding came from Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, but there was also substantial funding provided by the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Agency for International Development.
I explain how it happened in this video.
I call it “scientific chain migration.” In the 1990s, military-trained Chinese scientists began arriving in the United States, many sponsored by Anthony Fauci’s large AIDS research program.
Those initial Chinese military scientists, invited more Chinese military scientists until literally thousands were being trained in U.S. virus laboratories and taking knowledge and skills back to China.
Many of them are still in the United States collaborating with scientists in mainland China including military laboratories.
And, many of them, no doubt, have contributed to China’s biowarfare program.
The time has come for the American people to put an end to this robbery of our knowledge, skills, and research funding.
Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is retired from an international career in business and medical research with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. His email address is .
Joe Hoft is the twin brother of TGP's founder, Jim Hoft. His posts have been retweeted by President Trump and have made the headlines at the Drudge Report. Joe worked as a corporate executive in Hong Kong and traveled the world for his work, which gives him a unique perspective of US and global current events. He has ten degrees or designations and is the author of three books. His new book: 'In God We Trust: Not in Lying Liberal Lunatics' is out now - please take a look and buy a copy. @joehoft
Instead of using independent US experts to unravel the actions by China behind COVID-19, Biden is going to rely on a group of individuals who were involved in the release and the WHO whose head is from a terrorist nation and others who are involved in the manufacture and release of COVID-19.
Lawrence Sellin, PhD, reported based on available information that COVID was a biological attack by the Chinese Communists:
Sellin also reported that there may have exposed US military – athletes to COVID in October of 2019 based on various reports:
Sellin reported in March that the origin of COVID-19 was covered up by US individuals, including Dr. Peter Daszak:
Dr. Daszak is the only member from the US on the WHO teaminvestigating the origins of COVID-19:
The sole U.S. member of the WHO team, EcoHealth Alliance president Dr. Peter Daszak, revealed during a panel discussion Wednesday that they did not request to see the deleted WIV [Wuhan Institute of Virology] databases because he personally vouched for the lab, saying the data did not contain relevant information on the pandemic’s origins.
We’ve also reported in March 2020 that the current head of the WHO, Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, is one of the top government officials in the terrorist-led nation of Ethiopia and he does whatever China wants him to do:
Tedros was the one who set the world on fire when he claimed last March that COVID-19 had a 3.4% mortality rating, which we reported with evidence that this was total nonsense:
But none of this matters to the insane Biden gang. They are going to rely on China and the Director-General of the WHO, who’s a top party member of a terrorist-led nation, a US doctor who was in on it, and others on the WHO team to tell the US what is the real origin of the COVID-19 virus:
Biden Press Secretary Psaki says at the 3:00 mark below:
Well, the President has said and I have said from here many times that there needs to be a credible, independent investigation through the World Health Organization, one that relies on data, one that relies on participation from China and other countries that may have information. That’s certainly something that everybody has called for and we look forward to that happening.”
Tsaki and Biden are insane. No one who knows China’s Communist Party, the WHO, and a US professor with conflicts, wants this gang running the investigation into the origins of COVID-19.
You would have to be a fool to think this gang will produce anything near the truth about COVID-19 origins. We already know that relying on this group of conflicted clowns will only lead to a laughable outcome.
Joe Hoft is the twin brother of TGP's founder, Jim Hoft. His posts have been retweeted by President Trump and have made the headlines at the Drudge Report. Joe worked as a corporate executive in Hong Kong and traveled the world for his work, which gives him a unique perspective of US and global current events. He has ten degrees or designations and is the author of three books. His new book: 'In God We Trust: Not in Lying Liberal Lunatics' is out now - please take a look and buy a copy. @joehoft
WaPo Reporter Tells Joe Rogan: Fauci Behind Wuhan COVID-19 Leak
By Greg Reese - 01. May 2021
Washington Post reporter Josh Rogin admitted Dr. Anthony Fauci is the top gain-of-function researcher in the world and could have funded the Wuhan lab rumored to be responsible for COVID-19 behind Obama’s back.
This revelation comes a year after alternative media outlets like Infowars exposed the link between Fauci and the dangerous, controversial labs.
Steve Hilton Report: Dr. Anthony Fauci Is Directly Responsible With Funding The Gain-Of-Function Studies That Resulted In Coronavirus Pandemic + Peter Navarro: Fauci Is A Sociopath And Must Be Held Accountable For Crimes Against Humanity
Dr. Charles Lieber is a nano-scientist at Harvard University. He was recently charged by the American authorities for secretly being a Chinese agent. However, there is a mystery surrounding the nature of his work. It is said he was recruited for advanced research into nanowire-batteries. But investigation by GreatGameIndia has shown that Lieber was infact working on virus transmitters that could penetrate cell membranes without affecting the intercellular functions and even measure activities inside heart cells and muscle fibers.
- EXCLUSIVE: Coronavirus Bioweapon – How China Stole Coronavirus From Canada And Weaponized It (watch here Visualizing The Secret History Of Coronavirus)
- Watch the exclusive interview of Bioweapons Expert Dr. Francis Boyle on Coronavirus Biological Warfare blocked by the Deep State
- 1 Chinese Agent Charles Lieber
- 2 Nanowire-Batteries – a Smokescreen?
- 3 Lieber and his ‘Virus Transmitters’
- 4 Nanotech in the Battlefield
- 5 Dutch Virologist Ron Fouchier
Chinese Agent Charles Lieber
Dr. Charles Lieber is a nano-scientist at Harvard University who also serves as a chair for Harvard’s Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology. He was arrested by the U.S. Department of Defensein January for lying about his association with China’s Thousand Talent Program. It is basically a recruitment plan which seeks to lure Chinese overseas talent and foreign experts to bring their knowledge and experience to China and in return, reward individuals for stealing proprietary information.
According to the charging documents, Lieber was a contractual participant of the program and was paid $50,000 monthly, along with $158,000 in living expenses and $1.74 million to set up a research lab at Wuhan University. The fact that Lieber kept his association with the Chinese a secret put his integrity in question as well as financial conflicts of interest, including financial support from foreign governments or foreign entities.
Nanowire-Batteries – a Smokescreen?
What’s more concerning is that the affidavit released by the federal prosecutors states that Lieber signed an agreement between Harvard and Wuhan Insitute of Technology. According to the affidavit, the purpose of the agreement was to “carry out advanced research and development of nanowire-based lithium-ion batteries with high performance for electric vehicles.”
However, things don’t add up since the focus of Lieber’s research has never been about nanowire batteries. One nanoscientist and former student of Lieber’s says: “I have never seen Charlie working on batteries or nanowire batteries.” In fact, in all his research papers and patents, there is no mention of “batteries” or “vehicles”.
Although Lieber was released a day later on a $1 million bond, the question remains what exactly was the nature of Lieber’s research.
Lieber and his ‘Virus Transmitters’
Dr. Lieber joined Harvard in 1991. In his early days at the university, he made great strides in the field by growing nanowires in a flask. Researchers before Lieber were already creating wire-like structures with the help of semiconductors, metals and other materials. However, their approach would be quite expensive and would need clean-room facilities like the ones used by computer chip-makers.
In contrast, Lieber could create nanostructures using nothing but simple and inexpensive chemical techniques. He even went a step further to show how these nanowires could be used as transistors, complex logic circuits, data storage devices, and even sensors.
In 2001, Harvard Magazine published a report that discussed Lieber and his team’s research into what was termed as ‘Liquid Computing’. The report mentioned how Lieber was at the forefront solving silicon-based microelectronics industry’s greatest challenge – making silicon chips smaller and smaller.
Lieber noted that “continued shrinkage ultimately becomes problematic in terms of just how one achieves [it].” Instead, he created tiny logic circuits and memory – the two main components of a computer – using nanowires. And these circuits were really tiny, some of which just a few atoms across!
Ten years later, Lieber created a transistor so small it can be used to penetrate cell membranes and probe their interiors, without affecting the intercellular functions. The bio-compatible transistor – the size of a virus – can not only measure activities inside a neuron but also heart cells and muscle fibers.
In 2017, Lieber and his team successfully created flexible 3D nanowires mesh that can inject into the brain or retina of an animal, attach itself to the neurons and monitor electrical signals between the cells.
It’s no surprise the Chinese officials were quick to get him onboard considering he’s the brightest brain when it comes to nanotechnology. Not only his research would have made China an important player in this futuristic technology but it would also be a be a step forward towards China’s stated goal of Biological Dominance.
Nanotech in the Battlefield
The importance of nanotechnology in advanced warfare can be understood from the fact that the United States’ Department of Defense (DoD) is one of the largest supporters of nanotechnology research. They have funded hundreds of millions of dollars into various research related to nanoelectronics and nanomaterials.
The technology could help create nanosensors and nanocoatings that military could use to protect soldiers against chemical and biological attacks. The fact that nanosensors can detect microscopic quantities of chemicals means it can be used as an effective early warning system against chemical warfare agents such as nerve agents and blood agents.
One can see why Charles Lieber’s secret association with the Chineseinstitutes and universities and his expertise in nanotechnology could pose a serious threat. Lieber lied about his involvement with the Thousand Talents Plan and affiliation with the Wuhan Institute of Technology and that makes him no less than a Chinese biowarfare agent.
Another scientist who is key to the COVID-19 investigation is Dutch scientist Ron Fouchier. Fouchier is a controversial figure in the field of Viroscience. He created world’s deadliest virus strain and his research sparked a global controversy to de-fund and shutdown such experiments. Experts have raised concerns legally that such experiments could not only lead to a global pandemic but could also lead to bio-terrorism. However, Ron Fouchier is also a key to the COVID-19 investigation. He isolated the SARS Coronavirus smuggled out of Saudi Arabia which was sent to the Canadian scientist Frank Plummer, who ended up dead a week after GreatGameIndia‘s report was published.
Wake up and fight back!
Covid-19 vaccines depopulation plan exposed!
Re-published on BITCHUTE April 18th, 2021.
The Chinese Communist Party’s Ministry of Science and Technology announced the country is constructing three additional biosafety level-4 labs and 88 biosafety level-3 labs.
“China inaugurated the Biosecurity Law on Thursday, which is expected to further fortify the legal shield for the establishment and safe operation of more bio labs as China attaches greater importance to biosecurity as part of national security,” state-run outlet Global Times spun the new law.
Global Times also quoted Wuhan University’s Deputy Director of Pathogen Biology, who described the law as “timely” and “provid[ing] a legal shield for scientific projects on biosafety, including infectious diseases.
Deputy Minister of Science and Technology Xiang Libin revealed approval for the construction of three biosafety level-4 labs, or P4 labs, and 88 biosafety level-3 labs, or P3 labs. In April 2020, China had just two P4 labs in operation and 81 P3 labs in operation or approved to be built. These new projects represent an increase of over 100 percent in China’s existing P3 and P4 labs.
“With the new law, China aims to enhance the country’s bioscience research level and tackle the prevention and control of potential outbreaks of infectious diseases for animals and plants,” the ministry purported despite several scientists including former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Chief Robert Redfield supporting theories that COVID-19 “escaped” from a Chinese lab.
COMMENT: The following article about the opinion of this MIT researcher is a good example of the fact how many scientists are still afraid, far behind the curve, are sent out to repetitively confuse people and public opinion or to take the investigation back to earlier stages in order to delay the truth to become widely accepted. With all the evidence there can be no dispute any longer about the lab-origin of the SARS-CoV-2 pathogen and the 'wildlife'-excuse formula has been completely ruled out by all sane and honest researchers. The questions remaining must now only concentrate on who released the man-made contagion in Wuhan into the wild, how, when exactly and why?
Harvard/MIT Researcher: COVID Definitely Could Have Leaked From a Lab
"I think it's essential that we have a real investigation… into whether this virus could have come from a lab or from the wildlife trade."
By Dan Robitzski - 14. April 2021
Despite a team of World Health Organization (WHO) investigators ruling that it was “extremely unlikely” that the coronavirus was accidentally released from a research lab in China, the idea continues to persist.
Most notably, the head of the WHO said last month that he remained unconvinced by the investigation, especially because it was difficult for the investigators to access any raw data, and suggested that the lab leak hypothesis warranted further attention.
Now, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard researcher Alina Chan told Slate that she agrees. While she doesn’t say that’s what definitely happened, she suggests that it’s worth taking a closer look at what she feels is a plausible explanation for how the COVID-19 pandemic began.
“In Wuhan, there were early versions of the virus that didn’t seem to pass through the [Wuhan Huanan] market,” Chan, who’s been a longtime proponent for the lab leak hypothesis, told Slate. “They seemed to precede or be in parallel to the market,”
“I want to be really clear that I still think wildlife trade is a plausible scenario,” she added. “But I think it’s essential that we have a real investigation, a credible one that is free from political influence, into whether this virus could have come from a lab or from the wildlife trade.”
The main hole in other coronavirus origin stories, Chan argued, is that it’s hard to explain how a coronavirus that may have emerged from bat caves hundreds of miles away made its way to Wuhan. But the Wuhan Institute of Virology had a program where scientists would travel to collect samples for analysis in the lab, Chan added. Given that the institute was studying a close genetic relative of the coronavirus at the time, she feels that it’s a coincidence worth probing.
Labs “around the world [all] have safety issues, and it’s not clear which labs are having how many accidents a year,” Chan told Slate. “But these processes do have accidents.”===
Scientific community rejects WHO report on origin of Covid-19
By UCN/ET - 12 April 2021
More than a year after the pandemic, whether due to political interests, lack of scientific consensus, lack of resources or nature's own impossibilities, the truth, of the origin of Covid-19 is still an unknown. And perhaps it will remain so for a long time to come.
WHO chief Tedros has long been accused of being responsible for crimes against humanity, particularly in Ethiopia's Oromiya state and nationwide - see: The Gangster Head of the WHO
After the World Health Organisation sent a delegation to investigate the origin of Covid-19 and returned with meagre results and little irrefutable evidence, a group of scientific experts wrote an open letter completely rejecting the report produced by the international health organisation.
"The joint China-World Health Organisation report on COVID-19 has not provided credible answers to the question of how the pandemic began, so more detailed investigations are needed, with or without Beijing's involvement," reads part of the letter.
The report submitted by the UN included the "conclusion" that the likelihood of the virus originating in a laboratory was really minimal and that the route of transmission was from bats to other animals. However, it was the head of the entity itself, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, who was quick to tell the world that there was a lack of research and that the committee had had access to very little information.
This then gave rise to this letter from scientists, which also argues that "the world may need to go back to 'Plan B' and conduct an investigation as systematically as possible without Beijing's involvement. China has databases of the viruses they had, there are lab notes of the work that was done, there are all kinds of scientists doing the work and we don't have access to those resources or those people."
On the other hand, the experts call for a commission to be formed with experts and scientists who are appointed in a transparent way and have access to all the information "without the presence of government agencies and with the help of translators provided by WHO."
SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028: A Repeat Rehearsal of Event 201?
Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security
By Peter Koenig - April 08, 2021
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).
“At the end, what the 4th Industrial Revolution will lead to is a fusion of our physical, our digital and our biological identities.” – Klaus Schwab, Founder and CEO of the World Economic Forum (WEF)
The SPARS Pandemic – 2025 to 2028 – A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators – The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.
This 89 page-paper has supposedly been written in 2017, preceding by 2 years the by now infamous Event 201 that took place in NYC on 18 October 2019.
Event 201 was also sponsored by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, with cosponsors of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), and the World Economic Forum (WEF). Participants included such prominent UN agencies as the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Bank, the IMF, UNICEF, the UN political body itself – and many more.
Event 201 consisted basically of a computer simulation of the SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) virus that hit China from 2002 to 2004, but was more virulent in the simulation. The computer projection produced some 65 million deaths in 18 months, destroyed the world economy and plunged all 193 UN member countries into severe debt and social misery. Hence, the participation of the IMF, World Bank, regional development banks, as well as representatives of the FED. The rescuers.
The 2002 to 2004 SARS outbreak was relatively harmless. First cases of the outbreak were reported in Guangdong, China, on 16 November 2002. The epidemic was reported contained by WHO in May 2003 and concluded in 2004 with 8,096 confirmed cases and 774 deaths Worldwide. The epidemic spread over 29 countries most of them in East Asia with the vast majority in China. Indeed, all infected people outside of China could be traced to Chinese origins. Chinese scientists then strongly suspected that the SARS virus was directed specifically to the Chinese genome. In other words, a bio-war against China.
Just a few weeks after Event 201 on 18 October 2019, the first cases of the so-called SARS-CoV-2 were reported in Wuhan, China. Obviously, China was more than preoccupied, identified a virus very similar to the one of the 2002-2004 outbreak, suspecting again a China-targeted virus – biowarfare.
China took immediate and drastic measures to contain the outbreak, closing down first Wuhan, then the entire Hubei Province of 50 million people, and subsequently locked down other areas where the virus made appearance. Indeed, the Wuhan SARS-CoV-2 virus was directed again against the Chinese DNA. The few cases in the first weeks in January 2020 identified outside of China, were all traceable to people of Chinese origin.
Other countries, Italy, Iran, Spain, Central Europe, were later hit by other corona strains. SARS-COV-2. Then the WHO conveniently identified Covid-19 (as the disease triggered by SARS-2). COVID – may stand for Certificate of Vaccination ID, or simply Corona Virus ID.
Covid-19 was a well-orchestrated epidemic, first declared by WHO, a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, or PHEIC (30 January 2020) and a pandemic on 11 March 2020. Once declared a pandemic, no matter whether justified or not – the world, or those who think they call the shots on Mother Earth, had green light to lock down and destroy the world – socially, economically and morally.
Now, there is suddenly a new report, a new scenario emerging: The SPARS Pandemic. Why SPARS? – Because this fantasy story – purely hypothetical as the paper doesn’t fail to repeatedly point out – is based on a SARS-type virus outbreak in St. Paul Minnesota. Thus – Saint Paul Acute Respiratory Syndrome = SPARS. Of course, it doesn’t stay in St. Paul, but opportunely spreads all over the place – first heavily in the US, but then reaches out daringly around the world – as does SARS-CoV-2, alias Covid-19.
Is it a new fear campaign, based on human health, the threat of death, our vulnerability – the inward focus of people – playing on egocentricity – our personal well-being and will to live under all circumstances, and to live in comfort, and at all times wanting to maintain the status quo?
Pointedly, the document makes no reference at all to SARS-CoV-2, or to the “Covid-19 – Great Reset”. The 89-page paper was supposedly written some 2 years before the onset of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The playbook, that’s what it is, originates again from the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and pretends to protect people from epidemics and disasters and build resilient communities through innovative scholarship, engagement, and research that strengthens the organizations, systems, policies, and programs essential to preventing and responding to public health crises.
In their own words,
“The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (JHCHS) works to protect people from epidemics and disasters and build resilient communities through innovative scholarship, engagement, and research that strengthens the organizations, systems, policies, and programs essential to preventing and responding to public health crises. The Center is part of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and is located in Baltimore, MD.”
No mention of Bill Gates, of the Rockefeller Foundation which actually created and funded both, the JHCHS and the Bloomberg School of Public Health.
No mention either of the 2010 Rockefeller Report, outlining in great detail, the various health / disease / fear and tyranny scenarios humanity has to endure during the 2020-2030 period, the most notorious of which is the so-called “lockstep scenario”, in which humanity around the globe is so deeply and desperately entrenched and locked down today.
And of course, no mention of the perfect match between the 2010 Rockefeller Report’s scenarios, the UN Agenda 2030 and – “Covid-19 – the Great Reset”, penned by Klaus Schwab, CEO of the WEF. Their consistent parallelism is all coincidence.
According to Alex Jones, this apparently in October 2017 written Johns Hopkins document, SPARS, details plans for Big Pharma global domination. He says, “this document is the holy grail. The key to defeating the globalist.” Its war-gaming different scenarios, making sure they are “armed” for different dynamically appearing situations. See this.
However, the Big Picture of these scenarios is going much further than the kingdom of the pharma-industry. Looking closer and thinking deeper, isn’t it strange that this paper – written allegedly in October 2017, some 3 years ago – emerges only now, when Covid-19, with its nefarious vaxx-coercion is in full swing, with many of its “scenarios”, depicted in a more or less similar form in the paper that envisions – purely hypothetically, as the introduction doesn’t fail to repeat numerous times – what will (or may) happen – hypothetically – from 2025 to 2028?
Is it possible that this SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028 document was written much later? For example, well into the current SARS-CoV-2, alias covid-19 Plandemic, to detract the people’s attention from the much written and talked about Event 201, the PLAN that was then outlined for pretty precisely what is happening today – and may go on for another – well 10 years – if the goals and objectives of UN Agenda 2030 and the Great Reset, as well as of the 2010 Rockefeller Report are to be completed?
And what are those goals and objectives? They can be summarized into a set of three:
(i) Taking over total control of humanity, as in One World Order (OWO); by electromagnetic manipulation (that’s where 5G, later 6G come in); by digitizing everything, including all money; by converting humans into transhumans; they – Mr. Klaus Schwab, the co-author of the Great Reset, and his cabal, call it the 4th Industrial Revolution;
(ii) Shifting assets and resources from the middle and the bottom of society to the top few; and
(iii) Drastically reducing world population, via a eugenist depopulation agenda? Eventually, a small globalist elite – all those associated with managing and governing the OWO-tyranny – plus a relatively small world population of serfs – or what Aldous Huxley called the “Epsilon people” (the lowest cast working people) – in today’s world, “transhumans”, would survive. The serfs or Epsilon people, would all be electronically [digitally] controlled and manipulated, so they would not transgress into seeking their erstwhile “freedom” lost.
Could it be that the SPARS paper – which as mentioned above – does not refer to massive vaccination programs imposed on the world population – to deviate the attention from the final intention of the plandemic? Remember Bill Gates: “Only when 7 billion people have been vaccinated, will we go somewhat back to normal”. That’s what the master, or at least co-master, of this ordeal humanity is going through, predicts?
Look how the Preface to this paper introduces the scenes:
POSSIBLE FUTURE IN 2025: THE “ECHO CHAMBER”
UNBRIDLED GLOBAL ACCESS TO INFORMATION COUPLED WITH SOCIAL FRAGMENTATION AND SELF-AFFIRMING WORLDVIEWS
Scenario Purpose: The following narrative comprises a futuristic scenario that illustrates communication dilemmas concerning medical countermeasures (MCMs) that could plausibly emerge in the not-so-distant future. Its purpose is to prompt users [meaning medical and scientific personnel, government officials, and, of course, the media], both individually and in discussion with others, to imagine the dynamic and oftentimes conflicted circumstances in which communication around emergency MCM development, distribution, and uptake takes place.
While engaged with a rigorous simulated health emergency, scenario readers have the opportunity to mentally “rehearse” responses while also weighing the implications of their actions. At the same time, readers have a chance to consider what potential measures implemented in today’s environment might avert comparable communication dilemmas or classes of dilemmas in the future.
Generation Purpose: The timeframe for the scenario (the years 2025-2028) was selected first, and then major socioeconomic, demographic, technological, and environmental trends likely to have emerged by that period were identified. Specifically, two dominant trends likely to influence regulatory and public responses to future public health emergencies were selected: one, varying degrees of access to information technology; and two, varying levels of fragmentation among populations along social, political, religious, ideological, and cultural lines.
A scenario matrix was then constructed, illustrating four possible worlds shaped by these trends, with consideration given to both constant and unpredictable driving forces. Ultimately, a world comprised of isolated and highly fragmented communities with widespread access to information technology—dubbed “the echo-chamber”—was selected as the future in which the prospective scenario would take place.
From this point, scenario-specific storylines were then developed, drawing on subject matter expertise, historical accounts of past medical countermeasure crises, contemporary media reports, and scholarly literature in sociology, emergency preparedness, health education, and risk and crisis communication.
These sources were used to identify communication challenges likely to emerge in future public health emergencies. This prospective scenario is not intended to predict events to come; rather, it is meant to serve as a plausible narrative that illustrates a broad range of serious and frequently encountered challenges in the realm of risk and crisis communication.
Scenario Environment: In the year 2025, the world has become simultaneously more connected, yet more divided. Nearly universal access to wireless internet and new technology—including internet accessing technology (IAT): thin, flexible screens that can be temporarily attached to briefcases, backpacks, or clothing and used to stream content from the internet—has provided the means for readily sharing news and information.
However, many have chosen to self-restrict the sources they turn to for information, often electing to interact only with those with whom they agree. This trend has increasingly isolated cliques from one another, making communication across and between these groups more and more difficult. From a government standpoint, the current administration is led by President Randall Archer, who took office in January 2025. Archer served as Vice President under President Jaclyn Bennett (2020- 2024), [these are fictitious names] who did not seek a second term due to health concerns.
In regards to MCM communication more specifically, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and other public health agencies, have increasingly adopted a diverse range of social media technologies, including long-existing platforms such as Facebook, Snapchat, and Twitter, as well as emerging platforms like ZapQ, a platform that enables users to aggregate and archive selected media content from other platforms and communicate with cloud-based social groups based on common interests and current events.
Federal and state public health organizations have also developed agency-specific applications and ramped up efforts to maintain and update agency websites. Challenging their technological grip, however, are the diversity of new information and media platforms and the speed with which the social media community evolves. Moreover, while technologically savvy and capable, these agencies still lag in terms of their “multilingual” skills, cultural competence, and ability to be present on all forms of social media. Additionally, these agencies face considerable budget constraints, which further complicate their efforts to expand their presence across the aforementioned platforms, increase social media literacy among their communication workforces, and improve public uptake of key messages.
Scenario Organization & Use: This scenario was designed to illustrate the public health risk communication challenges associated with distribution of emergency medical countermeasures during an infectious disease pandemic. The story is organized chronologically, and each chapter concludes with a treatment of key communication dilemmas and corresponding discussion questions.
Some questions are targeted towards challenges faced by risk communicators representing federal agencies, while others address issues more relevant to state and local risk communicators. As such, users may find it most helpful to run the scenario as a tabletop exercise.
This reads like the blueprint for a medical tyranny. The paper is meant for “health providers”, Government officials, and politicians, as well as and especially for the media, who are to keep the public-at-large in-check and brainwashed with the right narrative. The paper doesn’t miss the opportunity to bring elements of “dynamics” into each one of the scenarios. In other words, nothing may happen as planned, what to do then?
This paper is utterly confusing and disturbing. If it’s supposed to be secret and destined for those who are to control us, and has been written for a number of scenarios of a fictitious corona virus disease, SPARS, very similar to the one that has affected China in 2002-2004, and is affecting the world today, since the beginning of 2020, SARS-CoV-2, alias Covid-19 the disease – then why is the paper surfacing now? – In principle for everyone to see. But to see what? – To see that what we are living today is a later version of the SPARS fiction, namely the Event 201 fiction?
According to a satanic ritual – the masters behind such ceremonies must inform the public in advance of what their plans are, in order for them to succeed. Event 201, in theory, supersedes the SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028. Unless, the three key objectives of the pandemic are not on track to be met by mid-decade 2020-2030, and need to be enhanced – by a “better organized” public relation and political manipulation strategy…. which has to be divulged to the public in advance.
In this case, this paper has hardly been written in October 2017, but is rather the “catch-up” work of now, mid-lockstep scenario – made public to introduce the next scenario which the 2010 Rockefeller Report calls “Clever Together” and describes as “A world in which highly coordinated and successful strategies emerge for addressing both urgent and entrenched worldwide issues.”. This may be interpreted as the “smart” scenario – the rolling out of full digitization of everything, from personal records, to brainwave reading and mind control, to money – to merging the biological man with the digital man – the becoming of transhumans. See the 2010 Rockefeller Report here.
Back to the beginning. Klaus Schwab’s and his cronies’ dream – and humanity’s nightmare:
“At the end, what the 4th Industrial Revolution will lead to is a fusion of our physical, our digital and our biological identities.”
This shall not happen. We can and must stop it NOW. Any complacency is a step closer to doomsday – to a digital and mental Armageddon – which we have the power to avoid, if we wake up and ascend to a consciousness of self-reliance and of integrity with nature and to the spiritual meaning of life in solidarity that flows from her, from Mother Earth.
Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Peter Koenig is a geopolitical analyst and a former Senior Economist at the World Bank and the World Health Organization (WHO), where he has worked for over 30 years on water and environment around the world. He lectures at universities in the US, Europe and South America. He writes regularly for online journals and is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed; and co-author of Cynthia McKinney’s book “When China Sneezes: From the Coronavirus Lockdown to the Global Politico-Economic Crisis” (Clarity Press – November 1, 2020)
He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization.
The original source of this article is Global Research
Copyright © Peter Koenig, Global Research, 2021
Emergency Saturday Broadcast!
World Shocked By SPARS 2025-2028 Document
By TAJS - 04. April 2020
A 2017 Johns Hopkins document details plans for Big Pharma global domination.
"This document is the holy grail. The key to defeating the globalist."
- Alex Jones
Here is a link to the SPARS Pandemic document. https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/Center-projects/completed-projects/spars-pandemic-scenario.html (see also below)
Here is a link to the SPARS Pandemic document. https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/Center-projects/completed-projects/spars-pandemic-scenario.html (see also below)
Interesting to note that the SPARS comparison to COVID-19 was tweeted by Concept 211 on Dec 20, 2020.
READ THE WHOLE THREAT: As of today, it has not been deleted! https://twitter.com/concept211/status/1340866153737035776?lang=en
just weeks before the "outbreak"? Welcome to the next simulation from Johns Hopkins brought to you by
Written in 2017, it's difficult to determine if it's COVID or something "new"...
SPARS Pandemic Scenario
Emerging Infectious Diseases and Epidemics
The Center’s SPARS Pandemic exercise narrative comprises a futuristic scenario that illustrates communication dilemmas concerning medical countermeasures (MCMs) that could plausibly emerge in the not-so-distant future. Its purpose is to prompt users, both individually and in discussion with others, to imagine the dynamic and oftentimes conflicted circumstances in which communication around emergency MCM development, distribution, and uptake takes place. While engaged with a rigorous simulated health emergency, scenario readers have the opportunity to mentally “rehearse” responses while also weighing the implications of their actions. At the same time, readers have a chance to consider what potential measures implemented in today’s environment might avert comparable communication dilemmas or classes of dilemmas in the future.
The self-guided exercise scenario for public health communicators and risk communication researchers covers a raft of themes and associated dilemmas in risk communications, rumor control, interagency message coordination and consistency, issue management, proactive and reactive media relations, cultural competency, and ethical concerns. To ensure that the scenario accounts for rapid technological innovation and exceeds the expectations of participants, the Center’s project team gleaned information from subject matter experts, historical accounts of past medical countermeasure crises, contemporary media reports, and scholarly literature in sociology, emergency preparedness, health education, and risk and crisis communication.
The scenario is hypothetical; the infectious pathogen, medical countermeasures, characters, news media excerpts, social media posts, and government agency responses are entirely fictional.
Project team lead: Monica Schoch-Spana, PhD
Project team: Matthew Shearer, MPH; Emily Brunson, PhD, associate professor of anthropology at Texas State University; Sanjana Ravi, MPH; Tara Kirk Sell, PhD, MA; Gigi Kwik Gronvall, PhD; Hannah Chandler, former research assistant at the Center
Date completed: October 2017
- SPARS Pandemic scenario book
- SPARS announcement from the Center
- SPARS Pandemic scenario book listing in the HHS Disaster Information Management Research Center's resource library
Dr. Yan: Covid-19 is a Chinese Military Bioweapon That Can Be Used More Than Once
By Bannons War Room - 02. April 2021
Dr. Yan says the Wuhan lab theory is proven, and the virus is an unrestricted bioweapon created by the Chinese military that “can be used at any time, not only one time.”
N.B.: Steve Bannon was advider to President Trump
CONCEALMENTS BY THE FBI IN THE CRIMINAL CASE AGAINST CHARLES LIEBER EXPOSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES’ COMPLICITY IN MEDIA DIVERSIONS HIDING UNPRECEDENTED NEUROSCIENCE, DARK TRADE IN ‘ELECTRO-GENETICS’, CORRUPTED BIOELECTRONICS, AND BRAIN-TO-CLOUD “TRANSHUMANISM”
SECRET HARVARD AGENT CHARLES LIEBER’s WUHAN LAB ACTIVITIES TIE U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY AND CHINESE MILITARY TO COVERT COVID NANO-VACCINOLOGY CONFIRMING THE ‘PLANDEMIC‘.
By Michele Reilly and Anonymous Contributors - 30. March 2021
(MedicalVeritas.org) New discoveries filed in the U.S. District Court of Middle Florida against COVID-19 vaccine makers, advertisers, and distributors by a Harvard-trained public health expert, Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz, reveal an enterprise secreting critical information about the actual activities of Harvard’s indicted nano-chemistry professor, Charles Lieber, his connections to the alleged “plandemic,” and the “conspiracy theory” embraced by a consensus of best-informed most-honorable scientists.
Among this growing consensus is the former Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Robert Redfield, who affirmed COVID’s lab origin on CNN. Redfield joined Nobel Prize virologist Luc Montagnier, who confirmed the same conclusion reached by IBM’S chief genetic analyst, Prashant Pradham et al. Gene sequencing showed the “novel” SARS-coronavirus pathogen most-likely emerged from a lab.
But government officials dismissed the ‘lab origin theory.’ This unreasonable and irresponsible dismissal caused the former Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Senior Ebola Program Manager (and later Head of the Vaccine Development Office for the German Center for Infection Research), Geert Vanden Bossche, to create a firestorm of controversy. He published that the new COVID vaccines were “likely to become the biggest and most tragic mistake made in the history of public health in general and in the field of vaccination in particular.” Corroboration came from former Vice President of Pfizer, Michael Yeadon, who predicted women would become sterile from the nano-bioelectrically-active shots.
All of the above were dismissed as “tin foil hat” conspiracy theorists by the ‘PharmaMedia.’
But vaccine advocates and opponents alike are “dead wrong,” argues federal case plaintiff Dr. Horowitz, who is the author of the best-selling, longest-enduring, and most censored book in this field, according to Amazon and Wikepedia.
“The ‘natural’ outbreak and ‘accidental leak’ theorists are all dead wrong.
They are all afraid to tell the truth. The overwhelming evidence filed for review by Judge John L. Badalamenti, and Magistrate Nicholas P. Mizell in the Florida civil case strongly presumes the Wuhan outbreak was intentional, best explaining why the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA ‘genetic therapies’ are misprepresented as ‘vaccines’; and were never tested for genetic damage or negative side-effects from their nano-bioelectric silver-infused hydrogel delivery system that impacts nerve cells (not exclusively immune cells),” Horowitz explained. “This suppression of military-science is recklessly irresponsible, even unconscionable. Genocide and population control exclusively justifies such outrageous negligence.”
According to Dr. Horowitz’s 20-page opposition filing in Horowitz v. Pfizer et. al., 21 exhibits evidence the most complete story yet told, but under seal in the FBI’s criminal case against Charles Lieber.
Most of this is being censored by the press.
Horowitz’s evidence examines the interplay between the Defense Department (especially DARPA) and private companies, Pfizer, and Moderna. The drug industry and U.S. military invested heavily in Lieber’s largely secreted neuroscience experiments at Harvard with cohorts at MIT. The “bioelectronic” and “frequency therapeutic” science features nano-particle silver-impregnated vaccine “hydrogels.”
These “game-changing” patents enable more than the transfer of genetic material from drugs and vaccines to human immune cells. Brain cells are highly susceptible to the wave-frequency manipulations, according to the researchers’ published science.
Dual Chinese-American military and commercial interests have worked for a decade to master this generally-secreted science that promises an array of population control patents and products merging brain function with electronics–the main focus of Lieber’s expertise and concealed activities in China.
Resulting bioelectric technologies, and opposition to what amounts to a “globalist plot,” is fundamental to Dr. Horowitz’s lawsuit against Pfizer, Moderna, and his former employer, Henry Schein, Inc. Horowitz charges the federal government and complicit corporations with covertly-operating a global enterprise leveraging bioterrorism, corrupted science, media censorship, and competitor disparagement.
Military Neuroscience and Dr. Lieber
All of this is being done to advance the latest U.S./Chinese military-financed neuroscience technology fostering the “transhumanist” movement promising optimal control over civilization through cyberspace, solid research evidences.
FBI-indicted chief biochemistry and neuroscience professor Lieber’s classified activity with military officials in the U.S. and China reveals this Anglo-Asian complicity as the true source of the COVID-19 pandemic that skeptics claim was a “plandemic.”
“I know that the Lieber Research Group has received more than $15,000,000 in grant funding from NIH and DoD since 2008,” wrote FBI Special Agent Robert Plumb for the Justice Department’s criminal case against Lieber. This money was paid for a “component of the United States Department of Health and Human Service”–the “NIH is a government agency responsible for biomedical and public health research,” Plumb’s charging affidavit explained. “LIEBER traveled to [Wuhan] in mid-November 2011 ostensibly in order to participate in a Nano-Energy Materials Forum.”
The purpose of Charles Lieber’s trip, among other things, was to “Conduct national important (key) projects, or international cooperation projects that meet China’s national strategic development requirements or stand at the forefront of international science and technology research field,” Plumb revealed.
In other words, Lieber was employed by the Communist Party to secure China’s military and national security interests, and undermine U.S. National Security interests on behalf of globalist governors working through public and private financiers. They transferred the most advanced nano-scale bioelectronic methods and materials to China. This, allegedly, advanced the field of vaccinology and genetic ‘therapies,’ but also brain-to-cloud transhumanism.
But here is what is most telling: FBI affiant Plumb obfuscated Lieber’s value to China. Federal prosecutors concealed the certainties regarding Lieber’s actual bio-electrical intellectual property and neuro-science transfer activities. Plumb charged Lieber with Chinese espionage activity thusly: “The stated purpose of the agreement, which had a five-year effective term, was to ‘carry out advanced research and development of nanowire-based lithium ion batteries with high performance for electric vehicles.'”
“Electric vehicles?” OUTRAGEOUS! Beyond reasonable doubt the only “electric vehicles” in Lieber’s labs were humans, who ‘volunteered’ to submit to experiments examining, inter alia, “Precision electronic medicine in the brain.”
“In fact,” Science Magazine reported, “one U.S. nanoscientist and former student of Lieber’s says: “I have never seen Charlie working on batteries or nanowire batteries.” (The scientist asked that their name not be used because of the sensitivity surrounding Lieber’s case.)”
Accordingly, the FBI’s “lithium battery” story is a smelly ‘red herring.’
This transparent diversionary obfuscation indicts federal agents and the Department of Justice for complicity in the scheme amounting to ‘pan-genocide.’ They have advanced a deadly fable concealing irrefutable ties between Harvard’s Lieber, MIT’s Media Lab, their advancing nano-neuroscience, COVID-19, and the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines that apply Lieber’s DARPA-financed hydrogel research and developments for “precision electronic medicine in the brain.”
And they paid to cover up all of the above.
The Useless Biological Weapons Convention
Dr Filippa Lentzos tries to sweet-talk the most out-dated UN treaty of 183 states, that persistently just lie to each other and their citizens.
•Mar 30, 2020
December marked the 2019 Meeting of the States Parties to the Biological Weapons Convention in Geneva and March 2020 marked the 45th anniversary of the Biological Weapons Convention. In this episode, we discuss biological weapons and the Biological Weapons Convention with a London based expert Dr Filippa Lentzos. She is a Senior Research Fellow at King's College London and Associate Senior Research at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).
|Dr. Robert Redfield|
Former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield, who currently serves as a COVID-19 adviser for Gov. Larry Hogan, said recently he believes the virus originated inside a lab in Wuhan, China and “escaped.”
- One year into our coronavirus fight, it's still unclear how the pandemic started. But the former CDC director and current COVID advisor to Governor Hogan is pointing to China.
ROBERT REDFIELD: I still think the most likely etiology of this pathogen in Wuhan was from a laboratory, escaped.
- This is Robert Redfield sharing his opinion on CNN. We still don't know where the COVID-19 started, but Dr. Anthony Fauci says there are several possibilities. The World Health Organization is expected to release a full report soon about its findings.
In a statement to WJZ, the governor's office says, "As Dr. Redfield said, this is his personal opinion. When or where the pandemic started has no bearing on how we are dealing with it now, which is our focus."
Revised version of the evidence collection on COVID-19
By Pofessor Jean-Bernard Fourtillan, Doctor Christian Tal Schaller, Docteur Serge Rader, Didier Rochard, Frédéric Chaumont - 14. März 2021
The Whole Truth
Since August 20, 2020, on the Verite-Covid19.fr website, we have provided all the irrefutable evidence concerning the origin of the artificial virus Covid-19 which allowed the New World Order to trigger a false pandemic for the purpose of extermination and enslavement of almost the entire world population.
Hereafter are the main charges against the Kabbalah leaders:
1- The Covid-19 virus is artificial. It was made in France by the Institut Pasteur.
2- The manufacture of artificial Covid-19 virus is protected by 5 patents filed by the Institut Pasteur:
- 3 patents for the protection of the artificial virus Sars-CoV2, filed between 2004 and 2010, with priority
on December 2, 2003: 1 European EP1694829 B1 and 2 American US 012.8224 A1 and US 8,243,718 B2.
- 2 patents protecting the artificial Covid-19 virus, which protect the integration of the HIV1 virus, the AIDS virus, into the Sars-CoV2 genome. They were filed in 2005 and 2015, with priority as of October 11, 2000:
2 American patents US 8,093,042 B2 and US 10,407,695 B2, filed in 2005 and 2015, respectively.
3- 1 American patent US 0279 585 A1, for the protection of tests COVID-19, which can detect COVID-19
disease, filed as a priority, by Richard Rothschild, October 13, 2015.The filing date of this patent proves that
the Covid-19 virus was manufactured by the Institut Pasteur before 2015.
The Covid-19 virus being artificial, there is no more need for a vaccine
The Institut Pasteur just has to stop letting go to stop the pandemic
4- Finally, we have shown that, if it had been necessary to manufacture vaccines against the Covid-19 virus, in case it was a natural virus, only one vaccine was developed, the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, manufactured by Astra Zeneca. It is the result of a collaboration between the Institut Pasteur, which supplied the Covid-19 virus, and Astra Zeneca, which supplied the Chimpanzee Adenovirus ChAdOx1. All other vaccines, such as the unthinkable messenger RNA vaccines from Moderna and BioNTech, are decoys
Recommendation: The sources of all the information contained in this document can be found on the Vérité-Covid19.fr website (videos, documents, etc.)
October 26th, 2021
Documents referred to in the video:
The covid bio-terrorism trail leads back to CCP collaborators, Anthony Fauci and Peter Daszak
By Lance D Johnson - 31. March 2021
When controversial, gain-of-function virus research was banned in the United States in October of 2014, top scientists in the government and in the private sector had to immediately halt twenty-one projects related to virus manipulation and vaccine development for influenza viruses and coronaviruses like SARS and MERS. Controversial projects at Harvard, Emory and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill were suspended. At the time, scientists were genetically modifying respiratory viruses to develop lucrative new vaccines for the pharmaceutical industry and the global health market.
Instead of following ethics and law, Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), plunged forward with controversial gain-of-function coronavirus research. Instead of conducting research in the United States, Dr. Fauci tapped his friend Peter Daszak of the Eco Health Alliance. Daszak is the famed zoologist who first discovered the bat origin of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), ten years prior. Daszak enjoyed connections with the Wuhan Institute of Virology in communist China and was adamant about continuing this unethical research offshore.
Dr. Fauci went on to approve $7.4 million in taxpayer funds to complete the studies through Eco Health Alliance. After taking government money from Fauci in 2016, Peter Daszak promoted the self-aggrandizing Dr. Fauci at events sponsored by Eco Health Alliance. The two bio-terrorists enjoy a longstanding relationship to this day.
Fauci directly involved in gain-of-function coronavirus research in China
Working with Daszak, Fauci ordered WIV lab director Shi Zhengli to collect several samples of bat feces in the caverns. Zhengli collected the bat samples and reported back to Fauci. Chinese virologists analyzed and sequenced the genetic information of the coronaviruses obtained from bats and were told to build genetically engineered viruses, or chimeras, that could readily infect human cells. To continue receiving money, the head of the Wuhan lab, Dr. Shi Zhengli, reported back to Fauci on the progress they were making on coronaviruses.
To come up with highly infectious coronaviruses, the Chinese researchers used the CRISPR gene editing tool to alter mice lung cells. The scientists equipped the mice with the ACE2 receptor from human lung cells – the same receptor that SARS-CoV-2 exploits in human immune systems. The Chinese researchers came clean about their work in June 2020, when they published a new model for studying SARS-CoV-2, one that uses enhanced gain-of-function properties that Fauci supported.
Ten years ago, Dr. Fauci used the NIAID to fund the first gain-of-function coronavirus study. The research that Fauci funded in the Netherlands made genetic changes to coronaviruses so they could be more readily transferred through the air. After demonstrating airborne transmission of the virus on ferret populations, the researchers sought to replicate the contagion in human cells. Fauci praised this research in an op-ed in the Washington Post, calling it “a risk worth taking.” He wrote, “Important information and insight can come from generating a potentially dangerous virus in the laboratory…”
Fauci and Daszak have engaged in bio-terrorism for years and continue to get away with it
Fauci concealed ongoing gain-of-function coronavirus research through New York’s Eco Health Alliance. Dr. Fauci funded a project there to learn about the risk of new coronaviruses, and how they could emerge from wild animals to rapidly infect humans. Isn’t it suspicious that Fauci quickly claimed that covid-19 was of natural origins, when he was the biggest supporter and funder of gain-of-function research for years?
The experimental vaccines that are pouring out of pharmaceutical companies at warp speed are designed to capitalize on the bio-terrorism, for this was the intention of gain-of-function virus research to begin with. Fauci has terrorized populations into compliance with these experimental vaccines, using coercion and deceit to submit people’s minds and bodies to the bio-terrorism and the corresponding vaccine “solutions.”
In 2016, the National Science Advisory Board for Bio-security (NSABB) ruled that government-funded gain-of-function experiments do not pose a significant threat to public health most of the time. By December 19, 2017, the NIH lifted the ban on gain-of-function research, normalizing research that enhances the attachment properties of respiratory viruses. In August 2000, the NIH reinstated a $7.5 million grant to Eco Health Alliance, going against the advice of Dr. Michael Lauer, NIH’s Deputy Director for Extramural Research. Dr. Lauer considered a suspension of federal funds for coronavirus gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, but is being ignored by Fauci and Daszak, as they continue on with their experiments on human biology.
A vicious cycle of fear and control will only continue as bio-terrorists continue to exploit humans and abuse populations with their “science.”
Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney: ‘We are in World War III. We did not have a pandemic… we had a biological attack’
There are always bombshells to be dropped whenever Lt. General Tom McInerney comes on a show and today was no exception. He discussed how the Chinese Communist Party in conjunctions with other nations and the Democratic Party are engaging in "hybrid warfare" against the United States. You won't want to miss this interview.
By JD Rucker - 25. March 2021
When Lt. General Tom McInerney was the #3 guy at the Pentagon, his perspectives helped shape the direction of the nation. Now that he is retired, he continues to try to share important information. But instead of giving it to the government where it may or may not be used properly, he is delivering important information to the people who need to understand what’s happening with the elections, Covid-19, China, cyberwarfare, vaccines, and the current biological attack against the nation.
“We are in World War III,” the General said in an interview this morning. “We did not have a pandemic a year ago. We had a biological attack on the whole world. It was intentional, done by the CCP.”
This war has been long planned, but the first big step the Chinese Communist Party took, according to General McInerney, was the release of the Covid-19 coronavirus.
“This morning I’ve got absolute evidence that it came from the Wuhan Lab and it took down the whole global economy, without a doubt,” he said. “We should not have taken it down, but that’s another story we can get into.”
It wasn’t just for the sake of destroying the economy. The CCP was targeting the 2020 U.S. elections because President Trump was the only person standing in their way. With Joe Biden in the Oval Office currently, their plans can proceed unimpeded.
“This massive biological attack is then utilized during the election, so we have fraudulently elected an unconstitutional president,” he said. “I do not call him ‘President Biden’ because he was unconstitutionally elected.”
General McInerney was one of the first to ring alarm bells about technological voter fraud even before Election Day. His viral video on an episode of Two Mikes has been taken down on YouTube and suppressed on Facebook, but we have it on Rumble and other platforms where it has combined for over 200,000 views. From the November 2, 2020 article:
Voter fraud is happening right now. We all know it; one would be hard pressed to find a single American on either side of the aisle who would not acknowledge that it’s taking place. Around half the country realizes (or is willing to admit) it’s happening in favor of Democrats, but very few realize just how deep this particular rabbit hole goes.
Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney does. The retired military man has kept his finger on the pulse of the intelligence community and national politics since retiring in 1994. He’s not alone in this regard, but what separates him from other retired military personnel is that his love for the nation and oath to the Constitution compel him to speak out even when he knows it will get him some heat. That heat will be coming based on his revelations in the latest episode of Two Mikes.
A CIA program known as “Scorecard” allows its users to change voting outcomes by hacking into the transfer between local reporting stations and state or national data centers. According to McInerney, it’s a small amount, under 3%, to keep it from triggering any alarms. He would know. He served in top military positions under the Secretary of Defense and the Vice President of the United States. His insights into the matter are coming at just the right time with election day tomorrow. Hopefully, it’s not too late.
As things become more clear about the scope and scale of this attack against our Constitution, General McInerney has put it all together in what he calls “hybrid warfare.” By combining biological, cyber, and intelligence warfare techniques, the Chinese Communist Party essentially engaged in a coup that is continuing today. Their influence over every facet of American life, from mainstream media to academia to Big Tech to the halls of government itself, gives them the power to drive this nation to the ground.
There were other nations involved, according to General McInerney, including Russia, North Korea, and even the Vatican. He described their participation in a massive ballot-changing scheme in the early hours the morning after Election Day. He referenced “Scorecard” and “The Hammer,” CIA technologies that were developed to spy on citizens and governments while also allowing votes to be shifted electronically.
“When we frame it, JD, you had massive biological attack on the world,” he said. “You then had a massive cyberwarfare attack in which people do not fully understand because there are about ten different ways that you can fraudulently affect an election.”
The General then described how these various analog methods of engaging in voter fraud culminated in the technological attack that we saw on and after Election Day. It was necessary because Donald Trump had a landslide victory, much bigger than anything they had anticipated, so they had to use the cyberattack contingency to advance their fraud even further.
We discussed a handful of other topics on the latest episode of NOQ Report, including what he learned recently about the Covid-19 vaccines. He took the first jab but was warned against getting the second one and still hasn’t to this day. He promised to come on the show again very soon to discuss this aspect of the attack against the citizens of the United States and the world.
If we can pull back the curtains and see the powers calling the shots, we’ll have a better chance of stopping them from destroying our country. If Americans stay willfully in the dark, our future looks very grim indeed.
Rumble — There are always bombshells to be dropped whenever Lt. General Tom McInerney comes on a show and today was no exception. He discussed how the Chinese Communist Party in conjunctions with other nations and the Democratic Party are engaging in "hybrid warfare" against the United States. You won't want to miss this interview.
Already by the end of January 2020, elements within the U.S. government and the U.S. scientific establishment were becoming increasingly concerned that the American people might learn the truth about the origin of the COVID-19.
That is, it was an artificial virus created in a laboratory in the People’s Republic of China with the assistance of U.S. scientists and funding from the U.S. government.
In addition to pressure coming directly from the Chinese Communist Party, there was, no doubt, similar coercion being brought to bear on susceptible and compliant people in Washington D.C. by international financial interests, whose investments in China would be placed in jeopardy if it was widely accepted that China manufactured the COVID-19 virus.
Similarly at stake were the careers of prominent members of the U.S. scientific establishment, who could be considered complicit or potentially culpable.
There was also the likely loss of trust by the American people in the integrity of science overall.
Like their partners in China, what U.S. government officials and members of the U.S. scientific establishment feared most was accountability.
That was the primary selfish motive for the cover-up they appeared to have initiated.
It began on February 3, 2020, when a meeting was held at U.S. National Academy of Science, led by Kelvin Droegemeier, Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy; D. Christian Hassell, Senior Science Advisor, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; and Anthony Fauci, Director, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health.
The emails related to the February 3, 2020 meeting are below:
Attendees included other U.S. government staff members from the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the National Institutes of Health and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Most of the participating scientists either had long histories of collaborative coronavirus research with China or were later associated with a robust support of China and the theory that COVID-19 originated as a naturally-occurring disease outbreak.
According to the Statement of Task and Work Plan, which were distributed before the meeting, it was already decided that the COVID-19 pandemic originated as a natural-occurring or “evolutionary” event and that arguments to the contrary needed to be countered.
That is, it was the responsibility of U.S. government officials and members of the U.S. scientific establishment to provide a continuous stream of evidence to support a preordained outcome, one that protected China, international financial interests and themselves from potential complicity or culpability.
As revealed in their own emails, the deliberations by the scientists involved in preparing a response to the February 3, 2020 meeting were primarily focused on suppressing any discussion that the COVID-19 virus might have originated in a laboratory.
Yet, the efforts to create a narrative that the COVID-19 pandemic was a naturally-occurring transmission from animals to humans for which no one is to blame went far beyond the response to the February 3, 2020 meeting.
Before the ink was dry on that response, Peter Daszak of the EcoHealth Alliance, on February 6, 2020, separately contacted selected scientific participants from the February 3, 2020 meeting in order to launch a public relations campaign in scientific journals in support of China, the theory that the COVID-19 pandemic was a naturally-occurring event and to condemn a laboratory origin as a conspiracy theory.
The statements made in these emails are stunning and can be construed as conspiratorial.
The emails related to the February 6, 2020 letter are contained in the below emails:
Not surprisingly, none of the U.S. government officials or members of the U.S. National Academy of Science were copied on the email exchange.
More surprisingly, however, Daszak included Lin-Fa Wang, who previously worked at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and was considered by some as a conduit to the Chinese Communist Party.
Daszak’s own words in that email exchange suggest that his public relations campaign was supported if not initiated by China and that Daszak’s and the others’ continued research collaboration with China was at risk:
“This letter is carefully worded to avoid political statements, and we have been told [by China?] would go a long way to supporting continued collaboration in this outbreak.”
“I hope you are willing to sign on to this – your voice will be very influential, particularly in keeping these critical bridges open between the USA and China. You should know that the conspiracy theorists have been very active, targeting our collaborators with some extremely unpleasant web pages in China, and some have now received death threats to themselves and their families. They have asked for any show of support we can give them.”
On March 7, 2020, an article appeared in the British medical journal The Lancet entitled “Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19,” co-authored by some of those on Daszak’s February 6, 2020 email, which stated:
“We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.”
That initial effort was followed by a flood of China-promoted and Western media articles supporting the contention that the COVID-19 pandemic was naturally-occurring.
Since then, there have also been reports that scientific and medical journals were censoring views opposed to a natural explanation for the origin of COVID-19.
It has been a highly successful public relations campaign.
No less than the Office of the Director of National Intelligence of the United States has blindly accepted the scientific “conventional wisdom” promoted by the Chinese Communist Party, issuing the following April 30, 2020 statement:
“The Intelligence Community also concurs with the wide scientific consensus that the COVID-19 virus was not manmade or genetically modified.”
Remarkedly, compared to the overwhelming evidence that the COVID-19 virus was a laboratory creation, there has never been conclusive scientific evidence to support a natural origin.
Yet many appear content endorsing the naturally-occurring narrative, mostly out of ignorance, vested interests, political pressure or simply an unwillingness to accept the ugly truth.
Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is retired from an international career in business and medical research with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. He is a member of the Citizens Commission on National Security. His email address is .
Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is retired from an international career in business and medical research with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. His email address is .
International financial interests and the global scientific establishment have never wanted the true source of the COVID-19 virus to be revealed, despite the fact that its laboratory origin was suspected early after the onset of the pandemic.
There is now evidence that elements within the U.S. government coordinated with selected members of the U.S. scientific community, no doubt with the blessing of international business and the media, to protect China from responsibility and, in doing so, protected their own interests.
By January 13, 2020, there were already comments on the internet that the COVID-19 virus was manufactured in a laboratory in China and that U.S. scientists may have helped Chinese scientists obtain the knowledge to do so, specifically in the laboratory of Dr. Zheng-Li Shi at the Wuhan Institute of Virology with the assistance of Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina.
On January 26, 2020, respected investigative reporter and defense expert, Bill Gertz, in his Washington Times article wrote:
“The deadly animal-borne coronavirus spreading globally may have originated in a laboratory in the city of Wuhan linked to China’s covert biological weapons program.”
On February 3, 2020, Kelvin Droegemeier, a product of the Republican establishment and then Director of the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), wrote a letter to Dr. Marcia McNutt, president of the National Academy of Sciences, asking:
“the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) to rapidly examine information and identify data requirements that would help determine the origins of 2019-nCoV, specifically from an evolutionary/structural biology standpoint.”
Oddly, his concern was precipitated by an obscure, non-peer-reviewed and already retracted Indian study “Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Hag.”
In retrospect, that article appears to have been a scientific strawman, suggesting that other government motives were involved, but what they were remains unclear.
Nevertheless, based on the scientists enlisted to formulate a response to OSTP’s request, the outcome of Droegemeier’s inquiry was preordained, that is, the complete absolution of China’s responsibility.
Those scientists were Kristian G. Andersen (Scripps Research Institute), Ralph Baric (UNC School of Public Health), Trevor Bedford (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Institute), Aravinda Chakravarti (New York University School of Medicine), Peter Daszak (EcoHealth Alliance), Gigi K. Gronvall (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health), Tom Inglesby (Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security), and Stanley Perlman (University of Iowa).
By citing a scientific article from the Wuhan Institute of Virology stating the disease outbreak “started from a local seafood market,” the National Academy of Science’s letter to OSTP unequivocally supported the contention made by China’s Communist Party government that the COVID-19 pandemic was a naturally-occurring transmission from animals to humans
Additionally, the three presidents of the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine recommended that the United States continue to work closely with China, in particular, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Most of the scientists consulted for the National Academy of Science response had long histories of collaboration with China and/or were later associated with a robust support of China and the theory that COVID-19 originated as a naturally-occurring event.
In some important respects, the final National Academy of Sciences response dated February 6, 2020, bears little resemblance to the original draft, dated February 4, 2020. (see “OSTP NAS emails 2” PDF)
According to the email exchanges between the National Academy of Science and the consultant scientists, there appeared to be a clear effort by the scientists to support the naturally-occurring theory and to eliminate or downplay any mention that the COVID-19 virus was engineered, had unique human binding characteristics, might mutate towards higher infectivity and possessed a furin polybasic cleavage site not found in any related coronavirus.
Subsequently, scientists consulted for National Academy of Sciences response began their own public relations campaign to support China and the theory that the COVID-19 virus was a natural transmission from animals to humans.
On March 7, 2020, Peter Daszak and Stanley Perlman were authors on an article in the British medical journal The Lancet, which stated “We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.”
On March 17, 2020, Kristian G. Andersen appeared as senior author on the article “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2,” which claimed that the COVID-19 virus was “not a purposefully manipulated virus.”
On September 21, 2020, Gigi K. Gronvall was part of a Johns Hopkins University team that wrote a criticism of Chinese whistleblower, Dr. Li-Meng Yan, who presented evidence that the COVID-19 virus was created in a laboratory.
It is also well-known that Ralph Baric has been a long-time collaborator with Zheng-Li Shi, the “bat woman” from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, including conducting experiments involving highly dangerous “gain of function” research.
As recently described by Neil Patel in the Daily Signal, Peter Daszak, the sole U.S. representative on the World Health Organization team investigating the origin of the COVID-19 virus, is also a close associate of Zheng-Li Shi and was a key figure in directing American taxpayer funds to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Daszak even organized a public relations campaign to paint the lab leak hypothesis as a “conspiracy” before any thorough investigation had been conducted. His spokesperson later said the goal was to protect the lab’s scientists, but ultimately and, perhaps intentionally, the beneficiaries were China, international financial interests and the global scientific establishment.
To be continued.
Here is the document:
Wuhan Institute of Virology Research in December 2019 Shows Evidence of Adenovirus Vaccine Experiments in Patients with COVID-19
SEATTLE, Jan. 29, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- A paper was published today by Dr. Steven Quay, M.D., PhD., CEO of Atossa Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: ATOS), entitled, "A Bayesian analysis concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived."
The 193-page paper can be downloaded from Zenodo, a general-purpose open-access repository operated by CERN, here: https://zenodo.org/record/4477081# .
A short 'explainer' video about the paper is here: https://zenodo.org/record/4477212#.The purpose of the analysis was to determine the origin of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Beginning with a likelihood of 98.2% that it was a zoonotic jump from nature with only a 1.2% probability it was a laboratory escape, twenty-six different, independent facts and evidence were examined systematically. The final conclusion is that it is a 99.8% probability SARS-CoV-2 came from a laboratory and only a 0.2% likelihood it came from nature.
"Like many others, I am concerned about what appear to be significant conflicts of interest between members of the WHO team and scientists and doctors in China and how much this will impede an unbiased examination of the origin of SARS-CoV-2," said Dr. Quay.
"By taking only publicly available, scientific evidence about SARS-CoV-2 and using highly conservative estimates in my analysis, I nonetheless conclude that it is beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 escaped from a laboratory. The additional evidence of what appears to be adenovirus vaccine genetic sequences in specimens from five patients from December 2019 and sequenced by the Wuhan Institute of Virology requires an explanation. You would see this kind of data in a vaccine challenge trial, for example. Hopefully the WHO team can get answers to these questions."
To assist in finding the truth and to get feedback on the methodologies used and conclusions reached in this paper, a pre-publication copy of this paper was sent to twenty-six scientists worldwide, including the WHO investigators currently in Wuhan, Wuhan Institute of Virology scientists, as well as other prominent virologists.
About Steven Quay, M.D., Ph.D.
Dr. Steven Quay has 360+ published contributions to medicine and has been cited over 10,000 times, placing him in the top 1% of scientists worldwide. He holds 87 US patents and has invented seven FDA-approved pharmaceuticals which have helped over 80 million people. He is the author of the best-selling book on surviving the pandemic, Stay Safe: A Physician's Guide to Survive Coronavirus. He is the CEO of Atossa Therapeutics Inc. (Nasdaq: ATOS), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company developing novel therapeutics for treating breast cancer and COVID-19.
He received his M.D. and Ph.D. from The University of Michigan, was a postdoctoral fellow in the Chemistry Department at MIT with Nobel Laureate H. Gobind Khorana, a resident at the Harvard-MGH Hospital, and spent almost a decade on the faculty of Stanford University School of Medicine. A TEDx talk he delivered on breast cancer prevention has been viewed over 220,000 times. For more information, visit www.DrQuay.com
Public Relations Contact:
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/new-study-by-dr-steven-quay-concludes-that-sars-cov-2-came-from-a-laboratory-301217952.html
SOURCE Dr. Steven Quay
A Bayesian analysis concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived
Working paper Open Access
A Bayesian analysis concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived
Files (14.9 MB)
|SQuay_Bayesian Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 FINAL V.2.pdf
By Tom Flanagan -
A team of scientists will visit and investigate the controversial Wuhan Institute of Virology following repeated unsubstantiated claims suggesting the coronavirus may have leaked from the lab.
The World Health Organisation-led team will probe the lab, which researches viruses in bats, despite continued reservations from Beijing, who have categorically denied allegations the virus originated inside.
Earlier this month, former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo fuelled speculation surrounding the lab after claiming Washington had “reason to believe” workers from the Wuhan Institute of Virology fell ill with Covid-like symptoms prior to the first known cases being detected in the city.
“Today’s revelations just scratch the surface of what is still hidden about Covid-19’s origin in China,” a ‘fact sheet’ released by the US said at the time.
Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying dismissed the claims as “lies” and a “conspiracy theory’.
The Communist Party of China has battled to deflect claims the virus originated in China, themselves peddling wild theories the virus came from overseas, including the US army laboratory at Fort Detrick, at every opportunity.
China’s president Xi Jinping has been concerned about China’s image since the pandemic began, with speculation surrounding the lab a further irritant to Beijing.
Chief virologist Shi Zhengli at the lab, often dubbed ‘Bat Woman’, previously told the BBC she would welcome a fair investigation at the lab, however her comments were quickly withdrawn by concerned officials.
Investigation plagued by complications
The team of WHO scientists left hotel quarantine in Wuhan on Thursday (local time) to begin field work, two weeks after arriving in the Chinese city where the virus emerged in late 2019.
The mission has been plagued by delays, concern over access and bickering between China and the United States, which has accused China of hiding the extent of the initial outbreak and criticised the terms of the visit under which Chinese experts conducted the first phase of research.
Despite the WHO criticising China last month over the delays, it revealed access had been granted to a variety of locations.
"The team plans to visit hospitals, laboratories and markets. Field visits will include the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Huanan market, Wuhan CDC (Centre for Disease Control and Prevention) laboratory," the WHO said in a tweet.
The team of independent experts, due to remain for two more weeks in China, will also speak with some of the first Covid-19 patients in Wuhan, it said.
"All hypotheses are on the table as the team follows the science in their work," it said, adding: "They should receive the support, access and the data they need."
Mission’s success dependent on access
Thea Fischer, a Danish team member, said visiting the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, where the virus was initially believed to have spread, would provide insight into whether it was the epicentre of the outbreak or just an amplifier of the virus.
"It is now that the actual field work can begin and it is my expectation that for this part of the mission we will have unhindered access to the requested destinations and individuals," Fischer told Reuters by phone from Wuhan.
"But it is important to remember that the success of this mission and origin-tracing is 100 per cent depending on access to the relevant sources,” she said.
“No matter how competent we are, how hard we work and how many stones we try to turn, this can only be possible with the support from China."
'Prejudiced': Wuhan lab on conspiracy theories investigation is once again denouncing any allegations.
After leaving their quarantine hotel without speaking to journalists, team members boarded a bus to a lakeside hotel where part the building and grounds were cordoned off.
Several team members described long work days during their quarantine and relief at being able to leave their rooms.
"Slightly sad to say goodbye to my 'gym' & my 'office' where I've been holed up for last 2 wks!!" team member Peter Daszak said on Twitter along with photos of exercise equipment and a desk in his hotel room.
The team members' luggage, loaded onto the bus by workers in protective suits, included yoga mats and what appeared to be a guitar case.
Hours before the WHO announced their planned visits, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus tweeted: "Thanks, Chinese Health Minister Ma Xiaowei, for a frank discussion on the Covid-19 virus origins mission."
The WHO has sought to manage expectations.
"There are no guarantees of answers," WHO emergencies chief Mike Ryan said this month.
China's foreign ministry said the team would participate in seminars, visits and field trips.
China's foreign ministry has also hinted that the sudden closure of a US army laboratory at Fort Detrick in Maryland in July 2019 was linked to the pandemic.
Tom Flanagan - News Reporter
Top government official says China lab leak “most credible” source of coronavirus outbreak
By Ethan Huff - 10. January 2021
Matthew Pottinger, President Donald Trump’s respected Deputy National Security Adviser, told politicians from around the world during a recent meeting that the most likely source of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) is a Chinese laboratory.
Rather than emerging at a Wuhan wet market as was initially claimed, the Chinese virus more than likely came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, China’s only level-four biolab.
“There is a growing body of evidence that the lab is likely the most credible source of the virus,” Pottinger is quoted as saying.
The novel virus may have been leaked, and it may have been “an accident,” Pottinger further suggested, adding that even “establishment figures in Beijing have openly dismissed the wet market story.”
The meeting, which took place over Zoom, occurred at the same time as experts from the World Health Organization (WHO) were gearing up to travel to Wuhan to conduct a full investigation concerning the source of COVID-19.
Many critics, including Pottinger, are already speculating that the WHO, due to being heavily influenced by China, will whitewash its findings to make the communist regime appear innocent.
“MPs around the world have a moral role to play in exposing the WHO investigation as a Potemkin exercise,” Pottinger stated, referring to the fake villages that were created in Crimea during the 18th century, the purpose of which was to convince the visiting Russian Empress Catherine the Great that the region was in good health.
Communist China owes U.S., U.K. compensation for coronavirus damages
Iain Duncan Smith, a former Tory Party leader who attended the meeting, commented that Pottinger’s statements represent a “stiffening” of the American position concerning the source of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).
“I was told the U.S. has an ex-scientist from the laboratory in America at the moment,” Smith further stated. “That was what I heard a few weeks ago. I was led to believe this is how they have been able to stiffen up their position on how this outbreak originated.”
Adding to the suspicion is Beijing’s refusal to allow journalists to visit the Wuhan laboratory where the China virus is now widely believed to have been concocted.
“The truth is there are people who have been in those labs who maintain that this is the case,” Smith added. “We don’t know what they have been doing in that laboratory.”
“They may well have been fiddling with bat coronaviruses and looking at them and they made a mistake. I’ve spoken to various people who believe that to be the case.”
Since it is basically now a given that communist China is directly responsible for having unleashed the WuFlu on the world, causing massive economic and societal destruction, the time has come for the regime to pay up.
Sam Armstrong, communications director at the Henry Jackson Society foreign policy think-tank, announced publicly that it is time for the British government, at least – and we would also contend the American government – to “seek both answers about and compensation for COVID-19.”
Should President Trump remain in office for a second term, there is a possibility that he, too, will call on China to fork over a large sum of cash to compensate all Americans for the horrors they had to endure throughout 2020, and now into 2021.
“Everyone with two brain cells to rub together knew it was not a coincidence that the pandemic began within a mile of the only lab in China that does experiments with the world’s most dangerous viruses,” wrote one Daily Mail Online commenter.
“The problem is too many western scientists have dirty hands from supporting unethical and dangerous gain-of-function experiments at this Chinese lab that create viruses capable of starting pandemics.”
More of the latest news about the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) can be found at Pandemic.news.
Sources for this article include:
Lab-made coronavirus triggers debate
By Jef Akst - The Scientist - 16. November 2015
Ralph Baric, an infectious-disease researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, last week (November 9) published a study on his team's efforts to engineer a virus with the surface protein of the SHC014 coronavirus, found in horseshoe bats in China, and the backbone of to one that causes human-like severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in mice. The hybrid virus could infect human airway cells and caused disease in mice, according to the team's results, which were published in Nature Medicine.
MERS coronavirus artist impression - © flickr/niaid
The results demonstrate the ability of the SHC014 surface protein to bind and infect human cells, validating concerns that this virus — or other coronaviruses found in bat species — may be capable of making the leap to people without first evolving in an intermediate host, Naturereported. They also reignite a debate about whether that information justifies the risk of such work, known as gain-of-function research. "If the [new] virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory," Simon Wain-Hobson, a virologist at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, told Nature.
In October 2013, the US government put a stop to all federal funding for gain-of-function studies, with particular concern rising about influenza, SARS, and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). "NIH [National Institutes of Health] has funded such studies because they help define the fundamental nature of human-pathogen interactions, enable the assessment of the pandemic potential of emerging infectious agents, and inform public health and preparedness efforts," NIH Director Francis Collins said in a statement at the time. "These studies, however, also entail biosafety and biosecurity risks, which need to be understood better."
Baric's study on the SHC014-chimeric coronavirus began before the moratorium was announced, and the NIH allowed it to proceed during a review process, which eventually led to the conclusion that the work did not fall under the new restrictions, Baric told Nature. But some researchers, like Wain-Hobson, disagree with that decision.
The debate comes down to how informative the results are. "The only impact of this work is the creation, in a lab, of a new, non-natural risk," Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist and biodefence expert at Rutgers University, told Nature.
But Baric and others argued the study's importance. "[The results] move this virus from a candidate emerging pathogen to a clear and present danger," Peter Daszak, president of the EcoHealth Alliance, which samples viruses from animals and people in emerging-diseases hotspots across the globe, told Nature.
Jane Bürgermeister - pandemic update 25 June 2012
The swine flu vaccine causes Neurological Auto Immune Disease which
turns people into something similiar to what these new zombie movies
show,thousands of people in Germany,Sweden and other european countries who took the swine flu vaccine now suffer neurological diseases,the ruling elites have possibly made these movies to show people
of whats going to happen to them in the near future.
At 3:50mins in 2009 plans to vaccinate 6 billion people were activated
by (WHO) World Health Organisation which is controled by the ruling
elites who want to depopulate the world
At 4:15mins if the WHO 2009 vaccine programme had succeded there would now be millions of people worldwide with Neurological Auto Immune Diseases
At 6:30mins no people in Poland took the swin flu vaccine because the Polish health minister said it was not safe,days later after the
health minister gave evidence against the vaccine 96 top military and
political Polish officials died in a plane crash
At 9:30mins Jane Bürgermeister is suspicious of Alex Jones because he suddenly canceled all interviews with her and with other pandemic
At 11:25mins three attempts were made to detain Jane Bürgermeister in a psychiatric hospital to discredit her
At 13:30mins a BIO-TERRORISM false flag event planned by the ruling elites will be used to inject people with the swin flu vaccine possibly after a bio-terrorist attack at the London Olympics 2012
YOUR FUTURE THE SPARS PANDEMIC 2025 TO 2028
First published on BITCHUTE December 24th, 2020.
Your future THE SPARS PANDEMIC 2025 to 2028
Japan's secret Unit 731 – where biological warfare was conceived | RT Documentary
•Dec 25, 2020
The terrible crimes of Japan's secret Unit 731 make anyone's blood run cold. Thousands of people were used as test subjects for the development of biological weapons. The subjects were injected with cholera, typhoid, anthrax, bubonic plague, to be later dissected alive. The unit's ideologist Shiro Ishii and most of his associates were never punished. They became practising physicians or scientists.
Watch our film to find out why.
00:00 - Intro
01:46– Japan’s biological warfare project
09:16 – Unit 731: Human experiments lab
13:14 – “I infected people with plague, shigella, etc”
22:03 – Torture of women and children
27:57 - Hiroshima and Nagasaki: atomic bombs
29:10 – The end of Unit 731
32:30 – Did the U.S. become a safe place for war criminals?
34:35 – The start of the Cold War
36:28 - Testing on humans continued
45:21 – Only 12 members of Unit 731 were tried
The Manic Experiments Performed By Nazi Doctors | Destruction | Timeline
•Mar 19, 2020
The Madness of The Nazi Experiments - In KZ Auschwitz, infamous Nazi doctors as Mengele and Schumann performed horrible and mostly fatal experiments "in vivo" on thousands of deportees, women, men and children, in order to find ways of fast and massive sterilization of "inferior races", and methods to promote the fertility of the German "Herrenvolk".
The Crimes of The Auschwitz Doctors | Destruction ( Nazi Doctors Documentary) | Timeline
•Mar 12, 2020
In KZ Auschwitz, infamous Nazi doctors as Mengele and Schumann performed horrible and mostly fatal experiments "in vivo" on thousands of deportees, women, men and children, in order to find ways of fast and massive sterilization of "inferior races", and methods to promote the fertility of the German "Herrenvolk".
Japan's Secret World War II Death Lab (2003)
•Dec 4, 2013
Japan's Dirty Secret (2003): The truth about Japan's secret facility at Harbin, used to manufacture germs that infected and killed thousands of Chinese during World War II.
Memories of Japanese war crimes continue to poison Japan's relations with its neighbours. Many Chinese are still suffering the effects of a vicious campaign of germ warfare. "Our unit did things no human being should ever do," confesses Unit 731 member Yoshio Shinozuka. His unit developed the deadly pathogens which were used to infect 250,000 Chinese. Japan's refusal to apologise for its actions, or to acknowledge Unit 731's existence, has further upset its victims.
Anthrax War - FULL Documentary
The Leader - Col. Muammar Gadhafi - was a visionary, who wanted to free all peoples and people in Africa from the Western and Eastern overlords. He was taken finally out and the whole country, which he had built up like no-one else, was destroyed completely by the same forces that keep today the whole world in lockdown. Apart from the insurgents and the foreign forces sitting in Tripoli and Benghazi today, NOBODY in Libya would not wish to turn the clock back to the time before the foreign mastered onslaught started.
'PROJECT COAST' HAS NOW BEEN EXPANDED TO ATTACK THE WHOLE WORLD
'PROJECT COAST' PLAN TO MASS MURDER SOUTH AFRICANS
Interestingly, the web-archive built by the University of The Witwatersrand with documents for the Truth and Reconcilliation Commission and the protocols has already been wiped off the internet, except for some remnants at the WEB ARCHIVE.
But you can still search many data and reports on the TRC website of the Justice Ministry (Department of Justice and Constitutional Development) of South Africa.
The technology has far advanced, but the mentality hasn't changed.
BEFORE CORONAVIRUS... BIO-WARFARE STARTED BY US NAVY IN 1952
Incredibile, now declassified video. Bio-Weapons Dossier on US MILITARY LABS secrets
List of publicly known BSL-4 facilities worldwide - secret laboratories do exist
|Argentina||Buenos Aires||National Service of Healthcare and Agriculture Quality(SENASA)||Diagnostic laboratory for foot-and-mouth disease.|
|Australia||Geelong, Victoria||Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness||1985||Capable of housing from large experimental animals to insects under conditions that exceed all BSL 4 requirements. The antecedent of all such facilities developed since the 1980s. Arguably the most researched design and construction project ever. AAHL is subdivided into a number of isolation zones that can be managed at differing containment levels concurrently. CSIRO AAHL Project Manager and Architect, William Curnow, provided technical reviews to Canadian, Indian, UK and French Authorities and consulted with Dr Jerry Callis [PIADC] to UN FAO on matters of bio-containment. Formerly known as the Australian Animal Health Laboratory (AAHL) and renamed to Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness April 2020|
|Melbourne, Victoria||University of Melbourne – Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity||2014||Diagnostic reference lab.|
|National High Security Laboratory||Operates under the auspice of the Victoria Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory.|
|Brazil||Pedro Leopoldo, Minas Gerais||Laboratório Nacional Agropecuário de Minas Gerais(Lanagro/MG)||2014||Focus on Agropecuary diseases and diagnostics.|
|Canada||Winnipeg, Manitoba||National Microbiology Laboratory||1999||Located at the Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health, it is jointly operated by the Public Health Agency of Canada and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency.|
|China||Wuhan, Hubei||Wuhan Institute of Virology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences||2015||Wuhan Institute of Virology has existed since 1956 and already hosted BSL3 laboratories. A BSL4 facility was completed in 2015, and became the first BSL-4 laboratory in China.|
|Harbin, Heilongjiang||Harbin Veterinary Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences||2018||Harbin Veterinary Research Institute researches prevention and control of major infectious diseases. China's second, and the first for large animals, BSL-4 lab.|
|Czech Republic||Těchonín, Pardubice Region||Biological Defense Center||1971, rebuilt 2003–2007||Hospital and research facility. Located at the Centrum biologické ochrany (Biological Defense Center). Operated by Army of the Czech Republic.|
|France||Brétigny-sur-Orge, Essonne||French Armed Biomedical Research Institute, French Defence Health Service||French Army laboratory.|
|Lyon, Metropolis of Lyon||Jean MérieuxBSL-4 Laboratory||1999||Built and owned by the Fondation Mérieux. Since 2004, operated by INSERM.|
|Vert-le-Petit, Essonne||Laboratoire de la DGA||2013||Operated by the Ministry of Defense.|
|Gabon||Franceville, Haut-Ogooué Province||Centre International de Recherches Médicales de Franceville||This facility is operated by a research organization supported by both Gabonese (mainly) and French governments, and is West Africa's only P4 lab (BSL-4).|
|Germany||Berlin||Robert Koch Institute||2015||Diagnostic and experimental lab facility.|
|Hamburg||Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine||2014||Part of the Leibniz Center Infection. National reference lab for tropical viruses.|
|Isle of Riems, Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern||Friedrich Loeffler Institute||2010||Focus on animal viral diseases and diagnostics.|
|Marburg, Hesse||Philipps University of Marburg||2008||Focuses on hemorrhagic fever viruses.|
|Hungary||Budapest||National Center for Epidemiology||1998||Division of Virology operates three WHO National Reference Laboratories. The BSL-4 biosafety laboratory provides a modern means to process dangerous imported zoonotic viral pathogens.|
|Pécs||University of Pécs||2016||Opened in 2016, part of "Szentágothai János Kutatóközpont".|
|India||Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh||High Security Animal Disease Laboratory (HSADL)||1998||This facility deals especially to zoonotic organisms and emerging infectious disease threats.|
|Hyderabad, Telangana||Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology||2009||National BSL-4 Containment Facility for Human Infectious Diseases.|
|Pune, Maharashtra||National Institute of Virology||2012||India's most advanced BSL-4 category lab.|
|Italy||Rome, Lazio||Istituto Nazionale per le Malattie Infettive||1997||The "National Institute of Infectious Diseases" used to operate within the Lazzaro Spallanzani hospital; the facility is now independent and is home to five BSL-3 labs as well as a single BSL-4 laboratory, which was completed in 1997.|
|Milano, Lombardia||Ospedale Luigi Sacco||2006|
|Japan||Musashimurayama, Tokyo||National Institute for Infectious Diseases||2015||Located at National Institute for Infectious Diseases, Department of Virology I. Built in 1981; operated at BSL-3 until 2015 due to opposition from nearby residents.|
|Tsukuba, Ibaraki Prefecture||Institute of Physical and Chemical Research(RIKEN)||1984||Facility completed in 1984 but not operated as BSL-4 due to local opposition.|
|Russia||Koltsovo, Novosibirsk Oblast||State Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology (VECTOR)||One of two WHO-approved facilities for work on variola virus.|
|Singapore||Singapore||DSO National Laboratories||End-2025 (expected)||First BSL-4 Lab in Singapore when completed.|
|South Africa||Johannesburg, Gauteng||National Institute for Communicable Diseases||2002|||
|South Korea||Cheongju, North Chungcheong Province||Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention||2017||First BSL-4 Lab in South Korea.|
|Sweden||Solna, Stockholm County||Public Health Agency of Sweden||2001||The only BSL-4 facility in the Nordic region. Constructed for research and diagnostics of hemorrhagic fever viruses.|
|Switzerland||Geneva, Canton of Geneva||University Hospital of Geneva||"Glove box" type laboratory; primarily for handling clinical samples.|
|Spiez, Canton of Bern||Spiez Laboratory||2013||Run by Federal Office for Civil Protection and the Federal Department of Defence, Civil Protection and Sports.|
|Mittelhäusern, Canton of Bern||The Institute of Virology and Immunology IVI||Part of the Food Safety and Veterinary Office (FSVO).Primary purpose is diagnostics of highly pathogenic viruses.|
|Taiwan||National Defense University||Institute of Preventive Medicine||1983|||
|United Kingdom||Camden, Greater London||Francis Crick Institute||2015||Has BSL-4 space but does not work on human pathogens.|
|Colindale, Greater London||Public Health England's Centre for Infections||Department of Health laboratory. Diagnostics for various viral diseases. Part of the European Network of Biosafety-Level-4 Laboratories.|
|Mill Hill, Greater London||National Institute for Medical Research||Medical Research Council laboratory. Research and diagnostics for highly pathogenic viruses. Closed in 2017 and work moved to the Francis Crick Institute. Site demolished in 2018. |
|Potters Bar, Hertfordshire||National Institute for Biological Standards and Control||Department of Health and Home Office laboratory. Develop assays and reagents for research on virulent pathogens.|
|Addlestone, Surrey||Animal and Plant Health Agency||Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs laboratory. Diagnostics and research for animal diseases.|
|Pirbright, Surrey||Institute for Animal Health||Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Councillaboratory. Research on highly pathogenic animal diseases.|
|Merial Animal Health||Private lab. Produces vaccines against foot and mouth disease and bluetongue disease.|
|Porton Down, Wiltshire||Centre for Emergency Preparedness and Response||Department of Health laboratory. Diagnostics and research for haemorrhagic fever viruses. Part of the European Network of Biosafety-Level-4 Laboratories.|
|Defence Science and Technology Laboratory||Ministry of Defence laboratory. Focuses on protection from biological weapons.|
|United States||Fort Collins, Colorado||Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Vector Borne Diseases||A BSL 3/4 facility that operates in connection with some of Colorado State University's biomedical research programs. The location specializes in arboviral and bacterial diseases.|
|Atlanta, Georgia||Centers for Disease Control and Prevention||Currently operates in two buildings. One of two facilities in the world that officially hold smallpox.|
|Georgia State University||1997||Research focus on B virus.|
|Manhattan, Kansas||National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility (NBAF), Kansas State University||2022 (expected)||Under construction. Facility to be operated by the Department of Homeland Security, and replace the Plum Island Animal Disease Center. Expected to be operational by 2022–2023.|
|Bethesda, Maryland||National Institutes of Health (NIH)||Located on the NIH Campus, it currently only operates with BSL-3 agents.|
|Fort Detrick, Maryland||Integrated Research Facility||Operated by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Focuses on animal models of human diseases.|
|National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center||Operated by the Department of Homeland Security. Focus on potential bioterrorism threats.|
|US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases(USAMRIID)||1969||Run by the U.S. Army. Research focuses on biological threats to the U.S. military.|
|Boston, Massachusetts||National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratory(NEIDL), Boston University||Built 2008, Opened 2012, BSL-4 Approval in 2017 ||Focus on potential threats to public health.|
|Hamilton, Montana||Rocky Mountain LaboratoriesIntegrated Research Facility||2008||NIAID laboratory. Focus on vector-borne diseases.|
|Galveston, Texas||Galveston National Laboratory, National Biocontainment Facility||Opened in 2008, facility is operated by the University of Texas Medical Branch.|
|Shope Laboratory||2004||Operated by the University of Texas Medical Branch.|
|San Antonio, Texas||Texas Biomedical Research Institute||1999||The only privately owned BSL-4 lab in the US.|
In a December 2014 speech Harvey Fineberg pointed out that "Another very important insight that was developed at the Hanover meeting was the fact that when we talk about laboratory safety the traditional classifications of biohazard of BSL-2, -3, and -4 are not sufficiently informative or specific to give us the assurance that we would like about the security of any laboratory. A label like BSL-3 covers a wide variety of laboratory procedures and practices. We need to think about biosafety in terms of whole systems of construction, of operation, training, protocols, measuring and monitoring that create a degree of safety in the functioning of laboratories for a particular purpose."
"SUMMARY REPORT DUAL USE RESEARCH ON MICROBES: Biosafety, Biosecurity, Responsibility" (PDF). Volkswagen Foundation. 12 December 2014.